Laser-patterning bacterial nanocellulose for cell-controlled interaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The interfacial topography of biomaterials has been identified as a major biophysical regulator of cell behavior and function, a role played through the interplay with biochemical cues. In this work, we demonstrate the potential of laser as a versatile technology for the direct fine-tuning of the topography of Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) with bioinspired topographies and micropatterns on a cell size scale. Two lasers were used, with different wavelengths—IR (CO2, 10600 nm) and UV (tripled Nd: YVO4, 355 nm) —attempting to reproduce the Pitcher-plant topography and to create cell-contact guidance patterns, respectively. Different topographies with parallel grooves featuring a 20–300 μm period were generated on the BNC surface with high fidelity and reliability of the generated microstructures, as demonstrated by 3D optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. Moreover, it was demonstrated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy that laser processing does not result in detectable chemical modification of BNC. The developed anisotropic microstructures can control cell behavior, particularly regarding morphology, alignment, and spatial distribution. Thus, this proof-of-concept study on the high-resolution laser patterning of BNC opens new perspectives for the development of cell-modulating laser-engineered BNC interfaces, scaffolds, and other advanced medical devices, which can potentially broaden the application of BNC in the biomedical field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. Abagnale G, Steger M, Nguyen VH et al (2015) Surface topography enhances differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. Biomaterials 61:316–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.030 ↗
2. Anselme K, Bigerelle M (2011) Role of materials surface topography on mammalian cell response. Int Mater Rev 56:243–266. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743280411Y.000000000110.1179/1743280411Y.0000000001 ↗
3. Azzam D, Romiyo P, Nguyen T et al (2018) Dural Repair in cranial surgery is associated with moderate rates of complications with both autologous and nonautologous dural substitutes. World Neurosurg 113:244–24810.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.115 ↗
4. Bae S, Shoda M (2004) Chap. 12 - bacterial cellulose production by Fed-batch fermentation in Molasses medium. Biotechnol Prog 20:1366–137110.1021/bp0498490 ↗
5. Biela SA, Su Y, Spatz JP, Kemkemer R (2009) Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano–micro range. Acta Biomater 5:2460–2466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.00310.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.003 ↗
6. Bottan S, Robotti F, Jayathissa P et al (2015) Surface-structured bacterial cellulose with guided assembly-based biolithography (GAB). ACS Nano 9:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn503612510.1021/nn5036125 ↗
7. Chan CW, Carson L, Smith GC et al (2017) Enhancing the antibacterial performance of orthopaedic implant materials by fibre laser surface engineering. Appl Surf Sci 404:67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.23310.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.233 ↗
8. da Rocha-Azevedo B, Grinnell F (2013) Fibroblast morphogenesis on 3D collagen matrices: the balance between cell clustering and cell migration. Exp Cell Res 319:2440–2446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.00310.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.003 ↗
9. da Rocha-Azevedo B, Ho C-H, Grinnell F (2013) Fibroblast cluster formation on 3D collagen matrices requires cell contraction dependent fibronectin matrix organization. Exp Cell Res 319:546–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.10.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2012.10.005 ↗
10. de Oliveira Barud HG, da Silva RR, da Silva Barud H et al (2016) A multipurpose natural and renewable polymer in medical applications: bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 153:406–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.05910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.059 ↗
11. de Vicente G, Lensen MC (2016) Topographically and elastically micropatterned PEG-based hydrogels to control cell adhesion and migration. Eur Polym J 78:290–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.02010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.020 ↗
12. Dourado F, Leal M, Fontão A et al (2016) Chap. 7 - celluloses as food ingredients/additives: is there a room for BNC ? In: Gama M, Dourado F, Bielecki S (eds.) Bacterial nanocellulose: from biotechnology to bio-economy. Elsevier: Amsterdam pp 123–13510.1016/B978-0-444-63458-0.00007-X ↗
13. Ferrari A, Bottan S, Robotti F, Stefopoulos G (2023) WO2023274669A1
14. Fu J, Liu X, Tan L et al (2020) Modulation of the mechanosensing of mesenchymal stem cells by laser-induced patterning for the acceleration of tissue reconstruction through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway activation. Acta Biomater 101:152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.04110.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.041 ↗
15. Gao C, Tang L, Hong J et al (2019) Effect of laser induced topography with moderate stiffness on human mesenchymal stem cell behavior. J Phys Mater 2:034006. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7639/ab15ee10.1088/2515-7639/ab15ee ↗
16. Ge L, Yang L, Bron R et al (2020) Topography-mediated fibroblast cell migration is influenced by direction, wavelength, and amplitude. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3:2104–2116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c0000110.1021/acsabm.0c00001 ↗
17. Gilchrist CL, Ruch DS, Little D, Guilak F (2014) Micro-scale and meso-scale architectural cues cooperate and compete to direct aligned tissue formation. Biomaterials 35:10015–10024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.04710.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.047 ↗
18. Halib N, Ahmad I, Grassi M, Grassi G (2019) The remarkable three-dimensional network structure of bacterial cellulose for tissue engineering applications. Int J Pharm 566:631–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.01710.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.06.017 ↗
19. Hantsche H (1993) High resolution XPS of organic polymers, the scienta ESCA300 database., By G, Beamson, Briggs D, Wiley, Chichester 1992, 295 pp., hardcover, £ 65.00, ISBN 0-471-93592-1. Adv Mater 5:778–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.1993005103510.1002/adma.19930051035 ↗
20. Holt DJ, Chamberlain LM, Grainger DW (2010) Cell–cell signaling in co-cultures of macrophages and fibroblasts. Biomaterials 31:9382–9394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.10110.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.101 ↗
21. Hu Y, You J-O, Aizenberg J (2016) Micropatterned hydrogel surface with high-aspect-ratio features for cell guidance and tissue growth. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:21939–21945. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1226810.1021/acsami.5b12268 ↗
22. Hu Y, Liu H, Zhou X et al (2019) Surface engineering of spongy bacterial cellulose via constructing crossed groove/column micropattern by low-energy CO2 laser photolithography toward scar-free wound healing. Mater Sci Eng C 99:333–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.11610.1016/j.msec.2019.01.116 ↗
23. Illa MP, Sharma CS, Khandelwal M (2019) Tuning the physiochemical properties of bacterial cellulose: effect of drying conditions. J Mater Sci 54:12024–12035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03737-910.1007/s10853-019-03737-9 ↗
24. ISO Standards, Ethiopian Standard Agency (2012) ISO5351, Pulps–determination of limiting viscosity number in cupri-ethylenediamine (CED) solution
25. ISO Standards (2008) ISO638, Paper, board and pulps–determination of dry matter content - oven-drying method
26. Jacek P, da Silva FAGS, Dourado F et al (2021) Optimization and characterization of bacterial nanocellulose produced by Komagataeibacter Rhaeticus K3. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl 2:100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2020.10002210.1016/j.carpta.2020.100022 ↗
27. Kianoush F, Nematollahi M, Waterfield JD, Brunette DM (2017) Regulation of RAW264.7 macrophage polarization on smooth and rough surface topographies by galectin-3. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 105:2499–2509. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3610710.1002/jbm.a.36107 ↗
28. Klemm D, Cranston ED, Fischer D et al (2018) Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science: today’s state. Mater Today 21:720–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 ↗
29. Labonte D, Robinson A, Bauer U, Federle W (2021) Disentangling the role of surface topography and intrinsic wettability in the prey capture mechanism of Nepenthes pitcher plants. Acta Biomater 119:225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.00510.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.005 ↗
30. Lakshminarayanan S (2018) Micro/nano patterning on polymers using soft lithography technique. In: Thirumalai J (ed) Micro/nanolithography –a heuristic aspect on the enduring technology. InTech, London
31. Lee K, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2014) More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol Biosci 14:10–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20130029810.1002/mabi.201300298 ↗
32. Lendenmann T, Fischer M, Bottan S et al (2015) WO2015040106A1
33. Li H, Wong YS, Wen F et al (2013) Human mesenchymal stem-cell behaviour on direct laser micropatterned electrospun scaffolds with hierarchical structures. Macromol Biosci 13:299–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.20120031810.1002/mabi.201200318 ↗
34. Li H, Lai Y, Huang J et al (2015) Multifunctional wettability patterns prepared by laser processing on superhydrophobic TiO2 nanostructured surfaces. J Mater Chem B 3:342–347. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB01814A10.1039/C4TB01814A ↗
35. Liu W, Sun Q, Zheng Z et al (2022) Topographic cues guiding cell polarization via distinct cellular mechanosensing pathways. Small. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20210432810.1002/smll.202104328 ↗
36. Liu H, Hu Y, Wu X et al (2023) Optimization of surface-engineered micropatterns on bacterial cellulose for guided scar-free skin wound healing. Biomolecules 13:793. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom1305079310.3390/biom13050793 ↗
37. Luu TU, Gott SC, Woo BWK et al (2015) Micro- and nanopatterned topographical cues for regulating macrophage cell shape and phenotype. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:28665–28672. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b1058910.1021/acsami.5b10589 ↗
38. Luz EPCG, Chaves PHS, Vieira L, de AP et al (2020) In vitro degradability and bioactivity of oxidized bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite composites. Carbohydr Polym 237:116174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.11617410.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116174 ↗
39. Mamlouk D, Gullo M (2013) Acetic acid bacteria: physiology and carbon sources oxidation. Indian J Microbiol 53:377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-013-0414-z10.1007/s12088-013-0414-z ↗
40. Mariani E, Lisignoli G, Borzì RM, Pulsatelli L (2019) Biomaterials: foreign bodies or tuners for the immune response? Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2003063610.3390/ijms20030636 ↗
41. McWhorter FY, Wang T, Nguyen P et al (2013) Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:17253–17258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.130888711010.1073/pnas.1308887110 ↗
42. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym 135:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 ↗
43. O’Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Pognan F (2000) Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. Eur J Biochem 267:5421–5426. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01606.x ↗
44. Pang M, Huang Y, Meng F et al (2020) Application of bacterial cellulose in skin and bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J 122:109365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.10936510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109365 ↗
45. Parker JB, Griffin MF, Spielman AF et al (2023) Exploring the overlooked roles and mechanisms of fibroblasts in the foreign body response. Adv Wound Care 12:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2022.006610.1089/wound.2022.0066 ↗
46. Pertile RAN, Andrade FK, Alves C, Gama M (2010) Surface modification of bacterial cellulose by nitrogen-containing plasma for improved interaction with cells. Carbohydr Polym 82:692–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.03710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.037 ↗
47. Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y ↗
48. Pham HL, Yang DH, Chae WR et al (2023) PDMS micropatterns coated with PDA and RGD induce a regulatory macrophage-like phenotype. Micromachines 14:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1403067310.3390/mi14030673 ↗
49. Qin D, Xia Y, Whitesides GM (2010) Soft lithography for micro- and nanoscale patterning. Nat Protoc 5:491–502. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2009.23410.1038/nprot.2009.234 ↗
50. Rafiee K, Naffakh-Moosavy H, Tamjid E (2020) The effect of laser frequency on roughness, microstructure, cell viability and attachment of Ti6Al4V alloy. Mater Sci Eng C 109:110637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.11063710.1016/j.msec.2020.110637 ↗
51. Riveiro A, Maçon ALB, del Val J et al (2018) Laser surface texturing of polymers for biomedical applications. Front Phys. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2018.0001610.3389/fphy.2018.00016 ↗
52. Robotti F, Bottan S, Fraschetti F et al (2018) A micron-scale surface topography design reducing cell adhesion to implanted materials. Sci Rep 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29167-210.1038/s41598-018-29167-2 ↗
53. Robotti F, Sterner I, Bottan S et al (2020) Microengineered biosynthesized cellulose as anti-fibrotic in vivo protection for cardiac implantable electronic devices. Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11958310.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119583 ↗
54. Rodrigues AC, Costa L, Silva-Carvalho R et al (2023) Assessment of the gastrointestinal fate of bacterial nanocellulose and its toxicological effects after repeated-dose oral administration. Environ Sci Nano 10:781–799. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EN01019D10.1039/D2EN01019D ↗
55. Samanta A, Wang Q, Shaw SK, Ding H (2020) Roles of chemistry modification for laser textured metal alloys to achieve extreme surface wetting behaviors. Mater Des 192:108744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10874410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108744 ↗
56. Samyn P, Meftahi A, Geravand SA et al (2023) Opportunities for bacterial nanocellulose in biomedical applications: review on biosynthesis, modification and challenges. Int J Biol Macromol 231:123316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12331610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123316 ↗
57. Shivakoti I, Kibria G, Cep R et al (2021) Laser surface texturing for biomedical applications: a review. Coatings 11:124. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1102012410.3390/coatings11020124 ↗
58. Singh S, Awuah D, Rostam HM et al (2017) Unbiased analysis of the impact of micropatterned biomaterials on macrophage behavior provides insights beyond predefined polarization states. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 3:969–978. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b0010410.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00104 ↗
59. Sridharan R, Cameron AR, Kelly DJ et al (2015) Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles. Mater Today 18:313–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.01910.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.019 ↗
60. Stasiak L, Błażejak S (2009) Acetic acid bacteria – perspectives of application in biotechnology – a review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci 59:17–23
61. Sun Q, Hou Y, Chu Z, Wei Q (2022) Soft overcomes the hard: flexible materials adapt to cell adhesion to promote cell mechanotransduction. Bioact Mater 10:397–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.02610.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.08.026 ↗
62. Taraballi F, Sushnitha M, Tsao C et al (2018) Biomimetic tissue engineering: tuning the immune and inflammatory response to implantable biomaterials. Adv Healthc Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.20180049010.1002/adhm.201800490 ↗
63. Tiainen L, Abreu P, Buciumeanu M et al (2019) Novel laser surface texturing for improved primary stability of titanium implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 98:26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.05210.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.04.052 ↗
64. Topalovic T, Nierstrasz VA, Bautista L et al (2007) XPS and contact angle study of cotton surface oxidation by catalytic bleaching. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Asp 296:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.02610.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.09.026 ↗
65. Torgbo S, Sukyai P (2018) Bacterial cellulose-based scaffold materials for bone tissue engineering. Appl Mater Today 11:34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2018.01.00410.1016/j.apmt.2018.01.004 ↗
66. Tylek T, Blum C, Hrynevich A et al (2020) Precisely defined fiber scaffolds with 40 µm porosity induce elongation driven M2-like polarization of human macrophages. Biofabrication 12:025007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e ↗
67. Vaheri A, Enzerink A, Räsänen K, Salmenperä P (2009) Nemosis, a novel way of fibroblast activation, in inflammation and cancer. Exp Cell Res 315:1633–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.03.00510.1016/j.yexcr.2009.03.005 ↗
68. Wang T, Luu TU, Chen A et al (2016) Topographical modulation of macrophage phenotype by shrink-film multi-scale wrinkles. Biomater Sci 4:948–952. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6bm00224b10.1039/c6bm00224b ↗
69. Wang J, Tavakoli J, Tang Y (2019) Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods – a review. Carbohydr Polym 219:63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.00810.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.008 ↗
70. Xu LC, Wo Y, Meyerhoff ME, Siedlecki CA (2017) Inhibition of bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by dual functional textured and nitric oxide releasing surfaces. Acta Biomater 51:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.03010.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.030 ↗
71. Yang L, Gao Q, Ge L et al (2020a) Topography induced stiffness alteration of stem cells influences osteogenic differentiation. Biomater Sci 8:2638–2652. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM00264J10.1039/D0BM00264J ↗
72. Yang L, Ge L, Zhou Q et al (2020b) Biomimetic multiscale hierarchical topography enhances osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Mater Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20200038510.1002/admi.202000385 ↗
73. Yang Y, Lin Y, Zhang Z et al (2021) Micro/nano-net guides M2-pattern macrophage cytoskeleton distribution via Src–ROCK signalling for enhanced angiogenesis. Biomater Sci 9:3334–3347. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1BM00116G10.1039/D1BM00116G ↗
74. Yang J, Zhu Z, Liu Y et al (2022) Double-modified bacterial cellulose/Soy protein isolate composites by laser hole forming and selective oxidation used for urethral Repair. Biomacromolecules 23:291–302. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c0126810.1021/acs.biomac.1c01268 ↗
75. Ye J, Li J, Wang X et al (2024) Preparation of bacterial cellulose-based antibacterial membranes with prolonged release of drugs: emphasis on the chemical structure of drugs. Carbohydr Polym 323:121379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.12137910.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121379 ↗
76. Yong J, Huo J, Yang Q et al (2018) Femtosecond laser direct writing of porous network microstructures for fabricating super-slippery surfaces with excellent liquid repellence and anti-cell proliferation. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1701479. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.20170147910.1002/admi.201701479 ↗
77. Yuan Y, Hays MP, Hardwidge PR, Kim J (2017) Surface characteristics influencing bacterial adhesion to polymeric substrates. RSC Adv 7:14254–14261. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA01571B10.1039/C7RA01571B ↗