Life‐Cycle Assessment of Solar Charger with Integrated Organic Photovoltaics
Source abstract
Abstract
Organic photovoltaics (OPV) applied in a commercial product comprising a solar charged power bank is subjected to a life cycle assessment (LCA) study. Regular power banks harvest electricity from the grid only. The solar power bank (called HeLi‐on) is however, a power bank that includes a portable OPV panel, enabling the possibility to be charged from the sun, and not only from the grid. In this paper, two well‐established power bank products using amorphous silicon solar panels (a‐Si PV) and a regular power bank without any portable solar panel is compared to HeLi‐on. The environmental impact of the products is quantified with the aim of indicate where eco‐design improvements would make a difference and to point out performance of a portable solar panel depending on the context of use (Denmark and China), realistic disposal scenarios and the recycling relevance particularly concerning metals content.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Prof. F. C. Krebs, Dr. G. A. R. Benatto, Dr. N. Espinosa Department of Energy Conversion and Storage Technical University of Denmark Frederiksborgvej 399 DK‐4000 Roskilde Denmark
Funding
Energinet.dk · Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.02010.1016/j.solmat.2010.08.020 ↗
2. 10.1039/C1EE02728J10.1039/C1EE02728J ↗
3. Hengevoss K. · 2015
4. 10.1039/c3ta01611k10.1039/c3ta01611k ↗
5. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.07410.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.074 ↗
6. 10.1021/es402969c10.1021/es402969c ↗
7. F.Ardente F.Mathieux L.Talens Peiró JRC Technical Reports Revision of methods to assess material efficiency of energy related products and potential requirements.Environmental Footprint and Material Efficiency Support for Product Policy. December2016. ISBN 978‐92‐79‐63889‐3 ISSN 1831‐9424.https://doi.org/10.2788/517101
8. 2010
9. 10.1039/C5EE01763G10.1039/C5EE01763G ↗
10. 10.1002/adem.20150050910.1002/adem.201500509 ↗
11. 10.1002/pip.96710.1002/pip.967 ↗
12. 10.1039/c1ee01127h10.1039/c1ee01127h ↗
13. ©PowerFilm Sol. Inc.http://www.powerfilmsolar.com/faq/ Date accessed: 07/11/2016.
14. S.Pacca D.Sivaraman G. A.Keoleian. Life Cycle Assessment of the 33 Kw Photovoltaic System on the Dana Building at the University of Michigan: Thin Film Laminates Multi‐Crystalline Modules and Balance of System Components. Center for Sustainable Systems Report No. CSS05‐09. Ann Arbor Michigan University of Michigan June 1 2006 87pp. 16 tables 44 figures 11 appendices. Available online at:http://css.snre.umich.edu
15. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories 2014.
16. 10.1039/C4EE03832K10.1039/C4EE03832K ↗
17. PRé Consultants 2015.10.1016/S1365-6937(15)30332-4 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6EE00578K10.1039/C6EE00578K ↗
19. 10.1007/s11367-012-0489-510.1007/s11367-012-0489-5 ↗
20. 10.1021/es204163f10.1021/es204163f ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20140073210.1002/aenm.201400732 ↗
22. 10.1039/c1ee01766g10.1039/c1ee01766g ↗