journal article·2021-10Open access

Towards regenerated cellulose fibers with high toughness

Kaniz Moriam, Daisuke Sawada, Kaarlo Nieminen, Michael Hummel, Yibo Ma, Marja Rissanen, Herbert Sixta

Cellulose· Volume 28· Issue 15

Abstract

Abstract The production of sustainable and high-performance fabrics requires high mechanical strength of the individual (staple) fibers. Although Ioncell fibers already exhibit higher fiber strength than commercial man-made cellulose fibers or cotton fibers, we further aimed to increase both strength and toughness to gradually approach synthetic fibers in these properties. Decisive factors for the achievable mechanical properties of the fibers were the pulp purity, the cellulose concentration in the spinning solution and length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio of the cylindrical part of the spinneret. The absence of low molecular weight fractions in combination with an increased average molecular weight had the highest impact on the achievement of both high strength and toughness. Using a spinneret with a high L/D ratio, it was possible to spin Ioncell fibers with a tensile strength of 925 MPa (61.5 cN/tex) and a modulus of toughness of 83.3 MPa (55.5 J/g). According to a fluid dynamic simulation, uniformly longer molecular cellulose chains in combination with a longer cylindrical capillary promoted an effective alignment of the cellulose molecules inside the spinneret capillary before entering the airgap, thus creating the conditions for a simultaneous increase in tensile strength and elongation i.e. toughness of the fiber. Mechanistically, high fiber toughness is caused by the structural parameters in longitudinal direction, in particular by a higher tilt angle, a longer periodicity of the lamellar plane and lower micro void orientation. In summary, we have developed lyocell-type fibers with high strength and toughness, which can potentially be used as a surrogate for synthetic fibers. Graphic abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Abihssira-García IS, Park Y, Kiron, V, Olsvik PA (2020) Fluorescent microplastic uptake by immune cells of atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Front Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.56020610.3389/fenvs.2020.560206 ↗
2. Abushammala H, Hettegger H, Bacher M, Korntner P, Potthast A, Rosenau T, Laborie MP (2017) On the mechanism of the unwanted acetylation of polysaccharides by 1,3-dialkylimidazolium acetate ionic liquids: part 2—the impact of lignin on the kinetics of cellulose acetylation. Cellulose 24:2767–2774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1322-x10.1007/s10570-017-1322-x ↗
3. Acharya S, Rumi SS, Hu Y, Abidi N (2021) Microfibers from synthetic textiles as a major source of microplastics in the environment: a review. Text Res J. https://doi.org/10.1177/004051752199124410.1177/0040517521991244 ↗
4. Adusumalli RB, Keckes J, Martinschitz KJ, Boesecke P, Weber H, Roeder T, Gindl W (2009) Comparison of molecular orientation and mechanical properties of lyocell fibre tow and staple fibres. Cellulose 16:765–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9292-210.1007/s10570-009-9292-2 ↗
5. Asaadi S, Hummel M, Hellsten S, Härkäsalmi T, Ma Y, Michud A, Sixta H (2016) Renewable high performancefibers from the chemical recycling of cotton waste utilizing an ionic liquid. Chemsuschem 9:3250–3258. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.20160068010.1002/cssc.201600680 ↗
6. Asaadi S, Hummel M, Ahvenainen P, Gubitosi M, Olsson U, Sixta H (2018a) Structural analysis of Ioncell-F fibres from birch wood. Carbohyd Polym 181:893–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.062 ↗
7. Asaadi S, Kakko T, King AWT, Kilpelainen I, Hummel M, Sixta H (2018b) High-performance acetylated ioncell-F fibers with low degree of substitution. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6:9418–9426. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0176810.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01768 ↗
8. Bentivoglio G, Roeder T, Fasching M, Buchberger M, Schottenberger H, Sixta H (2006) Cellulose processing with chloride-based ionic liquids. Lenzinger Berichte 86:154–161
9. Chen X, Zhang Y, Cheng L, Wang H (2009) Rheology of concentrated cellulose solutions in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. J Polym Environ 17:273–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-009-0149-410.1007/s10924-009-0149-4 ↗
10. Dorn S, Wendler F, Meister F, Heinze T (2008) Interactions of ionic liquids with polysaccharides – 7: thermal stability of cellulose in ionic liquids and N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide. Macromol Mater Eng 293:907–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.20080015310.1002/mame.200800153 ↗
11. Ebner G, Schiehser S, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2008) Side reaction of cellulose with common 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium-based ionic liquids. Tetrahedron Lett 49: 7322–7324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.05210.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.052 ↗
12. Elsayed S, Hellsten S, Guizani C, Witos J, Rissanen M, Rantamäki AH, Sixta H (2020) Recycling of superbase-based ionic liquid solvents for the production of textile-grade regenerated cellulose fibers in the lyocell process. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 8:14217–14227. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0533010.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05330 ↗
13. Essel R, Engel L, Carus M, Ahrens RHJT (2015) Sources of Microplastics Relevant to Marine Protection in Germany 64:1219–1226
14. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-910.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-9 ↗
15. The Fiber Year (2019) World survey on textiles & nonwovens. The Fiber Year GmbH. TOC2019.pdf. https://www.thefiberyear.com. Accessed 19 May 2019
16. The Fiber Year (2020) World survey on textiles & nonwovens. The Fiber Year GmbH. TFY2020.pdf. https://www.thefiberyear.com. Accessed 20 June 202010.1016/S0262-1762(20)30322-9 ↗
17. Goetze K (1964) Developments in the field of high-strength viscose fibers. Oesterreichische Chemiker Zeitung 65:209–218
18. Goswami P, Blackburn RS, El-Dessouky HM, Taylor J, White P (2009) Effect of sodium hydroxide pre-treatment on the optical and structural properties of lyocell. Eur Polymer J 45:455–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.10.03010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.10.030 ↗
19. Graessley WW (1980) Polymer chain dimensions and the dependence of viscoelastic properties on concentration, molecular weight and solvent power. Polymer 21:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(80)90266-910.1016/0032-3861(80)90266-9 ↗
20. Guizani C, Larkiala S, Moriam K, Sawada D, Elsayed S, Rantasalo S, Sixta H (2020) Air gap spinning of a cellulose solution in [DBNH][OAc] ionic liquid with a novel vertically arranged spinning bath to simulate a closed loop operation in the Ioncell® process. J Appl Polym Sci 138:49787. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4978710.1002/app.49787 ↗
21. Guo S, Li X, Zhao R, Gong Y (2021) Comparison of life cycle assessment between lyocell fiber and viscose fiber in China. Int J Life Cycle Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01916-y10.1007/s11367-021-01916-y ↗
22. Haslinger S, Hummel M, Anghelescu-Hakala A, Määttänen M, Sixta H (2019) Upcycling of cotton polyester blended textile waste to new man-made cellulose fibers. Waste Manage 97:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.04010.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.040 ↗
23. Hong JH, Ku MK, Ahn Y, Kim HJ, Kim H (2013) Air-gap spinning of cellulose/ionic liquid solution and its characterization. Fibers and Polymers 14:2015–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-013-2015-110.1007/s12221-013-2015-1 ↗
24. Huerta Lwanga E, Gertsen H, Gooren H, Peters P, Salánki T, van der Ploeg M, Geissen V (2016) Microplastics in the terrestrial ecosystem: implications for lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environ Sci Technol 50:2685–2691. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b0547810.1021/acs.est.5b05478 ↗
25. Hummel M, Michud A, Tanttu M, Asaadi S, Ma Y, Hauru LKJ, Sixta H (2016) Ionic Liquids for the Production of Man-Made Cellulosic Fibers: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Rojas OJ (ed) Cellulose chemistry and properties: fibers, nanocelluloses and advanced materials. Springer, Cham10.1007/12_2015_307 ↗
26. Johnson DL (1969) Compounds dissolved in cyclic amine oxides. Patent number US3447939A. Eastman Kodak Co
27. Jusner P, Bacher M, Hettegger H, Lê HQ, Potthast A, Sixta H, Rosenau T (2021) On the chemical interactions of the biomass processing agents γ-valerolactone (GVL) and N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO). Green Chem. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1GC01777B10.1039/D1GC01777B ↗
28. Kotek R (2007) Regenerated cellulose fibers. In: Lewin M (ed) Handbook of fiber chemistry. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, pp 33487–2742
29. Krässig H, Kitchen W (1961) Factors influencing tensile properties of cellulose fibers. J Polym Sci 51:123–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1961.120511550910.1002/pol.1961.1205115509 ↗
30. Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) X-ray Structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromol 2:410–416. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm005612q10.1021/bm005612q ↗
31. Laus G, Bentivoglio G, Schottenberger H, Kahlenberg V, Kopacka H, Roeder H, Sixta H (2005) Ionic liquids: current developments, potential and drawbacks for industrial applications. Lenzinger Berichte 84:71–85
32. Lim KY, Seong YJ, Kim BC (2003) Reduction of fibrillation of Lyocell Fiber with Cellulose-g-Poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymer. Polym J 35:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.35.69110.1295/polymj.35.691 ↗
33. Ma Y, Stubb J, Kontro I, Nieminen K, Hummel M, Sixta H (2018) Filament spinning of unbleached birch kraft pulps: Effect of pulping intensity on the processability and the fiber properties. Carbohyd Polym 179:45–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.07910.1016/j.carbpol.2017.09.079 ↗
34. Ma Y, Rissanen M, You X, Moriam K, Hummel M, Sixta H (2020) New method for determining the degree of fibrillation of regenerated cellulose fibres. Cellulose 28:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-020-03513-y10.1007/s10570-020-03513-y ↗
35. Ma K, Jin X, Zheng M, Gao H (2021) Dissolution and functionalization of celluloses using 1,2,3-triazolium ionic liquid. Carbohydrate Polymer Technol Appl 2:100109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2021.10010910.1016/j.carpta.2021.100109 ↗
36. McCorsley CC III (1978) Process for shaped cellulose article prepared from a solution containing cellulose dissolved in a tertiary amine N-oxide solvent. Patent number US4246221A. Akzona Inc USA
37. Michud A, Hummel M, Sixta H (2016) Influence of process parameters on the structure formation of man-made cellulosic fibers from ionic liquid solution. J Appl Polym Sci 133:30. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4371810.1002/app.43718 ↗
38. Mortimer SA, Peguy AA (1996) The influence of air-gap conditions on the structure formation of lyocell fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 60:1747–1756. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960606)60:103.0.co;2-#10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960606)60:103.0.co;2-# ↗
39. Murthy NS, Grubb DT (2006) Tilted lamellae in an affinely deformed 3D macrolattice and elliptical features in small-angle scattering. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 44:1277–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.2077810.1002/polb.20778 ↗
40. Murthy NS, Grubb DT, Zero K, Nelson CJ, Chen G (1998) Lamellar structure and properties in poly(ethylene terephthalate) fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 70:2527–2538. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12%3c2527::AID-APP27%3e3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2527::AID-APP27>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
41. Murthy NS, Grubb DT, Zero K (2000) Structural implications of the elliptical form of small-angle reflections in oriented semicrystalline polymers. Macromolecules 33:1012–1021. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma991150110.1021/ma9911501 ↗
42. Napper IE, Thompson RC (2016) Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: effects of fabric type and washing conditions. Mar Pollut Bull 112:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.02510.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.09.025 ↗
43. Ramsperger AFRM, Narayana VKB, Gross W, Mohanraj J, Thelakkat M, Greiner A, Laforsch C (2020) Environmental exposure enhances the internalization of microplastic particles into cells. Sci Adv 6:eabd1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd121110.1126/sciadv.abd1211 ↗
44. Röder T, Moosbauer J, Kliba G, Schlader S, Zuckerstätter G, Sixta H (2009) Comparative chracterization of man-made regenerated cellulose fibres. Lenzinger Berichte 87:98–105
45. Salvador Cesa F, Turra A, Baruque-Ramos J (2017) Synthetic fibers as microplastics in the marine environment: a review from textile perspective with a focus on domestic washings. Sci Total Environ 598:1116–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.17210.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.172 ↗
46. Sana SS, Dogiparthi LK, Gangadhar L, Chakravorty A, Abhishek N (2020) Effects of microplastics and nanoplastics on marine environment and human health. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:44743–44756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10573-x10.1007/s11356-020-10573-x ↗
47. Sawada D, Nishiyama Y, Röder T, Porcar L, Zahra H, Trogen M, Hummel M (2021) Process-dependent nanostructures of regenerated cellulose fibres revealed by small angle neutron scattering. Polymer 218:123510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.12351010.1016/j.polymer.2021.123510 ↗
48. Schurz J, Lenz J (1994a) Investigations on the structure of regenerated cellulose fibers. Macromol Symp 83:273–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.1994083012310.1002/masy.19940830123 ↗
49. Schurz J, Lenz J (1994b) Investigations on the structure of regenerated cellulose fibers; Herrn Professor Janeschitz-Kriegl zum 70. Geburtstag Mit Den Besten Wünschen Gewidmet 83:273–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.1994083012310.1002/masy.19940830123 ↗
50. Schurz J, Lenz J, Wrentschur E (1995) Inner surface and void system of regenerated cellulose fibers. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie 229:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/apmc.1995.05229011210.1002/apmc.1995.052290112 ↗
51. Sharma A, Wankhede P, Samant R, Nagarkar S, Thakre S, Kumaraswamy G (2021) Process-induced microstructure in viscose and lyocell regenerated cellulose fibers revealed by SAXS and SEM of acid-etched samples. ACS Appl Polymer Mater 3:2598–2607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.1c0020410.1021/acsapm.1c00204 ↗
52. Sixta H, Michud A, Hauru L, Asaadi S, Ma Y, King AWT, Hummel M (2015) Ioncell-F: a high-strength regenerated cellulose fiber. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 30:43–57. https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2015-30-01-p043-05710.3183/npprj-2015-30-01-p043-057 ↗
53. Sluiter A, Hames B, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, in: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). National Renewable Energy Laboratory
54. Swatloski RP, Spear SK, Holbrey JD, Rogers RD (2002) Dissolution of cellulose with ionic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 124:4974–4975. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025790m10.1021/ja025790m ↗
55. Udomkichdecha W, Chiarakorn S, Potiyaraj P (2002) Relationships Between Fibrillation Behavior of Lyocell Fibers and Their Physical Properties. Text Res J 72:939–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175020720110110.1177/004051750207201101 ↗
56. Von Bucher HP (1968) Viscose rayon textile fibers. Man-Made Fibers: Sci Technol 2:7–42
57. Wendler F, Todi LN, Meister F (2012) Thermostability of imidazolium ionic liquids as direct solvents for cellulose. Thermochim Acta 528:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2011.11.01510.1016/j.tca.2011.11.015 ↗
58. Xu A, Wang F (2020) Carboxylate ionic liquid solvent systems from 2006 to 2020: thermal properties and application in cellulose processing. Green Chem 22:7622–7664. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02840A10.1039/D0GC02840A ↗
59. Xu A, Chen L, Wang J (2018) Functionalized imidazalium carboxylates for enhancing practical applicability in cellulose processing. Macromolecules 51:4158–4166. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0072410.1021/acs.macromol.8b00724 ↗
60. Zhang W, Okubayashi S, Bechtold T (2005) Fibrillation tendency of cellulosic fibers. part 1: effects of swelling. Cellulose 12:267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-004-2786-z10.1007/s10570-004-2786-z ↗
61. Zhang W, Okubayashi S, Badura W, Bechtold T (2006) Fibrillation tendency of cellulosic fibers, part 6: Effects of treatments with additive polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 101:4140–4147. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2328310.1002/app.23283 ↗
62. Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, Hu H, Li H, Li J, Ni Y (2018) Regenerated cellulose by the lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. Journal of BioResources 13(2):1–16. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.13.2.Zhang10.15376/biores.13.2.Zhang ↗
63. Zhang D, Fraser MA, Huang W, Ge C, Wang Y, Zhang C, Guo P (2021) Microplastic pollution in water, sediment, and specific tissues of crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) within two different breeding modes in Jianli, Hubei province. China Environmental Pollution 272:115939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11593910.1016/j.envpol.2020.115939 ↗
64. Zhu H, Zhu S, Jia Z, Parvinian S, Li Y, Vaaland O, Li T (2015) Anomalous scaling law of strength and toughness of cellulose nanopaper. PNAS 112:8971–8976. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.150287011210.1073/pnas.1502870112 ↗
65. Zikeli S, Firgo H, Eichinger D, Jurkovic R (1992) Process for spinning cellulose fibers with high toughness. Patent number EP0494852A2. Lenzing A-G, Austria
66. Zubris KAV, Richards BK (2005) Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge. Environ Pollut 138:201–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.01310.1016/j.envpol.2005.04.013 ↗