All-cellulose nanocomposite films based on cellulose acetate and cellulose biocolloids by solution blow spinning
Source abstract
Abstract
Over the last years, the potential of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) as fillers in polymers for mechanical reinforcement and extending the operation lifespan of materials is highlighted. Here, we investigate the inclusion of CNCs and CNFs with two distinct functional groups (TEMPO-oxidized, or solely having hydroxyl groups) as nanofillers into cellulose acetate films. Solution blow spinning has been utilized as a novel approach to fabricate composite materials from renewable carbon feedstocks, and the resulting structural, morphological and mechanical properties were evaluated. A maximum concentration of 5 wt% was found for CNCs while this was lower for CNFs, 2.5 wt%, to achieve uninterrupted processing of composite materials via SBS. All-cellulose composites showed differences in morphological features depending on the nanofiller type. Interestingly, a low loading of CNCs (1.5 wt%) increases the strength at break by 30%, while the inclusion of CNFs in a same amount deteriorates the mechanical properties. However, further increase to 2.5 wt% CNFs provides enhanced tensile strength and elastic modulus values. The largest improvements in elongation at break and strength at break is achieved with the inclusion of 2.5 wt% TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Microscopic analysis after fracture reveals coral-like structured films, providing a unique mechanical behavior. Overall, the results point out that TEMPO-oxidized CNFs are efficient reinforcements to fabricate renewable carbon-containing composite materials with improved mechanical performance. The proposed SBS processing offers a unique advantage in the fabrication of highly flexible cellulose-based films, eliminating the need for plasticizers or additional additives. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmadian-Fard-Fini S, Ghanbari D, Amiri O, Salavati-Niasari M (2020) Electro-spinning of cellulose acetate nanofibers/Fe/carbon dot as photoluminescence sensor for mercury (II) and lead (II) ions. Carbohydr Polym 229:115428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.11542810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115428 ↗
2. Attari N, Hausler R (2023) Reinforcing effects of fibrous and crystalline nanocelluloses on cellulose acetate membranes. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 5:100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2023.10028110.1016/j.carpta.2023.100281 ↗
3. Azizi Samir MA, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromol 6:612–626. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049368510.1021/bm0493685 ↗
4. Baghaei B, Skrifvars M (2020) All-Cellulose composites: a review of recent studies on structure. Prop Appl Mol 25:2836. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2512283610.3390/molecules25122836 ↗
5. Battirola LC, Zanata DM, Gonçalves MC (2018) Improvement of cellulose acetate dimensional stability by chemical crosslinking with cellulose nanocrystals. Compos Part A 113:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.016 ↗
6. vom Berg C, Carus M et al. (2023) Renewable Carbon as a Guiding Principle for Sustainable Carbon Cycles. Editor: Renewable Carbon Initiative (ed.), Hürth 2023. https://doi.org/10.52548/CXFS751910.52548/CXFS7519 ↗
7. Berroci M, Vallejo C, Lizundia E (2022) Environmental impact assessment of chitin nanofibril and nanocrystal isolation from fungi, shrimp shells and crab shells. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 10:14280–14293. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c0441710.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04417 ↗
8. Cao X, Zhu M, Fan F et al (2020) All-cellulose composites based on jute cellulose nanowhiskers and electrospun cellulose acetate (CA) fibrous membranes. Cellulose 27:1385–1391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02880-510.1007/s10570-019-02880-5 ↗
9. Cerqueira DA, Filho GR, Assunção RMN (2006) A new value for the heat of fusion of a perfect crystal of cellulose acetate. Polymer Bull 56:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-006-0511-910.1007/s00289-006-0511-9 ↗
10. Chen J, Chen W, Fan P, Yao I (2014a) Effect of thermal annealing on the surface properties of electrospun polymer fibers. Macromol Mater Eng 35:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20130029010.1002/marc.201300290 ↗
11. Chen S, Schueneman G, Pipes RB, Moon RJ (2014b) Effects of crystal orientation on cellulose nanocrystals–cellulose acetate nanocomposite fibers prepared by dry spinning. Biomacromol 15:3827–3835. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm501161v10.1021/bm501161v ↗
12. Cheng M, Qin Z, Hu J et al (2021) Facile one−step preparation of acetylated cellulose nanocrystals and their reinforcing function in cellulose acetate film with improved interfacial compatibility. Cellulose 28:2137–2148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03663-z10.1007/s10570-020-03663-z ↗
13. Cherpinski A, Torres-Giner S, Vartiainen J et al (2018) Improving the water resistance of nanocellulose-based films with polyhydroxyalkanoates processed by the electrospinning coating technique. Cellulose 25:1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1648-z10.1007/s10570-018-1648-z ↗
14. Cindradewi AW, Bandi R, Park C et al (2021) Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate film reinforced with cellulose nanofibril. Polymers 13:2990. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1317299010.3390/polym13172990 ↗
15. Cobo FN, Faria-Tisher PCS, Duarte JL, Carvalho GM (2017) Preparation and characterization of microporous cellulose acetate films using breath figure method by spin coating technique. Cellulose 24:4981–4995. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1459-710.1007/s10570-017-1459-7 ↗
16. Dadol GC, Kilic A, Tijing LD et al (2020) Solution blow spinning (SBS) and SBS-spun nanofibers: materials, methods, and applications. Mater Today Commun 25:101656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10165610.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101656 ↗
17. De FRRM, Senna AM, Botaro VR (2017) Influence of degree of substitution on thermal dynamic mechanical and physicochemical properties of cellulose acetate. Ind Crop Prod 109:452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.06210.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.062 ↗
18. Domínguez JE, Kasiri A, González-Benito J (2021a) Wettability behavior of solution blow spun polysulfone by controlling morphology. J Appl Polymer Sci 138:50200. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.5020010.1002/app.50200 ↗
19. Domínguez JE, Olivos E, Vázquez C et al (2021b) Automated low-cost device to produce sub-micrometric polymer fibers based on blow spun method. HardwareX 10:e00218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e0021810.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00218 ↗
20. Dreyfus H (1939) The birth, development, and present position of the cellulose acetate artificial silk industry in this country. J Soc Dye Colour 55:116–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.1939.tb02047.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.1939.tb02047.x ↗
21. El Miri N, Abdelouahdi K, Barakat A et al (2015) Bio-nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose Nanocrystals : rheology of film-forming solutions, transparency, water vapor barrier and tensile properties of films bio-nanocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: rheology of film-form. Carbohydr Polymer 129:156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.04.051 ↗
22. Figueroa-Lopez KJ, Enescu D, Torres-Giner S et al (2020) Development of electrospun active films of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyvalerate ) by the incorporation of cyclodextrin inclusion complexes containing oregano essential oil. Food Hydrocoll 108:106013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.10601310.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106013 ↗
23. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
24. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y ↗
25. Gonçalves SM, dos Santos DC, Motta JFG et al (2019) Structure and functional properties of cellulose acetate films incorporated with glycerol. Carbohydr Polym 209:190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2019.01.031 ↗
26. González-Benito J, Teno J, González-Gaitano G et al (2017) PVDF/TiO2 nanocomposites prepared by solution blow spinning: surface properties and their relation with S. Mutans adhesion. Polymer Test 58:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.00510.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.12.005 ↗
27. González-Benito J, Torres D, Ballesteros C et al (2019) PVDF based nanocomposites produced by solution blow spinning, structure and morphology induced by the presence of MWCNT and their consequences on some properties. Colloid Polymer Sci 297:1105–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-019-04530-510.1007/s00396-019-04530-5 ↗
28. Gwon JG, Lee DB, Cho HJ, Lee SY (2018) Preparation and characteristics of cellulose acetate based nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). J Korean Wood Sci Technol 46:565–576. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2018.46.5.56510.5658/WOOD.2018.46.5.565 ↗
29. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) The Halpin-Tsai equations: a review. Polym Eng Sci 16:344–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
30. He Y, Boluk Y, Deltin J et al (2020) Comparative study of CNC and CNF as additives in waterborne acrylate-based anti-corrosion coatings. J Dispers Sci Technol 41:2037–2047. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2019.164722910.1080/01932691.2019.1647229 ↗
31. Hui CY, Shia D (1998) Simple formulae for the effective moduli of unidirectional aligned composites. Polymer Eng Sci 38:774–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.1024310.1002/pen.10243 ↗
32. Jiang Z, Ngai T (2022) Recent advances in chemically modified cellulose and its derivatives for food packaging applications : a review. Polymers 14:1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1408153310.3390/polym14081533 ↗
33. Jiang L, Li K, Yang H et al (2020) Improving mechanical properties of electrospun cellulose acetate nanofiber membranes by cellulose nanocrystals with and without polyvinylpyrrolidone. Cellulose 27:955–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02830-110.1007/s10570-019-02830-1 ↗
34. Ju X, Bowden M, Brown EE, Zhang X (2015) An improved X-ray diffraction method for cellulose crystallinity measurement. Carbohydr Polymers 123:476–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.07110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.071 ↗
35. Kafy A, Kim HC, Zhai L et al (2017) Cellulose long fibers fabricated from cellulose nanofibers and its strong and tough characteristics. Sci Rep 7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17713-310.1038/s41598-017-17713-3 ↗
36. Kamide K (2005) Cellulose and cellulose derivatives Molecular characterization and its applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam
37. Konwarh R, Karak N, Misra M (2013) Electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers: the present status and gamut of biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv 31:421–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.00210.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.002 ↗
38. Kramar A, González-Benito J (2023) Preparation of cellulose acetate film with dual hydrophobic-hydrophilic properties using solution blow spinning. Mater Des 227:111788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11178810.1016/j.matdes.2023.111788 ↗
39. Kramar A, Rodríguez Ortega I, González-Gaitano G, Gonzalez-Benito J (2023) Solution casting of cellulose acetate films: influence of surface substrate and sumidity on wettability, morphology and optical properties. Cellulose 30:2037–2052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-05026-210.1007/s10570-022-05026-2 ↗
40. Li J, Nawaz H, Wu J et al (2018) All-cellulose composites based on the self-reinforced effect. Compos Commun 9:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2018.04.00810.1016/j.coco.2018.04.008 ↗
41. Li T, Chen C, Brozena AH et al (2021) Developing fibrillated cellulose as a sustainable technological material. Nature 590:47–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03167-710.1038/s41586-020-03167-7 ↗
42. Liu Y, Ahmed S, Sameen DE et al (2021) A review of cellulose and its derivatives in biopolymer-based for food packaging application. Trends Food Sci Technol 112:532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.01610.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.016 ↗
43. Lizundia E, Puglia D, Nguyen T-D, Armentano I (2020) Cellulose nanocrystal based multifunctional nanohybrids. Prog Mater Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.10066810.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100668 ↗
44. Melendez-Rodriguez B, Torres-Giner S, Angulo I et al (2021) High-oxygen-barrier multilayer films based on polyhydroxyalkanoates and cellulose nanocrystals. Nanomaterials 11:1443. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1106144310.3390/nano11061443 ↗
45. Menachem L (ed) (2007) Handbook of fiber chemistry. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
46. Mittal N, Ojanguren A, Cavasin N et al (2021) Transient rechargeable battery with a high lithium transport number cellulosic separator. Adv Funct Mater 31:2101827. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20210182710.1002/adfm.202101827 ↗
47. Mittal N, Tien S, Lizundia E, Niederberger M (2022) Hierarchical nanocellulose-based gel polymer electrolytes for stable Na electrodeposition in sodium ion batteries. Small 18:2107183. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20210718310.1002/smll.202107183 ↗
48. Moradienayat M, González-Benito J, Olmos D (2023) Airbrushed PSF/ZnO composite coatings as a novel approach for the consolidation of historical bones. Nanomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1304062510.3390/nano13040625 ↗
49. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polymers 135:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 ↗
50. Nicosia A, Keppler T, Müller FA et al (2016) Cellulose acetate nanofiber electrospun on nylon substrate as novel composite matrix for efficient, heat-resistant, air filters. Chem Eng Sci 153:284–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2016.07.01710.1016/j.ces.2016.07.017 ↗
51. Nishino T, Matsuda I, Hirao K (2004) All-cellulose composite. Macromolecules 37:7683–7687. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049300h10.1021/ma049300h ↗
52. Rincon-Iglesias M, Lizundia E, Lanceros-Mendez S (2019) Water-soluble cellulose derivatives as suitable matrices for multifunctional materials ́. Biomacromolecules 20:2786–2795. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.9b0057410.1021/acs.biomac.9b00574 ↗
53. Rosenboom J, Langer R (2022) Bioplastics for a circular economy. Nat Rev Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00407-810.1038/s41578-021-00407-8 ↗
54. Salevic A, Prieto C, Cabedo L et al (2019) Physicochemical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of electrospun poly (ε-caprolactone ) films containing a solid dispersion of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) extract. Nanomaterials 9:270. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano902027010.3390/nano9020270 ↗
55. Shaikh HM, Anis A, Poulose AM et al (2022) Synthesis and characterization of cellulose triacetate obtained from date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) trunk mesh-derived cellulose. Molecules 27:1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2704143410.3390/molecules27041434 ↗
56. Sharma A, Mandal T, Goswami S (2021) Fabrication of cellulose acetate nanocomposite films with lignocelluosic nanofiber filler for superior effect on thermal, mechanical and optical properties. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects 25:100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.10064210.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100642 ↗
57. Shen M, Song B, Zeng G et al (2020) Are biodegradable plastics a promising solution to solve the global plastic pollution ?*. Environ Pollut 263:114469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11446910.1016/j.envpol.2020.114469 ↗
58. Shivamurthy B, Thimmappa BHS, Purushothama R, Datta Sai GKVD (2019) Electrical conductivity and mechanical properties of dendritic copper particulate polymer films. Trans Electr Electron Mater 20:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42341-018-00085-410.1007/s42341-018-00085-4 ↗
59. Sikorski P, Wada M, Heux L et al (2004) Crystal structure of cellulose triacetate I. Macromolecules 37 (12):4547–4553. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma049852010.1021/ma0498520 ↗
60. Soykeabkaew N, Nishino T, Peijs T (2009) All-cellulose composites of regenerated cellulose fibres by surface selective dissolution. Compos Part A 40:321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.021 ↗
61. Sun C, Boluk Y, Ayranci C (2015) Investigation of nanofiber nonwoven meshes produced by electrospinning of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions in cellulose acetate solutions. Cellulose 22:2457–2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0665-410.1007/s10570-015-0665-4 ↗
62. Thi To NuD, Phi Hung N, Van Hoang C, Van der Bruggen B (2019) Preparation of an asymmetric membrane from sugarcane bagasse using DMSO as green solvent. Appl Sci 9:3347. https://doi.org/10.3390/app916334710.3390/app9163347 ↗
63. Thomas RT, Rio D, de Vicente J, Zhang K et al (2022) Size exclusion and affinity-based removal of nanoparticles with electrospun cellulose acetate membranes infused with functionalized cellulose nanocrystals. Mater Des 217:110654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11065410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110654 ↗
64. Trache D, Tarchoun AF, Derradji M et al (2020) Nanocellulose: from fundamentals to advanced applications. Front Chem. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.0039210.3389/fchem.2020.00392 ↗
65. Vallejos ME, Peresin MS, Rojas OJ (2012) All-cellulose composite fibers obtained by electrospinning dispersions of cellulose acetate and cellulose nanocrystals. J Polymers Environ 20:1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0499-110.1007/s10924-012-0499-1 ↗
66. Wada N, Fujie T, Sasaki R et al (2022) Direct synthesis of a robust cellulosic composite from cellulose acetate and a nano fi brillated bacterial cellulose sol. Polymer J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41428-022-00619-x10.1038/s41428-022-00619-x ↗
67. Wu X, Moon RJ, Martini A (2013) Crystalline cellulose elastic modulus predicted by atomistic models of uniform deformation and nanoscale indentation. Cellulose 20:43–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9823-010.1007/s10570-012-9823-0 ↗
68. Yadav N, Hakkarainen M (2021) Degradable or not? Cellulose acetate as a model for complicated interplay between structure, environment and degradation. Chemosphere 265:128731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12873110.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128731 ↗