journal article·2022-11Open access

Efficiency Potential and Voltage Loss of Inorganic CsPbI2Br Perovskite Solar Cells

Max Grischek, Pietro Caprioglio, Jiahuan Zhang, Francisco Peña-Camargo, Kári Sveinbjörnsson, Fengshuo Zu, Dorothee Menzel, Jonathan H. Warby, Jinzhao Li, Norbert Koch, Eva Unger, Lars Korte, Dieter Neher, Martin Stolterfoht, Steve Albrecht

Solar RRL· Volume 6· Issue 11

Abstract

Inorganic perovskite solar cells show excellent thermal stability, but the reported power conversion efficiencies are still lower than for organic–inorganic perovskites. This is mainly caused by lower open‐circuit voltages (VOCs). Herein, the reasons for the low VOC in inorganic CsPbI2Br perovskite solar cells are investigated. Intensity‐dependent photoluminescence measurements for different layer stacks reveal that n–i–p and p–i–n CsPbI2Br solar cells exhibit a strong mismatch between quasi‐Fermi level splitting (QFLS) and VOC. Specifically, the CsPbI2Br p–i–n perovskite solar cell has a QFLS–e ·VOC mismatch of 179 meV, compared with 11 meV for a reference cell with an organic–inorganic perovskite of similar bandgap. On the other hand, this study shows that the CsPbI2Br films with a bandgap of 1.9 eV have a very low defect density, resulting in an efficiency potential of 20.3% with a MeO–2PACz hole‐transporting layer and 20.8% on compact TiO2. Using ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy measurements, energy level misalignment is identified as a possible reason for the QFLS–e ·VOC mismatch and strategies for overcoming this VOC limitation are discussed. This work highlights the need to control the interfacial energetics in inorganic perovskite solar cells, but also gives promise for high efficiencies once this issue is resolved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department Perovskite Tandem Solar Cells Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin 12489 Berlin Germany

Institute of Physics and Astronomy University of Potsdam 14476 Potsdam Germany

Institut für Physik & IRIS Adlershof Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin 12489 Berlin Germany

Department Solution Processing of Hybrid Materials & Devices Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin 12489 Berlin Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ic401215x10.1021/ic401215x ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aaa576010.1126/science.aaa5760 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.124398210.1126/science.1243982 ↗
4. 10.1039/C7TA00404D10.1039/C7TA00404D ↗
5. NREL National Renewable Energy Laboratory Best Research-Cell Efficiency Charthttps://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html(accessed: March 2022).
6. 10.1126/science.abd401610.1126/science.abd4016 ↗
7. 10.1039/C6CP00721J10.1039/C6CP00721J ↗
8. 10.1039/C7EE02564E10.1039/C7EE02564E ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0330810.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03308 ↗
10. 10.1002/ANIE.20220130010.1002/ANIE.202201300 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20200106910.1002/adma.202001069 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0106710.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01067 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20210393310.1002/aenm.202103933 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20210185410.1002/aenm.202101854 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aam709210.1126/science.aam7092 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20200008010.1002/adma.202000080 ↗
17. A.Onno C.Chen Z. C.Holman inConf. Rec. IEEE Photovolt. Spec. Conf. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) New York NY USA2019 pp.2329–2333.https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980762.10.1109/PVSC40753.2019.8980762 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9EE02020A10.1039/C9EE02020A ↗
19. Würfel P. · 2016
20. 10.1002/aenm.20190163110.1002/aenm.201901631 ↗
21. 10.1002/ente.20210069110.1002/ente.202100691 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20180189210.1002/aenm.201801892 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.abd401610.1126/science.abd4016 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.9b0718210.1021/jacs.9b07182 ↗
25. 10.1038/srep4462910.1038/srep44629 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0178310.1021/acsenergylett.1c01783 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20210002210.1002/aenm.202100022 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0110410.1021/acsenergylett.0c01104 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.7b1197710.1021/acsami.7b11977 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature2598910.1038/nature25989 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.01410.1016/j.joule.2019.06.014 ↗
32. Giordano F. · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7
33. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0026710.1021/acsnano.8b00267 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.11.00810.1016/j.matt.2020.11.008 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20190801110.1002/adma.201908011 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20210144710.1002/aenm.202101447 ↗
37. 10.1039/D1EE02650J10.1039/D1EE02650J ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0094610.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00946 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0372810.1021/acs.jpclett.8b03728 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.295758810.1063/1.2957588 ↗
41. 10.1147/rd.43.028310.1147/rd.43.0283 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41560-021-00941-310.1038/s41560-021-00941-3 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.7b0794910.1021/jacs.7b07949 ↗
44. Xiang W. · Nat. Commun. · 2019 · 10
45. 10.1002/aenm.20210393310.1002/aenm.202103933 ↗
46. 10.1002/ange.20210972410.1002/ange.202109724 ↗