journal article·2015-01-21

Influence of Metal–MoS2Interface on MoS2Transistor Performance: Comparison of Ag and Ti Contacts

Hui Yuan, Guangjun Cheng, Lin You, Haitao Li, Hao Zhu, Wei Li, Joseph J. Kopanski, Yaw S. Obeng, Angela R. Hight Walker, David J. Gundlach, Curt A. Richter, Dimitris E. Ioannou, Qiliang Li

Publisher page

Abstract

In this work, we compare the electrical characteristics of MoS2 field-effect transistors (FETs) with Ag source/drain contacts with those with Ti and demonstrate that the metal-MoS2 interface is crucial to the device performance. MoS2 FETs with Ag contacts show more than 60 times higher ON-state current than those with Ti contacts. In order to better understand the mechanism of the better performance with Ag contacts, 5 nm Au/5 nm Ag (contact layer) or 5 nm Au/5 nm Ti film was deposited onto MoS2 monolayers and few layers, and the topography of metal films was characterized using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. The surface morphology shows that, while there exist pinholes in Au/Ti film on MoS2, Au/Ag forms a smoother and denser film. Raman spectroscopy was carried out to investigate the metal-MoS2 interface. The Raman spectra from MoS2 covered with Au/Ag or Au/Ti film reveal that Ag or Ti is in direct contact with MoS2. Our findings show that the smoother and denser Au/Ag contacts lead to higher carrier transport efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Semiconductor and Dimensional Metrology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878, United States

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States

Funding

National Institute of Standards and Technology

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Butler S. Z. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 289810.1021/nn400280c ↗
2. Jariwala D. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 110210.1021/nn500064s ↗
3. Roy T. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 625910.1021/nn501723y ↗
4. Li H. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 6310.1002/smll.201101016 ↗
5. Wang L. · Small · 2014 · 10 · 110110.1002/smll.201302081 ↗
6. Lebègue S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 11540910.1103/PhysRevB.79.115409 ↗
7. Kuc A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 24521310.1103/PhysRevB.83.245213 ↗
8. Splendiani A. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 127110.1021/nl903868w ↗
9. Sundaram R. S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 141610.1021/nl400516a ↗
10. Yin Z. Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 7410.1021/nn2024557 ↗
11. Lee G.-H. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 793110.1021/nn402954e ↗
12. Chang H.-Y. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 544610.1021/nn401429w ↗
13. Yoon J. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 329510.1002/smll.201300134 ↗
14. Lu W.-Y. · IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2006 · 53 · 113710.1109/TED.2006.871879 ↗
15. Radisavljevic B. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 14710.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
16. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 339610.1021/nl401831u ↗
17. Zhu W. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 308710.1038/ncomms4087 ↗
18. Chan M. Y. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 957210.1039/c3nr03220e ↗
19. Min S.-W. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 54810.1039/C2NR33443G ↗
20. Das S. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 168110.1021/nn406603h ↗
21. Tarasov A. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 638910.1002/adfm.201401389 ↗
22. Das S. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 13 · 10010.1021/nl303583v ↗
23. Gong C. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 171410.1021/nl403465v ↗
24. McDonnell S. · ACS Nano · 2014 · 8 · 288010.1021/nn500044q ↗
25. Chuang S. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 133710.1021/nl4043505 ↗
26. Du Y. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2014 · 35 · 59910.1109/LED.2014.2313340 ↗
27. Lim S. C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 26410310.1063/1.3255016 ↗
28. Liu W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 198310.1021/nl304777e ↗
29. Becker U. · Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta · 2003 · 67 · 92310.1016/S0016-7037(02)01144-4 ↗
30. Liu W. · 2013 · 19.4.1
31. Baugher B. W. H. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 421210.1021/nl401916s ↗
32. Liu H. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 8 · 103110.1021/nn405916t ↗
33. Kang J. · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4 · 031005
34. Michaelson H. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗
35. Gong C. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 1135010.1021/nn4052138 ↗
36. Mahatha S. K. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 115501
37. Lince J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 36 · 164710.1103/PhysRevB.36.1647 ↗
38. Ikarashi N. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 27 · L75010.1143/JJAP.27.L750 ↗
39. Conley H. J. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 362610.1021/nl4014748 ↗
40. Wang Y. · Small · 2013 · 9 · 285710.1002/smll.201202876 ↗
41. Castellanos-Gomez A. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 536110.1021/nl402875m ↗
42. Lanzillo N. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 09310210.1063/1.4819337 ↗
43. Najmaei S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 01310610.1063/1.3673907 ↗
44. Yan R. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 8 · 98610.1021/nn405826k ↗
45. Najmaei S. · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 975810.1039/c3nr02567e ↗
46. Taube A. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 895910.1021/am502359k ↗
47. Ho C. Y. · J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data · 1972 · 1 · 27910.1063/1.3253100 ↗
48. Horcas I. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2007 · 78 · 01370510.1063/1.2432410 ↗