DataVXCellulosePaper
journal article·2024-12

Assessment for industrial production of poplar ethanol after analysis of influencing factors and predicted yield

Xiaoyu Pei, Meishan Fan, Hongdan Zhang, Jun Xie

Cellulose· Volume 31· Issue 18
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biofuel production and bioconversion · Bioenergy crop production and management · Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (81)

Show source-provided references
1. Adesina OA, Taiwo AE, Akintola O, Igbafe AI (2023) Optimization of process variables for metallic nanoparticle inclusion in bioethanol synthesis of sug-ar cane bagasse. Biofuels 14:655–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2023.216495710.1080/17597269.2023.2164957 ↗
2. Agbor VB, Cicek N, Sparling R et al (2011) Biomass pretreatment: Fundamen-tals toward application. Biotechnol Adv 29:675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.00510.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.005 ↗
3. Aguilar-Reynosa A, Romaní A, Rodríguez-Jasso RM et al (2017) Comparison of microwave and conduction-convection heating autohydrolysis pretreatmen-t for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 243:273–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.09610.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.096 ↗
4. Bao YL, Yan ZC, Wang HL, Chen L (2011) Optimization of bioethanol production during simultaneous saccharification and fermentation in very high-gravity cassava mash. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 99:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-010-9494-510.1007/s10482-010-9494-5 ↗
5. Betiku E, Taiwo AE (2015) Modeling and optimization of bioethanol productio-n from breadfruit starch hydrolyzate vis-à-vis response surface methodolog-y and artificial neural network. Renew Energy 74:87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.07.05410.1016/j.renene.2014.07.054 ↗
6. Bonfiglio F, Cagno M, Rey F et al (2019) Pretreatment of switchgrass by stea-m explosion in a semi-continuous pre-pilot reactor. Biomass Bioenerg 121:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.01310.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.013 ↗
7. Branciforti MC, Yang H-S, Hafez I et al (2019) Morphological and rheological behaviors of micro-nanofibrillated NaOH-pretreated Aspen wood. Cellulose 26:4601–4614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02389-x10.1007/s10570-019-02389-x ↗
8. Chen X, Kuhn E, Jennings EW et al (2016) DMR (deacetylation and mechani-cal refining) processing of corn stover achieves high monomeric sugar con-centrations (230 g L−1) during enzymatic hydrolysis and high ethanol con-centrations (>10% v/v) during fermentation without hydrolysate purificatio-n or concentration. Energy Environ Sci 9:1237–1245. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE03718B10.1039/C5EE03718B ↗
9. Chohan NA, Aruwajoye GS, Sewsynker-Sukai Y, Gueguim Kana EB (2020) Va-lorisation of potato peel wastes for bioethanol production using simultaneo-us saccharification and fermentation: process optimization and kinetic asse-ssment. Renew Energy 146:1031–1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.04210.1016/j.renene.2019.07.042 ↗
10. Chouaibi M, Daoued KB, Riguane K et al (2020) Production of bioethanol fro-m pumpkin peel wastes: comparison between response surface methodolo-gy (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Ind Crops Prod 155:112822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11282210.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112822 ↗
11. Choudhary J, Singh S, Sharma A et al (2018) Complementary effect of therm-otolerant yeast and cold active cellulase on simultaneous saccharification a-nd fermentation for bioethanol production from rice straw. J Renew Sustain Ener 10:043102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.504332210.1063/1.5043322 ↗
12. Chovau S, Degrauwe D, Van Der Bruggen B (2013) Critical analysis of techno-economic estimates for the production cost of lignocellulosic bio-ethanol. Ren-Ew Sust Energ Rev 26:307–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.06410.1016/j.rser.2013.05.064 ↗
13. Corrales RCNR, Mendes FMT, Perrone CC et al (2012) Structural evaluation of sugar cane bagasse steam pretreated in the presence of CO2 and SO2. Biot-Echnol Biofuels 5:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-5-3610.1186/1754-6834-5-36 ↗
14. Cui M-J, Hu Y-P, Li B-Y, Wang R-X (2023) Effects of non-ionic surfactants o-n bioethanol production using extracted cellulose from wheat straw and ki-netic studies. Biomass Conv Bioref 13:2217–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01421-010.1007/s13399-021-01421-0 ↗
15. Da Silva ARG, Errico M, Rong B-G (2018) Evaluation of organosolv pretreat-ment for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: solvent recycl-e and process integration. Biomass Convers Bior 8:397–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0292-410.1007/s13399-017-0292-4 ↗
16. Den Haan R, Van Rensburg E, Rose SH et al (2015) Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.00310.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.003 ↗
17. Fan M, Li C, Dai T et al (2023) Understanding the influences of poplar recal-citrance during combinatorial pretreatment on ethanol production. Fuel Process Technol 242:107636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.10763610.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107636 ↗
18. Fang H, Li C, Zhao J, Zhao C (2021) Biotechnological advances and trends i-n engineering Trichoderma reesei towards Cellulase Hyperproducer. Biotechnol Bioproc E 26:517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-020-0243-y10.1007/s12257-020-0243-y ↗
19. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorph-s. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
20. French AD (2022) How crystalline is my cellulose specimen? Probing the Li-mits of X-ray diffraction. BioResources 17:5557–556110.15376/biores.17.4.5557-5561 ↗
21. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y ↗
22. Ganguly P, Das P (2022) Integral approach for second-generation bio-ethanol production and wastewater treatment using peanut shell waste: yield, removal, and ANN studies. Biomass Convers Biorefin. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-02277-010.1007/s13399-021-02277-0 ↗
23. Han J, Moraga C (1995) The influence of the sigmoid function parameters on the speed of backpropagation learning. In: Mira J, Sandoval F (eds) From natu-ral to artificial neural computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 195–20110.1007/3-540-59497-3_175 ↗
24. Han X, Zhang X, Dai T et al (2023) Enhancing the co-production of sugars f-rom sugarcane bagasse via CuCl2-catalyzed organosolv pretreatment and a-dditives. Fuel Process Technol 241:107629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.10762910.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107629 ↗
25. Helle SS, Duff SJB, Cooper DG (1993) Effect of surfactants on cellulose hydr-olysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 42:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26042050910.1002/bit.260420509 ↗
26. Hossain MS, Theodoropoulos C, Yousuf A (2019) Techno-economic evaluation of heat integrated second generation bioethanol and furfural coproduction. Bioc-Hem Eng J 144:89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2019.01.01710.1016/j.bej.2019.01.017 ↗
27. Huang Y, Qin X, Luo X-M et al (2015) Efficient enzymatic hydrolysis and si-multaneous saccharification and fermentation of sugarcane bagasse pulp for ethanol production by cellulase from Penicillium oxalicum EU2106 and th-ermotolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae ZM1-5. Biomass Bioenerg 77:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.02010.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.020 ↗
28. Huang X, Fan M, Xie J et al (2022) High titer ethanol production from popla-r by aluminum chloride catalyzed organosolv pretreatment and simultaneou-s saccharification and fermentation. Ind Crops Prod 181:114803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11480310.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114803 ↗
29. Humbird D, Davis R, Tao L, et al (2011) Process design and economics for biochemical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol: dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover10.2172/1013269 ↗
30. IEA (2024) CO2 Emissions in 2023, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2023
31. Imtiaz U, Assadzadeh A, Jamuar SS, Sahu JN (2013) Bioreactor temperature p-rofile controller using inverse neural network (INN) for production of eth-anol. J Process Control 23:731–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.03.00510.1016/j.jprocont.2013.03.005 ↗
32. Jönsson LJ, Martín C (2016) Pretreatment of lignocellulose: formation of inhib-itory by-products and strategies for minimizing their effects. Bioresour Technol 199:103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.00910.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.009 ↗
33. Jugwanth Y, Sewsynker-Sukai Y, Gueguim Kana EB (2020) Valorization of sug-arcane bagasse for bioethanol production through simultaneous saccharifica-tion and fermentation: optimization and kinetic studies. Fuel 262:116552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.11655210.1016/j.fuel.2019.116552 ↗
34. Kautto J, Realff M, Ragauskas A, Kässi T (2014) Economic analysis of an or-ganosolv process for bioethanol production. BioResources 9:6041–607210.15376/biores.9.4.6041-6072 ↗
35. Keshav PK, Banoth C, Kethavath SN, Bhukya B (2023) Lignocellulosic ethanol production from cotton stalk: an overview on pretreatment, saccharificatio-n and fermentation methods for improved bioconversion process. Biomass Convers Bior 13:4477–4493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01468-z10.1007/s13399-021-01468-z ↗
36. Khaleghian H, Karimi K, Behzad T (2015) Ethanol production from rice straw by sodium carbonate pretreatment and Mucor hiemalis fermentation. Ind Crops Prod 76:1079–1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.00810.1016/j.indcrop.2015.08.008 ↗
37. Kim S, Holtzapple MT (2005) Lime pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stover. Bioresour Technol 96:1994–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.01410.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.014 ↗
38. Krause DJ (2023) The evolution of anaerobic growth in Saccharomycotina yeas-ts. Yeast 40:395–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.389010.1002/yea.3890 ↗
39. Krawczykowski D, Krawczykowska A, Trybalski K (2012) Laser particle size a-nalysis - the influence of density and particle shape on measurement resul-ts. Gospod Surowcami Miner - Miner Resour Manag 28:101–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10269-012-0033-z10.2478/v10269-012-0033-z ↗
40. Kundu C, Samudrala SP, Kibria MA, Bhattacharya S (2021) One-step peracetic acid pretreatment of hardwood and softwood biomass for platform chemica-ls production. Sci Rep 11:11183. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90667-910.1038/s41598-021-90667-9 ↗
41. Li C, Fan M, Xie J, Zhang H (2023) Effect of NaOH-catalyzed organosolv pr-etreatment on the co-production of ethanol and xylose from poplar. Ind Crops Prod 200:116774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.11677410.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116774 ↗
42. Liu G, Bao J (2017) Maximizing cellulosic ethanol potentials by minimizing w-astewater generation and energy consumption: competing with corn ethano-l. Bioresour Technol 245:18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.07010.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.070 ↗
43. Liu Z-H, Chen H-Z (2016) Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation f-or improving the xylose utilization of steam exploded corn stover at high solid loading. Bioresour Technol 201:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.02310.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.023 ↗
44. Lloyd TA, Wyman CE (2005) Combined sugar yields for dilute sulfuric acid p-retreatment of corn stover followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the remain-ing solids. Bioresour Technol 96:1967–1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.01110.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.011 ↗
45. Masiero SS, Peretti A, Trierweiler LF, Trierweiler JO (2014) Simultaneous cold hydrolysis and fermentation of fresh sweet potato. Biomass Bioenergy 70:174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.08.00710.1016/j.biombioe.2014.08.007 ↗
46. Md Razali N, Ibrahim M, Kamal Bahrin E, Abd-Aziz S (2018) Optimisation o-f simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) for biobutanol pr-oduction using pretreated oil palm empty fruit bunch. Molecules 23:1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2308194410.3390/molecules23081944 ↗
47. Mondal P, Sadhukhan AK, Ganguly A, Gupta P (2021) Optimization of process parameters for bio-enzymatic and enzymatic saccharification of waste brok-en rice for ethanol production using response surface methodology and art-ificial neural network–genetic algorithm. 3Biotech 11:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02553-210.1007/s13205-020-02553-2 ↗
48. Moniruzzaman M, Ono T (2013) Separation and characterization of cellulose fi-bers from cypress wood treated with ionic liquid prior to laccase treatmen-t. Bioresour Technol 127:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.11310.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.113 ↗
49. Mosier N (2005) Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignoce-llulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96:673–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.02510.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 ↗
50. Noori MS, Karimi K (2016) Detailed study of efficient ethanol prod-uction from elmwood by alkali pretreatment. Biochem Eng J 105:197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.09.01910.1016/j.bej.2015.09.019 ↗
51. Nuanpeng S, Thanonkeo S, Klanrit P et al (2023) Optimization conditions for ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice by thermotolerant yeast saccha-romyces cerevisiae: using a statistical experimental design. Fermentation 9:450. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation905045010.3390/fermentation9050450 ↗
52. Ofori-Boateng C, Lee KT (2014) Same-vessel enzymatic saccharification and fe-rmentation of organosolv/H2O2 pretreated oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jac-q.) fronds for bioethanol production: Optimization of process parameters. Energ Con-Vers Manage 78:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.07510.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.075 ↗
53. Panichikkal AF, Prakasan P, Kizhakkepowathial Nair U, Kulangara Valappil M (2018) Optimization of parameters for the production of biodiesel from rub-ber seed oil using onsite lipase by response surface methodology. 3Biotech 8:459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1477-710.1007/s13205-018-1477-7 ↗
54. Pasandideh SHR, Niaki STA (2006) Multi-response simulation optimization usin-g genetic algorithm within desirability function framework. Appl Math Comput 175:366–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2005.07.02310.1016/j.amc.2005.07.023 ↗
55. Pereira LMS, Milan TM, Tapia-Blácido DR (2021) Using Response Surface Me-thodology (RSM) to optimize 2G bioethanol production: a review. Biomass Bi-Oenerg 151:106166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.10616610.1016/j.biombioe.2021.106166 ↗
56. Quijada-Maldonado E, Aelmans TAM, Meindersma GW, De Haan AB (2013) P-ilot plant validation of a rate-based extractive distillation model for water–ethanol separation with the ionic liquid [emim][DCA] as solvent. Chem Eng J 223:287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.02.11110.1016/j.cej.2013.02.111 ↗
57. Raja Sathendra E, Baskar G, Praveenkumar R, Gnansounou E (2019) Bioethano-l production from palm wood using Trichoderma reesei and Kluveromyces mar-xianus. Bioresour Technol 271:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.13410.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.134 ↗
58. Ray A, Halder T, Jena S et al (2020) Application of artificial neural network (ANN) model for prediction and optimization of coronarin D content in Hedyc-hium coronarium. Ind Crops Prod 146:112186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11218610.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112186 ↗
59. Salari R, Salari R (2017) Investigation of the Best Saccharomyces cerevisiae G-rowth condition. Electron Physician 9:3592–3597. https://doi.org/10.19082/359210.19082/3592 ↗
60. Sebayang AH, Masjuki HH, Ong HC et al (2017) Optimization of bioethanol production from sorghum grains using artificial neural networks integrated with ant colony. Ind Crops Prod 97:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.06410.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.064 ↗
61. Sewsynker-Sukai Y, Gueguim Kana EB (2018) Simultaneous saccharification an-d bioethanol production from corn cobs: Process optimization and kinetic studies. Bioresour Technol 262:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.05610.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.056 ↗
62. Shen F, Liu R, Wang T (2009) Effects of temperature, pH, agitation and part-icles stuffing rate on fermentation of sorghum stalk juice to ethanol. E-Nergy Sources Part A 31:646–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/1556703080190129910.1080/15567030801901299 ↗
63. Sivarathnakumar S, Jayamuthunagai J, Baskar G et al (2019) Bioethanol produ-ction from woody stem Prosopis juliflora using thermo tolerant yeast Klu-yveromyces marxianus and its kinetics studies. Bioresour Technol 293:122060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12206010.1016/j.biortech.2019.122060 ↗
64. Sun D, Zhang J, Wu J, Dong P (2021) A hybrid model for evaluating the sawability of stones through the performance of frame sawing machine. Measurement 181:109588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10958810.1016/j.measurement.2021.109588 ↗
65. Taiwo AE, Musonge P (2023) Comparative evaluation of bioethanol fermentatio-n process parameters using RSM, ANN and ANFIS. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefi-n 17:961–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.249010.1002/bbb.2490 ↗
66. Taiwo A, Madzimbamuto T, Ojumu T (2018) Optimization of corn steep liqu-or dosage and other fermentation parameters for ethanol production by sacc-haromyces cerevisiae type 1 and anchor instant yeast. Energies 11:1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1107174010.3390/en11071740 ↗
67. Tan L, Zhong J, Jin Y-L et al (2020) Production of bioethanol from unwashed-pretreated rapeseed straw at high solid loading. Bioresour Technol 303:122949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.12294910.1016/j.biortech.2020.122949 ↗
68. Thitiprasert S, Pimtong V, Kodama K et al (2016) Correlative effect of dissolv-ed oxygen and key enzyme inhibitors responsible for l-lactate production by immobilized Rhizopus oryzae NRRL395 cultivated in a static bed biore-actor. Process Biochem 51:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2015.11.03410.1016/j.procbio.2015.11.034 ↗
69. Wang J, Fishwild SJ, Begel M, Zhu JY (2020) Properties of densified poplar wood through partial delignification with alkali and acid pretreatment. J Mater Sci 55:14664–14676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05034-210.1007/s10853-020-05034-2 ↗
70. Wooley RJ, Putsche V (1996) Development of an ASPEN PLUS physical prop-erty database for biofuels components. United States10.2172/257362 ↗
71. Wu Z, Peng K, Zhang Y et al (2022) Lignocellulose dissociation with biologic-al pretreatment towards the biochemical platform: a review. Mater Today Bio 16:100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.10044510.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100445 ↗
72. Yan Z, Li J, Li S et al (2015) Impact of lignin removal on the enzymatic hy-drolysis of fermented sweet sorghum bagasse. Appl Energ 160:641–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.07010.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.070 ↗
73. Yang H, Li J, Xu J, Mo L (2016) The critical analysis of catalytic steam E-xplosion pretreatment of corn stalk, lignin degradation, recovery, and C-haracteristic variations. BioResources 12:344–361. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.12.1.344-36110.15376/biores.12.1.344-361 ↗
74. Yang Q, Ying W, Wen P et al (2021) Delignification of poplar for xylooligosa-ccharides production using lactic acid catalysis. Bioresour Technol 342:125943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.12594310.1016/j.biortech.2021.125943 ↗
75. You Y, Zhou Z, Zhao P et al (2016) Comparison of pretreatment methods for production of ethanol from sugarcane bagasse. BioResources 11:2297–2307. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.1.2297-230710.15376/biores.11.1.2297-2307 ↗
76. Yu M, Li J, Chang S et al (2014) Optimization of ethanol production from N-aOH-pretreated solid state fermented sweet sorghum bagasse. Energies 7:4054–4067. https://doi.org/10.3390/en707405410.3390/en7074054 ↗
77. Zhang W, Lin Y, Zhang Q et al (2013) Optimisation of simultaneous saccharif-ication and fermentation of wheat straw for ethanol production. Fuel 112:331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.06410.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.064 ↗
78. Zhang H, Zhang J, Xie J, Qin Y (2020) Effects of NaOH-catalyzed organosolv pretreatment and surfactant on the sugar production from sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 312:123601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.12360110.1016/j.biortech.2020.123601 ↗
79. Zhao X, Liu D (2019) Multi-products co-production improves the economic fea-sibility of cellulosic ethanol: a case of Formiline pretreatment-based biore-fining. Appl Energ 250:229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.04510.1016/j.apenergy.2019.05.045 ↗
80. Zhao X, Moates GK, Elliston A et al (2015) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam exploded duckweed: Improvement of the ethanol yi-eld by increasing yeast titre. Bioresour Technol 194:263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.13110.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.131 ↗
81. Zhu J, Chen L, Gleisner R, Zhu JY (2019) Co-production of bioethanol and fu-rfural from poplar wood via low temperature (≤90 °C) acid hydrotropic fr-actionation (AHF). Fuel 254:115572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.15510.1016/j.fuel.2019.05.155 ↗