Computational Discovery of New 2D Materials Using Deep Learning Generative Models
Source abstract
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) materials have emerged as promising functional materials with many applications such as semiconductors and photovoltaics because of their unique optoelectronic properties. Although several thousand 2D materials have been screened in existing materials databases, discovering new 2D materials remains challenging. Herein, we propose a deep learning generative model for composition generation combined with a random forest-based 2D materials classifier to discover new hypothetical 2D materials. Furthermore, a template-based element substitution structure prediction approach is developed to predict the crystal structures of a subset of the newly predicted hypothetical formulas, which allows us to confirm their structure stability using DFT calculations. So far, we have discovered 267 489 new potential 2D materials compositions, where 1485 probability scores are more then 0.95. Among them, we have predicted 101 crystal structures and confirmed 92 2D/layered materials by DFT formation energy calculation. Our results show that generative machine learning models provide an effective way to explore the vast chemical design space for new 2D materials discovery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
Funding
Division of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure · Division of Materials Research
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adom.20180127410.1002/adom.201801274 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41565-019-0438-610.1038/s41565-019-0438-6 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41586-019-1573-910.1038/s41586-019-1573-9 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41699-020-0152-010.1038/s41699-020-0152-0 ↗
5. 10.1002/wcms.138510.1002/wcms.1385 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41565-017-0035-510.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 ↗
7. 10.1002/smtd.20170035910.1002/smtd.201700359 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa930510.1088/1361-648X/aa9305 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-017-05402-010.1038/s41598-017-05402-0 ↗
10. 10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc110.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41597-019-0097-310.1038/s41597-019-0097-3 ↗
12. Fronzi M. · arXiv preprint · 2019 · 1911.11559
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0095710.1021/acsenergylett.0c00957 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20200265810.1002/adma.202002658 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41524-020-0300-210.1038/s41524-020-0300-2 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.02400510.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.024005 ↗
17. 10.1002/inf2.1209410.1002/inf2.12094 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41570-018-012110.1038/s41570-018-0121 ↗
19. 10.1039/C9NR01315F10.1039/C9NR01315F ↗
20. 10.1038/s41524-020-00375-710.1038/s41524-020-00375-7 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41524-020-00352-010.1038/s41524-020-00352-0 ↗
22. Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., Courville, A., Bengio, Y. Generative Adversarial Nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems; 2014; pp 2672–2680.
23. Arjovsky, M., Chintala, S., Bottou, L. Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks. International Conference on Machine Learning; 2017; pp 214–223.
24. 10.21105/joss.0136110.21105/joss.01361 ↗
25. 10.1149/1.213141910.1149/1.2131419 ↗
26. Liaw A. · R news · 2002 · 2 · 18
27. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.2810.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41578-019-0101-810.1038/s41578-019-0101-8 ↗
30. Liang H. · arXiv preprint · 2020 · 2003.14328
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0338110.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03381 ↗
32. 10.1023/A:102654390005410.1023/A:1026543900054 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
35. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
42. 10.1002/jcc.2175910.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
43. Maaten L. v. d. · J. Mach. Learn. Res. · 2008 · 9 · 2579
44. Goodall R. E. · arXiv preprint · 2019 · 1910.00617
45. 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.51510.1103/RevModPhys.73.515 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
48. 10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/30710.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104 ↗
50. Wang V. · arXiv preprint · 2019 · 1908.08269