Durability of cellulose nanofibril films examined via residual drying stress measurement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmad Zuber SAN, Rusli A, Ismail H (2019) Effectiveness of triacetin and triethyl citrate as plasticizer in polyvinyl alcohol. Mater Today: Proc 17:560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.33510.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.335 ↗
2. Arrieta MP, Fortunati E, Dominici F, López J, Kenny JM (2015) Bionanocomposite films based on plasticized PLA–PHB/cellulosenanocrystal blends. Carbohydr Polym 121:265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.05610.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.056 ↗
3. Aulin C, Flodberg G, Ström G, Lindström T (2022) Enhanced mechanical and gas barrier performance of plasticized cellulose nanofibril films. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 37(1):138–148. https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2021-006110.1515/npprj-2021-0061 ↗
4. Azeredo HMC, Mattoso LHC, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Filho GC, Munford ML, Wood D, McHugh TH (2010) Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75:N1–N7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01386.x10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01386.x ↗
5. Benítez AJ, Lossada F, Zhu B, Rudolph T, Walther A (2016) Understanding toughness in bioinspired cellulose nanofibril/polymer nanocomposites. Biomacromol 17:2417–2426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b0053310.1021/acs.biomac.6b00533 ↗
6. Bootjomchai C, Laopaiboon R, Pencharee S, Laopaiboon J (2014) Elastic moduli of borosilicate glasses doped with heavy metal oxides. J Non Cryst Solids 388:37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.01.03910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.01.039 ↗
7. Chowdhury RA, Nuruddin M, Clarkson C, Montes F, Howarter J, Youngblood JP (2019) Cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) coatings with controlled anisotropy as high-performance gas barrier films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:1376–1383. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b1689710.1021/acsami.8b16897 ↗
8. Cindradewi AW, Bandi R, Park CW, Park JS, Lee EA, Kim JK, Kwon GJ, Han SY, Lee SH (2021) Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate film reinforced with cellulose nanofibril. Polymers 13:2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1317299010.3390/polym13172990 ↗
9. Corcoran EM (1969) Determining stresses in organic coatings using plate beam deflection. J Paint Technol 41:635–640
10. Csiszar E, Nagy S (2017) A comparative study on cellulose nanocrystals extracted from bleached cotton and flax and used for casting films with glycerol and sorbitol plasticisers. Carbohydr Polym 174:740–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.10310.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.103 ↗
11. Erdmann R, Kabasci S, Heim HP (2021) Thermal properties of plasticized cellulose acetate and its β-relaxation phenomenon. Polymers 13:1356. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1309135610.3390/polym13091356 ↗
12. Farooq M, Zou T, Riviere G, Sipponen MH, Österberg M (2019) Strong, ductile, and waterproof cellulose nanofibril composite films with colloidal lignin particles. Biomacromol 20(2):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0136410.1021/acs.biomac.8b01364 ↗
13. Fein K, Bousfield DW, Gramlich WA (2021) Processing effects on structure, strength, and barrier properties of refiner-produced cellulose nanofibril layers. ACS App Polym Mater 3:3666–3678. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.1c0062010.1021/acsapm.1c00620 ↗
14. Fernández-Santos J, Valls C, Cusola O, Roncero MB (2021) Improving filmogenic and barrier properties of nanocellulose films by addition of biodegradable plasticizers. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9:9647–9660. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0910910.1021/acssuschemeng.0c09109 ↗
15. Fernandez-Santos J, Valls C, Cusola O, Blanca Roncero M (2022) Composites of cellulose nanocrystals in combination with either cellulose nanofibril or carboxymethylcellulose as functional packaging films. Int J Biol Macromol 211:218–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.04910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.049 ↗
16. Forti ES, El Awad Azrak SM, Ng XY, Cho W, Schueneman GT, Moon RJ, Fox DM, Youngblood JP (2021) Mechanical enhancement of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) films through the addition of water-soluble polymers. Cellulose 28:6449–6465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03937-010.1007/s10570-021-03937-0 ↗
17. Greca LG, Klockars KW, Rojas OJ, Tardy BL (2023) Drying stresses to tune strength and long range order in nanocellulosic materials. Cellulose 30:8275–8286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05353-y10.1007/s10570-023-05353-y ↗
18. Hakalahtia M, Salminen A, Seppälä J, Tammelia T, Hänninen T (2015) Effect of interfibrillar PVA bridging on water stability and mechanical properties of TEMPO/NaClO2oxidized cellulosic nanofibril film. Carbohydr Polym 126:78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.00710.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.007 ↗
19. Hansen NML, Blomfeldt TOJ, Hedenqvist MS, Plackett DV (2012) Properties of plasticized composite films prepared from nanofibrillated cellulose and birch wood xylan. Cellulose 19:2015–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9764-710.1007/s10570-012-9764-7 ↗
20. Hasan I, Wang J, Tajvidi M (2021) Tuning physical, mechanical and barrier properties of cellulose nanofibril films through film drying techniques coupled with thermal compression. Cellulose 28:11345–11366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-04269-910.1007/s10570-021-04269-9 ↗
21. Herrera MA, Mathew AP, Oksman K (2017) Barrier and mechanical properties of plasticized and cross-linked nanocellulose coatings for paper packaging applications. Cellulose 24:3969–3980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1405-810.1007/s10570-017-1405-8 ↗
22. Hubbe MA, Ferrer A, Tyagi P, Yin Y, Salas C, Pal L, Rojas OJ (2017) Nanocellulose in thin films, coatings, and plies for packaging applications: a review. BioResources 12(1):2143–223310.15376/biores.12.1.Hubbe ↗
23. Jung BN, Jung HW, Kang DH, Kim GH, Lee M, Shim JK, Hwang SW (2020) The fabrication of flexible and oxygen barrier cellulose nanofiber/polylactic acid nanocomposites using cosolvent system. J Appl Polym Sci 137:e49536. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4953610.1002/app.49536 ↗
24. Kelly PV, Gardner DJ, Gramlich WA (2021) Optimizing lignocellulosic nanofibril dimensions and morphology by mechanical refining for enhanced adhesion. Carbohydr Polym 273:118566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11856610.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118566 ↗
25. Klockars KW, Greca LG, Majoinen J et al (2023) Drying stresses in cellulose nanocrystal coatings: impact of molecular and macromolecular additives. Carbohydr Polym 303:120465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.12046510.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120465 ↗
26. Kumar V, Lazarus E, Salminen P, Bousfield DW, Toivakka M (2016) Influence of nanolatex addition on cellulose nanofiber film properties. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 31(2):333–340. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p333-34010.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p333-340 ↗
27. Ma Q, Wang K, Mohawk D, Chen Y, Hazra R, Jiang L (2021) Strong, ductile, transparent, water-resistant cellulose nanofibril composite films via UV-induced inter-cross-linked networks. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 9:10749–10760. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0122210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01222 ↗
28. Mariani LM, Johnson WR, Considine JM, Turner KT (2019) Printing and mechanical characterization of cellulose nanofibril materials. Cellulose 26:2639–2651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02247-w10.1007/s10570-019-02247-w ↗
29. Mathew AP, Dufresne A (2002) Plasticized waxy maize starch: effect of polyols and relative humidity on material properties. Biomacromol 3(5):1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm020065p10.1021/bm020065p ↗
30. MatWeb.com, Borosilicate Glass, Available online: https://matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=5bb651ca58524e79a503011b2cd8083d Accessed on 1 March 2024
31. Mokhena TC, Sadiku ER, Mochane MJ, Ray SS, John MJ, Mtibe A (2021) Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibril papers and their bionanocomposites: a review. Carbohydr Polym 273(1):118507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11850710.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118507 ↗
32. Monfort S, Manas P, Condon S, Raso J, Alvarez I (2012) Physicochemical and functional properties of liquid whole egg treated by the application of pulsed electric fields followed by heat in the presence of triethyl citrate. Food Res Int 48(2):484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2012.04.01510.1016/j.foodres.2012.04.015 ↗
33. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00108B10.1039/C0CS00108B ↗
34. Nakamura K, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (2004) Poisson’s ratio of cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 42(7):1206–1211. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.1077110.1002/polb.10771 ↗
35. Nuruddin M, Chowdhury RA, Szeto R, Howarter JA, Erk KA, Szczepanski CR, Youngblood JP (2021) Structure−property relationship of cellulose nanocrystal−polyvinyl alcohol thin films for high barrier coating applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13:12472–12482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c2152510.1021/acsami.0c21525 ↗
36. Payne JA, McCormick AV, Francis LF (1998) In situ stress measurement apparatus for liquid applied coatings. Rev Sci Instrum 68(12):4564–4568. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.114843210.1063/1.1148432 ↗
37. Qing Y, Sabo R, Wu Y, Cai Z (2012) High-performance cellulose nanofibril composite films. BioResources 7(3):3064–307510.15376/biores.7.3.3064-3075 ↗
38. Rahman M, Brazel CS (2004) The plasticizer market: an assessment of traditional plasticizers and research trends to meet new challenges. Prog Polym Sci 29:1223–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.10.001 ↗
39. Reiner RS, Rudie AW (2017) Experiences with scaling-up production of TEMPO-grade cellulose nanofibrils. In: Nanocelluloses: their preparation, properties, and applications, ACS symposium series; American chemical society 1251:227−245. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1251.ch01210.1021/bk-2017-1251.ch012 ↗
40. Reshmy R, Philip E, Vaisakh PH, Raj S, Paul SA, Madhavan A, Sindhu R, Binod P, Sirohi R, Pugazhendhi A, Pandey A (2021) Development of an eco-friendly biodegradable plastic from jack fruit peel cellulose with different plasticizers and Boswellia serrata as filler. Sci Total Environ 767:144285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14428510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144285 ↗
41. Sabo R, Yermakov A, Law C, Elhajjar R (2016) Nanocellulose-enabled electronics, energy harvesting devices, smart materials and sensors: a review. J Renew Mater 4(5):297–312. https://doi.org/10.7569/JRM.2016.63411410.7569/JRM.2016.634114 ↗
42. Soni B, Hassan EL, Schilling MW, Mahmoud B (2016) Transparent bionanocomposite films based on chitosan and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers with enhanced mechanical and barrier properties. Carbohydr Polym 151:779–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.02210.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.022 ↗
43. Stoney GG (1909) The tension of metallic films deposited by electrolysis. Proc R Soc London Ser A 82:172. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
44. Tayeb AH, Amini E, Ghasemi S, Tajvidi M (2018) Cellulose nanomaterials—binding properties and applications: a review. Molecules 23:2684. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2310268410.3390/molecules23102684 ↗
45. Tayeb AH, Tajvidi M, Bousfield D (2020a) Paper-based oil barrier packaging using lignin-containing cellulose nanofibrils. Molecules 25(6):1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2506134410.3390/molecules25061344 ↗
46. Tayeb AH, Tajvidi M, Bousfield DW (2020b) Enhancing the oxygen barrier properties of nanocellulose at high humidity: numerical and experimental assessment. Sustain Chem 1:198–208. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem103001410.3390/suschem1030014 ↗
47. Teixeira SC, Silva RRA, de Oliveira TV, Stringheta P, Pinto MRMR, Soares NDFF (2021) Glycerol and triethyl citrate plasticizer effects on molecular, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of cellulose acetate films. Food Biosci 42:101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2021.10120210.1016/j.fbio.2021.101202 ↗
48. Tian J, Cao Z, Qian S, Xia Y, Zhang J, Kong Y, Sheng K, Zhang Y, Wan Y, Takahashi J (2022) Improving tensile strength and impact toughness of plasticized poly(lactic acid) biocomposites by incorporating nanofibrillated cellulose. Nanotechnol Rev 11:2469–2482. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-014210.1515/ntrev-2022-0142 ↗
49. Wang J, Gardner DJ, Stark NM, Bousfield DW, Tajvidi M, Cai Z (2018) Moisture and oxygen barrier properties of cellulose nanomaterial-based films. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:49–70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0352310.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03523 ↗
50. Wedin P, Lewis JA, Bergstrom L (2005) Soluble organic additive effects on stress development during drying of calcium carbonate suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci 290:134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.02010.1016/j.jcis.2005.04.020 ↗
51. Yadav M, Rhee KY, Jung IH, Park SJ (2013) Eco-friendly synthesis, characterization and properties of a sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene oxide nanocomposite film. Cellulose 20:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9855-510.1007/s10570-012-9855-5 ↗