DataVXCellulosePaper
journal article·2024-02

Exploring potential of cellulose acetate sulfate films for sustainable packaging: tuning characteristics via sulfate group variation

Seonghyun Park, Seunghyun Yoo, Seong-Min Cho, Hyeonji Park, David Cruz, Stephen S. Kelley, Sunkyu Park

Cellulose· Volume 31· Issue 3
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Adilah AN, Jamilah B, Noranizan MA, Hanani ZAN (2018) Utilization of mango peel extracts on the biodegradable films for active packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 16:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.00610.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.006 ↗
2. Aguirre-Loredo RY, Rodríguez-Hernández AI, Morales-Sánchez E et al (2016) Effect of equilibrium moisture content on barrier, mechanical and thermal properties of chitosan films. Food Chem 196:560–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.06510.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.065 ↗
3. Ansari S, Rashid MdAI, Waghmare PR, Nobes DS (2020) Measurement of the flow behavior index of Newtonian and shear-thinning fluids via analysis of the flow velocity characteristics in a mini-channel. SN Appl Sci 2:1787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-03561-w10.1007/s42452-020-03561-w ↗
4. Arfin T (2020) Chapter 12 - Cellulose and hydrogel matrices for environmental applications. In: Mohammad F, Al-Lohedan HA, Jawaid M (eds) Sustainable nanocellulose and nanohydrogels from natural sources. Elsevier, pp 255–27410.1016/B978-0-12-816789-2.00012-2 ↗
5. Asbury JB, Steinel T, Fayer MD (2004) Hydrogen bond networks: structure and evolution after hydrogen bond breaking. J Phys Chem B 108:6544–6554. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp036600c10.1021/jp036600c ↗
6. Asim N, Badiei M, Mohammad M (2021) Recent advances in cellulose-based hydrophobic food packaging. Emergent Mater. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021-00314-210.1007/s42247-021-00314-2 ↗
7. Assis RQ, Rios PD, de Rios A, O, Olivera FC, (2020) Biodegradable packaging of cellulose acetate incorporated with norbixin, lycopene or zeaxanthin. Ind Crops Prod 147:112212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11221210.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112212 ↗
8. Atiwesh G, Mikhael A, Parrish CC et al (2021) Environmental impact of bioplastic use: a review. Heliyon 7:e07918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e0791810.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07918 ↗
9. Azaza YB, Hamdi M, Charmette C et al (2023) Development and characterization of composite films based on chitosan and collagenous proteins from bluefin tuna: application for peeled shrimp preservation. Cellulose 30:373–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04893-z10.1007/s10570-022-04893-z ↗
10. Biswas A, do Socorro Rocha Bastos M, Furtado RF, et al (2020) Evaluation of the properties of cellulose ester films that incorporate essential oils. Int J Polym Sci 2020:e4620868. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/462086810.1155/2020/4620868 ↗
11. Boarino A, Klok H-A (2023) Opportunities and challenges for lignin valorization in food packaging, antimicrobial, and agricultural applications. Biomacromol 24:1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c0138510.1021/acs.biomac.2c01385 ↗
12. Bonifacio A, Bonetti L, Piantanida E, De Nardo L (2023) Plasticizer design strategies enabling advanced applications of cellulose acetate. Eur Polym J 197:112360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.11236010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112360 ↗
13. Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke EA (eds) (1999) Polymer handbook, 4th edn. Wiley, New York
14. Bustamante-Torres M, Romero-Fierro D, Arcentales-Vera B et al (2021) Hydrogels classification according to the physical or chemical interactions and as stimuli-sensitive materials. Gels Basel Switz 7:182. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels704018210.3390/gels7040182 ↗
15. Cadek M, Coleman JN, Barron V et al (2002) Morphological and mechanical properties of carbon-nanotube-reinforced semicrystalline and amorphous polymer composites. Appl Phys Lett 81:5123–5125. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.153311810.1063/1.1533118 ↗
16. Calvino C, Macke N, Kato R, Rowan SJ (2020) Development, processing and applications of bio-sourced cellulose nanocrystal composites. Prog Polym Sci 103:101221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.10122110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2020.101221 ↗
17. Cao Y, Mu T (2014) Comprehensive investigation on the thermal stability of 66 ionic liquids by thermogravimetric analysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:8651–8664. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie500959710.1021/ie5009597 ↗
18. Charpentier D, Mocanu G, Carpov A et al (1997) New hydrophobically modified carboxymethylcellulose derivatives. Carbohydr Polym 33:177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00031-310.1016/S0144-8617(97)00031-3 ↗
19. Chauvelon G, Doublier J-L, Buléon A et al (2003) Rheological properties of sulfoacetate derivatives of cellulose. Carbohydr Res 338:751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00009-010.1016/S0008-6215(03)00009-0 ↗
20. Chen G, Zhang B, Zhao J, Chen H (2014) Development and characterization of food packaging film from cellulose sulfate. Food Hydrocoll 35:476–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.00310.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.07.003 ↗
21. Chen Q, Liu Y, Chen G (2019) A comparative study on the starch-based biocomposite films reinforced by nanocellulose prepared from different non-wood fibers. Cellulose 26:2425–2435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02254-x10.1007/s10570-019-02254-x ↗
22. Cichosz S, Masek A (2020) IR study on cellulose with the varied moisture contents: insight into the supramolecular structure. Materials 13:4573. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1320457310.3390/ma13204573 ↗
23. Das D, Panesar PS, Saini CS, Kennedy JF (2022) Improvement in properties of edible film through non-thermal treatments and nanocomposite materials: a review. Food Packag Shelf Life 32:100843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.10084310.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100843 ↗
24. Faure C, Tranchant JF, Dufourc EJ (1996) Comparative effects of cholesterol and cholesterol sulfate on hydration and ordering of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine membranes. Biophys J 70:1380–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79696-010.1016/S0006-3495(96)79696-0 ↗
25. Forgiarini A, Scorzza C, Velásquez J et al (2010) Influence of the mixed propoxy/ethoxy spacer arrangement order and of the ionic head group nature on the adsorption and aggregation of Extended surfactants. J Surfactants Deterg 13:451–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11743-010-1216-510.1007/s11743-010-1216-5 ↗
26. Galus S (2018) Functional properties of soy protein isolate edible films as affected by rapeseed oil concentration. Food Hydrocoll 85:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.02610.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.026 ↗
27. Galus S, Arik Kibar EA, Gniewosz M, Kraśniewska K (2020) Novel materials in the preparation of edible films and coatings—A review. Coatings 10:674. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1007067410.3390/coatings10070674 ↗
28. Ganapathy V, Muthukumaran G, Sudhagar PE et al (2023) Mechanical properties of cellulose-based multiscale composites: a review. Polym Compos 44:734–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2717510.1002/pc.27175 ↗
29. Garusinghe UM, Varanasi S, Raghuwanshi VS et al (2018) Nanocellulose-montmorillonite composites of low water vapour permeability. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 540:233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.01.01010.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.01.010 ↗
30. Grant D, Long WF, Moffat CF, Williamson FB (1991) Infrared spectroscopy of heparins suggests that the region 750–950 cm-1 is sensitive to changes in iduronate residue ring conformation. Biochem J 275(Pt 1):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj275019310.1042/bj2750193 ↗
31. Guan T, Miao Y, Xu L et al (2011) Injectable nimodipine-loaded nanoliposomes: preparation, lyophilization and characteristics. Int J Pharm 410:180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.00910.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.03.009 ↗
32. Guzman-Puyol S, Benítez JJ, Heredia-Guerrero JA (2022a) Transparency of polymeric food packaging materials. Food Res Int 161:111792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.11179210.1016/j.foodres.2022.111792 ↗
33. Guzman-Puyol S, Hierrezuelo J, Benítez JJ et al (2022b) Transparent, UV-blocking, and high barrier cellulose-based bioplastics with naringin as active food packaging materials. Int J Biol Macromol 209:1985–1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.17710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.177 ↗
34. Hafiezal MRM, Khalina A, Zurina ZA et al (2019) Thermal and flammability characteristics of blended jatropha bio-epoxy as matrix in carbon fiber-reinforced polymer. J Compos Sci 3:6. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs301000610.3390/jcs3010006 ↗
35. Hambleton A, Voilley A, Debeaufort F (2011) Transport parameters for aroma compounds through i-carrageenan and sodium alginate-based edible films. Food Hydrocoll 25:1128–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.10.01010.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.10.010 ↗
36. Hassanloofard Z, Gharekhani M, Zandi M et al (2023) Fabrication and characterization of cellulose acetate film containing Falcaria vulgaris extract. Cellulose 30:6833–6853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05337-y10.1007/s10570-023-05337-y ↗
37. Heinze T, El Seoud OA, Koschella A (2018) Structure and properties of cellulose and its derivatives. In: Heinze t, El Seoud OA, Koschella A (eds) Cellulose derivatives: synthesis, structure, and properties. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 39–172
38. Hettrich K, Wagenknecht W, Volkert B, Fischer S (2008) New possibilities of the acetosulfation of cellulose. Macromol Symp 262:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.20085021610.1002/masy.200850216 ↗
39. Ibrahim M, Fahmy T, Salaheldin E et al (2015) Role of tosyl cellulose acetate as potential carrier for controlled drug release. Life Sci J 12:127–133. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj121015.1610.7537/marslsj121015.16 ↗
40. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ibrahim R et al (2019) Effect of sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose concentrations on morphological, mechanical and physical properties of biodegradable films based on agro-waste sugar palm (Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merr) starch. J Mater Res Technol 8:4819–4830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.02810.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.028 ↗
41. Jiang Z, Ngai T (2022) Recent advances in chemically modified cellulose and its derivatives for food packaging applications: a review. Polymers 14:1533. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1408153310.3390/polym14081533 ↗
42. Kaushik A, Kaur R (2016) Thermoplastic starch nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: effect of plasticizer on properties. Compos Interfaces 23:701–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2016.116948710.1080/09276440.2016.1169487 ↗
43. Kaya EC, Yucel U, Kaya EC, Yucel U (2023) Advances in cellulose-based packaging films for food products. In: Cellulose–Fundamentals and conversion into biofuel and useful chemicals. IntechOpen
44. Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T et al (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry: functionalization of cellulose, 1st edn. Wiley10.1002/3527601937 ↗
45. Kowalczyk D, Baraniak B (2014) Effect of candelilla wax on functional properties of biopolymer emulsion films–A comparative study. Food Hydrocoll 41:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.00410.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.004 ↗
46. Kumar S, Aswal DK (2020) Thin film and significance of its thickness. In: Kumar S, Aswal DK (eds) Recent advances in thin films. Springer, Singapore, pp 1–1210.1007/978-981-15-6116-0 ↗
47. la Vega AS, Salazar-Lozas H, Narváez WEV et al (2021) Water clusters as bifunctional catalysts in organic chemistry: the hydrolysis of oxirane and its methyl derivatives. Org Biomol Chem 19:6776–6780. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1OB01026C10.1039/D1OB01026C ↗
48. Law K-Y (2014) Definitions for hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, and superhydrophobicity: getting the Basics Right. J Phys Chem Lett 5:686–688. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz402762h10.1021/jz402762h ↗
49. Liu Y, Ahmed S, Sameen DE et al (2021) A review of cellulose and its derivatives in biopolymer-based for food packaging application. Trends Food Sci Technol 112:532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.01610.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.016 ↗
50. Luecke H, Quiocho FA (1990) High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds. Nature 347:402–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/347402a010.1038/347402a0 ↗
51. Malhotra B, Keshwani A, London HK (2015) Natural polymer based cling films for food packaging. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 7:10–18
52. Marrez DA, Abdelhamid AE, Darwesh OM (2019) Eco-friendly cellulose acetate green synthesized silver nano-composite as antibacterial packaging system for food safety. Food Packag Shelf Life 20:100302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.10030210.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100302 ↗
53. Masek A, Kosmalska A (2022) Technological limitations in obtaining and using cellulose biocomposites. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 10:912052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.91205210.3389/fbioe.2022.912052 ↗
54. Matta E, Tavera-Quiroz MJ, Bertola N (2019) Active edible films of methylcellulose with extracts of green apple (Granny Smith) skin. Int J Biol Macromol 124:1292–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.11410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.114 ↗
55. Mu R, Hong X, Ni Y et al (2019) Recent trends and applications of cellulose nanocrystals in food industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 93:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.01310.1016/j.tifs.2019.09.013 ↗
56. Oprea M, Voicu SI (2020) Recent advances in composites based on cellulose derivatives for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 247:116683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11668310.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116683 ↗
57. Park S, Yoo S, Cho S-M et al (2023) Production of single-component cellulose-based hydrogel and its utilization as adsorbent for aqueous contaminants. Int J Biol Macromol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12508510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125085 ↗
58. Rohowsky J, Heise K, Fischer S, Hettrich K (2016) Synthesis and characterization of novel cellulose ether sulfates. Carbohydr Polym 142:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.06010.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.060 ↗
59. Romão S, Bettencourt A, Ribeiro IAC (2022) Novel features of cellulose-based films as sustainable alternatives for food packaging. Polymers 14:4968. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1422496810.3390/polym14224968 ↗
60. Salari M, Sowti Khiabani M, Rezaei Mokarram R et al (2021) Use of gamma irradiation technology for modification of bacterial cellulose nanocrystals/chitosan nanocomposite film. Carbohydr Polym 253:117144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11714410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117144 ↗
61. Salim MH, Abdellaoui Y, Ait Benhamou A et al (2022) Influence of cellulose nanocrystals from pea pod waste on mechanical, thermal, biodegradability, and barrier properties of chitosan-based films. Cellulose 29:5117–5135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-022-04587-610.1007/s10570-022-04587-6 ↗
62. Seddiqi H, Oliaei E, Honarkar H et al (2021) Cellulose and its derivatives: towards biomedical applications. Cellulose 28:1893–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03674-w10.1007/s10570-020-03674-w ↗
63. Selberg J, Jia M, Rolandi M (2019) Proton conductivity of Glycosaminoglycans. PLOS ONE 14:e0202713. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.020271310.1371/journal.pone.0202713 ↗
64. Shah YA, Bhatia S, Al-Harrasi A et al (2023) Mechanical properties of protein-based food packaging materials. Polymers 15:1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1507172410.3390/polym15071724 ↗
65. Sharma A, Mandal T, Goswami S (2021) Fabrication of cellulose acetate nanocomposite films with lignocelluosic nanofiber filler for superior effect on thermal, mechanical and optical properties. Nano-Struct Nano-Objects 25:100642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.10064210.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100642 ↗
66. Song J, Birbach N, Hinestroza J (2012) Deposition of silver nanoparticles on cellulosic fibers via stabilization of carboxymethyl groups. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9647-310.1007/s10570-011-9647-3 ↗
67. Sorolla-Rosario D, Llorca-Porcel J, Pérez-Martínez M et al (2022) Study of microplastics with semicrystalline and amorphous structure identification by TGA and DSC. J Environ Chem Eng 10:106886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10688610.1016/j.jece.2021.106886 ↗
68. Swaroop K, Gaana MJ, Shruthi SS et al (2019) Studies on swelling behaviour of radiolytically synthesised PVA/gelatin hydrogels. AIP Conf Proc 2115:030050. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.511288910.1063/1.5112889 ↗
69. Tanaka R, Meadows J, Phillips GO, Williams PA (1990) Viscometric and spectroscopic studies on the solution behaviour of hydrophobically modified cellulosic polymers. Carbohydr Polym 12:443–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8617(90)90093-810.1016/0144-8617(90)90093-8 ↗
70. Thomas A (2014) Application of nanotechnolog in food and dairy industry. Indian J Dairy Sci 67:367–374
71. Vergne P (2007) 23 - super low traction under EHD & mixed lubrication regimes. In: Erdemir A, Martin J-M (eds) Superlubricity. Elsevier Science B.V, Amsterdam, pp 427–44310.1016/B978-044452772-1/50054-8 ↗
72. Yang Z, Lu S, Lan L et al (2019) Twelve-coordinated sulfate hydrogen bonding interactions in water-containing Fe(II) system. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 680:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15421406.2019.162440010.1080/15421406.2019.1624400 ↗
73. Zhang K, Peschel D, Bäucker E et al (2011) Synthesis and characterisation of cellulose sulfates regarding the degrees of substitution, degrees of polymerisation and morphology. Carbohydr Polym 83:1659–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.02910.1016/j.carbpol.2010.10.029 ↗
74. Zhang J, Xu W-R, Zhang Y et al (2018a) Liquefied chitin/polyvinyl alcohol based blend membranes: preparation and characterization and antibacterial activity. Carbohydr Polym 180:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.01410.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.014 ↗
75. Zhang S, Kim N, Yokoyama W, Kim Y (2018b) Effects of moisture content on mechanical properties, transparency, and thermal stability of yuba film. Food Chem 243:202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.12710.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.127 ↗
76. Zhang J, Guo Z, Chen S et al (2021) High-barrier, strong, and antibacterial paper fabricated by coating acetylated cellulose and cinnamaldehyde for food packaging. Cellulose 28:4371–4384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-021-03778-x10.1007/s10570-021-03778-x ↗
77. Zhao J, Wang Y, Liu C (2022) Film transparency and opacity measurements. Food Anal Methods 15:2840–2846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02343-x10.1007/s12161-022-02343-x ↗
78. Zhou H, Tong H, Lu J et al (2021) Preparation of bio-based cellulose acetate/chitosan composite film with oxygen and water resistant properties. Carbohydr Polym 270:118381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.11838110.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118381 ↗
79. Zhou L, Liu X, Jiang S et al (2023) In-situ microstructure regulation towards feasible production of self-reinforced lignocellulose nanopaper with multifunctionality. Ind Crops Prod 193:116229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11622910.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116229 ↗