journal article·2016-03-16

Morphology-Driven High-Performance Polymer Transistor-based Ammonia Gas Sensor

Seong Hoon Yu, Jangwhan Cho, Kyu Min Sim, Jae Un Ha, Dae Sung Chung

Publisher page

Abstract

Developing high-performance gas sensors based on polymer field-effect transistors (PFETs) requires enhancing gas-capture abilities of polymer semiconductors without compromising their high charge carrier mobility. In this work, cohesive energies of polymer semiconductors were tuned by strategically inserting buffer layers, which resulted in dramatically different semiconductor surface morphologies. Elucidating morphological and structural properties of polymer semiconductor films in conjunction with FET studies revealed that surface morphologies containing large two-dimensional crystalline domains were optimal for achieving high surface areas and creating percolation pathways for charge carriers. Ammonia molecules with electron lone pairs adsorbed on the surface of conjugated semiconductors can serve as efficient trapping centers, which negatively shift transfer curves for p-type PFETs. Therefore, morphology optimization of polymer semiconductors enhances their gas sensing abilities toward ammonia, leading to a facile method of manufacturing high-performance gas sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical Engineering and Material Science, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156-756, Korea

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10962247.2014.99255410.1080/10962247.2014.992554 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.snb.2014.11.11210.1016/j.snb.2014.11.112 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.03010.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.030 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0015310.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00153 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20070150410.1002/adma.200701504 ↗
6. Chenier P. J. · 2012
7. 10.1021/jp047185710.1021/jp0471857 ↗
8. 10.1021/am500195410.1021/am5001954 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.00510.1016/j.snb.2015.11.005 ↗
10. 10.1002/elan.20070393310.1002/elan.200703933 ↗
11. 10.1021/ja405112s10.1021/ja405112s ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.5b0221310.1021/acsami.5b02213 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma200482210.1021/ma2004822 ↗
14. 10.1002/adfm.20150052510.1002/adfm.201500525 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.snb.2004.11.05410.1016/j.snb.2004.11.054 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20130113810.1002/adma.201301138 ↗
17. 10.1039/c3tc31412j10.1039/c3tc31412j ↗
18. 10.1016/j.snb.2012.06.06010.1016/j.snb.2012.06.060 ↗
19. 10.1109/JSEN.2011.212190110.1109/JSEN.2011.2121901 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.01810.1016/j.orgel.2013.09.018 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.11.03010.1016/j.orgel.2012.11.030 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.03.00610.1016/j.orgel.2006.03.006 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.5b0305910.1021/acsami.5b03059 ↗
24. 10.1021/jz900285710.1021/jz9002857 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.16.367610.1103/PhysRevB.16.3676 ↗
26. Kinloch A. · 2012
27. 10.1002/adfm.20110129910.1002/adfm.201101299 ↗
28. 10.1021/cr050140x10.1021/cr050140x ↗
29. 10.1038/srep0548210.1038/srep05482 ↗
30. 10.1021/cr300110910.1021/cr3001109 ↗
31. 10.1149/1.325133710.1149/1.3251337 ↗