Synthesis of highly porous ferric hydroxide-bacterial cellulose nanocomposites via in-situ mineralization for efficient glyphosate removal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed J, Gultekinoglu M, Edirisinghe M (2020) Bacterial cellulose micro-nano fibres for wound healing applications. Biotechnol Adv 41:107549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.10754910.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107549 ↗
2. Alagha O, Manzar MS, Zubair M, Anil I, Mu’azu ND, Qureshi A (2020) Comparative adsorptive removal of phosphate and nitrate from wastewater using biochar-MgAl LDH nanocomposites: coexisting anions effect and mechanistic studies. Nanomaterials 10(2):336–354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1002033610.3390/nano10020336 ↗
3. Besghaier S, Cecilia JA, Chouikhi N, Vilarrasa-García E, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Chlendi M, Bagane M (2021) Glyphosate adsorption onto porous clay heterostructure (PCH): kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Braz J Chem Eng 39:903–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43153-021-00166-710.1007/s43153-021-00166-7 ↗
4. Briceno S, Reinoso C (2022) CoFe2O4-chitosan-graphene nanocomposite for glyphosate removal. Environ Res 212:113470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.11347010.1016/j.envres.2022.113470 ↗
5. Cañas-Gutiérrez A, Osorio M, Molina-Ramírez C, Arboleda-Toro D, Castro-Herazo C (2020) Bacterial cellulose: a biomaterial with high potential in dental and oral applications. Cellulose 27(17):9737–9754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03456-410.1007/s10570-020-03456-4 ↗
6. Castrejon-Godinez ML, Tovar-Sanchez E, Valencia-Cuevas L, Rosas-Ramirez ME, Rodriguez A, Mussali-Galante P (2021) Glyphosate pollution treatment and microbial degradation alternatives, a review. Microorganisms 9:2322–2342. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms911232210.3390/microorganisms9112322 ↗
7. Chen Q, Zheng J, Yang Q, Dang Z, Zhang L (2019) Insights into the glyphosate adsorption behavior and mechanism by a MnFe2O4@Cellulose-activated carbon magnetic hybrid. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11(17):15478–15488. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b2238610.1021/acsami.8b22386 ↗
8. Chen C, Ding W, Zhang H, Zhang L, Huang Y, Fan M, Yang J, Sun D (2022) Bacterial cellulose-based biomaterials: From fabrication to application. Carbohydr Polym 278:118995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11899510.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118995 ↗
9. Cui GR, Liu M, Chen Y, Zhang W, Zhao JQ (2016) Synthesis of a ferric hydroxide-coated cellulose nanofiber hybrid for effective removal of phosphate from wastewater. Carbohydr Polym 154:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.025 ↗
10. De Oliveira Barud HG, Da Silva RR, Da Silva BH, Tercjak A, Gutierrez J, Lustri WR, De Oliveira Junior OB, Ribeiro SJL (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059 ↗
11. Diel JC, Franco DSP, Igansi AV, Cadaval TRS Jr, Pereira HA, Nunes IDS, Basso CW, Alves M, Morais J, Pinto D, Dotto GL (2021a) Green synthesis of carbon nanotubes impregnated with metallic nanoparticles: characterization and application in glyphosate adsorption. Chemosphere 283:131193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13119310.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131193 ↗
12. Diel JC, Franco DSP, Nunes IS, Pereira HA, Moreira KS, de Burgo TAL, Foletto EL, Dotto GL (2021) Carbon nanotubes impregnated with metallic nanoparticles and their application as an adsorbent for the glyphosate removal in an aqueous matrix. J Environ Chem Eng 9(2):105178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10517810.1016/j.jece.2021.105178 ↗
13. Dissanayake Herath GA, Poh LS, Ng WJ (2019) Statistical optimization of glyphosate adsorption by biochar and activated carbon with response surface methodology. Chemosphere 227:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.07810.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.078 ↗
14. Doan THY, Nguyen THT, Kieu TT, Hoang DT, Vu TLC, Le TS, Dang VL, Nguyen MN, Pham TD (2024) Modification of bio-zeolite greenly synthesized from rice husk and application in adsorptive removal of herbicide glyphosate. Mater Chem Phys 316:129108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.12910810.1016/j.matchemphys.2024.129108 ↗
15. Elsayed I, Schueneman GT, El-Giar EM, Hassan EB (2023) Amino-functionalized cellulose nanofiber/lignosulfonate new aerogel adsorbent for the removal of dyes and heavy metals from wastewater. Gels 9(2):154–169. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels902015410.3390/gels9020154 ↗
16. Espinoza-Montero PJ, Vega-Verduga C, Alulema-Pullupaxi P, Fernandez L, Paz JL (2020) Technologies employed in the treatment of water contaminated with glyphosate: a review. Molecules 25(23):5550–5576. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2523555010.3390/molecules25235550 ↗
17. Fang Y, Liu Q, Zhu S (2021) Selective biosorption mechanism of methylene blue by a novel and reusable sugar beet pulp cellulose/sodium alginate/iron hydroxide composite hydrogel. Int J Biol Macromol 188:993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.19210.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.192 ↗
18. Gupta P, Verma N (2021) Evaluation of degradation and mineralization of glyphosate pollutant in wastewater using catalytic wet air oxidation over Fe-dispersed carbon nanofibrous beads. Chem Eng J 417:128029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12802910.1016/j.cej.2020.128029 ↗
19. Gupta P, Pandey K, Verma N (2022) Augmented complete mineralization of glyphosate in wastewater via microbial degradation post CWAO over supported Fe-CNF. Chem Eng J 428:132008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13200810.1016/j.cej.2021.132008 ↗
20. Han D, Zhao Z, Xu Z, Li Y, Zhang P, Guo X (2018) β-FeOOH-coupled activated carbon prepared by the high temperature impregnation method for bromate removal from water. J Chem Eng Data 63(6):2243–2251. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.8b0019110.1021/acs.jced.8b00191 ↗
21. Hu YS, Zhao YQ, Sorohan B (2011) Removal of glyphosate from aqueous environment by adsorption using water industrial residual. Desalination 271(1–3):150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.01410.1016/j.desal.2010.12.014 ↗
22. Hussain Z, Sajjad W, Khan T, Wahid F (2019) Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: a review. Cellulose 26(5):2895–2911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02307-110.1007/s10570-019-02307-1 ↗
23. Iriel A, Marco-Brown JL, Diljkan M, Trinelli MA, dos Santos AM, Fernández Cirelli A (2020) Arsenic adsorption on iron-modified montmorillonite: kinetic equilibrium and surface complexes. Environ Eng Sci 37(1):22–32. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2019.022010.1089/ees.2019.0220 ↗
24. Khenifi A, Derriche Z, Mousty C, Prévot V, Forano C (2010) Adsorption of glyphosate and glufosinate by Ni2AlNO3 layered double hydroxide. Appl Clay Sci 47(3–4):362–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.11.05510.1016/j.clay.2009.11.055 ↗
25. Koizumi S, Yue Z, Tomita Y, Kondo T, Iwase H, Yamaguchi D, Hashimoto T (2008) Bacterium organizes hierarchical amorphous structure in microbial cellulose. Eur Phys J E 26(1–2):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2007-10259-310.1140/epje/i2007-10259-3 ↗
26. Li Y, Zhao C, Wen Y, Wang Y, Yang Y (2018) Adsorption performance and mechanism of magnetic reduced graphene oxide in glyphosate contaminated water. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25(21):21036–21048. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2282-x10.1007/s11356-018-2282-x ↗
27. Li X, Wang Z, Liang H, Ning J, Li G, Zhou Z (2019) Chitosan modification persimmon tannin bioadsorbent for highly efficient removal of Pb(II) from aqueous environment: the adsorption equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics. Environ Technol 40(1):112–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.138071210.1080/09593330.2017.1380712 ↗
28. Li WY, Chen Z, Yang L, Qin YY, Wang TL, Sun W, Wang CW (2024) In situ preparation of controllable hierarchical pores Zr-PDCs metal-organic frameworks for adsorption of glyphosate. Chem Eng Sci 288:119797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.11979710.1016/j.ces.2024.119797 ↗
29. Liu F, Chen C, Qian J (2021) Film-like bacterial cellulose/cyclodextrin oligomer composites with controllable structure for the removal of various persistent organic pollutants from water. J Hazard Mater 405:124122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12412210.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124122 ↗
30. Manzar MS, Waheed A, Qazi IWI, Blaisi N, Ullah N (2019) Synthesis of a novel epibromohydrin modified crosslinked polyamine resin for highly efficient removal of methyl orange and eriochrome black T. J Taiwan Inst Chem E 97:424–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2019.01.02710.1016/j.jtice.2019.01.027 ↗
31. Meftaul IM, Venkateswarlu K, Dharmarajan R, Annamalai P, Asaduzzaman M, Parven A, Megharaj M (2020) Controversies over human health and ecological impacts of glyphosate: Is it to be banned in modern agriculture? Environ Pollut 263:114372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11437210.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372 ↗
32. Nargis F, Duong A, Rehl E, Bradshaw C, Kazemian H (2022) Highly efficient and low-cost clay-based adsorbent for glyphosate removal from contaminated water. Chem Eng Technol 45(2):340–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.20210043710.1002/ceat.202100437 ↗
33. Oprea M, Voicu SI (2020) Recent advances in composites based on cellulose derivatives for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 247:116683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11668310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116683 ↗
34. Peng G, Tang B, Zhou X (2021) Effect of preparation methods on the adsorption of glyphosate by calcined Ca-Al hydrotalcite. ACS Omega 6(24):15742–15749. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0102510.1021/acsomega.1c01025 ↗
35. Pereira HA, Hernandes PRT, Netto MS, Reske GD, Vieceli V, Oliveira LFS, Dotto GL (2020) Adsorbents for glyphosate removal in contaminated waters: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19(2):1525–1543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01108-410.1007/s10311-020-01108-4 ↗
36. Qu J, Wu Z, Liu Y, Li R, Wang D, Wang S, Wei S, Zhang J, Tao Y, Jiang Z, Zhang Y (2022) Ball milling potassium ferrate activated biochar for efficient chromium and tetracycline decontamination: Insights into activation and adsorption mechanisms. Bioresour Technol 360:127407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.12740710.1016/j.biortech.2022.127407 ↗
37. Rallet D, Paltahe A, Tsamo C, Loura B (2022) Synthesis of clay-biochar composite for glyphosate removal from aqueous solution. Heliyon 8(3):e09112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e0911210.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09112 ↗
38. Ramanayaka S, Tsang DCW, Hou D, Ok YS, Vithanage M (2020) Green synthesis of graphitic nanobiochar for the removal of emerging contaminants in aqueous media. Sci Total Environ 706:135725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13572510.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135725 ↗
39. Ramrakhiani L, Ghosh S, Mandal AK, Majumdar S (2019) Utilization of multi-metal laden spent biosorbent for removal of glyphosate herbicide from aqueous solution and its mechanism elucidation. Chem Eng J 361:1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.16310.1016/j.cej.2018.12.163 ↗
40. Rol F, Belgacem M, Gandini A, Bras J (2019) Recent advances in surface-modified cellulose nanofibrils. Prog Polym Sci 88:241–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2018.09.002 ↗
41. Sheals J, Sjöberg S, Persson P (2002) Adsorption of glyphosate on goethite: molecular characterization of surface complexes. Environ Sci Technol 36:3090–3095. https://doi.org/10.1021/es010295w10.1021/es010295w ↗
42. Sodha V, Shahabuddin S, Gaur R, Ahmad I, Bandyopadhyay R, Sridewi N (2022) Comprehensive review on zeolite-based nanocomposites for treatment of effluents from wastewater. Nanomaterials 12(18):3199–3228. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1218319910.3390/nano12183199 ↗
43. Wang J, Tavakoli J, Tang Y (2019) Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods—a review. Carbohydr Polym 219:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008 ↗
44. Xiang B, Tang J, Feng X, Zhu Y, Li Y, Tan T (2023) Preparation of aluminium-hydroxide-modified diatomite and its fluoride adsorption mechanism. Sci Rep 13(1):3871–3883. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30901-810.1038/s41598-023-30901-8 ↗
45. Xiao G, Meng Q (2020) D151 resin preloaded with Fe3+ as a salt resistant adsorbent for glyphosate from water in the presence 16% NaCl. Sci Total Environ 190:110140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.11014010.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110140 ↗
46. Xie Y, Yang X, Li W, Li J, Wu T, Wang H, Huang J, Xu F (2022) Enhanced removal of glyphosate from aqueous solution by nano-CaO2/AS composite: oxidation and precipitation. Sep Purif Technol 288:120349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.12034910.1016/j.seppur.2021.120349 ↗
47. Yamaguchi NU, Bergamasco R, Hamoudi S (2016) Magnetic MnFe2O4—graphene hybrid composite for efficient removal of glyphosate from water. Chem Eng J 295:391–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.05110.1016/j.cej.2016.03.051 ↗
48. Yang Y, Deng Q, Yan W, Jing C, Zhang Y (2018) Comparative study of glyphosate removal on goethite and magnetite: adsorption and photo-degradation. Chem Eng J 352:581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.07.05810.1016/j.cej.2018.07.058 ↗
49. Zhao JQ, Lu ZX, He X, Zhang XF, Li QY, Xia T, Zhang W, Lu CH, Deng YL (2017) One-step fabrication of Fe(OH)3@Cellulose hollow nanofibers with superior capability for water purification. Acs Appl Mater Interfaces 9(30):25339–25349. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b0703810.1021/acsami.7b07038 ↗
50. Zubair M, Manzar MS, El-Qanni A, Haroon H, Alqahtani HA, Al-Ejji M, Mu’azu ND, AlGhamdi JM, Haladu SA, Al-Hashim D, Ahmed SZ (2023) Biochar-layered double hydroxide composites for the adsorption of tetracycline from water: synthesis, process modeling, and mechanism. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(50):109162–109180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29954-z10.1007/s11356-023-29954-z ↗