DataVXCellulosePaper
journal article·2025-03

A systematic review on cellulose based hydrogels for anti-microbial applications

Gaurav Sharma, Yaksha Verma, Amit Kumar, Pooja Dhiman, F. J. Stadler

Cellulose· Volume 32· Issue 5
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Polymers

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications · Advanced Drug Delivery Systems · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Abdelaziz AM, Dacrory S, Hashem AH, Attia MS, Hasanin M, Fouda HM et al (2021) Protective role of zinc oxide nanoparticles based hydrogel against wilt disease of pepper plant. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 35:102083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.10208310.1016/j.bcab.2021.102083 ↗
2. Abdelhamid HN, Mathew AP (2021) Cellulose-Based Materials for Water Remediation: Adsorption, Catalysis, and Antifouling. Front Chem Eng 3:790314. https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2021.79031410.3389/fceng.2021.790314 ↗
3. Abdelhamid HN, Mathew AP (2022) Cellulose-based nanomaterials advance biomedicine: a review. Int j Mol Sci 23:5405. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2310540510.3390/ijms23105405 ↗
4. Adewumi A, Ogunjinmi A (2011) The healing potential of honey and propolis lotion on septic wounds. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 1:S55–S57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60123-810.1016/S2221-1691(11)60123-8 ↗
5. Ahmad M, Manzoor K, Ahmad S, Ikram S (2018) Preparation, kinetics, thermodynamics, and mechanism evaluation of thiosemicarbazide modified green carboxymethyl cellulose as an efficient Cu (II) adsorbent. J Chem Eng Data 63:1905–1916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.7b0100810.1021/acs.jced.7b01008 ↗
6. Ahmed EM (2015) Hydrogel: Preparation, characterization, and applications: a review. J Adv Res 6:105–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.00610.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 ↗
7. Akter M, Bhattacharjee M, Dhar AK, Rahman FBA, Haque S, Rashid TU et al (2021) Cellulose-based hydrogels for wastewater treatment: a concise review. Gels 7:30. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels701003010.3390/gels7010030 ↗
8. Alavi M (2019) Modifications of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC), and nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) for antimicrobial and wound healing applications. e-Polymers 19:103–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/epoly-2019-001310.1515/epoly-2019-0013 ↗
9. Al-Enizi AM, Ahamad T, Al-Hajji AB, Ahmed J, Chaudhary AA, Alshehri SM (2018) Cellulose gum and copper nanoparticles based hydrogel as antimicrobial agents against urinary tract infection (UTI) pathogens. Int J Biol Macromol 109:803–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.05710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.057 ↗
10. Alshehri SM, Aldalbahi A, Al-Hajji AB, Chaudhary AA, In Het Panhuis M, Alhokbany N et al (2016a) Development of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel and nanosilver composite as antimicrobial agents for UTI pathogens. Carbohydr Polym 138:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.004 ↗
11. Alshehri SM, Aldalbahi A, Al-Hajji AB, Chaudhary AA, Panhuis MIH, Alhokbany N et al (2016b) Development of carboxymethyl cellulose-based hydrogel and nanosilver composite as antimicrobial agents for UTI pathogens. Carbohydr Polym 138:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.00410.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.004 ↗
12. Altiok D, Altiok E, Tihminlioglu F (2010) Physical, antibacterial and antioxidant properties of chitosan films incorporated with thyme oil for potential wound healing applications. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:2227–2236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4065-x10.1007/s10856-010-4065-x ↗
13. Anagha B, George D, Maheswari PU, Begum KMS (2019) Biomass derived antimicrobial hybrid cellulose hydrogel with green ZnO nanoparticles for curcumin delivery and its kinetic modelling. J Polym Environ 27:2054–2067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-019-01495-y10.1007/s10924-019-01495-y ↗
14. Angajala G, Pavan P, Subashini R (2014) One-step biofabrication of copper nanoparticles from Aegle marmelos correa aqueous leaf extract and evaluation of its anti-inflammatory and mosquito larvicidal efficacy. RSC Adv 4:51459–51470. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA10003D10.1039/C4RA10003D ↗
15. Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL (1984) Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 223:283–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.223.4633.28310.1126/science.223.4633.283 ↗
16. Babaluei M, Mojarab Y, Mottaghitalab F, Farokhi M (2023) Injectable hydrogel based on silk fibroin/carboxymethyl cellulose/agarose containing polydopamine functionalized graphene oxide with conductivity, hemostasis, antibacterial, and anti-oxidant properties for full-thickness burn healing. Int J Biol Macromol 249:126051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12605110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126051 ↗
17. Bao Y, He J, Song K, Guo J, Zhou X, Liu S (2022) Functionalization and antibacterial applications of cellulose-based composite hydrogels. Polymers 14:769. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1404076910.3390/polym14040769 ↗
18. Barakat A, Kamoun EA, El-Moslamy SH, Ghazy M, Fahmy A (2022) Photo-curable carboxymethylcellulose composite hydrogel as a promising biomaterial for biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol 207:1011–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.20110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.201 ↗
19. Basta AH, El-Saied H, Hasanin MS, El-Deftar MM (2018) Green carboxymethyl cellulose-silver complex versus cellulose origins in biological activity applications. Int J Biol Macromol 107:1364–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.06110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.061 ↗
20. Benhalima T, Ferfera-Harrar H, Lerari D (2017) Optimization of carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels beads generated by an anionic surfactant micelle templating for cationic dye uptake: Swelling, sorption and reusability studies. Int J Biol Macromol 105:1025–1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.13510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.07.135 ↗
21. Bethke K, Palantöken S, Andrei V, Roß M, Raghuwanshi VS, Kettemann F et al (2018) Functionalized cellulose for water purification, antimicrobial applications, and sensors. Adv Funct Mater 28:1800409. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20180040910.1002/adfm.201800409 ↗
22. Blecher K, Nasir A, Friedman A (2011) The growing role of nanotechnology in combating infectious disease. Virulence 2:395–401. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.2.5.1703510.4161/viru.2.5.17035 ↗
23. Butylina S, Geng S, Oksman K (2016) Properties of as-prepared and freeze-dried hydrogels made from poly (vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanocrystals using freeze-thaw technique. Eur Polym J 81:386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.06.02810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.06.028 ↗
24. Cangul IT, Gul NY, Topal A, Yilmaz R (2006) Evaluation of the effects of topical tripeptide-copper complex and zinc oxide on open-wound healing in rabbits. Vet Dermatol 17:417–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.2006.00551.x10.1111/j.1365-3164.2006.00551.x ↗
25. Cao VD, Nguyen PP, Khuong VQ, Nguyen CK, Nguyen XC, Dang CH et al (2014) Ultrafine copper nanoparticles exhibiting a powerful antifungal/killing activity against Corticium salmonicolor. Bull Korean Chem Soc 35:2645–2648. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2014.35.9.264510.5012/bkcs.2014.35.9.2645 ↗
26. Capanema NS, Carvalho IC, Mansur AA, Carvalho SM, Lage AP, Mansur HS (2019) Hybrid hydrogel composed of carboxymethylcellulose–silver nanoparticles–doxorubicin for anticancer and antibacterial therapies against melanoma skin cancer cells. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2:7393–7408. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b0192410.1021/acsanm.9b01924 ↗
27. Carnicero A, González A, Dalosto SD, Passeggi MC Jr, Minari RJ, Alvarez Igarzabal CI et al (2022) Ascidian-inspired supramolecular cellulose nanocomposite hydrogels with antibacterial activity. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 8:5027–5037. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0093510.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00935 ↗
28. Chang K-C, Lin D-J, Wu Y-R, Chang C-W, Chen C-H, Ko C-L et al (2019) Characterization of genipin-crosslinked gelatin/hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel membranes and loaded with hinokitiol: in vitro evaluation of antibacterial activity and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C 105:110074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.11007410.1016/j.msec.2019.110074 ↗
29. Chu S, Maples MM, Bryant SJ (2020) Cell encapsulation spatially alters crosslink density of poly (ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed from free-radical polymerizations. Acta Biomater 109:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.03310.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.033 ↗
30. Cui J, Hu C, Yang Y, Wu Y, Yang L, Wang Y et al (2012) Facile fabrication of carbonaceous nanospheres loaded with silver nanoparticles as antibacterial materials. J Mater Chem 22:8121–8126. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM16441H10.1039/C2JM16441H ↗
31. Cui X, Lee J, Ng KR, Chen WN (2021) Food waste Durian rind-derived cellulose organohydrogels: toward anti-freezing and antimicrobial wound dressing. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0770510.1021/acssuschemeng.0c07705 ↗
32. Dacrory S, Abou-Yousef H, Abou-Zeid RE, Kamel S, Abdel-Aziz MS, Elbadry M (2018a) Preparation and characterization of eco-friendly carboxymethyl cellulose antimicrobial nanocomposite hydrogels. J Renew Mater 6:536. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2017.63419010.7569/JRM.2017.634190 ↗
33. Dacrory S, Abou-Yousef H, Abouzeid RE, Kamel S, Abdel-Aziz MS, El-Badry M (2018b) Antimicrobial cellulosic hydrogel from olive oil industrial residue. Int J Biol Macromol 117:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.17910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.179 ↗
34. Das N (2013) Preparation methods and properties of hydrogel: A review. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 5:112–117
35. Davies J, Davies D (2010) Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 74:417–433. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00016-1010.1128/mmbr.00016-10 ↗
36. Demitri C, Del Sole R, Scalera F, Sannino A, Vasapollo G, Maffezzoli A et al (2008) Novel superabsorbent cellulose-based hydrogels crosslinked with citric acid. J Appl Polym Sci 110:2453–2460. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2866010.1002/app.28660 ↗
37. Deng P, Yao L, Chen J, Tang Z, Zhou J (2022) Chitosan-based hydrogels with injectable, self-healing and antibacterial properties for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 276:118718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11871810.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118718 ↗
38. Deng L, Huang Y, Chen S, Han Z, Han Z, Jin M et al (2023) Bacterial cellulose-based hydrogel with antibacterial activity and vascularization for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 308:120647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12064710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120647 ↗
39. Dharmalingam K, Bordoloi D, Kunnumakkara AB, Anandalakshmi R (2020) Preparation and characterization of cellulose-based nanocomposite hydrogel films containing CuO/Cu2O/Cu with antibacterial activity. J Appl Polym Sci 137:49216. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4921610.1002/app.49216 ↗
40. Dorman HD, Deans SG (2000) Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils. J Appl Microbiol 88:308–316. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00969.x10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00969.x ↗
41. Ducret M, Montembault A, Josse J, Pasdeloup M, Celle A, Benchrih R et al (2019) Design and characterization of a chitosan-enriched fibrin hydrogel for human dental pulp regeneration. Dent Mater 35:523–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.01810.1016/j.dental.2019.01.018 ↗
42. Dunlop MJ, Acharya B, Bissessur R (2018) Isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose from tunicates. J Environ Chem Eng 6:4408–4412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.05610.1016/j.jece.2018.06.056 ↗
43. El Fawal GF, Abu-Serie MM, Hassan MA, Elnouby MS (2018) Hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel for wound dressing: fabrication, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol 111:649–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.04010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.040 ↗
44. Elango J, Zamora-Ledezma C, Negrete-Bolagay D, Aza PND, Gómez-López VM, López-González I et al (2022) Retinol-loaded poly (vinyl alcohol)-based hydrogels as suitable biomaterials with antimicrobial properties for the proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci 23:15623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23241562310.3390/ijms232415623 ↗
45. Espitia PJP, Soares NDFF, Coimbra JSDR, De Andrade NJ, Cruz RS, EaA M (2012) Zinc oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, antimicrobial activity and food packaging applications. Food Bioproc Tech 5:1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0797-610.1007/s11947-012-0797-6 ↗
46. Fazli Y, Shariatinia Z (2017) Controlled release of cefazolin sodium antibiotic drug from electrospun chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanofibrous Mats. Mater Sci Eng C 71:641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.04810.1016/j.msec.2016.10.048 ↗
47. Fazli Y, Shariatinia Z, Kohsari I, Azadmehr A, Pourmortazavi SM (2016) A novel chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanofibrous mat designed for controlled co-release of hydrocortisone and imipenem/cilastatin drugs. Int J Pharm 513:636–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.07810.1016/j.ijpharm.2016.09.078 ↗
48. Finnegan S, Percival SL (2015) Clinical and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial hydrogels. Adv Wound Care 4:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2014.055610.1089/wound.2014.0556 ↗
49. French AD (2017) Glucose, not cellobiose, is the repeating unit of cellulose and why that is important. Cellulose 24:4605–4609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1450-310.1007/s10570-017-1450-3 ↗
50. French AD, Montgomery DW, Prevost NT, Edwards JV, Woods RJ (2021) Comparison of cellooligosaccharide conformations in complexes with proteins with energy maps for cellobiose. Carbohydr Polym 264:118004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11800410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118004 ↗
51. Gattuso G, Barreca D, Gargiulli C, Leuzzi U, Caristi C (2007) Flavonoid composition of citrus juices. Molecules 12:1641–1673. https://doi.org/10.3390/1208164110.3390/12081641 ↗
52. George J, Sabapathi S (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, functional properties, and applications. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 65:45–54. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S64386410.2147/NSA.S643864 ↗
53. George J, Ramana K, Sabapathy S, Bawa A (2005) Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-005-3574-010.1007/s11274-005-3574-0 ↗
54. George D, Maheswari PU, Begum KMS (2020) Chitosan-cellulose hydrogel conjugated with L-histidine and zinc oxide nanoparticles for sustained drug delivery: kinetics and in-vitro biological studies. Carbohydr Polym 236:116101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11610110.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116101 ↗
55. Ghorpade VS, Yadav AV, Dias RJ (2016) Citric acid crosslinked cyclodextrin/hydroxypropylmethylcellulose hydrogel films for hydrophobic drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 93:75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.07210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.08.072 ↗
56. Glazer I, Masaphy S, Marciano P, Bar-Ilan I, Holland D, Kerem Z et al (2012) Partial identification of antifungal compounds from Punica granatum peel extracts. J Agric Food Chem 60:4841–4848. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300330y10.1021/jf300330y ↗
57. Goyal S, Gupta N, Chatterjee S, Nimesh S (2017) Natural plant extracts as potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer. Curr Top Med Chem 17:96–106. https://doi.org/10.2174/156802661666616053015440710.2174/1568026616666160530154407 ↗
58. Guarda A, Rubilar JF, Miltz J, Galotto MJ (2011) The antimicrobial activity of microencapsulated thymol and carvacrol. Int J Food Microbiol 146:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.01110.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.02.011 ↗
59. Gupta A, Low WL, Radecka I, Britland ST, Mohd Amin MCI, Martin C (2016) Characterisation and in vitro antimicrobial activity of biosynthetic silver-loaded bacterial cellulose hydrogels. J Microencapsul 33:725–734. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652048.2016.125379610.1080/02652048.2016.1253796 ↗
60. Gupta A, Briffa SM, Swingler S, Gibson H, Kannappan V, Adamus G et al (2020) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles using curcumin-cyclodextrins loaded into bacterial cellulose-based hydrogels for wound dressing applications. Biomacromol 21:1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0172410.1021/acs.biomac.9b01724 ↗
61. Hajipour MJ, Fromm KM, Ashkarran AA, De Aberasturi DJ, De Larramendi IR, Rojo T et al (2012) Antibacterial properties of nanoparticles. Trends Biotechnol 30:499–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2012.06.004 ↗
62. Haleem N, Arshad M, Shahid M, Tahir MA (2014) Synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose from waste of cotton ginning industry. Carbohydr Polym 113:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.02310.1016/j.carbpol.2014.07.023 ↗
63. Han Z, Deng L, Chen S, Wang H, Huang Y (2023) Zn2+-Loaded adhesive bacterial cellulose hydrogel with angiogenic and antibacterial abilities for accelerating wound healing. Burns Trauma 11:048. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac04810.1093/burnst/tkac048 ↗
64. Harkins AL, Duri S, Kloth LC, Tran CD (2014) Chitosan–cellulose composite for wound dressing material. Part 2. Antimicrobial activity, blood absorption ability, and biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 102:1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3310310.1002/jbm.b.33103 ↗
65. Haslam E (1996) Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: possible modes of action. J Nat Prod 59:205–215. https://doi.org/10.1021/np960040+10.1021/np960040+ ↗
66. Hemraz UD, Lam E, Sunasee R (2023) Recent advances in cellulose nanocrystals-based antimicrobial agents. Carbohydr Polym 315:120987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12098710.1016/j.carbpol.2023.120987 ↗
67. Hennink WE, Van Nostrum CF (2012) Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:223–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.00910.1016/j.addr.2012.09.009 ↗
68. Hu W, Wang Z, Xiao Y, Zhang S, Wang J (2019) Advances in crosslinking strategies of biomedical hydrogels. Biomater Sci 7:843–855. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8BM01246F10.1039/C8BM01246F ↗
69. Hu W, Chen Z, Chen X, Feng K, Hu T, Huang B et al (2023) Double-network cellulose-based hybrid hydrogels with favourable biocompatibility and antibacterial activity for wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 319:121193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12119310.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121193 ↗
70. Huh AJ, Kwon YJ (2011) “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J Control Release 156:128–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.00210.1016/j.jconrel.2011.07.002 ↗
71. Ibrahim SM, El Salmawi KM, Zahran A (2007) Synthesis of crosslinked superabsorbent carboxymethyl cellulose/acrylamide hydrogels through electron-beam irradiation. J Appl Polym Sci 104:2003–2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2591610.1002/app.25916 ↗
72. Ibrahim F, Moniruzzaman M, Yusup S, Uemura Y (2015) Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquid in pressurized cell. J Mol Liq 211:370–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.04110.1016/j.molliq.2015.07.041 ↗
73. Ishii D, Tatsumi D, Matsumoto T (2008) Effect of solvent exchange on the supramolecular structure, the molecular mobility and the dissolution behavior of cellulose in LiCl/DMAc. Carbohydr Res 343:919–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.03510.1016/j.carres.2008.01.035 ↗
74. Ivask A, Elbadawy A, Kaweeteerawat C, Boren D, Fischer H, Ji Z et al (2014) Toxicity mechanisms in Escherichia coli vary for silver nanoparticles and differ from ionic silver. ACS Nano 8:374–386. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn404404710.1021/nn4044047 ↗
75. Jeong J-O, Park J-S, Kim EJ, Jeong S-I, Lee JY, Lim Y-M (2019) Preparation of radiation cross-linked poly (Acrylic acid) hydrogel containing metronidazole with enhanced antibacterial activity. Int J Mol Sci 21:187. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2101018710.3390/ijms21010187 ↗
76. Jiji S, Udhayakumar S, Rose C, Muralidharan C, Kadirvelu K (2019) Thymol enriched bacterial cellulose hydrogel as effective material for third degree burn wound repair. Int J Biol Macromol 122:452–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.19210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.192 ↗
77. Jiji S, Udhayakumar S, Maharajan K, Rose C, Muralidharan C, Kadirvelu K (2020) Bacterial cellulose matrix with in situ impregnation of silver nanoparticles via catecholic redox chemistry for third degree burn wound healing. Carbohydr Polym 245:116573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11657310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116573 ↗
78. Jin F, Liao S, Li W, Jiang C, Wei Q, Xia X et al (2023) Amphiphilic sodium alginate-polylysine hydrogel with high antibacterial efficiency in a wide pH range. Carbohydr Polym 299:120195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12019510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120195 ↗
79. Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC (2008) Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett 279:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01012.x10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.01012.x ↗
80. Joseph B, Sagarika V, Sabu C, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S (2020) Cellulose nanocomposites: fabrication and biomedical applications. J Bioresour Bioprod 5:223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobab.2020.10.00110.1016/j.jobab.2020.10.001 ↗
81. Kabir SF, Sikdar PP, Haque B, Bhuiyan MR, Ali A, Islam M (2018) Cellulose-based hydrogel materials: chemistry, properties and their prospective applications. Prog Biomater 7:153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0095-010.1007/s40204-018-0095-0 ↗
82. Khamrai M, Banerjee SL, Paul S, Samanta S, Kundu PP (2019) Curcumin entrapped gelatin/ionically modified bacterial cellulose based self-healable hydrogel film: an eco-friendly sustainable synthesis method of wound healing patch. Int J Biol Macromol 122:940–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.19610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.196 ↗
83. Khan MUA, Stojanovic GM, Hassan R, Anand TJS, Al-Ejji M, Hasan A (2023) Role of graphene oxide in bacterial cellulose− gelatin hydrogels for wound dressing applications. ACS Omega 8:15909–15919. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c0727910.1021/acsomega.2c07279 ↗
84. Khattak S, Wahid F, Liu L-P, Jia S-R, Chu L-Q, Xie Y-Y et al (2019) Applications of cellulose and chitin/chitosan derivatives and composites as antibacterial materials: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:1989–2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-09602-010.1007/s00253-018-09602-0 ↗
85. Khattak S, Qin X-T, Huang L-H, Xie Y-Y, Jia S-R, Zhong C (2021) Preparation and characterization of antibacterial bacterial cellulose/chitosan hydrogels impregnated with silver sulfadiazine. Int J Biol Macromol 189:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.15710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.157 ↗
86. Kim Y, Kim YK, Kim S, Harbottle D, Lee JW (2017) Nanostructured potassium copper hexacyanoferrate-cellulose hydrogel for selective and rapid cesium adsorption. Chem Eng J 313:1042–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.13610.1016/j.cej.2016.10.136 ↗
87. Kittler S, Greulich C, Diendorf J, Koller M, Epple M (2010) Toxicity of silver nanoparticles increases during storage because of slow dissolution under release of silver ions. Chem Mater 22:4548–4554. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm100023p10.1021/cm100023p ↗
88. Knetsch ML, Koole LH (2011) New strategies in the development of antimicrobial coatings: the example of increasing usage of silver and silver nanoparticles. Polymers 3:340–366. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym301034010.3390/polym3010340 ↗
89. Kolpak FJ, Blackwell J (1976) Determination of the structure of cellulose II. Macromolecules 9:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma60050a01910.1021/ma60050a019 ↗
90. Komatsu S, Asoh T-A, Ishihara R, Kikuchi A (2019) Fabrication of thermoresponsive degradable hydrogel made by radical polymerization of 2-methylene-1, 3-dioxepane: unique thermal coacervation in hydrogel. Polymer 179:121633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12163310.1016/j.polymer.2019.121633 ↗
91. Koneru A, Dharmalingam K, Anandalakshmi R (2020) Cellulose based nanocomposite hydrogel films consisting of sodium carboxymethylcellulose–grapefruit seed extract nanoparticles for potential wound healing applications. Int J Biol Macromol 148:833–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.01810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.018 ↗
92. Kopka B, Kost B, Rajkowska K, Pawlak A, Kunicka-Styczyńska A, Biela T et al (2021) A simple strategy for efficient preparation of networks based on poly (2-isopropenyl-2-oxazoline), poly (ethylene oxide), and selected biologically active compounds: novel hydrogels with antibacterial properties. Soft Matter 17:10683–10695. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM01066B10.1039/D1SM01066B ↗
93. Kruk T, Szczepanowicz K, Stefańska J, Socha RP, Warszyński P (2015) Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of monodisperse copper nanoparticles. Colloids Surf b: Biointerfaces 128:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.02.00910.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.02.009 ↗
94. Kurek-Górecka A, Rzepecka-Stojko A, Górecki M, Stojko J, Sosada M, Świerczek-Zięba G (2013) Structure and antioxidant activity of polyphenols derived from propolis. Molecules 19:78–101. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules1901007810.3390/molecules19010078 ↗
95. Laçin NT (2014) Development of biodegradable antibacterial cellulose based hydrogel membranes for wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol 67:22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.00310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.03.003 ↗
96. Larsson M, Hjärtstam J, Larsson A (2012) Novel nanostructured microfibrillated cellulose–hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films with large one-dimensional swelling and tunable permeability. Carbohydr Polym 88:763–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.056 ↗
97. Lethesh KC, Evjen S, Venkatraman V, Shah SN, Fiksdahl A (2020) Highly efficient cellulose dissolution by alkaline ionic liquids. Carbohydr Polym 229:115594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11559410.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115594 ↗
98. Li H, Cui R, Peng L, Cai S, Li P, Lan T (2017) Preparation of antibacterial cellulose paper using layer-by-layer assembly for cooked beef preservation at ambient temperature. Polymers 10:15. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1001001510.3390/polym10010015 ↗
99. Li S, Dong S, Xu W, Tu S, Yan L, Zhao C et al (2018) Antibacterial hydrogels. Adv Sci 5:1700527. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20170052710.1002/advs.201700527 ↗
100. Li Y, Hou X, Pan Y, Wang L, Xiao H (2020) Redox-responsive carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel for adsorption and controlled release of dye. Eur Polym J 123:109447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.10944710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109447 ↗