Exploring Nanoscale Structure in Perovskite Precursor Solutions Using Neutron and Light Scattering
Source abstract
Abstract
Tailoring the solution chemistry of metal halide perovskites requires a detailed understanding of precursor aggregation and coordination. In this work, we use various scattering techniques, including dynamic light scattering (DLS), small angle neutron scattering (SANS), and spin-echo SANS (SESANS) to probe the nanostructures from 1 nm to 10 μm within two different lead-halide perovskite solution inks (MAPbI3 and a triple-cation mixed-halide perovskite). We find that DLS can misrepresent the size distribution of the colloidal dispersion and use SANS/SESANS to confirm that these perovskite solutions are mostly comprised of 1-2 nm-sized particles. We further conclude that if there are larger colloids present, their concentration must be <0.005% of the total dispersion volume. With SANS, we apply a simple fitting model for two component microemulsions (Teubner-Strey), demonstrating this as a potential method to investigate the structure, chemical composition, and colloidal stability of perovskite solutions, and we here show that MAPbI3 solutions age more drastically than triple cation solutions.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sheffield, The Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands
ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Campus, Didcot OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-021-03964-810.1038/s41586-021-03964-8 ↗
2. 10.1039/c3ee43822h10.1039/c3ee43822h ↗
3. 10.1002/anie.20170322610.1002/anie.201703226 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.18660110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.186601 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0000210.1021/acsenergylett.6b00002 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20130517210.1002/adma.201305172 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11118910.1016/j.solmat.2021.111189 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10371210.1016/j.isci.2021.103712 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-020-63674-510.1038/s41598-020-63674-5 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10853-020-04883-110.1007/s10853-020-04883-1 ↗
11. 10.1021/jacs.5b0032110.1021/jacs.5b00321 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.00910.1016/j.joule.2017.09.009 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20200155910.1002/adfm.202001559 ↗
14. 10.1039/C5NR04715C10.1039/C5NR04715C ↗
15. 10.1039/C7EE02272G10.1039/C7EE02272G ↗
16. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0920810.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09208 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.02510.1016/j.chempr.2019.02.025 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8RA03471K10.1039/C8RA03471K ↗
19. 10.1021/jacs.0c0041110.1021/jacs.0c00411 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jechem.2019.04.01910.1016/j.jechem.2019.04.019 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20160703910.1002/adma.201607039 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0197510.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01975 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12551-016-0218-610.1007/s12551-016-0218-6 ↗
24. 10.1002/bip.1981.36020111010.1002/bip.1981.360201110 ↗
25. 10.1016/S1359-0294(01)00072-310.1016/S1359-0294(01)00072-3 ↗
26. 10.1038/s43586-021-00070-x10.1038/s43586-021-00070-x ↗
27. 10.1039/D1TA01468D10.1039/D1TA01468D ↗
28. 10.1107/S002188980300398410.1107/S0021889803003984 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.foostr.2021.10023510.1016/j.foostr.2021.100235 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8SM01425F10.1039/C8SM01425F ↗
31. Rekveldt M. T. · 1997 · 134
32. 10.1107/S002188980302121610.1107/S0021889803021216 ↗
33. 10.1039/C9RA08019H10.1039/C9RA08019H ↗
34. Loq. https://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/Loq.aspx (accessed 2022-02-18).
35. Doucet, M. SASView, version 4.2.2. https://zenodo.org/record/2652478#.YuGKCXbMJ48.
36. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.185857910.1063/1.1858579 ↗
38. Lamor. https://www.isis.stfc.ac.uk/Pages/Larmor.aspx (accessed 2022-02-18).
39. Technical Note: Dynamic Light Scattering; Malvern Instruments: Malvern, UK, 2010.
40. 10.1021/la00081a02910.1021/la00081a029 ↗
41. Teubner–Strey Model. https://www.sasview.org/docs/user/models/teubner_strey.html (accessed 2022-03-22).
42. 10.1063/1.45300610.1063/1.453006 ↗
43. 10.1002/cssc.20210033210.1002/cssc.202100332 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0134410.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01344 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0105710.1021/acsenergylett.7b01057 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.6b0492410.1021/jacs.6b04924 ↗
47. 10.1038/nmat401410.1038/nmat4014 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0001310.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00013 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0366110.1021/acs.jpcc.0c03661 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsaem.9b0020610.1021/acsaem.9b00206 ↗
51. 10.1126/science.aaa927210.1126/science.aaa9272 ↗
52. 10.1021/jacs.5b0493010.1021/jacs.5b04930 ↗
53. 10.1039/D0MA00815J10.1039/D0MA00815J ↗
54. 10.1002/smll.20160412510.1002/smll.201604125 ↗