Regenerated cellulose-based composite membranes as adsorbent for protein adsorption
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of protein adsorbents with high adsorption performance has attracted great attention due to the important role of these adsorbents in protein separation and purification. Herein, cellulose-based composite membranes were prepared through a combination of cellulose fiber (CF) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl oxidized cellulose nanofiber (CNF) in alkaline/urea aqueous solution and regeneration from a tape casting method. Taking advantage of the functional carboxyl groups in CNF, the obtained cellulose-based composite membranes display a good protein adsorption property, with a capacity of 241.6 mg g−1, by using bovine serum albumin as a model protein. Meanwhile, the adsorption performance of cellulose-based composite membranes can be optimized by regulating the blending ratios of CNF and CF, buffer pH, initial protein concentrations and temperature, and the mechanical property of cellulose-based composite membranes can be adjusted by changing the ratio of CNF and CF. These effective and economic membranes may act as promising candidates for protein adsorption in protein separation and purification fields.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Abedini R (2011) A novel cellulose acetate (CA) membrane using TiO2 nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and permeation study. Desalination 277:40–4510.1016/j.desal.2011.03.089 ↗
2. Bhatt N, Gupta PK, Naithani S (2011) Hydroxypropyl cellulose from α-cellulose isolated from Lantana camara with respect to DS and rheological behavior. Carbohydr Polym 86:1519–152410.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.054 ↗
3. Castro GR, Jingsong C, Bruce P, Kaplan DL (2009) Emulsan-alginate beads for protein adsorption. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 20:411–42610.1163/156856209X416449 ↗
4. Chang F, Yamabuki K, Onimura K, Oishi T (2008) Modification of cellulose by using atom transfer radical polymerization and ring-opening polymerization. Polym J 40:1170–117910.1295/polymj.PJ2008136 ↗
5. Dinand E, Vignon M, Chanzy H, Heux L (2002) Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of cellulose I → cellulose II. Cellulose 9:7–1810.1023/A:1015877021688 ↗
6. Doulabi AH, Mirzadeh H, Imani M, Samadi N (2013) Chitosan/polyethylene glycol fumarate blend film: physical and antibacterial properties. Carbohydr Polym 92:48–5610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.002 ↗
7. Duan J, He X, Zhang L (2015) Magnetic cellulose–TiO2 nanocomposite microspheres for highly selective enrichment of phosphopeptides. Chem Commun 51:338–34110.1039/C4CC08442J ↗
8. Dubey V, Pandey LK, Saxena C (2005) Pervaporative separation of ethanol/water azeotrope using a novel chitosan-impregnated bacterial cellulose membrane and chitosan-poly(vinyl alcohol) blends. J Membr Sci 251:131–13610.1016/j.memsci.2004.11.009 ↗
9. Foo KY, Hameed BH (2010) Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem Eng J 156:2–1010.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 ↗
10. Fu Q, Wang X, Si Y, Liu L, Yu J, Ding B (2016) Scalable fabrication of electrospun nanofibrous membranes functionalized with citric acid for high-performance protein adsorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:11819–1182910.1021/acsami.6b03107 ↗
11. Fu LH, Qi C, Liu YJ, Cao WT, Ma MG (2018) Sonochemical synthesis of cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites and their application in protein adsorption. Sci Rep 8:8292–830310.1038/s41598-018-25566-7 ↗
12. Handschuh-Wang S, Wang T, Druzhinin SI, Wesner D, Jiang X, Schönherr H (2016) Detailed study of BSA adsorption on micro- and nanocrystalline diamond/β-SiC composite gradient films by time-resolved fluorescence microscopy. Langmuir 33:802–81310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04177 ↗
13. Hao W, Chao T, Tian H, Li Y, Wang J (2018) Fabrication of functional magnetic cellulose nanocomposite membranes for controlled adsorption of protein. Cellulose 25:2977–298610.1007/s10570-018-1750-2 ↗
14. Hazarika P, Behrendt JM, Petersson L, Wingren C, Turner ML (2014) Photopatterning of self assembled monolayers on oxide surfaces for the selective attachment of biomolecules. Biosens Bioelectron 53:82–8910.1016/j.bios.2013.09.001 ↗
15. Hlady V, Buijs J, Jennissen HP (1999) Methods for studying protein adsorption. Methods Enzymol 309:402–42910.1016/S0076-6879(99)09028-X ↗
16. Hu T, Chang C, Zhang L (2011) Efficient adsorption of Hg2 + ions on chitin/cellulose composite membranes prepared via environmentally friendly pathway. Chem Eng J 173:689–69710.1016/j.cej.2011.07.045 ↗
17. Hubbe MA, Beck KR, O’Neal WG, Sharma YC (2012) Cellulosic substrates for removal of pollutants from aqueous systems: a review. 2. Dyes. Bioresources 7:2592–2687
18. Iriarte-Velasco U, Chimeno-AlaníS N, GonzáLez-Marcos MP, Álvarez-Uriarte JI (2011) Relationship between thermodynamic data and adsorption/desorption performance of acid and basic dyes onto activated carbons. J Chem Eng Data 56:2100–210910.1021/je1011345 ↗
19. Jie C, Lina Z (2006) Unique gelation behavior of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Biomacromol 7:183–18910.1021/bm0505585 ↗
20. Juang LC, Wang CC, Lee CK (2006) Adsorption of basic dyes onto MCM-41. Chemosphere 64:1920–192810.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.024 ↗
21. Kamide K, Okajima K, Kowsaka K, Matsui T, Nomura S, Hikichi K (1985) Effect of the distribution of substitution of the sodium salt of carboxymethylcellulose on its absorbency toward aqueous liquid. Polym J 17:909–91810.1295/polymj.17.909 ↗
22. Khattri SD, Singh MK (2009) Removal of malachite green from dye wastewater using neem sawdust by adsorption. J Hazard Mater 167:1089–109410.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.101 ↗
23. Luan Q et al (2017) Cellulose-based composite macrogels from cellulose fiber and cellulose nanofiber as intestine delivery vehicles for probiotics. J Agric Food Chem 66:339–34510.1021/acs.jafc.7b04754 ↗
24. Luo X, Liu S, Zhou J, Zhang L (2009) In situ synthesis of Fe3O4/cellulose microspheres with magnetic-induced protein delivery. J Mater Chem 19:3538–354510.1039/b900103d ↗
25. Madaeni SS, Heidary F (2011) Improving separation capability of regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membrane by surface modification. Appl Surf Sci 257:4870–487610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.128 ↗
26. Marek K (2014) The pH dependent surface charging and points of zero charge. VI. Update. J Colloid Interface Sci 426:209–21210.1016/j.jcis.2014.02.036 ↗
27. Meng H, Chang C, Na P, Zhang L (2012) Structure and properties of hydroxyapatite/cellulose nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 87:2512–251810.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.029 ↗
28. Montanari S, Roumani M, Laurent Heux A, Vignon MR (2008) Topochemistry of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals resulting from TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Macromolecules 38:1665–167110.1021/ma048396c ↗
29. Pelton R (2009) Bioactive paper provides a low-cost platform for diagnostics. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 28:925–94210.1016/j.trac.2009.05.005 ↗
30. Richter AG, Ivan K (2013) Using in situ X-ray reflectivity to study protein adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces: benefits and limitations. Langmuir 29:5167–518010.1021/la3049532 ↗
31. Sadir S, Prabhakaran MP, Wicaksono DHB, Ramakrishna S (2014) Fiber based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for C-reactive protein. Sensors Actuators B Chem 205:50–6010.1016/j.snb.2014.08.051 ↗
32. Sahadevan R, Crandall C, Schneiderman S, Menkhaus TJ (2018) Cellulose-graft-polyethyleneamidoamine anion-exchange nanofiber membranes for simultaneous protein adsorption and virus filtration. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:3321–333010.1021/acsanm.8b00519 ↗
33. Sang YO et al (2005) Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 340:2376–239110.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007 ↗
34. Sun XF, Wang SG, Liu XW, Gong WX, Bao N, Gao BY, Zhang HY (2008) Biosorption of Malachite Green from aqueous solutions onto aerobic granules: kinetic and equilibrium studies. Biores Technol 99:3475–348310.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.055 ↗
35. Tailor R, Shah BA, Shah AV (2012) Sorptive removal of phenol by zeolitic bagasse fly ash: equilibrium, kinetics, and column studies. J Chem Eng Data 57:1437–144810.1021/je300399y ↗
36. Tsuguyuki S, Satoshi K, Yoshiharu N, Akira I (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8:2485–249110.1021/bm0703970 ↗
37. Udoetok IA, Dimmick RM, Wilson LD, Headley JV (2016) Adsorption properties of cross-linked cellulose-epichlorohydrin polymers in aqueous solution. Carbohydr Polym 136:329–34010.1016/j.carbpol.2015.09.032 ↗
38. Yang F, Wang J, Hou J, Guo H, Liu C (2013) Bone regeneration using cell-mediated responsive degradable PEG-based scaffolds incorporating with rhBMP-2. Biomaterials 34:1514–152810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.058 ↗
39. Zhang H et al (2017) Cellulose anionic hydrogels based on cellulose nanofibers as natural stimulants for seed germination and seedling growth. J Agric Food Chem 65:3785–379110.1021/acs.jafc.6b05815 ↗
40. Zhang H et al (2018) A pH-responsive gel macrosphere based on sodium alginate and cellulose nanofiber for potential intestinal delivery of probiotics. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:13924–1393110.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02237 ↗
41. Zhao ZP, Wang Z, Wang SC (2003) Formation, charged characteristic and BSA adsorption behavior of carboxymethyl chitosan/PES composite MF membrane. J Membr Sci 217:151–15810.1016/S0376-7388(03)00105-4 ↗
42. Zhu B, Nan M, Wu D, Sun Y, Li W (2011) Synergistic extraction and selective removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution using magnetic nanoparticles coated with mixtures of sodium oleate and saponified 2-ethylhexyl phosphonic acid mono-2-ethylhexyl ester. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:11698–1170510.1021/ie200792j ↗