The Roles of Ion Migration on Perovskite Solar Cell Operational Stability at Various Illumination Intensities
Source abstract
Abstract
Monitoring the stability of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) under operational conditions is crucial for their development. This study integrates maximum power point (MPP) tracking with quasi in‐situ electrochemical impedance spectroscopy at successive intervals to elucidate the temporal evolution of degradation mechanisms in PSCs. The gradual losses in photocurrent, photovoltage, and fill factor during MPP tracking were attributed to alterations in recombination processes, kinetic constants, shunt pathways, and series resistances, each manifesting at distinct phases of the PSC stability assessment. Notably, these variations correlated with a progressive increase in ionic density and mobility within the perovskite layer, as evidenced by a shift in the low‐frequency ionic response and a 0.13 eV reduction in ionic activation energy. This apparent enhancement in ionic conductivity was more pronounced under illuminance levels below 1000Lx, predominantly affecting shunt resistance and leading to significant implications for indoor photovoltaic performance. The reported methodology offers a straightforward, non‐destructive, and effective means to augment conventional PSC stability analyses across various lighting conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanostructured Materials for Photovoltaic Energy Group Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB) Barcelona Spain
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.13410.1038/nphoton.2014.134 ↗
2. (b) NREL 2023.
3. 10.1063/1.486477810.1063/1.4864778 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41578-023-00582-w10.1038/s41578-023-00582-w ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐40585‐310.1038/s41467‐023‐40585‐3 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.01010.1016/j.joule.2020.09.010 ↗
8. Hailegnaw B. · 2020 · 2000291
9. 10.1038/s41560-019-0529-510.1038/s41560-019-0529-5 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0282210.1021/acsenergylett.4c02822 ↗
11. 10.1063/5.014519910.1063/5.0145199 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41560-020-00747-910.1038/s41560-020-00747-9 ↗
13. 10.1039/D1TA02878B10.1039/D1TA02878B ↗
14. 10.1039/C8CP01259H10.1039/C8CP01259H ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0170710.1021/acsenergylett.1c01707 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.05810.1016/j.solener.2023.04.058 ↗
17. Almora O. · Journal of Applied Physics · 2024 · 136
18. 10.3390/en1613495110.3390/en16134951 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0216110.1021/acsaem.2c02161 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7EE02670F10.1039/C7EE02670F ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20220765610.1002/adma.202207656 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2018.05.005 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.01110.1016/j.solener.2014.02.011 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.15510.1016/j.rser.2014.07.155 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41560-021-00941-310.1038/s41560-021-00941-3 ↗
26. 10.1002/celc.20170049810.1002/celc.201700498 ↗
27. Jacobs D. A. · Journal of Applied Physics · 2018 · 124
28. 10.1002/cplu.20210023310.1002/cplu.202100233 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6CP08424A10.1039/C6CP08424A ↗
30. 10.1039/D0NR03058A10.1039/D0NR03058A ↗
31. 10.1039/C8EE02362J10.1039/C8EE02362J ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0284810.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02848 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10565810.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105658 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.01410.1016/j.joule.2019.07.014 ↗
35. 10.1002/ente.20210022910.1002/ente.202100229 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.04210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.042 ↗
37. 10.1039/C9TA02808K10.1039/C9TA02808K ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.02403110.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024031 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.01406110.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014061 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20200050210.1002/aenm.202000502 ↗
41. 10.1039/C7EE02415K10.1039/C7EE02415K ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0281010.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02810 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.9b0499110.1021/acsami.9b04991 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2TA04840J10.1039/D2TA04840J ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-019-09079-z10.1038/s41467-019-09079-z ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0219310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02193 ↗
47. 10.1039/C9EE00476A10.1039/C9EE00476A ↗
48. 10.1002/aenm.20220437010.1002/aenm.202204370 ↗
49. 10.1039/D2MA00619G10.1039/D2MA00619G ↗
50. 10.1002/anie.20200585310.1002/anie.202005853 ↗
51. O.Almora P.López‐Varo R.Escalante J.Mohanraj L. F.Marsal S.Olthof andJ. A.Anta(2024): arXiv:2402.00439.
52. 10.1021/jp506214410.1021/jp5062144 ↗
53. (a)T.Duong Y.Wu H.Shen J.Peng N.Wu T.White et al. Impact of Light on the Thermal Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells and Development of Stable Semi‐Transparent Cells 2018.10.1016/j.solmat.2018.08.017 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0261310.1021/acsnano.6b02613 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0203710.1021/acsaem.1c02037 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0222910.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02229 ↗
57. 10.1002/adfm.20200759610.1002/adfm.202007596 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.491358910.1063/1.4913589 ↗
59. 10.1002/adsu.20210012010.1002/adsu.202100120 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0163610.1021/acsenergylett.2c01636 ↗
61. Wang Q. · Applied Physics Letters · 2014 · 105
62. 10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w10.1038/s41560-024-01487-w ↗
63. 10.1038/s41467-019-12613-810.1038/s41467-019-12613-8 ↗
64. 10.1039/D1SE01398J10.1039/D1SE01398J ↗
65. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0024710.1021/acsenergylett.9b00247 ↗
66. 10.1039/C8EE02751J10.1039/C8EE02751J ↗