journal article·2021-01-13

Sustainability in Perovskite Solar Cells

Katelyn P. Goetz, Alexander D. Taylor, Yvonne J. Hofstetter, Yana Vaynzof

Publisher page

Abstract

At a current value of 25.5%, perovskites have reached some of the highest power conversion efficiencies of all single-junction solar cell devices. Researchers, however, are questioning their readiness for the commercial market, citing reasons of the toxicity of the lead-based active layer and instability. Closer examination of the life cycle of perovskite solar cells reveals that there are more areas than just these which should be addressed in order to bring an environmentally friendly and sustainable technology to global use. In this review, we discuss these issues. Life cycle analyses show that high temperature processes, heavy use of organic solvents, and extensive use of certain materials can have high up and downstream consequences in terms of emissions, human and ecotoxicity. We further bring attention to the toxicity of the perovskites themselves, where the most direct analyses suggest that the lead cannot be considered totally safe, despite its small quantity and that replacements such as tin may be more toxic in certain scenarios. As a way to reduce the negative environmental impact, we highlight ways in which researchers have used encapsulation and recycling to extend the life of the entire unit and its components and to prevent lead leakage. We hope this review directs researchers toward new strategies to introduce a clean solar technology to the world.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Integrated Center for Applied Physics and Photonic Materials and Center for Advancing Electronics Dresden, Technical University of Dresden, Nöthnitzer Strasse 61, 01187 Dresden, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · H2020 European Research Council

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. National Renewable Energy Lab. Best Research-Cell Efficiencies, http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/ (accessed 12-01-2020).
2. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
3. Ambrose J. · The Guardian · 2020
4. 10.1038/d41586-019-01985-y10.1038/d41586-019-01985-y ↗
5. 10.1039/C5EE00615E10.1039/C5EE00615E ↗
6. 10.1039/C4TA04994B10.1039/C4TA04994B ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0033610.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00336 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms1521810.1038/ncomms15218 ↗
9. 10.1002/aenm.20170026410.1002/aenm.201700264 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-017-02331-410.1038/s41467-017-02331-4 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep1872110.1038/srep18721 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-019-08918-310.1038/s41467-019-08918-3 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20200147110.1002/aenm.202001471 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20180323010.1002/adma.201803230 ↗
15. 10.1002/admi.20180175810.1002/admi.201801758 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20180884310.1002/adfm.201808843 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41578-019-0176-210.1038/s41578-019-0176-2 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8EE03025A10.1039/C8EE03025A ↗
19. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.1710.1038/natrevmats.2018.17 ↗
20. 10.1088/1674-4926/41/4/04160310.1088/1674-4926/41/4/041603 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8RA00384J10.1039/C8RA00384J ↗
22. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.02.01310.1016/j.solmat.2015.02.013 ↗
23. Goedkoop, M.; Spriemsma, R. The ECO-Indicator 98: A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report, 3 rd ed. PRe Consultants B.V., 2001.10.1007/BF02979347 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11367-008-0038-410.1007/s11367-008-0038-4 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z10.1007/s10098-013-0629-z ↗
26. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.07710.1016/j.rser.2016.10.077 ↗
27. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.1510.1038/nenergy.2015.15 ↗
28. 10.3390/en1007084110.3390/en10070841 ↗
29. 10.1126/sciadv.abb005510.1126/sciadv.abb0055 ↗
30. 10.1002/pip.287710.1002/pip.2877 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.03710.1016/j.solmat.2016.04.037 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.09510.1016/j.rser.2017.05.095 ↗
33. 10.3390/en1219374610.3390/en12193746 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.14110.1016/j.energy.2018.10.141 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.512978410.1063/1.5129784 ↗
36. 10.1088/2516-1083/ab7e8410.1088/2516-1083/ab7e84 ↗
37. 10.1039/C8TA09452G10.1039/C8TA09452G ↗
38. 10.1016/j.rser.2011.06.00410.1016/j.rser.2011.06.004 ↗
39. U.S. Department of Energy. Critical Materials Strategy, 2010.
40. 10.1021/acsami.5b0317110.1021/acsami.5b03171 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0249010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02490 ↗
42. 10.1002/pssa.20170050910.1002/pssa.201700509 ↗
43. 10.1039/C6TA02581A10.1039/C6TA02581A ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.02410.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.024 ↗
45. 10.1002/solr.20190025710.1002/solr.201900257 ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0174710.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01747 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.00810.1016/j.solmat.2017.03.008 ↗
49. 10.1002/aenm.20200307310.1002/aenm.202003073 ↗
50. 10.1039/D0EE02175J10.1039/D0EE02175J ↗
51. 10.1039/C7EE00757D10.1039/C7EE00757D ↗
52. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.219843410.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2198434 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0305410.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03054 ↗
54. 10.1007/s11356-020-09194-110.1007/s11356-020-09194-1 ↗
55. 10.1002/aenm.20150111910.1002/aenm.201501119 ↗
56. 10.1002/cssc.20150084810.1002/cssc.201500848 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.00810.1016/j.solmat.2017.11.008 ↗
58. 10.1557/mre.2017.1710.1557/mre.2017.17 ↗
59. World Health Organization. Lead Poisoning and Health, August 2019; https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/lead-poisoning-and-health (accessed 12-02- 2020).
60. 10.1002/aenm.20190250010.1002/aenm.201902500 ↗
61. 10.1038/nmat457210.1038/nmat4572 ↗
62. 10.1002/advs.20170033110.1002/advs.201700331 ↗
63. 10.1002/cssc.20190129610.1002/cssc.201901296 ↗
64. 10.1039/C5TX00303B10.1039/C5TX00303B ↗
65. 10.1038/s41467-019-13910-y10.1038/s41467-019-13910-y ↗
66. 10.1038/nature1106710.1038/nature11067 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41467-017-02684-w10.1038/s41467-017-02684-w ↗
68. 10.1021/ic401215x10.1021/ic401215x ↗
69. 10.1039/C7TA00929A10.1039/C7TA00929A ↗
70. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.8210.1038/nphoton.2014.82 ↗
71. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
72. 10.1002/solr.20190031010.1002/solr.201900310 ↗
73. 10.1039/C8TA07699E10.1039/C8TA07699E ↗
74. 10.1021/jacs.6b1073410.1021/jacs.6b10734 ↗
75. 10.1002/adma.20180483510.1002/adma.201804835 ↗
76. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0063610.1021/acsenergylett.7b00636 ↗
77. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0052610.1021/acsenergylett.0c00526 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.01210.1016/j.joule.2018.09.012 ↗
79. 10.2146/ajhp06017510.2146/ajhp060175 ↗
80. Sigma-Aldrich · 2020
81. Alfa Aesar · 2020
82. Sigma-Aldrich · 2020
83. Fisher Scientific · 2018
84. Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, Amending and Repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and Amending Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, December 16, 2008.
85. 10.2307/193168410.2307/1931684 ↗
86. Nchedo A. C. · Nat. Sci. · 2012 · 10 · 47
87. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Fifty-Fifth Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, WHO Technical Report Series 901, 2001.
88. 10.3389/fpls.2018.0133510.3389/fpls.2018.01335 ↗
89. 10.1002/solr.20170009110.1002/solr.201700091 ↗
90. 10.1002/aenm.20160038610.1002/aenm.201600386 ↗
91. 2020
92. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.01010.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.010 ↗
93. 10.1021/jacs.5b1329410.1021/jacs.5b13294 ↗
94. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1184510.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11845 ↗
95. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0423110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04231 ↗
96. 10.1002/admi.20180046410.1002/admi.201800464 ↗
97. 10.1002/advs.20170075910.1002/advs.201700759 ↗
98. 10.1002/adfm.20180737510.1002/adfm.201807375 ↗
99. 10.1002/adfm.20200155710.1002/adfm.202001557 ↗
100. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0102010.1021/acsenergylett.0c01020 ↗