journal article·2025-03

Preparation process for biomass nanofiber/bisphenol A-type epoxy resin composites with superior mechanical and thermal properties

Ryo Hatano, Yuichi Tominaga, Yusuke Imai, Kazunori Nakano

Cellulose· Volume 32· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Turaif HA (2013) Relationship between tensile properties and film formation kinetics of epoxy resin reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose. Prog Org Coat 76(2–3):477–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.11.00110.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.11.001 ↗
2. Amaral I, Granja P, Melo LV, Saramago B, Barbosa M (2006) Functionalization of chitosan membranes through phosphorylation: atomic force microscopy, wettability, and cytotoxicity studies. J Appl Polym Sci 102(1):276–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2373710.1002/app.23737 ↗
3. Ansari F, Galland S, Johansson M, Plummer CJ, Berglund LA (2014) Cellulose nanofiber network for moisture stable, strong and ductile biocomposites and increased epoxy curing rate. Compos A 63:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.017 ↗
4. Anwer MA, Wang J, Guan AQ, Naguib HE (2019) Chitin nano-whiskers (CNWs) as a bio-based bio-degradable reinforcement for epoxy: evaluation of the impact of CNWs on the morphological, fracture, mechanical, dynamic mechanical, and thermal characteristics of DGEBA epoxy resin. RSC Adv 9(20):11063–11076. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra00769e10.1039/c9ra00769e ↗
5. Capricho JC, Fox B, Hameed N (2020) Multifunctionality in epoxy resins. Polym Revi 60(1):1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2019.165006310.1080/15583724.2019.1650063 ↗
6. Cunha AG, Fernandes SC, Freire CS, Silvestre AJ, Neto CP, Gandini A (2008) What is the real value of chitosan’s surface energy? Biomacromol 9(2):610–614. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm701199g10.1021/bm701199g ↗
7. Deng S, Zhang J, Ye L, Wu J (2008) Toughening epoxies with halloysite nanotubes. Polymer 49(23):5119–5127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.02710.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.027 ↗
8. Ejaz H, Mubashar A, Uddin E, Ali Z, Arif N (2022) Effect of functionalised and non-functionalised GNPs addition on strength properties of high viscous epoxy adhesive and lap shear joints. Polym Test 113:107680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10768010.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107680 ↗
9. Ekeocha J, Ellingford C, Pan M, Wemyss AM, Bowen C, Wan C (2021) Challenges and opportunities of self-healing polymers and devices for extreme and hostile environments. Adv Mater 33(33):2008052. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200805210.1002/adma.202008052 ↗
10. Frone AN, Uşurelu CD, Oprică GM, Panaitescu DM, Gabor AR, Nicolae C-A, Ciuprina F, Damian CM, Raduly FM (2023) Contribution of the surface treatment of nanofibrillated cellulose on the properties of bio-based epoxy nanocomposites intended for flexible electronics. Int J Mol Sci 24(7):6544. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2407654410.3390/ijms24076544 ↗
11. Gañan P, Garbizu S, Llano-Ponte R, Mondragon I (2005) Surface modification of sisal fibers: effects on the mechanical and thermal properties of their epoxy composites. Polym Compos 26(2):121–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2008310.1002/pc.20083 ↗
12. Hatano R, Tominaga Y, Imai Y, Nakano K (2023) Influence of mechanical defibration and chemical interaction of chitosan nanofibers on epoxy resin reinforcement. Cellulose 30(10):6333–6347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05303-810.1007/s10570-023-05303-8 ↗
13. Huang D, Peng Z, Hu Z, Zhang S, He J, Cao L, Zhou Y, Zhao F (2013) A new consolidation system for aged silk fabrics: effect of reactive epoxide-ethylene glycol diglycidyl ether. React Funct Polym 73(1):168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.08.01910.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2012.08.019 ↗
14. Ifuku S, Nogi M, Abe K, Yoshioka M, Morimoto M, Saimoto H, Yano H (2009) Preparation of chitin nanofibers with a uniform width as α-chitin from crab shells. Biomacromol 10(6):1584–1588. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900163d10.1021/bm900163d ↗
15. Iotti M, Gregersen ØW, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19(1):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0248-210.1007/s10924-010-0248-2 ↗
16. Iwamoto S, Kai W, Isogai A, Iwata T (2009) Elastic modulus of single cellulose microfibrils from tunicate measured by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromol 10(9):2571–2576. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm900520n10.1021/bm900520n ↗
17. Iwatake A, Nogi M, Yano H (2008) Cellulose nanofiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Compos Sci Technol 68(9):2103–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.006 ↗
18. Kishi H, Uesawa K, Matsuda S, Murakami A (2004) Improvement in peel-adhesive properties by toughening of epoxy resins using preformed thermoplastic polymer particles. J Adhesion Soc Jpn 40(5):177–183. https://doi.org/10.11618/adhesion.40.17710.11618/adhesion.40.177 ↗
19. Kurita H, Ishigami R, Wu C, Narita F (2021) Mechanical properties of mechanically-defibrated cellulose nanofiber reinforced epoxy resin matrix composites. J Compos Mater 55(4):455–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832096743010.1177/0021998320967430 ↗
20. Lavoratti A, Scienza LC, Zattera AJ (2016) Dynamic-mechanical and thermomechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber/polyester resin composites. Carbohydr Polym 136:955–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.008 ↗
21. Lu J, Askeland P, Drzal LT (2008) Surface modification of microfibrillated cellulose for epoxy composite applications. Polymer 49(5):1285–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.02810.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.028 ↗
22. McCoy JD, Ancipink WB, Clarkson CM, Kropka JM, Celina MC, Giron NH, Hailesilassie L, Fredj N (2016) Cure mechanisms of diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy with diethanolamine. Polymer 105:243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.10.02810.1016/j.polymer.2016.10.028 ↗
23. Mushi NE, Nishino T, Berglund LA, Zhou Q (2018) Strong and tough chitin film from α-chitin nanofibers prepared by high pressure homogenization and chitosan addition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7(1):1692–1697. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0545210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05452 ↗
24. Nair SS, Dartiailh C, Levin DB, Yan N (2019) Highly toughened and transparent biobased epoxy composites reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils. Polymers 11(4):612. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1104061210.3390/polym11040612 ↗
25. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 ↗
26. Neves RM, Ornaghi HL Jr, Zattera AJ, Amico SC (2021) Recent studies on modified cellulose/nanocellulose epoxy composites: a systematic review. Carbohydr Polym 255:117366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11736610.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117366 ↗
27. Nogi M, Kurosaki F, Yano H, Takano M (2010) Preparation of nanofibrillar carbon from chitin nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym 81(4):919–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.00610.1016/j.carbpol.2010.04.006 ↗
28. Nogi M, Kim C, Sugahara T, Inui T, Takahashi T, Suganuma K (2013) High thermal stability of optical transparency in cellulose nanofiber paper. Appl Phys Lett 102(18):181911. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480436110.1063/1.4804361 ↗
29. Omrani A, Simon LC, Rostami AA (2008) Influences of cellulose nanofiber on the epoxy network formation. Mater Sci Eng A 490(1–2):131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.01210.1016/j.msea.2008.01.012 ↗
30. Orzan E, Janewithayapun R, Gutkin R, Re GL, Kallio K (2021) Thermo-mechanical variability of post-industrial and post-consumer recyclate PC-ABS. Polym Test 99:107216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10721610.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107216 ↗
31. Pruksawan S, Samitsu S, Fujii Y, Torikai N, Naito M (2020) Toughening effect of rodlike cellulose nanocrystals in epoxy adhesive. Acs Appl Polym Mater 2(3):1234–1243. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b0110210.1021/acsapm.9b01102 ↗
32. Rajan STK, Nagarajan K, Balasubramani V, Sathickbasha K, Sanjay M, Siengchin S, Balaji A (2023) Investigation of mechanical and thermo-mechanical characteristics of silane-treated cellulose nanofibers from agricultural waste reinforced epoxy adhesive composites. Int J Adhes Adhes 126:103492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10349210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103492 ↗
33. Raquez J-M, Deléglise M, Lacrampe M-F, Krawczak P (2010) Thermosetting (bio) materials derived from renewable resources: a critical review. Prog Polym Sci 35(4):487–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.01.001 ↗
34. Saba N, Safwan A, Sanyang M, Mohammad F, Pervaiz M, Jawaid M, Alothman O, Sain M (2017) Thermal and dynamic mechanical properties of cellulose nanofibers reinforced epoxy composites. Int J Biol Macromol 102:822–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.07410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.074 ↗
35. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromol 14(1):248–253. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm301674e10.1021/bm301674e ↗
36. Sato Y, Kondo Y, Tsujita K, Kawai N (2005) Degradation behaviour and recovery of bisphenol-A from epoxy resin and polycarbonate resin by liquid-phase chemical recycling. Polym Degrad Stab 89(2):317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.015 ↗
37. Shibata M, Ohkita T (2017) Fully biobased epoxy resin systems composed of a vanillin-derived epoxy resin and renewable phenolic hardeners. Eur Polym J 92:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.05.00710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.05.007 ↗
38. Shibata M, Enjoji M, Sakazume K, Ifuku S (2016) Bio-based epoxy/chitin nanofiber composites cured with amine-type hardeners containing chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 144:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.033 ↗
39. Shibata M, Fujigasaki J, Enjoji M, Shibita A, Teramoto N, Ifuku S (2018) Amino acid-cured bio-based epoxy resins and their biocomposites with chitin-and chitosan-nanofibers. Eur Polym J 98:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.11.024 ↗
40. Shrestha S, Chowdhury RA, Toomey MD, Betancourt D, Montes F, Youngblood JP (2019) Surface hydrophobization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) using a facile, aqueous modification process and its effect on properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Cellulose 26(18):9631–9643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02762-w10.1007/s10570-019-02762-w ↗
41. Silva R, Elvira C, Mano J, San Roman J, Reis R (2004) Influence of β-radiation sterilisation in properties of new chitosan/soybean protein isolate membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15(4):523–528. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jmsm.0000021132.60475.7910.1023/b:jmsm.0000021132.60475.79 ↗
42. Srivastava V (2011) Effect of carbon nanotubes on the strength of adhesive lap joints of C/C and C/C–SiC ceramic fibre composites. Int J Adhes Adhes 31(6):486–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.00610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.03.006 ↗
43. Tominaga Y, Sato K, Hotta Y, Shibuya H, Sugie M, Saruyama T (2018) Improvement of thermal conductivity of composite film composed of cellulose nanofiber and nanodiamond by optimizing process parameters. Cellulose 25(7):3973–3983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1869-110.1007/s10570-018-1869-1 ↗
44. Trinh BM, Mekonnen T (2018) Hydrophobic esterification of cellulose nanocrystals for epoxy reinforcement. Polymer 155:64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.07610.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.076 ↗
45. Varanasi S, He R, Batchelor W (2013) Estimation of cellulose nanofibre aspect ratio from measurements of fibre suspension gel point. Cellulose 20(4):1885–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9972-910.1007/s10570-013-9972-9 ↗
46. Wei Y, Hadigheh S (2022) Cost benefit and life cycle analysis of CFRP and GFRP waste treatment methods. Constr Build Mater 348:128654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12865410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128654 ↗
47. Wei Y, Hudson S, Mayer J, Kaplan D (1992) The crosslinking of chitosan fibers. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 30(10):2187–2193. https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.1992.08030101310.1002/pola.1992.080301013 ↗
48. Xu S, Girouard N, Schueneman G, Shofner ML, Meredith JC (2013a) Mechanical and thermal properties of waterborne epoxy composites containing cellulose nanocrystals. Polymer 54(24):6589–6598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2013.10.011 ↗
49. Xu X, Liu F, Jiang L, Zhu J, Haagenson D, Wiesenborn DP (2013b) Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(8):2999–3009. https://doi.org/10.1021/am302624t10.1021/am302624t ↗
50. Yeo J-S, Kim OY, Hwang S-H (2017) The effect of chemical surface treatment on the fracture toughness of microfibrillated cellulose reinforced epoxy composites. J Ind Eng Chem 45:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.03910.1016/j.jiec.2016.09.039 ↗
51. Zhang L, Batchelor W, Varanasi S, Tsuzuki T, Wang X (2012) Effect of cellulose nanofiber dimensions on sheet forming through filtration. Cellulose 19(2):561–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9641-910.1007/s10570-011-9641-9 ↗
52. Zhang C, Tominaga Y, Sato K, Imai Y (2021) Simultaneous attainment of particle dispersion and surface modification of Al2O3 nanoparticles via wet–jet milling. J Compos Mater 55(4):521–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832095347410.1177/0021998320953474 ↗
53. Zhang C, Cui J, Sui W, Gong Y, Liu H, Ao Y, Shang L (2023) High heat resistance, strength, and toughness of epoxy resin with cellulose nanofibers and structurally designed ionic liquid. Chem Eng J 478:147063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.14706310.1016/j.cej.2023.147063 ↗
54. Zhao J, Li Q, Zhang X, Xiao M, Zhang W, Lu C (2017) Grafting of polyethylenimine onto cellulose nanofibers for interfacial enhancement in their epoxy nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 157:1419–1425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.02510.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.025 ↗