DIBL improvement in hysteresis-free and ferroelectric-gated FinFETs
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The improvement of drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) in hysteresis-free and ferroelectric-gated fin field effect transistors (FinFETs) [a.k.a., negative capacitance (NC) FinFET] has been experimentally verified. Moreover, all fabricated NC FinFETs (some of which are not hysteresis-free) have successfully shown sub-60-mV/decade subthreshold slope (SS) characteristics. By adjusting both the fin width and channel length, the ferroelectric and dielectric capacitance matching in the gate stacks of FinFETs is successfully implemented, resulting in hysteresis-free NC FinFETs with a 20 mV/decade SS. Finally, the negative DIBL phenomenon in the hysteresis-free NC FinFET has produced an enhanced DIBL of 20.78 mV/V (note that the DIBL of baseline FinFET is 68.89 mV/V at 300 K).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Ko · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2016 · 63 · 503010.1109/TED.2016.2619372 ↗
2. Lee · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2016 · 63 · 182710.1109/TED.2016.2539209 ↗
3. Liu · IEEE Spectrum · 2012 · 49 · 3910.1109/MSPEC.2012.6172808 ↗
4. Choe · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2008 · 64 · 527010.1109/TED.2017.2756676 ↗
5. Shukla · Nature Comm. · 2015 · 6 · 781210.1038/ncomms8812 ↗
6. Shukla · 201610.1109/IEDM.2016.7838542 ↗
7. Jo · Nano Lett. · 2015 · 15 · 455310.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01130 ↗
8. Zhou · 201610.1109/IEDM.2016.7838401 ↗
9. Khan · Nature Mater. · 2014 · 14 · 18210.1038/nmat4148 ↗
10. Li · 201510.1109/IEDM.2015.7409760 ↗
11. Salahuddin · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 40510.1021/nl071804g ↗
12. Wong · Proceedings of IEEE · 2019 · 107 · 4910.1109/JPROC.2018.2884518 ↗
13. Kobayashi · Applied Physics Express · 2018 · 1110.7567/APEX.11.110101 ↗
14. Sharma · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 27210.1109/LED.2017.2782261 ↗
15. Jo · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 24510.1109/LED.2016.2523681 ↗
16. Ko · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2017 · 38 · 41810.1109/LED.2017.2672967 ↗
17. Zhou · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2017 · 64 · 483810.1109/TED.2017.2762926 ↗
18. Khandelwal · 201610.1109/VLSIT.2016.7573446 ↗
19. Dutta · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2018 · 38 · 14710.1109/LED.2017.2770158 ↗
20. Ko · IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society · 2017 · 5 · 30610.1109/JEDS.2017.2731401 ↗
21. Lee · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2015 · 36 · 29410.1109/LED.2015.2402517 ↗
22. Jo · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2017 · 64 · 497410.1109/TED.2017.2764508 ↗
23. Pahwa · 201610.1109/ESSCIRC.2016.7598240 ↗
24. Khan · 201110.1109/IEDM.2011.6131532 ↗
25. Karda · Applied Physics Letters · 2015 · 10610.1063/1.4918649 ↗
26. Li · Solid-State Electronics · 2015 · 114 · 1710.1016/j.sse.2015.07.001 ↗
27. Zhou · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 62210.1109/LED.2018.2810071 ↗
28. Agarwal · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2018 · 65 · 203310.1109/TED.2018.2817238 ↗
29. Kwon · IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. · 2018 · 39 · 30010.1109/LED.2017.2787063 ↗
30. Cho · Semiconductor Sci. Tech. · 2019 · 34 · 02500410.1088/1361-6641/aaf518 ↗
31. Khan · IEEE Electron Dec. Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 11110.1109/LED.2015.2501319 ↗
32. Cano · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9710.1063/1.3494533 ↗
33. Hu · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 477210.1038/srep04772 ↗
34. Seo · IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. · 2017 · 64 · 179310.1109/TED.2017.2658673 ↗