journal article·2017-12

Toward High‐Performance Polymer Photovoltaic Devices for Low‐Power Indoor Applications

Shun‐Shing Yang, Zong‐Chun Hsieh, Muchamed L. Keshtov, Ganesh D. Sharma, Fang‐Chung Chen

Solar RRL· Volume 1· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

This article describes the performance of organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices, incorporating three different polymer/fullerene derivative blends, under low‐level lighting conditions. The devices exhibit much higher power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) under indoor lighting conditions than they do under sunlight. The best‐performing device is capable of delivering a power output of 22.57 μW cm−2, corresponding to a PCE of 13.76%, under illumination with indoor lighting conditions at 500 lux. Increasing the open‐circuit voltage (Voc) of the OPV devices is the most critical factor for achieving high device performance for low‐power indoor applications. Therefore, the device power output will be maximized if we could obtain a larger energy difference between the highest occupied molecular orbital of the polymer donor and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of the electron acceptor, thereby ensuring a high value of Voc.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Photonics National Chiao Tung University Hsinchu 30010 Taiwan

Institute of Organoelement Compounds of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow 119991 Russian Federation

Department of Physics The LNM Institute of Information Technology Jamdoli, Jaipur Rajasthan 302031 India

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan · Ministry of Education of Taiwan

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.00310.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.003 ↗
2. 10.1109/TII.2014.230075310.1109/TII.2014.2300753 ↗
3. Ferdous R. M. · Energy Rev · 2016 · 58 · 1114
4. 10.1109/MPRV.2005.910.1109/MPRV.2005.9 ↗
5. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.222502310.1109/JPHOTOV.2012.2225023 ↗
6. 10.3390/en703150010.3390/en7031500 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.01110.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.011 ↗
8. Mori S. · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys · 2015 · 54 · 071602‐1
9. 10.1039/C6TC03344J10.1039/C6TC03344J ↗
10. 10.1039/C4EE01724B10.1039/C4EE01724B ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20150344810.1002/adfm.201503448 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.00410.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.004 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.289815310.1063/1.2898153 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20110127410.1002/adma.201101274 ↗
15. Huang W. · Adv. Energy Mater · 2015 · 5 · 1401259‐1
16. 10.1021/ja908602j10.1021/ja908602j ↗
17. 10.1039/c1ee01723c10.1039/c1ee01723c ↗
18. 10.1021/nn102295p10.1021/nn102295p ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20050042010.1002/adfm.200500420 ↗
20. 10.1166/sam.2017.311410.1166/sam.2017.3114 ↗
21. 10.1145/1773814.177381710.1145/1773814.1773817 ↗