In situ preparation of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite scaffold in colloidal culture media containing gum tragacanth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Enzyme Production and Characterization · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Asanarong O, Quan VM, Boonrungsiman S, Sukyai P (2021) Bioactive wound dressing using bacterial cellulose loaded with papain composite: morphology, loading/release and antibacterial properties. Eur Polym J 143:110224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.11022410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.110224 ↗
2. Badshah M, Ullah H, Khan AR, Khan S, Park JK, Khan T (2018) Surface modification and evaluation of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol 113:526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.13510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.02.135 ↗
3. Bayir E, Bilgi E, Hames EE, Sendemir A (2019) Production of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose composite scaffolds with enhanced pore diameters for bone tissue engineering applications. Cellulose 26(18):9803–9817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02763-910.1007/s10570-019-02763-9 ↗
4. Blanco Parte FG, Santoso SP, Chou C-C, Verma V, Wang H-T, Ismadji S, Cheng K-C (2020) Current progress on the production, modification, and applications of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Biotechnol 40(3):397–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2020.171372110.1080/07388551.2020.1713721 ↗
5. Castro C, Vesterinen A, Zuluaga R, Caro G, Filpponen I, Rojas OJ, Kortaberria G, Gañán P (2014) In situ production of nanocomposites of poly (vinyl alcohol) and cellulose nanofibrils from Gluconacetobacter bacteria: effect of chemical crosslinking. Cellulose 21(3):1745–1756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0170-110.1007/s10570-014-0170-1 ↗
6. Fang L, Catchmark JM (2014) Structure characterization of native cellulose during dehydration and rehydration. Cellulose 21(6):3951–3963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0435-810.1007/s10570-014-0435-8 ↗
7. French A (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
8. Gao G, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Wu M, Ma T, Li G (2020) In situ production of bacterial cellulose/xanthan gum nanocomposites with enhanced productivity and properties using Enterobacter sp. Carbohydr Polym. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11678810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116788 ↗
9. Gorgieva S, Trček J (2019) Bacterial cellulose: Production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications. Nanomater 9(10):1352. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano910135210.3390/nano9101352 ↗
10. Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Bañó MC (2009) Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 5(5):1605–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.02210.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022 ↗
11. Indrianingsih AW, Rosyida VT, Apriyana W, Hayati SN, Darsih C, Nisa K, Ratih D (2020) Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of bacterial cellulose: Indonesian plant extract composites for mask sheet. J Appl Pharm Sci 10(7):037–042. https://doi.org/10.7324/JAPS.2020.1070510.7324/JAPS.2020.10705 ↗
12. Jonsirivilai B, Torgbo S, Sukyai P (2022) Multifunctional filter membrane for face mask using bacterial cellulose for highly efficient particulate matter removal. Cellulose 29(11):6205–6218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04641-310.1007/s10570-022-04641-3 ↗
13. Lam NT, Quan VM, Boonrungsiman S, Sukyai P (2022) Effectiveness of bio-dispersant in homogenizing hydroxyapatite for proliferation and differentiation of osteoblast. J Colloid Interface Sci 611:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.08810.1016/j.jcis.2021.12.088 ↗
14. Lett JA, Sundareswari M, Ravichandran K, Latha B, Sagadevan S (2019) Fabrication and characterization of porous scaffolds for bone replacements using gum tragacanth. Mater Sci Eng C 96:487–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.08210.1016/j.msec.2018.11.082 ↗
15. Lin S-P, Liu C-T, Hsu K-D, Hung Y-T, Shih T-Y, Cheng K-C (2016) Production of bacterial cellulose with various additives in a PCS rotating disk bioreactor and its material property analysis. Cellulose 23(1):367–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0855-010.1007/s10570-015-0855-0 ↗
16. Liu M, Zhong C, Zheng X, Ye L, Wan T, Jia SR (2017) Oriented bacterial cellulose-glass fiber nanocomposites with enhanced tensile strength through electric field. Fibers Polym 18(7):1408–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-017-1232-410.1007/s12221-017-1232-4 ↗
17. Liu D, Cao Y, Qu R, Gao G, Chen S, Zhang Y, Wu M, Ma T, Li G (2019) Production of bacterial cellulose hydrogels with tailored crystallinity from Enterobacter sp. FY-07 by the controlled expression of colanic acid synthetic genes. Carbohydr Polym 207:563–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.014 ↗
18. Liu W, Du H, Zhang M, Liu K, Liu H, Xie H, Zhang X, Si C (2020) Bacterial cellulose-based composite scaffolds for biomedical applications: a review. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8(20):7536–7562. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0012510.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00125 ↗
19. Liu L, Ji X, Mao L, Wang L, Chen K, Shi Z, Ahmed AAQ, Thomas S, Vasilievich RV, Xiao L, Li X, Yang G (2022) Hierarchical-structured bacterial cellulose/potato starch tubes as potential small-diameter vascular grafts. Carbohydr Polym 281:119034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11903410.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119034 ↗
20. Luz EPCG, Borges MdF, Andrade FK, Rosa MdF, Infantes-Molina A, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Vieira RS (2018) Strontium delivery systems based on bacterial cellulose and hydroxyapatite for guided bone regeneration. Cellulose 25(11):6661–6679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2008-810.1007/s10570-018-2008-8 ↗
21. Ma T, Zhao QQ, Ji KH, Zeng B, Li GQ (2014) Homogeneous and porous modified bacterial cellulose achieved by in situ modification with low amounts of carboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose 21(4):2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0316-110.1007/s10570-014-0316-1 ↗
22. Na Y, Chen S-y, Ouyang Y, Lian T, Yang J-x, Wang H-p (2011) Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of hydroxyapatite bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Prog Nat Sci Mater 21(6):472–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60085-910.1016/S1002-0071(12)60085-9 ↗
23. Nejatian M, Abbasi S, Azarikia F (2020) Gum Tragacanth: Structure, characteristics and applications in foods. Int J Biol Macromol 160:846–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.21410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.05.214 ↗
24. Niamsap T, Lam NT, Sukyai P (2019) Production of hydroxyapatite-bacterial nanocellulose scaffold with assist of cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 205:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.03410.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.034 ↗
25. Nicoara AI, Stoica AE, Ene D-I, Vasile BS, Holban AM, Neacsu IA (2020) In situ and ex situ designed hydroxyapatite: Bacterial cellulose materials with biomedical applications. Materials 13(21):4793. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1321479310.3390/ma13214793 ↗
26. Portela R, Leal CR, Almeida PL, Sobral RG (2019) Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb Biotechnol 12(4):586–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.1339210.1111/1751-7915.13392 ↗
27. Quan VM, Li B, Sukyai P (2020) Bacterial cellulose modification using static magnetic field. Cellulose 27(10):5581–5596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03159-w10.1007/s10570-020-03159-w ↗
28. Taghavizadeh Yazdi ME, Nazarnezhad S, Mousavi SH, Sadegh Amiri M, Darroudi M, Baino F, Kargozar S (2021) Gum tragacanth (GT): a versatile biocompatible material beyond borders. Molecules 26(6):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2606151010.3390/molecules26061510 ↗
29. Torgbo S, Sukyai P (2018) Bacterial cellulose-based scaffold materials for bone tissue engineering. Appl Mater Today 11:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.01.00410.1016/j.apmt.2018.01.004 ↗
30. Usawattanakul N, Torgbo S, Sukyai P, Khantayanuwong S, Puangsin B, Srichola P (2021) Development of nanocomposite film comprising of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) incorporated with bacterial cellulose nanocrystals and magnetite nanoparticles. Polym 13(11):1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1311177810.3390/polym13111778 ↗
31. Wan Y, Hu D, Xiong G, Li D, Guo R, Luo H (2015) Directional fluid induced self-assembly of oriented bacterial cellulose nanofibers for potential biomimetic tissue engineering scaffolds. Mater Chem Phys 149:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.10.03710.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.10.037 ↗
32. Xun X, Li Y, Zhu X, Zhang Q, Lu Y, Yang Z, Wan Y, Yao F, Deng X, Luo H (2021) Fabrication of robust, shape recoverable, macroporous bacterial cellulose scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 21(11):2100167. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20210016710.1002/mabi.202100167 ↗
33. Yingkamhaeng N, Intapan I, Sukyai P (2018) Fabrication and characterisation of functionalised superparamagnetic bacterial nanocellulose using ultrasonic-assisted in situ synthesis. Fibers Polym 19:489–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-7738-610.1007/s12221-018-7738-6 ↗