DataVXCellulosePaper
journal article·2024-12

Chemo-enzymatic pre-treatment of eucalyptus kraft pulp for phosphorylated nanocellulose production

Isidora Reyes-González, Isabel Carrillo-Varela, Andre Mazega, Quim Tarrés, Marc Delgado-Aguilar, Regis Teixeira Mendonҫa

Cellulose· Volume 31· Issue 18
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Nanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Biofuel production and bioconversion · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. Ablouh EH, Brouillette F, Taourirte M et al (2021) A highly efficient chemical approach to producing green phosphorylated cellulosic macromolecules. RSC Adv 11:24206–24216. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA02713A10.1039/D1RA02713A ↗
2. Ablouh EH, Kassab Z, Hassani FZSA et al (2022) Phosphorylated cellulose paper as highly efficient adsorbent for cadmium heavy metal ion removal in aqueous solutions. RSC Adv 12(2):1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA08060A10.1039/D1RA08060A ↗
3. Aguado R, Lourenço AF, Ferreira PJT et al (2019) The relevance of the pretreatment on the chemical modification of cellulosic fibers. Cellulose 26:5925–5936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02517-710.1007/s10570-019-02517-7 ↗
4. Ait A, Kassab Z, Nadifiyine M et al (2021) Extraction, characterization and chemical functionalization of phosphorylated cellulose derivatives from Giant Reed Plant. Cellulose 28(8):4625–4642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03842-610.1007/s10570-021-03842-6 ↗
5. Arfelis S, Aguado RJ, Civancik D et al (2023) Sustainability of cellulose micro-/nanofibers: a comparative life cycle assessment of pathway technologies. Sci Total Environ 874:162482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16248210.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162482 ↗
6. Aulin C, Ström GR (2013) Multilayered alkyd resin/nanocellulose coatings for use in renewable packaging solutions with a high level of moisture resistance. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:2582–2589. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie301785a10.1021/ie301785a ↗
7. Balea A, Fuente E, Tarrés Q et al (2021) Influence of pretreatment and mechanical nanofibrillation energy on properties of nanofibers from Aspen cellulose. Cellulose 28:9187–9206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04109-w10.1007/s10570-021-04109-w ↗
8. Balkissoon S, Andrew J, Sithole B (2023) Dissolving wood pulp production: a review. Biomass Convers Biorefin 13:16607–16642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-022-02442-z10.1007/s13399-022-02442-z ↗
9. Banvillet G, Depres G, Belgacem N et al (2021) Alkaline treatment combined with enzymatic hydrolysis for efficient cellulose nanofibrils production. Carbohydr Polym 255:117383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11738310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117383 ↗
10. Bedane AH, Eić M, Farmahini-Farahani M et al (2015) Water vapor transport properties of regenerated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose films. J Membr Sci 493:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.00910.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.009 ↗
11. Bezerra RDS, Silva MMF, Morais AIS et al (2014) Phosphated cellulose as an efficient biomaterial for aqueous drug ranitidine removal. Materials 7(12):7907–792410.3390/ma7127907 ↗
12. Blanco A, Monte MC, Campano C et al (2018) Nanocellulose for industrial use: cellulose nanofibers (CNF), cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), and bacterial cellulose (BC). In: Handbook of nanomaterials for industrial applications. Elsevier, pp 74–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813351-4.00005-510.1016/B978-0-12-813351-4.00005-5 ↗
13. Bondancia TJ, Florencio C, Baccarin GS, Farinas CS (2022) Cellulose nanostructures obtained using enzymatic cocktails with different compositions. Int J Biol Macromol 207:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.00710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.007 ↗
14. Booya E, Gorospe K, Ghaednia H et al (2019) Free and restrained plastic shrinkage of cementitious materials made of engineered kraft pulp fibres. Constr Build Mater 212:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.29610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.296 ↗
15. Budtova T, Navard P (2016) Cellulose in NaOH–water based solvents: a review. Cellulose 23:5–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0779-810.1007/s10570-015-0779-8 ↗
16. Carrillo-Varela I, Pereira M, Mendonça RT (2018) Determination of polymorphic changes in cellulose from Eucalyptus spp. fibres after alkalization. Cellulose 25:6831–6845. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2060-410.1007/s10570-018-2060-4 ↗
17. Carrillo-Varela I, Retamal R, Pereira M et al (2019) Structure and reactivity of cellulose from bleached kraft pulps of different Eucalyptus species upgraded to dissolving pulp. Cellulose 26:5731–5744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02491-010.1007/s10570-019-02491-0 ↗
18. Carrillo-Varela I, Vidal C, Vidaurre S et al (2022) Alkalization of kraft pulps from pine and eucalyptus and its effect on enzymatic saccharification and viscosity control of cellulose. Polymers 14:3127. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1415312710.3390/polym14153127 ↗
19. Carrillo-Varela I, Albornoz M, Reyes-González I et al (2024) Tailoring cellulose-based hydrogels by phosphorylation of unbleached kraft pulps for adsorption applications. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-024-06086-210.1007/s10570-024-06086-2 ↗
20. Carter N, Grant I, Dewey M et al (2021) Production and characterization of cellulose nanofiber slurries and sheets for biomedical applications. Front Nanotechnol 3:729743. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2021.72974310.3389/fnano.2021.729743 ↗
21. Ceaser R, Chimphango AFA (2021) Comparative analysis of physical and functional properties of cellulose nanofibers isolated from alkaline pre-treated wheat straw in optimized hydrochloric acid and enzymatic processes. Int J Biol Macromol 171:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.01810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.018 ↗
22. Chen C, Xu R, Chen X et al (2016) Influence of cocrystallization behavior on structure and properties of HDPE/LLDPE microporous membrane. J Polym Res 23:46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-016-0935-310.1007/s10965-016-0935-3 ↗
23. Ciolacu D, Gorgieva S, Tampu D et al (2011) Enzymatic hydrolysis of different allomorphic forms of microcrystalline cellulose. Cellulose 18:1527–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9601-410.1007/s10570-011-9601-4 ↗
24. Daicho K, Kobayashi K, Fujisawa S et al (2021) Recovery of the irreversible crystallinity of nanocellulose by crystallite fusion: a strategy for achieving efficient energy transfers in sustainable biopolymer skeletons. Angew Chem Int Ed 60:24630–24636. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20211003210.1002/anie.202110032 ↗
25. Engström A-C, Ek M, Henriksson G (2006) Improved accessibility and reactivity of dissolving pulp for the viscose process: pretreatment with monocomponent endoglucanase. Biomacromol 7(6):2027–2031. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050972510.1021/bm0509725 ↗
26. Farhat W, Venditti R, Quick A et al (2017) Hemicellulose extraction and characterization for applications in paper coatings and adhesives. Ind Crops Prod 107:370–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.05510.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.055 ↗
27. Fernandes A, Cruz-Lopes L, Esteves B et al (2023) Nanotechnology applied to cellulosic materials. Materials (Basel) 16(8):3104. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1608310410.3390/ma16083104 ↗
28. Ghanadpour M, Carosio F, Larsson PT et al (2015) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibrils: a renewable nanomaterial for the preparation of intrinsically flame-retardant materials. Biomacromol 16:3399–3410. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b0111710.1021/acs.biomac.5b01117 ↗
29. Goswami R, Singh S, Narasimhappa P et al (2024) Nanocellulose: a comprehensive review investigating its potential as an innovative material for water remediation. Int J Biol Macromol 254:127465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12746510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127465 ↗
30. Hadid M, Noukrati H, Barroug A et al (2021) Phosphorylated cellulose for water purification: a promising material with outstanding adsorption capacity towards methylene blue. Cellulose 28:7893–7908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04012-410.1007/s10570-021-04012-4 ↗
31. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA et al (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
32. Hou G, Zhao S, Peng L et al (2022) A systematic study for the structures and properties of phosphorylated pulp fibers prepared under various conditions. Cellulose 29:7365–7376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04713-410.1007/s10570-022-04713-4 ↗
33. Hutterer C, Kliba G, Punz M et al (2017) Enzymatic pulp upgrade for producing high-value cellulose out of a Kraft paper pulp. Enzyme Microb Technol 102:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.03.01410.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.03.014 ↗
34. Ibrahim AM, Hamouda RA, El-Naggar NE-A et al (2021) Bioprocess development for enhanced endoglucanase production by newly isolated bacteria, purification, characterization and in-vitro efficacy as anti-biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep 11:9754. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87901-910.1038/s41598-021-87901-9 ↗
35. Ji Y, Peng Y, Strand A et al (2018) Fiber evolution during alkaline treatment and its impact on handsheet properties. BioResources 13:7310–7324. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.4.7310-732410.15376/biores.13.4.7310-7324 ↗
36. Khakalo A, Jaiswal AK, Kumar V et al (2021) Production of high-solid-content fire-retardant phosphorylated cellulose microfibrils. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(36):12365–12375. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0440310.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04403 ↗
37. Klemm D, Cranston ED, Fischer D et al (2018) Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: today’s state. Mater Today 21:720–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 ↗
38. Kokol V, Božič M, Vogrinčič R et al (2015) Characterisation and properties of homo-and heterogenously phosphorylated nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym 125:301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2015.02.056 ↗
39. Kunusa WR, Isa I, Laliyo LA et al (2018) FTIR, XRD and SEM analysis of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) fibers from corncorbs in alkaline treatment. J Phys Conf Ser 1028:012199. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/01219910.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012199 ↗
40. Lehtonen J, Hassinen J, Kumar AA et al (2020) Phosphorylated cellulose nanofibers exhibit exceptional capacity for uranium capture. Cellulose 27:10719–10732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-02971-810.1007/s10570-020-02971-8 ↗
41. Leppänen I, Vikman M, Harlin A et al (2020) Enzymatic degradation and pilot-scale composting of cellulose-based films with different chemical structures. J Polym Environ 28:458–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01621-w10.1007/s10924-019-01621-w ↗
42. Martins CCN, Dias MC, Mascarenhas ARP et al (2023) Phosphorylation as a means to reduce energy consumption for fibrillation when producing micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose from unbleached Eucalyptus sp. pulps. Eur J Wood Wood Prod 81(5):1291–1304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-023-01959-y10.1007/s00107-023-01959-y ↗
43. Mazega A, Signori-Iamin G, Aguado RJ et al (2023) Enzymatic pretreatment for cellulose nanofiber production: understanding morphological changes and predicting reducing sugar concentration. Int J Biol Macromol 253:127054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12705410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.127054 ↗
44. Mittal A, Katahira R, Himmel ME et al (2011) Effects of alkaline or liquid-ammonia treatment on crystalline cellulose: changes in crystalline structure and effects on enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-4-4110.1186/1754-6834-4-41 ↗
45. Mulin LB, Martins CCN, Dias MC, dos Santos AdA et al (2023) Effect of phosphorylation on the production of cellulose nanofibrils from Eucalyptus sp. Ind Crops Prod 193:116173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11617310.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116173 ↗
46. Nagl M, Haske-Cornelius O, Skopek L et al (2022) Mechanistic investigation of the effect of endoglucanases related to pulp refining. Cellulose 29(4):2579–2598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04386-510.1007/s10570-021-04386-5 ↗
47. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
48. Newman RH (2004) Carbon-13 NMR evidence for cocrystallization of cellulose as a mechanism for hornification of bleached kraft pulp. Cellulose 11:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CELL.0000014768.28924.0c10.1023/B:CELL.0000014768.28924.0c ↗
49. Noguchi Y, Homma I, Matsubara Y (2017) Complete nanofibrillation of cellulose prepared by phosphorylation. Cellulose 24:1295–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1191-310.1007/s10570-017-1191-3 ↗
50. Parihar A, Vongsvivut J, Bhattacharya S (2019) Synchrotron-based infra-red spectroscopic insights on thermo-catalytic conversion of cellulosic feedstock to levoglucosenone and furans. ACS Omega 4(5):8747–8757. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0368110.1021/acsomega.8b03681 ↗
51. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME et al (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-1010.1186/1754-6834-3-10 ↗
52. Patoary MK, Islam SR, Farooq A et al (2023) Phosphorylation of nanocellulose: state of the art and prospects. Ind Crops Prod 201:116965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11696510.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116965 ↗
53. Pirich CL, Picheth GF, Fontes AM et al (2020) Disruptive enzyme-based strategies to isolate nanocelluloses: a review. Cellulose 27:5457–5475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03185-810.1007/s10570-020-03185-8 ↗
54. Randhawa A, Dutta SD, Ganguly K et al (2022) A review of properties of nanocellulose, its synthesis, and potential in biomedical applications. Appl Sci 12:7090. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1214709010.3390/app12147090 ↗
55. Rodríguez-Fabià S, Zarna C, Chinga-Carrasco G (2023) A comparative study of kraft pulp fibres and the corresponding fibrillated materials as reinforcement of LDPE- and HDPE-biocomposites. Compos - a: Appl Sci Manuf 173:107678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10767810.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107678 ↗
56. Rol F, Sillard C, Bardet M et al (2020) Cellulose phosphorylation comparison and analysis of phosphorate position on cellulose fibers. Carbohydr Polym 229:115294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11529410.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115294 ↗
57. Rossi BR, Pellegrini VOA, Cortez AA et al (2021) Cellulose nanofibers production using a set of recombinant enzymes. Carbohydr Polym 256:117510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11751010.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117510 ↗
58. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049776910.1021/bm0497769 ↗
59. Sánchez-Gutiérrez M, Espinosa E, Bascón-Villegas I et al (2020) Production of cellulose nanofibers from olive tree harvest: a residue with wide applications. Agronomy 10:696. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy1005069610.3390/agronomy10050696 ↗
60. Sanchez-Salvador JL, Campano C, Balea A et al (2022) Critical comparison of the properties of cellulose nanofibers produced from softwood and hardwood through enzymatic, chemical and mechanical processes. Int J Biol Macromol 205:220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.02.074 ↗
61. Sang S, Zhuang X, Chen H et al (2022) Effect of supramolecular structural changes during the crystalline transformation of cellulose on its enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod 180:114687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11468710.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114687 ↗
62. Sawada D, Nishiyama Y, Shah R et al (2022) Untangling the threads of cellulose mercerization. Nat Commun 13(1):6189. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33812-w10.1038/s41467-022-33812-w ↗
63. Scherrer P (1918) Bestimmung der grösse und der inneren struktur von kolloidteilchen mittels röntgenstrahlen. Gӧtt Nachr Math Phys Klass 1918:98–100
64. Semlali F-Z, Ait Benhamou A, El Bourakadi K et al (2023) Thermo-compression process-mediated in-situ cellulose microfibers phosphorylation enables high performant cellulosic paper packaging. Chem Eng J 473:145268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14526810.1016/j.cej.2023.145268 ↗
65. Serra A, González I, Oliver-Ortega H et al (2017) Reducing the amount of catalyst in TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers: effect on properties and cost. Polymers 9:557. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym911055710.3390/polym9110557 ↗
66. Serra-Parareda F, Tarrés Q, Pèlach M et al (2021) Monitoring fibrillation in the mechanical production of lignocellulosic micro/nanofibers from bleached spruce thermomechanical pulp. Int J Biol Macromol 178:354–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.18710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.187 ↗
67. Solhi L, Guccini V, Heise K et al (2023) Understanding nanocellulose-water interactions: turning a detriment into an asset. Chem Rev 123:1925–2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0061110.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00611 ↗
68. Tahir D, Karim MRA, Hu H et al (2022) Sources, chemical functionalization, and commercial applications of nanocellulose and nanocellulose-based composites: a review. Polymers 14:4468. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1421446810.3390/polym14214468 ↗
69. Tao P, Zhang Y, Wu Z et al (2019) Enzymatic pretreatment for cellulose nanofibrils isolation from bagasse pulp: Transition of cellulose crystal structure. Carbohydr Polym 214:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.01210.1016/j.carbpol.2019.03.012 ↗
70. Wada M, Ike M, Tokuyasu K (2010) Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose I is greatly accelerated via its conversion to the cellulose II hydrate form. Polym Degrad Stab 95:543–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.01410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2009.12.014 ↗
71. Zainudin MHM, Mustapha NA, Hassan MA et al (2019) A highly thermostable crude endoglucanase produced by a newly isolated Thermobifida fusca strain UPMC 901. Sci Rep 9:13526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50126-y10.1038/s41598-019-50126-y ↗
72. Zhang J, Cai D, Qin Y et al (2020) High value-added monomer chemicals and functional bio-based materials derived from polymeric components of lignocellulose by organosolv fractionation. Biofuel Bioprod Biorefin 14:371–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.205710.1002/bbb.2057 ↗