Quaternary Organic Solar Cells Enable Suppressed Energy Loss
Source abstract
Abstract
Multi‐component organic solar cells (OSCs) composing of more than two donor and acceptor materials have attracted increasing attention, due to the possibilities to further mitigate voltage loss (ΔVoc) for the gain of open‐circuit voltage (Voc). However, the control of phase morphology in multi‐component blend systems that critically impacts ΔVoc and the ultimate power conversion efficiency (PCE) is still a challenge. Here, we report a quaternary blend‐based strategy for non‐fullerene OSCs by using two polymer donors (PM6 and L20) along with acceptors of a non‐fullerene (Y6) and PC71BM, leading to concurrent improvements of the Voc, device fill factor and eventual PCE. The quaternary OSC exhibits the advantages of a higher charge collection efficiency, expedited charge carrier sweep‐out, and reduced charge recombination losses. The suppression on ΔVoc is attributed to the reduced radiative recombination loss below the bandgap (0.143 V) and non‐radiative voltage loss (0.216 V). These properties are linked to synergies of modified energetics and film morphology of the quaternary blends. This work demonstrates that incorporating suitable donor and acceptor guest molecules to organic binary blend systems is a highly viable approach for lowering the energy loss in organic bulk heterojunctions towards the boost of photovoltaic performance for realistic energy conversion applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry Beihang University Beijing 100191 China
National Center for Nanoscience and Technology Beijing 100190 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c3ra42989j10.1039/c3ra42989j ↗
2. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10639910.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106399 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20210309110.1002/adma.202103091 ↗
4. 10.1088/1674-4926/42/1/01050110.1088/1674-4926/42/1/010501 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20210879710.1002/adfm.202108797 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.06.02010.1016/j.joule.2021.06.020 ↗
7. 10.1002/aenm.20200317710.1002/aenm.202003177 ↗
8. 10.1002/aenm.20190172810.1002/aenm.201901728 ↗
9. Ma X. · Natl. Sci. Rev. · 2021 · 8
10. 10.1002/aenm.20150133510.1002/aenm.201501335 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-020-20580-810.1038/s41467-020-20580-8 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20200723110.1002/adma.202007231 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20180680410.1002/adfm.201806804 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.01410.1016/j.joule.2020.06.014 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20200143610.1002/aenm.202001436 ↗
16. 10.1002/admi.20200057710.1002/admi.202000577 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10653810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106538 ↗
18. 10.1039/D0EE04012F10.1039/D0EE04012F ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.0c1919810.1021/acsami.0c19198 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20190230210.1002/adma.201902302 ↗
21. 10.1039/D1EE02124A10.1039/D1EE02124A ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0072110.1021/acsenergylett.9b00721 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20190143810.1002/aenm.201901438 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.0c0675910.1021/acsami.0c06759 ↗
25. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.26910.1038/nphoton.2014.269 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20210133810.1002/aenm.202101338 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0504510.1021/acs.nanolett.0c05045 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.213039610.1063/1.2130396 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11426-020-9837-y10.1007/s11426-020-9837-y ↗
30. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.04.00710.1016/j.joule.2021.04.007 ↗
31. 10.1002/aenm.20180135210.1002/aenm.201801352 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41467-019-10351-510.1038/s41467-019-10351-5 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41563-018-0128-z10.1038/s41563-018-0128-z ↗