Impact of Potential‐Induced Degradation on Different Architecture‐Based Perovskite Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic–inorganic perovskites photovoltaic materials are considered as one of the promising candidates for the emerging photovoltaic (PV) sector. It has drawn tremendous attention from fundamental research and PV industries, due to its high efficiency, chemical properties, and low fabrication cost. But, its lifetime under real field operation is always the major obstacle toward commercialization. Potential‐induced degradation (PID) is known as the common reliable threat in the established commercial PV technologies which lead to catastrophic failure within a short time. Thus, it is essential to enable reliability assessment of PID on the precommercial development stage of perovskite photovoltaics to further enrich the confidence by identifying, eliminating, and developing an understanding of the possible degradation mechanism in the field condition. In this article, different architecture‐based perovskite solar cells are studied to reveal the degradation mechanism under PID for the first time. The results show that PSCs of n–i–p with a phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) layer have good stability under PID compared with other treated structures with only 4% degradation after 18 h.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced battery technologies research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hasselt University 3500 Hasselt Belgium
EnergyVille II 3600 Genk Belgium
Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University Raisan Gandhinagar Gujarat 382421 India
Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT) Katholieke Universiteit Leuven 3001 Heverlee Belgium
imec 3000 Leuven Belgium
Department of Physics Sardar Vallabbhai National Institute of Technology Surat 395009 India
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. NREL Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart 2020 https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html(accessed: February 2021).
2. NREL Champion Photovoltaic Module Efficiency Chart 2020 https://www.nrel.gov/pv/module-efficiency.html(accessed: February 2021).
3. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
4. Kulkarni S. · Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 9221
5. 10.1002/adma.20130517210.1002/adma.201305172 ↗
6. Snaith H. J. · Chem. Lett. · 2013 · 4 · 3623
7. 10.1039/D0CS00573H10.1039/D0CS00573H ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0801910.1021/acs.jpcc.0c08019 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.05310.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.053 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41560-019-0422-210.1038/s41560-019-0422-2 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41560-020-00767-510.1038/s41560-020-00767-5 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6EE02271E10.1039/C6EE02271E ↗
13. 10.1039/C8CP02703J10.1039/C8CP02703J ↗
14. 10.1038/s41560-018-0174-410.1038/s41560-018-0174-4 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.aah555710.1126/science.aah5557 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aad584510.1126/science.aad5845 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20170154310.1002/aenm.201701543 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TA10727C10.1039/C6TA10727C ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms849710.1038/ncomms8497 ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20160033010.1002/aenm.201600330 ↗
21. 10.1039/C5EE01265A10.1039/C5EE01265A ↗
22. 10.1039/C4SC03141E10.1039/C4SC03141E ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0028210.1021/acsenergylett.7b00282 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-017-00284-210.1038/s41467-017-00284-2 ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms994910.1038/ncomms9949 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20190892010.1002/adfm.201908920 ↗
27. Cho A. · Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 18206