Bacterial nanocellulose in papermaking
Source abstract
Abstract
Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) is a unique natural nanomaterial that shares very few similarities with other natural or industrially produced nanomaterials. BNC can be produced by a variety of bacteria, as a survival aid in different ecological niches. BNC is traditionally produced by static or shaking culture methods, and the ‘mother vinegar’, or biofilm, is a typical example of this product after static vinegar fermentation. BNC has great potential in biomedicine, and recent studies have also demonstrated its use in the papermaking industry. It has nanoscale fiber size and large numbers of free hydroxyl groups, which ensure high inter-fiber hydrogen bonding. Thus, BNC has great potential as a reinforcing material, and is especially applicable for recycled paper and for paper made of nonwoody cellulose fiber. As well as enhancing the strength and durability of paper, modified BNC shows great potential for production of fire resistant and specialized papers. However, the biotechnological aspects of BNC need to be improved to minimize the cost of its production, and to thus make this process economically feasible.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Aitomäki Y, Oksman K (2014) Reinforcing efficiency of nanocellulose in polymers. React Funct Polym 85:151–15610.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2014.08.010 ↗
2. Ashjaran A, Yazdanshenas ME, Rashidi A et al (2013) Overview of bio nanofabric from bacterial cellulose. J Text Inst 104:121–13110.1080/00405000.2012.703796 ↗
3. Balea A, Merayo N, Fuente E et al (2017) Cellulose nanofibers from residues to improve linting and mechanical properties of recycled paper. Cellulose 25:1339–135110.1007/s10570-017-1618-x ↗
4. Basta AH, El-Saied H (2009) Performance of improved bacterial cellulose application in the production of functional paper. J Appl Microbiol 107:2098–210710.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04467.x ↗
5. Blanco A, Miranda R, Monte MC (2013) Extending the limits of paper recycling: improvements along the paper value chain. For Syst 22:471–48310.5424/fs/2013223-03677 ↗
6. Brown AJ (1886) XIX. The chemical action of pure cultivations of bacterium aceti. J Chem Soc Trans 49:172–18710.1039/CT8864900172 ↗
7. Brown RM (2004) Cellulose structure and biosynthesis: what is in store for the 21st century? J Polym Sci Part Polym Chem 42:487–49510.1002/pola.10877 ↗
8. Brown RM, Willison JH, Richardson CL (1976) Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:4565–456910.1073/pnas.73.12.4565 ↗
9. Campano C, Balea A, Blanco A, Negro C (2016) Enhancement of the fermentation process and properties of bacterial cellulose: a review. Cellulose 23:57–9110.1007/s10570-015-0802-0 ↗
10. Campano C, Merayo N, Balea A et al (2018a) Mechanical and chemical dispersion of nanocelluloses to improve their reinforcing effect on recycled paper. Cellulose 25:269–28010.1007/s10570-017-1552-y ↗
11. Campano C, Merayo N, Negro C, Blanco Á (2018b) Low-fibrillated bacterial cellulose nanofibers as a sustainable additive to enhance recycled paper quality. Int J Biol Macromol 114:1077–108310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.03.170 ↗
12. Campano C, Merayo N, Negro C, Blanco A (2018c) In-situ production of bacterial cellulose to economically improve recycled paper properties. Int J Biol Macromol 118:1532–154110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.201 ↗
13. Carreira P, Mendes JAS, Trovatti E et al (2011) Utilization of residues from agro-forest industries in the production of high value bacterial cellulose. Bioresour Technol 102:7354–736010.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.081 ↗
14. Chang W-S, Chen H-H (2016) Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocoll 53:75–8310.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.009 ↗
15. Chao Y, Ishida T, Sugano Y, Shoda M (2000) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum in a 50-L internal-loop airlift reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:345–35210.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000505)68:3<345::AID-BIT13>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
16. Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications. Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124
17. Cheng H-P, Wang P-M, Chen J-W, Wu W-T (2002) Cultivation of Acetobacter xylinum for bacterial cellulose production in a modified airlift reactor. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 35:125–13210.1042/BA20010066 ↗
18. Dahman Y (2009) Nanostructured biomaterials and biocomposites from bacterial cellulose nanofibers. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:5105–512210.1166/jnn.2009.1466 ↗
19. Donini ÍAN, Salvi DTBD, Fukumoto FK et al (2010) Biossíntese e recentes avanços na produção de celulose bacteriana. Eclética Quím 35:165–17810.1590/S0100-46702010000400021 ↗
20. Eichhorn SJ, Baillie CA, Zafeiropoulos N et al (2001) Review: current international research into cellulosic fibres and composites. J Mater Sci 36:2107–213110.1023/A:1017512029696 ↗
21. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M et al (2009) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–3310.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
22. El-Saied H, El-Diwany AI, Basta AH et al (2008) Production and characterization of economical bacterial cellulose. BioResources 3:1196–121710.15376/biores.3.4.1196-1217 ↗
23. Fang L, Catchmark JM (2014) Characterization of water-soluble exopolysaccharides from Gluconacetobacter xylinus and their impacts on bacterial cellulose crystallization and ribbon assembly. Cellulose 21:3965–397810.1007/s10570-014-0443-8 ↗
24. Fillat A, Martínez J, Valls C et al (2018) Bacterial cellulose for increasing barrier properties of paper products. Cellulose 25:6093–610510.1007/s10570-018-1967-0 ↗
25. Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G (2013) Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym 92:1432–144210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071 ↗
26. Gallegos AMA, Carrera SH, Parra R et al (2016) Bacterial cellulose: a sustainable source to develop value-added products—a review. BioResources 11:5641–565510.15376/biores.11.2.Gallegos ↗
27. Gao W-H, Chen K-F, Yang R-D et al (2010) Properties of bacterial cellulose ad its influence on the physical properties of paper. BioResources 6:144–15310.15376/biores.6.1.144-153 ↗
28. Gatenholm P, Klemm D (2010) Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 35:208–21310.1557/mrs2010.653 ↗
29. Goncalves M, Łaszkiewicz B (1999) Celuloza bakteryjna—biosynteza, właściwości i zastosowanie. Prz Pap R 55:657–661
30. Hamada H, Beckvermit J, Bousfield D (2010) Nanofibrillated cellulose with fine clay as a coating agent to improve print quality. In: Paper conference and trade show, PaperCon, pp 854–880
31. Hon DN-S (1994) Cellulose: a random walk along its historical path. Cellulose 1:1–2510.1007/BF00818796 ↗
32. Hong F, Zhu YX, Yang G, Yang XX (2011) Wheat straw acid hydrolysate as a potential cost-effective feedstock for production of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:675–68010.1002/jctb.2567 ↗
33. Hornung M, Ludwig M, Schmauder HP (2007) Optimizing the production of bacterial cellulose in surface culture: a novel aerosol bioreactor working on a fed batch principle (part 3). Eng Life Sci 7:35–4110.1002/elsc.200620164 ↗
34. Huang Y, Zhu C, Yang J et al (2014) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21:1–3010.1007/s10570-013-0088-z ↗
35. Hubbe MA (2013) Prospects for maintaining strength of paper and paperboard products while using less forest resources: a review. BioResources 9:1634–176310.15376/biores.9.1.1634-1763 ↗
36. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–27010.1023/A:1004775229149 ↗
37. Ishihara M, Matsunaga M, Hayashi N, Tišler V (2002) Utilization of d-xylose as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose. Enzym Microb Technol 31:986–99110.1016/S0141-0229(02)00215-6 ↗
38. Jeon S, Yoo Y-M, Park J-W et al (2014) Electrical conductivity and optical transparency of bacterial cellulose based composite by static and agitated methods. Curr Appl Phys 14:1621–162410.1016/j.cap.2014.07.010 ↗
39. Jonas R, Farah LF (1998) Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab 59:101–10610.1016/S0141-3910(97)00197-3 ↗
40. Jozala AF, de Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes AM et al (2016) Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:2063–207210.1007/s00253-015-7243-4 ↗
41. Jung JY, Khan T, Park JK, Chang HN (2007) Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii using a novel bioreactor equipped with a spin filter. Korean J Chem Eng 24:265–27110.1007/s11814-007-5058-4 ↗
42. Karlovits I, Lavrič G (2018) The influence of nanocellulose addition on printing properties of recycled paper. In: Gane P (ed) Advances in printing and media technology: proceedings of the 45th international research conference of Iarigai, pp 49–54
43. Kawano Y, Saotome T, Ochiai Y et al (2011) Cellulose accumulation and a cellulose synthase gene are responsible for cell aggregation in the cyanobacterium Thermosynechococcus vulcanus RKN. Plant Cell Physiol 52:957–96610.1093/pcp/pcr047 ↗
44. Keshk SM (2014) Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J Bioprocess Biotech 4:1–1010.4172/2155-9821.1000150 ↗
45. Keshk SMAS, Sameshima K (2005) Evaluation of different carbon sources for bacterial cellulose production. Afr J Biotechnol 4:478–482
46. Kim C-W, Kim D-S, Kang S-Y et al (2006) Structural studies of electrospun cellulose nanofibers. Polymer 14:5097–510710.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.033 ↗
47. Kim Y-J, Kim J-N, Wee Y-J et al (2007) Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter sp. PKY5 in a rotary biofilm contactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 137:529–537
48. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S (2001) Bacterial synthesized cellulose—artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci 26:1561–160310.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1 ↗
49. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:5438–546610.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
50. Kongruang S (2008) Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum strains from agricultural waste products. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 148:245–25610.1007/s12010-007-8119-6 ↗
51. Kose R, Yamaguchi K, Okayama T (2016) Preparation of fine fiber sheets from recycled pulp fibers using aqueous counter collision. Cellulose 23:1393–139910.1007/s10570-016-0874-5 ↗
52. Kralisch D, Hessler N, Klemm D et al (2010) White biotechnology for cellulose manufacturing—the HoLiR concept. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:740–74710.1002/bit.22579 ↗
53. Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, Nakamura Y (2009) Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym 76:333–33510.1016/j.carbpol.2008.11.009 ↗
54. Laftah WA, Rahman WAWA (2016) Pulping process and the potential of using nonwood pineapple leaves fiber for pulp and paper production: a review. J Nat Fibers 13:85–10210.1080/15440478.2014.984060 ↗
55. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90:735–76410.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
56. Lavrič G (2016) Efficiency of fibrillation of cellulose fibres process by enzymes. MSc thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
57. Lee K-Y, Buldum G, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2014) More than meets the eye in bacterial cellulose: biosynthesis, bioprocessing, and applications in advanced fiber composites. Macromol Biosci 14:10–3210.1002/mabi.201300298 ↗
58. Legnani C, Vilani C, Calil VL et al (2008) Bacterial cellulose membrane as flexible substrate for organic light emitting devices. Thin Solid Films 517:1016–102010.1016/j.tsf.2008.06.011 ↗
59. Lim G-H, Lee J, Kwon N et al (2016) Fabrication of flexible magnetic papers based on bacterial cellulose and barium hexaferrite with improved mechanical properties. Electron Mater Lett 12:574–57910.1007/s13391-016-6179-x ↗
60. Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J 59:302–32510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025 ↗
61. Lin S-P, Loira Calvar I, Catchmark JM et al (2013) Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20:2191–221910.1007/s10570-013-9994-3 ↗
62. Luu WT, Bousfield D, Kettle J (2011) Application of nano-fibrillated cellulose as a paper surface treatment for inkjet printing. In: Paper conference and trade show, PaperCon, pp 1152–1163
63. Masaoka S, Ohe T, Sakota N (1993) Production of cellulose from glucose by Acetobacter xylinum. J Ferment Bioeng 75:18–2210.1016/0922-338X(93)90171-4 ↗
64. Matsuoka M, Tsuchida T, Matsushita K et al (1996) A synthetic medium for bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum subsp. sucrofermentans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 60:575–57910.1271/bbb.60.575 ↗
65. Medvešček S (2017) Influence of nanocrystallized cellulose on paper printability. MSc thesis, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
66. Mikkelsen D, Flanagan BM, Dykes GA, Gidley MJ (2009) Influence of different carbon sources on bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain ATCC 53524. J Appl Microbiol 107:576–58310.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x ↗
67. Mohite BV, Patil SV (2014) A novel biomaterial: bacterial cellulose and its new era applications. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 61:101–11010.1002/bab.1148 ↗
68. Morgan JLW, Strumillo J, Zimmer J (2013) Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature 493:181–18610.1038/nature11744 ↗
69. Mormino R, Bungay H (2003) Composites of bacterial cellulose and paper made with a rotating disk bioreactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 62:503–50610.1007/s00253-003-1377-5 ↗
70. Nunes T, Lourenço AF, Gamelas JAF, Ferreira PJT (2015) Cellulose nanofibrils in papermaking—filler retention, wet web resistance and printability. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on natural fibers, pp 27–29
71. Nygårds S (2011) Nanocellulose in pigment coatings—aspects of barrier properties and printability in offset. MSc thesis, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
72. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:93–12310.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 ↗
73. Poland CA, Duffin R, Kinloch I et al (2008) Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. Nat Nanotechnol 3:423–42810.1038/nnano.2008.111 ↗
74. Presler S, Surma-Ślusarska B (2006) Modyfikacja roślinnych półproduktów papierniczych celulozą bakteryjną. Przem Chem T85(8–9):1297–1299
75. Puceković N, Hooimeijer A, Lozo B (2015) Cellulose nanocrystals coating—a novel paper coating for use in the graphic industry. Acta Graph 26:21–26
76. Putra A, Kakugo A, Furukawa H et al (2008) Tubular bacterial cellulose gel with oriented fibrils on the curved surface. Polymer 49:1885–189110.1016/j.polymer.2008.02.022 ↗
77. Rajwade JM, Paknikar KM, Kumbhar JV (2015) Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2491–251110.1007/s00253-015-6426-3 ↗
78. Retegi A, Gabilondo N, Peña C et al (2010) Bacterial cellulose films with controlled microstructure–mechanical property relationships. Cellulose 17:661–66910.1007/s10570-009-9389-7 ↗
79. Römling U (2002) Molecular biology of cellulose production in bacteria. Res Microbiol 153:205–21210.1016/S0923-2508(02)01316-5 ↗
80. Römling U, Galperin MY (2015) Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol 23:545–55710.1016/j.tim.2015.05.005 ↗
81. Rosa JR, da Silva ISV, de Lima CSM et al (2014) New biphasic mono-component composite material obtained by partial oxypropylation of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 21:1361–1368
82. Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M (1991) Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 55:35–5810.1128/MMBR.55.1.35-58.1991 ↗
83. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Quintana E et al (2015) Characterization of purified bacterial cellulose focused on its use on paper restoration. Carbohydr Polym 116:173–18110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064 ↗
84. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N et al (2016) Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part II: application on real samples. J Mater Sci 51:1553–156110.1007/s10853-015-9477-z ↗
85. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N et al (2017) Paper reinforcing by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 52:5882–589310.1007/s10853-017-0824-0 ↗
86. Schramm M, Hestrin S (1954) Factors affecting production of cellulose at the air/liquid interface of a culture of Acetobacter xylinum. J Gen Microbiol 11:123–12910.1099/00221287-11-1-123 ↗
87. Schrecker ST, Gostomski PA (2005) Determining the water holding capacity of microbial cellulose. Biotechnol Lett 27:1435–143810.1007/s10529-005-1465-y ↗
88. Serafica G, Mormino R, Bungay H (2002) Inclusion of solid particles in bacterial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:756–76010.1007/s00253-002-0978-8 ↗
89. Shah J, Brown RM (2005) Towards electronic paper displays made from microbial cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66:352–35510.1007/s00253-004-1756-6 ↗
90. Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Park JK (2013) Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym 98:1585–159810.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018 ↗
91. Shoda M, Sugano Y (2005) Recent advances in bacterial cellulose production. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 10:1–810.1007/BF02931175 ↗
92. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–49410.1007/s10570-010-9405-y ↗
93. Somerville C (2006) Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:53–7810.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.022206.160206 ↗
94. Son H-J, Kim H-G, Kim K-K et al (2003) Increased production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 in synthetic media under shaking culture conditions. Bioresour Technol 86:215–21910.1016/S0960-8524(02)00176-1 ↗
95. Song H-J, Li H, Seo J-H et al (2009) Pilot-scale production of bacterial cellulose by a spherical type bubble column bioreactor using saccharified food wastes. Korean J Chem Eng 26:141–14610.1007/s11814-009-0022-0 ↗
96. Suwannapinunt N, Burakorn J, Thaenthanee S (2007) Effect of culture conditions on bacterial BC (BC) production from Acetobacter xylinum TISTR976 and physical properties of BC parchment paper. J Sci Technol 14:357–365
97. Tabarsa T, Sheykhnazari S, Ashori A et al (2017) Preparation and characterization of reinforced papers using nano bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 101:334–34010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.108 ↗
98. Tang W, Jia S, Jia Y, Yang H (2009) The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:125–13110.1007/s11274-009-0151-y ↗
99. Ummartyotin S, Juntaro J, Sain M, Manuspiya H (2012) Development of transparent bacterial cellulose nanocomposite film as substrate for flexible organic light emitting diode (OLED) display. Ind Crops Prod 35:92–9710.1016/j.indcrop.2011.06.025 ↗
100. Vitta S, Thiruvengadam V (2012) Multifunctional bacterial cellulose and nanoparticle-embedded composites. Curr Sci 102:1398–1405