journal article·2020-09-02Open access

Persistent Double-Layer Formation in Kesterite Solar Cells: A Critical Review

Filipe Martinho, Simon Lopez-Marino, Moises Espíndola-Rodríguez, Alireza Hajijafarassar, Fredrik Stulen, Sigbjørn Grini, Max Döbeli, Mungunshagai Gansukh, Sara Engberg, Eugen Stamate, Lasse Vines, Jørgen Schou, Ole Hansen, Stela Canulescu

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 35

Abstract

In kesterite Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) solar cell research, an asymmetric crystallization profile is often obtained after annealing, resulting in a bilayered – or double-layered – CZTSSe absorber. So far, only segregated pieces of research exist to characterize the appearance of this double layer, its formation dynamics, and its effect on the performances of devices. In this work, we review the existing research on double-layered kesterites and evaluate the different mechanisms proposed. Using a cosputtering-based approach, we show that the two layers can differ significantly in morphology, composition, and optoelectronic properties and complement the results with a large statistical data set of over 850 individual CZTS solar cells. By reducing the absorber thickness from above 1000 to 300 nm, we show that the double-layer segregation is alleviated. In turn, we see a progressive improvement in the device performance for lower thickness, which alone would be inconsistent with the well-known case of ultrathin CIGS solar cells. We therefore attribute the improvements to the reduced double-layer occurrence and find that the double layer limits the efficiency of our devices to below 7%. By comparing the results with CZTS grown on monocrystalline Si substrates, without a native Na supply, we show that the alkali metal supply does not determine the double-layer formation but merely reduces the threshold for its occurrence. Instead, we propose that the main formation mechanism is the early migration of Cu to the surface during annealing and formation of Cu2–xS phases in a self-regulating process akin to the Kirkendall effect. Finally, we comment on the generality of the mechanism proposed by comparing our results to other synthesis routes, including our own in-house results from solution processing and pulsed laser deposition of sulfide- and oxide-based targets. We find that although the double-layer occurrence largely depends on the kesterite synthesis route, the common factors determining the double-layer occurrence appear to be the presence of metallic Cu and/or a chalcogen deficiency in the precursor matrix. We suggest that understanding the limitations imposed by the double-layer dynamics could prove useful to pave the way for breaking the 13% efficiency barrier for this technology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde DK-4000, Denmark

DTU Nanolab, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby DK-2800, Denmark

DTU Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde DK-4000, Denmark

Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo 0371, Norway

Ion Beam Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich CH-8093, Switzerland

Funding

Innovationsfonden

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.322810.1002/pip.3228 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.04310.1016/j.tsf.2018.11.043 ↗
3. 10.1002/pip.314710.1002/pip.3147 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.06310.1016/j.nanoen.2019.02.063 ↗
5. 10.1039/c9ta00385a10.1039/c9ta00385a ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.9b0319510.1021/acsami.9b03195 ↗
7. 10.1039/C9TA08310C10.1039/C9TA08310C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.02910.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.029 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.9b0396910.1021/acsami.9b03969 ↗
10. 10.1002/aenm.20160258510.1002/aenm.201602585 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20190074010.1002/aenm.201900740 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mssp.2018.02.02510.1016/j.mssp.2018.02.025 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0121310.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01213 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0131310.1021/acsenergylett.7b01313 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0067110.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00671 ↗
16. 10.1039/D0EE00291G10.1039/D0EE00291G ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20170176010.1002/aenm.201701760 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.02710.1016/j.solener.2019.05.027 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0067710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00677 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20150107010.1002/aenm.201501070 ↗
21. 10.1039/c7ee02318a10.1039/c7ee02318a ↗
22. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.01110.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.011 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.8b1230710.1021/acsami.8b12307 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0132210.1021/acsaem.9b01322 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0000910.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00009 ↗
26. 10.1039/C9TA09576D10.1039/C9TA09576D ↗
27. 10.1038/s41560-018-0206-010.1038/s41560-018-0206-0 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0339810.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03398 ↗
29. 10.1039/C9EE01726G10.1039/C9EE01726G ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20190043910.1002/aenm.201900439 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.482025010.1063/1.4820250 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20130146510.1002/aenm.201301465 ↗
33. 10.1039/C5EE02153G10.1039/C5EE02153G ↗
34. 10.1021/cm202379s10.1021/cm202379s ↗
35. 10.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.01510.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.015 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.01910.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.019 ↗
37. 10.1116/1.492675410.1116/1.4926754 ↗
38. 10.1002/pssa.20153242010.1002/pssa.201532420 ↗
39. 10.1039/c3ta11419h10.1039/c3ta11419h ↗
40. 10.1021/ja111713g10.1021/ja111713g ↗
41. 10.1021/ja305798510.1021/ja3057985 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.11060510.1016/j.solmat.2020.110605 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.08510.1016/j.solener.2017.10.085 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.01410.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.014 ↗
45. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.281326410.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2813264 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja407202u10.1021/ja407202u ↗
47. 10.1039/C5GC02417J10.1039/C5GC02417J ↗
48. 10.1039/C9TA08319G10.1039/C9TA08319G ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0118110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01181 ↗
50. 10.1039/C5CP07577G10.1039/C5CP07577G ↗
51. 10.1002/advs.20170064510.1002/advs.201700645 ↗
52. 10.1109/IRSEC.2016.798389210.1109/IRSEC.2016.7983892 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.07710.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.077 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.05210.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.052 ↗
55. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0279710.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02797 ↗
56. 10.7567/APEX.8.08230210.7567/APEX.8.082302 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.02710.1016/j.solmat.2016.09.027 ↗
58. 10.1016/0168-583X(86)90291-010.1016/0168-583X(86)90291-0 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11033410.1016/j.solmat.2019.110334 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0028010.1021/acsaem.0c00280 ↗
61. The RRUFF Database; https://rruff.info/ (accessed Apr 21, 2020).
62. 10.1016/0009-2541(93)90295-T10.1016/0009-2541(93)90295-T ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.217710.1103/PhysRevB.15.2177 ↗
64. 10.1063/1.486159310.1063/1.4861593 ↗
65. Cook, W. R., Jr. Phase Changes in Cu2S as a Function of Temperature. In 5th Materials Research Symposium; National Bureau of Standars Special Publication: 1972, pp. 703–712.
66. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.08410.1016/j.jallcom.2003.08.084 ↗
67. 10.1016/0001-6160(53)90112-610.1016/0001-6160(53)90112-6 ↗
68. 10.1143/JPSJ.10.67910.1143/JPSJ.10.679 ↗
69. 10.1002/anie.20090656210.1002/anie.200906562 ↗
70. 10.1016/0013-4686(95)00454-810.1016/0013-4686(95)00454-8 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.10.01910.1016/j.solmat.2011.10.019 ↗
72. 10.1016/0379-6787(89)90050-110.1016/0379-6787(89)90050-1 ↗
73. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)00257-810.1016/S0040-6090(03)00257-8 ↗
74. 10.1063/1.212805410.1063/1.2128054 ↗
75. 10.1002/pip.46210.1002/pip.462 ↗
76. Würfel P. · 2016
77. 10.1021/cm401522310.1021/cm4015223 ↗
78. 10.1002/pssa.20153231110.1002/pssa.201532311 ↗
79. Green M. A. · 1982
80. 10.1063/1.491663510.1063/1.4916635 ↗
81. 10.1021/cm403504u10.1021/cm403504u ↗
82. 10.1002/aenm.20140084910.1002/aenm.201400849 ↗
83. Berg D. M. · 2015
84. 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90030-810.1016/0040-6090(89)90030-8 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.02410.1016/j.solener.2018.04.024 ↗