journal article·2014-06

Do multi-use cellulosic textiles provide safe protection against the contamination of sterilized items?

B. Rogina-Car, A. Budimir, V. Turcic, D. Katovic

Cellulose· Volume 21· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether multiple use cellulosic medical textiles could provide protection against contamination after sterilization, regardless of the barrier system of only qualified materials, as per EN 868- 2, used in the process. New methods for testing permeability and durability of the microbial barrier cellulosic textiles were developed. The most resistant forms of microorganisms of apathogenic bacterial endospore of the Bacilllus genus: Geobacillus stearothermophilus and Bacillus atrophaeus were used. Testing was performed after 1, 10, 20, 30 and 50 cycles of washing and sterilization under real hospital conditions. The durability of the textile microbial barrier (one layer) was tested after 1, 2 and 3 months of storage under controlled conditions. Bacterial permeability occurs in cellulosic medical textiles when they are contaminated with an extremely high quantity of aerobe bacterial spores. During the testing of microbial barrier durability, the package remained uncontaminated after 1, 2 and 3 months of storage. Medical cellulose textiles used under real hospital conditions functioned properly as a microbial barrier system after 50 cycles of washing and sterilization and 3 months of storage, as the sterilized content was not contaminated at all ; they could be used a microbe barrier system for packing in sterilization, regardless of the fact that they do not meet the standard EN 868- 02:2009 Packaging materials for terminally sterilized medical devices. Part 2: Sterilization wrap - requirements and test methods or the International standard, for example EN ISO 11607- 1:2009 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices, Part 1: Requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Medical Device Sterilization and Disinfection · Infection Control in Healthcare · Infection Control and Ventilation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. American Society for Testing and Materials (1997) F1671-97b standard test method for resistance of materials used in protective clothing to penetration by blood borne pathogens using phi-x174 bacteriophage penetration as a test system. ASTM, West Conshohocken
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (1998) F1670-98 standard test method for resistance of materials used in protective clothing to penetration by synthetic blood. ASTM, West Conshohocken
3. Beck WC (1963) Aseptic barriers in surgery: their present status. Arch Surg 87(2):288–29610.1001/archsurg.1963.01310140096017 ↗
4. Beck WC, Carlson WW (1981) Aseptic barriers. Arch Surg 116(2):240–24410.1001/archsurg.1981.01380140086022 ↗
5. Belkin NL (1980) Textiles as aseptic barriers: the past, present, and future. Med Instrum 14(4):233–236
6. Belkin NL (1988) Aseptic barrier materials for surgical gowns and drapes. AORN J 47(2):572–57610.1016/S0001-2092(07)69024-3 ↗
7. Belkin NL (1994) The new American society for testing and materials tests: all that glitters is not gold. Am J Infect Control 22:172–17610.1016/0196-6553(94)90006-X ↗
8. Belkin NL (2002a) Surgical gowns and drapes: just how necessary are they? Text Rent 72:66–73
9. Belkin NL (2002b) A historical review of barrier materials. AORN J 76(4):648–65310.1016/S0001-2092(06)60940-X ↗
10. Bojic-Turcic V (1994) Sterilization and disinfection in medicine. Medicinska naklada, Medicom, Zagreb. ISBN: 953-176-024-1
11. Borkow G, Gabbay J (2008) Biocidal textiles can help fight nosocomial infections. Med Hypotheses 70:990–99410.1016/j.mehy.2007.08.025 ↗
12. EN ISO 11607-1:2009 Packaging for terminally sterilized medical devices. Part 1: requirements for materials, sterile barrier systems and packaging systems
13. EN 868-02:2009 Packaging materials for terminally sterilized medical devices. Part 2: sterilization wrap—requirements and test methods or the International standard for example
14. Enko MT (2009) Sterile supply packaging. WFHSS-ÖGSV Basic Script
15. Fijan S, Šoštar-Turk S (2012) Hospital textiles, are they a possible vehicle for healthcare-associated infections? Int J Environ Res Public Health 9(9):3330–334310.3390/ijerph9093330 ↗
16. Granzow JW, Smith JW, Nichols RL, Waterman RS, Muzik AC (1998) Evaluation of the protective value of hospital gowns against blood strike-through and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus penetration. Am J Infect Control 26(2):85–9310.1016/S0196-6553(98)80027-8 ↗
17. Lankester BJ, Bartlett GE, Garneti N, Blom AW, Bowker KE, Bannister GC (2002) Direct measurement of bacterial penetration through surgical gowns: a new method. J Hosp Infect 50(4):281–28510.1053/jhin.2001.1154 ↗
18. Leonas KK (1998) Effect of laundering on the barrier properties of reusable surgical gown fabrics. Am J Infect Control 26:495–50110.1016/S0196-6553(98)70022-7 ↗
19. Rutala WA, Weber DJ (2001) A review of single use and reusable gowns and drapers in health care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 22(4):248–25710.1086/501895 ↗
20. Stephens-Borg K (2008) Surgical dressings and turbulent years of cotton industry. J Perioper Pract 18(7):305–30610.1177/175045890801800707 ↗