3D printed PLA based bionanocomposites with improved mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties: effect of varying CNC reinforcements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Adediran AA, Akinwande AA, Balogun OA, Olorunfemi BJ, Saravana Kumar M (2021) Optimisation studies of stir casting parameters and mechanical properties of TiO2 reinforced Al 7075 composite using response surface methodology. Sci Rep 11(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99168-110.1038/s41598-021-99168-1 ↗
2. Agbakoba VC, Mokhena TC, Ferg EE, Hlangothi SP, John MJ (2023) PLA bio-nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) for 3D printing applications. Cellulose 30(18):11537–11559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-023-05549-210.1007/s10570-023-05549-2 ↗
3. Andrew JJ, Dhakal HN (2022) Sustainable biobased composites for advanced applications: recent trends and future opportunities—a critical review. Compos Part C 7:100220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10022010.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100220 ↗
4. Awad S, Siakeng R, Khalaf EM, Mahmoud MH, Fouad H, Jawaid M, Sain M (2023) Evaluation of characterisation efficiency of natural fibre-reinforced polylactic acid biocomposites for 3D printing applications. Sustain Mater Technol 36:e00620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2023.e0062010.1016/j.susmat.2023.e00620 ↗
5. Bourell D, Kruth JP, Leu M, Levy G, Rosen D, Beese AM, Clare A (2017) Materials for additive manufacturing. CIRP Ann 66(2):659–681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.00910.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
6. Chen X, Yang R, Wu X (2022) Printing of MXene-based materials and the applications: a state-of-the-art review. 2D Materials 9(4):042002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ac800910.1088/2053-1583/ac8009 ↗
7. Dong J, Li M, Zhou L, Lee S, Mei C, Xu X, Wu Q (2017) The influence of grafted cellulose nanofibers and postextrusion annealing treatment on selected properties of poly(lactic acid) filaments for 3D printing. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 55(11):847–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2433310.1002/polb.24333 ↗
8. Dong J, Mei C, Han J, Lee S, Wu Q (2019) 3D printed poly(lactic acid) composites with grafted cellulose nanofibers: Effect of nanofiber and post-fabrication annealing treatment on composite flexural properties. Addit Manuf 28:621–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.06.00410.1016/j.addma.2019.06.004 ↗
9. Fico D, Rizzo D, Casciaro R, Corcione CE (2022) A Review of polymer-based materials for fused filament fabrication (FFF): focus on sustainability and recycled materials. Polymers 14(3):465. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1403046510.3390/polym14030465 ↗
10. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20(1):583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y ↗
11. Gao X, Yu N, Li J (2020) Influence of printing parameters and filament quality on structure and properties of polymer composite components used in the fields of automotive. In: Structure and properties of additive manufactured polymer components, pp 303–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819535-2.00010-710.1016/B978-0-12-819535-2.00010-7 ↗
12. Gupta MK (2018) Thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of hybrid jute/sisal fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part l 232(9):743–748. https://doi.org/10.1177/146442071664639810.1177/1464420716646398 ↗
13. Gupta MK, Srivastava RK (2017) Mechanical, thermal and dynamic mechanical analysis of jute fibre reinforced epoxy composite. Indian J Fibre Text Res 42:1–14
14. Gupta A, Prasad A, Mulchandani N, Shah M, Ravi Sankar M, Kumar S, Katiyar V (2017) Multifunctional nanohydroxyapatite-promoted toughened high-molecular-weight stereocomplex poly (lactic acid)-based bionanocomposite for both 3D-printed orthopedic implants and high-temperature engineering applications. ACS Omega 2(7):4039–4052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b0091510.1021/acsomega.7b00915 ↗
15. Jadhav H, Jadha A, Takkalkar P, Hossain N, Nizammudin S, Zahoor M, Jamal M, Mubarak NM, Griffin G, Kao N (2020) Potential of polylactide based nanocomposites-nanopolysaccharide filler for reinforcement purpose: a comprehensive review. J Polym Res 27(11):330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-020-02287-y10.1007/s10965-020-02287-y ↗
16. Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hassan A, Dungan R, Hadiyane A (2013) Effect of jute fibre loading on tensile and dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm epoxy composites. Compos B Eng 45(1):619–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.068 ↗
17. Kabir SMF, Mathur K, Seyam AFM (2020) A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: History, mechanism, materials and properties. Compos Struct 232:111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11147610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
18. Kamarudin SH, Abdullah LC, Aung MM, Ratnam CT, Jusoh Talib ER (2018) A study of mechanical and morphological properties of PLA based biocomposites prepared with EJO vegetable oil based plasticiser and kenaf fibres. Mater Res Express 5(8):085314. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aabb8910.1088/2053-1591/aabb89 ↗
19. Krishnan KA, Jose C, KR R, George KE (2015) Sisal nanofibril reinforced polypropylene/polystyrene blends: morphology, mechanical, dynamic mechanical and water transmission studies. Ind Crop Prod 71:173–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.07610.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.076 ↗
20. Li X, Ni Z, Bai S, Lou B (2018) Preparation and mechanical properties of fiber reinforced PLA for 3D printing materials. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 322:022012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/322/2/02201210.1088/1757-899X/322/2/022012 ↗
21. Liu Z, Lei Q, Xing S (2019) Mechanical characteristics of wood, ceramic, metal and carbon fiber-based PLA composites fabricated by FDM. J Mater Res Technol 8(5):3741–3751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.03410.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.034 ↗
22. Lu F, Yu H, Yan C, Yao J (2016) Polylactic acid nanocomposite films with spherical nanocelluloses as efficient nucleation agents: effects on crystallisation, mechanical and thermal properties. RSC Adv 6(51):46008–46018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA02768G10.1039/C6RA02768G ↗
23. Luo X, Chen H, Wu X (2023) Nanomaterials reinforced polymer filament for fused deposition modeling: a state-of-the-art review. Polymers 15(14):2980. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1514298010.3390/polym15142980 ↗
24. Mathew AP, Oksman K, Sain M (2006) The effect of morphology and chemical characteristics of cellulose reinforcements on the crystallinity of polylactic acid. J Appl Polym Sci 101(1):300–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2334610.1002/app.23346 ↗
25. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10(2):1–11
26. Oyama HT, Abe S (2015) Stereocomplex poly(lactic acid) alloys with superb heat resistance and toughness. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3(12):3245–3252. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b0083210.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00832 ↗
27. Rajpurohit SR, Dave HK (2018) Effect of process parameters on tensile strength of FDM printed PLA part. Rapid Prototyp J 24(8):1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2017-013410.1108/RPJ-06-2017-0134 ↗
28. Rosli NA, Wan Ishak WH, Ahmad I (2021) Eco-friendly high-density polyethylene/amorphous cellulose composites: Environmental and functional value. J Clean Prod 290:125886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12588610.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125886 ↗
29. Sahu P, Gupta MK (2020) Lowering in water absorption capacity and mechanical degradation of sisal/epoxy composite by sodium bicarbonate treatment and PLA coating. Polym Compos 41(2):668–681. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2539710.1002/pc.25397 ↗
30. Shahar FS, Hameed Sultan MT, Safri SNA, Jawaid M, Abu Talib Abd R, Basri AA, Md Shah AU (2022) Fatigue and impact properties of 3D printed PLA reinforced with kenaf particles. J Mater Res Technol 16:461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.02310.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.023 ↗
31. Shen R, Xue S, Xu Y, Liu Q, Feng Z, Ren H, Zhai H (2020) Research progress and development demand of nanocellulose reinforced polymer composites. Polymer 12(2113):1–19
32. Shojaeiarani J, Bajwa DS, Chanda S (2021) Cellulose nanocrystal based composites: a review. Compos Part C. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10016410.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100164 ↗
33. Tao Y, Liu M, Han W, Li P (2021) Waste office paper filled polylactic acid composite filaments for 3D printing. Compos Part B Eng 221:108998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10899810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108998 ↗
34. Trivedi AK, Gupta MK (2023) An efficient approach to extract nanocrystalline cellulose from sisal fibers: structural, morphological, thermal and antibacterial analysis. Int J Biol Macromol 233:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12349610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123496 ↗
35. Trivedi AK, Gupta MK (2024) PLA-based biodegradable bionanocomposite filaments reinforced with nanocellulose: development and analysis of properties. Sci Rep 14(23819):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-71619-510.1038/s41598-024-71619-5 ↗
36. Trivedi AK, Gupta MK, Singh H (2023) PLA based biocomposites for sustainable products: a review. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res 6(4):382–39536665254553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2023.02.00210.1016/j.aiepr.2023.02.002 ↗
37. Vakharia VS, Kuentz L, Salem A, Halbig MC, Salem JA, Singh M (2021) Additive manufacturing and characterization of metal particulate reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) polymer composites. Polymers 13(20):3545. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1320354510.3390/polym13203545 ↗
38. Vanaei S, Parizi MS, Vanaei S, Salemizadehparizi F, Vanaei HR (2021) An overview on materials and techniques in 3D bioprinting toward biomedical application. Eng Regener 2:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.00110.1016/j.engreg.2020.12.001 ↗
39. Wimpenny DI, Pandey PM, Jyothish Kumar L (2016) Advances in 3D printing and additive manufacturing technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0812-210.1007/978-981-10-0812-2 ↗
40. Xiao X, Chevali VS, Song P, He D, Wang H (2019) Polylactide/hemp hurd biocomposites as sustainable 3D printing feedstock. Compos Sci Technol 184:107887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.10788710.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107887 ↗
41. Zaman UK, Boesch E, Siadat A, Rivette M, Baqai AA (2019) Impact of fused deposition modeling (FDM) process parameters on strength of built parts using Taguchi’s design of experiments. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 101(5–8):1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3014-610.1007/s00170-018-3014-6 ↗
42. Zhou X, Deng J, Fang C, Lei W, Song Y, Zhang Z, Huang Z, Li Y (2021) Additive manufacturing of CNTs/PLA composites and the correlation between microstructure and functional properties. J Mater Sci Technol 60:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.03810.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.038 ↗