Cellulose nanofibril-reinforced composites using aqueous dispersed ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer
Source abstract
Abstract
Natural cellulosic fibres such as wood pulps are well known reinforcing agents in composites and the high strength and large aspect ratio of nano-scale cellulose fibrils make them suitable as reinforcement in composite materials (Berglund and Peijs 2010 ; Oksman et al. 2016 ). Recent developments in cellulose pulp processing have made nano-sized cellulose fibrils commercially available (Saito et al. 2007 ). Since cellulose is one of the most abundant organic polymer in the world, it has the potential to be an inexpensive reinforcing filler material in thermoplastics. A major drawback of using cellulose nanofibrils (CNF) as reinforcement in thermoplastics is however the difference in hydrophilic nature between cellulose and the usually hydrophobic matrix phase polymer. Moreover, it can be argued that dewatering and drying of cellulose nanomaterials promotes irreversible bonding between nanofibrils, as discussed in Fernandes Diniz et al. ( 2004 ). This incompatibility can affect the mixing of the cellulose in the matrix and can lead to aggregation of cellulose fibre/fibrils resulting in a non-uniform thermoplastic composite (Ariño and Boldizar 2012 ). Insufficient compatibility can also result in poor fibre–matrix adhesion, leading to poor stress transfer and inferior mechanical properties. In addition, the low thermal degradation temperature of cellulose limits the range of processing temperatures and the selection of applicable polymer matrices. Common matrices used in melt extrusion of CNF are polyesters such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA) (Jonoobi et al. 2010 ), due to its renewable origin and biodegradability. Other common matrices used are polyethylene and polypropylene (Boldizar et al. 1987 ), which have relatively low melting temperatures and are common bulk polymers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ansari F, Galland S, Johansson M, Plummer CJ, Berglund LA (2014) Cellulose nanofiber network for moisture stable, strong and ductile biocomposites and increased epoxy curing rate. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 63:35–4410.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.017 ↗
2. Ariño R, Boldizar A (2012) Processing and mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites based on cellulose fibers and ethylene-acrylic acid copolymer. Polym Eng Sci 52(9):1951–195710.1002/pen.23134 ↗
3. Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Cellulose biocomposites from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull 35(3):201–20710.1557/mrs2010.652 ↗
4. Boldizar A, Klason C, Kubát J, Näslund P, Sáha P (1987) Prehydrolyzed cellulose as reinforcing filler for thermoplastics. Int J Polym Mater 11(4):229–26210.1080/00914038708078665 ↗
5. Brandrup J, Immergut E, Grulke E (1999) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken
6. Cox HL (1952) The elasticity and strength of paper and other fibrous materials. Br J Appl Phys 3(3):7210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
7. de Menezes AJ, Siqueira G, Curvelo AA, Dufresne A (2009) Extrusion and characterization of functionalized cellulose whiskers reinforced polyethylene nanocomposites. Polymer 50(19):4552–456310.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.038 ↗
8. Diddens I, Murphy B, Krisch M, Mller M (2008) Anisotropic elastic properties of cellulose measured using inelastic x-ray scattering. Macromolecules 41(24):9755–975910.1021/ma801796u ↗
9. Diniz JMBF, Gil MH, Castro JAAM (2004) Hornification: its origin and interpretation in wood pulps. Wood Sci Technol 37(6):489–49410.1007/s00226-003-0216-2 ↗
10. Dufresne A (2017) Cellulose nanomaterial reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 29(Supplement C):1–810.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.004 ↗
11. Ehrnrooth E, Kolseth P (1984) The tensile testing of single wood pulp fibers in air and in water. Wood Fiber Sci 16:549–566
12. Favier V, Canova GR, Cavaill JY, Chanzy H, Dufresne A, Gauthier C (1995) Nanocomposite materials from latex and cellulose whiskers. Polym Adv Technol 6(5):351–35510.1002/pat.1995.220060514 ↗
13. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindström T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9(6):1579–158510.1021/bm800038n ↗
14. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Mathew A, Oksman K (2010) Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) prepared by twin screw extrusion. Compos Sci Technol 70(12):1742–174710.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.005 ↗
15. Larsson K, Berglund LA, Ankerfors M, Lindstrom T (2012) Polylactide latex/nanofibrillated cellulose bionanocomposites of high nanofibrillated cellulose content and nanopaper network structure prepared by a papermaking route. J Appl Polym Sci 125(3):2460–246610.1002/app.36413 ↗
16. Loo YL, Wakabayashi K, Huang YE, Register RA, Hsiao BS (2005) Thin crystal melting produces the low-temperature endotherm in ethylene/methacrylic acid ionomers. Polymer 46(14):5118–512410.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.043 ↗
17. Maia THS, Larocca NM, Beatrice CAG, de Menezes AJ, de Freitas Siqueira G, Pessan LA, Dufresne A, Frana MP, de Almeida Lucas A (2017) Polyethylene cellulose nanofibrils nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 173(Supplement C):50–5610.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.089 ↗
18. Moberg T, Rigdahl M (2012) On the viscoelastic properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 20:123–130
19. Naderi A, Lindström T, Sundström J (2014) Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies. Cellulose 21(3):1561–157110.1007/s10570-014-0192-8 ↗
20. Oksman K, Aitomäki Y, Mathew AP, Siqueira G, Zhou Q, Butylina S, Tanpichai S, Zhou X, Hooshmand S (2016) Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 83:2–1810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.10.041 ↗
21. Quennouz N, Hashmi SM, Choi HS, Kim JW, Osuji CO (2015) Rheology of cellulose nanofibrils in the presence of surfactants. Soft Matter 12:157–16410.1039/C5SM01803J ↗
22. Saarikoski E, Lipponen S, Rissanen M, Seppälä J (2012) Blending cellulose with polyethylene-co-acrylic acid in alkaline water suspension. Cellulose 19(3):661–66910.1007/s10570-012-9668-6 ↗
23. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(8):2485–249110.1021/bm0703970 ↗
24. Samir MASA, Alloin F, Sanchez JY, Dufresne A (2004) Cellulose nanocrystals reinforced poly(oxyethylene). Polymer 45(12):4149–415710.1016/j.polymer.2004.03.094 ↗
25. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2011) Nanostructured biocomposites of high toughness: a wood cellulose nanofiber network in ductile hydroxyethylcellulose matrix. Soft Matter 7:7342–735010.1039/c1sm05325f ↗
26. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2009) Cellulose whiskers versus microfibrils: Influence of the nature of the nanoparticle and its surface functionalization on the thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 10(2):425–43210.1021/bm801193d ↗
27. Srithep Y, Turng LS, Sabo R, Clemons C (2012) Nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) reinforced polyvinyl alcohol (PVOH) nanocomposites: properties, solubility of carbon dioxide, and foaming. Cellulose 19(4):1209–122310.1007/s10570-012-9726-0 ↗
28. Tanpichai S, Quero F, Nogi M, Yano H, Young RJ, Lindström T, Sampson WW, Eichhorn SJ (2012) Effective youngs modulus of bacterial and microfibrillated cellulose fibrils in fibrous networks. Biomacromolecules 13(5):1340–134910.1021/bm300042t ↗
29. Thomason J, Vlug M (1996) Influence of fibre length and concentration on the properties of glass fibre-reinforced polypropylene: 1. Tensile and flexural modulus. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 27(6):477–48410.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A ↗
30. Volk N, He R, Magniez K (2015) Enhanced homogeneity and interfacial compatibility in melt-extruded cellulose nano-fibers reinforced polyethylene via surface adsorption of poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(ethylene) amphiphiles. Eur Polym J 72:270–28110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.09.025 ↗
31. Yao F, Wu Q, Lei Y, Xu Y (2008) Rice straw fiber-reinforced high-density polyethylene composite: effect of fiber type and loading. Ind Crops Prod 28(1):63–7210.1016/j.indcrop.2008.01.007 ↗
32. Zhang J, Chen S, Su J, Shi X, Jin J, Wang X, Xu Z (2009) Non-isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behavior of eaa with different acrylic acid content. J Therm Anal Calorim 97(3):959–96710.1007/s10973-009-0014-7 ↗