Effect of homogenization (microfluidization) process parameters in mechanical production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose on its rheological and morphological properties
Source abstract
Abstract
The rheological properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC)/nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) suspensions have an important role during processing and mixing. In this work, the process parameters for MFC/NFC production within a microfluidizer (i.e., the size of interaction chamber and number of passes) were varied to investigate the influences on morphology, zeta potential, chemical properties and rheological features including viscosity, creep, strain recovery and yield stress behavior. The stability and appropriate viscosity of the fiber suspensions can be controlled by optimizing the processing conditions, resulting in a reduction in fiber diameter and most negative zeta potential value. The viscosity increased with higher amount of fibrillation by using a smaller chamber or higher number of passes, but intermediate plateau values are characteristic for temporary aggregation and breaking-up of the fiber network. The creep response and yield stress have been described by parameters of the Burger model and Herschel–Bulkley model, respectively, showing a more prominent effect on yield stress of chamber size than number of passes. The network formation leads to lower creep compliance and step-like strain recovery. The transition from gel-like to liquid-like behavior as characterized by the dynamic yield point at a specific strain, is almost independent of the processing conditions. Most important, the total number of passes applied in production can be directly related to the rotational Peclet number, which combines rheological and morphological data.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls · Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdul Khalil APS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–97910.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.078 ↗
2. Adebajo MO, Frost RL (2004) Infrared and 13C MAS nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopis study of acetylation of cotton. Spectrochim Acta A 60:449–45310.1016/S1386-1425(03)00249-X ↗
3. Barnes HA (1999) The yield stress: a review or ‘πανταρει’—everything flows? J Non Newtonian Fluid Mech 81:133–17810.1016/S0377-0257(98)00094-9 ↗
4. Barnes HA (2000) A handbook of elementary rheology. Institute of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics Wales, University of Wales, Aberystwyth
5. Barry BW (1983) Rheology of dermatological vehicles. Marcel Dekker, New York
6. Benhamoua K, Dufresne A, Magninc A, Mortha G, Kaddami H (2013) Control of size and viscoelastic properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from palm tree by varying the TEMPO-mediated oxidation time. Carbohydr Polym 99:74–8310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.032 ↗
7. Björkman U (2003) Break-up of suspended fibre networks. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 18:32–3710.3183/NPPRJ-2003-18-01-p032-037 ↗
8. Bröckel U, Meier W, Wagner G (2013) Product design and engineering: formulation of gels and pastes. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Heidelberg10.1002/9783527654741 ↗
9. Charani PR, Firouzabadi MD, Afra E, Shakeri A (2013) Rheological characterization of high concentrated MFC gel from kenaf unbleached pulp. Cellulose 20:727–74010.1007/s10570-013-9862-1 ↗
10. Chen P, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang X, Ouyang M (2013) Concentration effects on the isolation and dynamic rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers via ultrasonic processing. Cellulose 20:149–15710.1007/s10570-012-9829-7 ↗
11. Derakhshandeh B, Hatzikiriakos SG, Bennington CPJ (2010) The apparent yield stress of pulp fiber suspensions. J Rheol 54:1137–115410.1122/1.3473923 ↗
12. Dinand E, Chanzy H, Vignon M (1996) Parenchymal cell cellulose from sugar beet pulp: preparation and properties. Cellulose 3:183–18810.1007/BF02228800 ↗
13. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–89610.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
14. Henn AR, Fraundorf PB (1990) A quantitative measure of the degree of fibrillation of short reinforcing fibres. J Mater Sci 25:659–3663
15. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813
16. Hill RJ (2008) Elastic modulus of microfibrillar cellulose gels. Biomacromolecules 9:2963–296610.1021/bm800490x ↗
17. Hubbe MA (2007) Flocculation and redispersion of cellulosic fiber suspension: a review of effects of hydrodynamic shear and polyelectrolyte. Bioresources 2:296–33110.15376/biores.2.2.296-331 ↗
18. Iotti M, Gregersen Ø, Moe S, Lenes M (2011) Rheological studies of microfibrillar cellulose water dispersions. J Polym Environ 19:137–14510.1007/s10924-010-0248-2 ↗
19. Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2007) Nano-fibrillation of pulp fibers for the processing of transparent nanocomposites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 89:461–46610.1007/s00339-007-4175-6 ↗
20. Iwamoto S, Abe K, Yano H (2008) The effect of hemicelluloses on wood pulp nanofibrillation and nanofiber network characteristics. Biomacromolecules 9:1022–102610.1021/bm701157n ↗
21. Janardhnan S, Sain M (2011) Targeted disruption of Hydroxyl chemistry and crystallinity in natural fibers for the isolation of cellulose nano-fibers via enzymatic treatment. Bioresources 6:1242–124510.15376/biores.6.2.1242-1250 ↗
22. Kacuralova M, Capek P, Sasinklova V, Wellner N, Ebringerova A (2000) FT-IR study of plant cell wall model compounds: pectic polysaccharides and hemicelluloses. Carbohydr Polym 43:195–20310.1016/S0144-8617(00)00151-X ↗
23. Karande VS, Bharimalla AK, Hadge GB, Mhaske ST, Vigneshwaran N (2011) Nanofibrillation of cotton fibers by disc refiner and its characterization. Fibers Polym 12:399–40410.1007/s12221-011-0399-3 ↗
24. Karppinen A, Vesterinen AH, Saarinen T, Pietikäinen P, Seppälä J (2011) Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 18:1381–139010.1007/s10570-011-9597-9 ↗
25. Karppinen A, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Laukkanen A, Nuopponen M, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow. Cellulose 19:1807–181910.1007/s10570-012-9766-5 ↗
26. Kataoka Y, Kondo T (1998) FTIR microscopic analysis of changing cellulose crystalline structure during wood cell wall formation. Macromolec 31:760–76410.1021/ma970768c ↗
27. Kondo T (1997) The assignment of IR absorption bands due to free hydroxyl groups in cellulose. Cellulose 4:281–29210.1023/A:1018448109214 ↗
28. Kondo T, Togawa E, Brown RM (2001) Nematic ordered cellulose: a concept of glucan chain association. Biomacromolecules 2:1324–133010.1021/bm0101318 ↗
29. Lasseuguette E, Roux D, Nishiyama Y (2008) Rheological properties of microfibrillar suspension of TEMPO-oxidized pulp. Cellulose 15:425–43310.1007/s10570-007-9184-2 ↗
30. Li MC, Wu Q, Song K, Lee S, Qing Y, Wu Y (2015) Cellulose nanoparticles: structure–morphology–rheology relationships. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng 3:821–83210.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00144 ↗
31. Lowys MP, Desbrières J, Rinaudo M (2001) Rheological characterization of cellulosic microfibril suspensions. Role of polymeric additives. Food Hydrocoll 15:25–3210.1016/S0268-005X(00)00046-1 ↗
32. Masalova I, Malkin AY, Foudazi R (2008) Yield stress of emulsions and suspensions as measured in steady shearing and in oscillations. Appl Rheol 18:44790–1–44790-810.1515/arh-2008-0013 ↗
33. Mewis J, Wagner NJ (2009) Current trends in suspension rheology. J Non Newton Fluid Mech 157:147–15010.1016/j.jnnfm.2008.11.004 ↗
34. Missoum K, Belgacem N, Krouit M, Martin C, Tapin-Lingua S, Bras J (2010) Influence of fibrillation degree and surface grafting of microfibrillated cellulose on their rheological behavior in aqueous suspension. In: TAPPI Nanotechnology conference for the forest product industry
35. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–399410.1039/c0cs00108b ↗
36. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Pignon F (2014) Rheological properties of micro-/nanofibrillated cellulose suspensions: wall-slip and shear banding phenomena. Carbohydr Polym 112:432–43910.1016/j.carbpol.2014.05.092 ↗
37. Nelson ML, O’Connor RL (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal latticed type. Part I. Spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1311–132410.1002/app.1964.070080322 ↗
38. Oh SY, Yoo DI, Shin Y, Seo G (2005) FTIR analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide. Carbohydr Res 340:417–42810.1016/j.carres.2004.11.027 ↗
39. Ono H, Shimaya Y, Sato K, Hongo T (2004) 1H spin–spin relaxation time of water and rheological properties of cellulose nanofiber dispersion, transparent cellulose hydrogel (TCG). Polym J 36:684–69410.1295/polymj.36.684 ↗
40. Pääkkö M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Ruokolainen J, Laine J, Larsson PT, Ikkala O, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Bio-macromolecules 8:1934–194110.1021/bm061215p ↗
41. Saarikoski E, Saarinen T, Salmela J, Seppälä J (2012) Flocculated flow of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions: an imaging approach for characterisation of rheological behavior. Cellulose 19(3):647–65910.1007/s10570-012-9661-0 ↗
42. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TEMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–169110.1021/bm060154s ↗
43. Salmén L, Åkertholm M, Hinterstoisser B (2005) Polyssaccharides: structural diversity and functional versatility. New York, USA
44. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–79410.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
45. Shogrena RL, Peterson SC, Evans KO, Kenar JA (2011) Preparation and characterization of cellulose gels from corn cobs. Carbohydr Polym 86:1351–135710.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.035 ↗
46. Taheri H, Samyn P (2015) Rheological properties and processing of polymer blends with micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose. In: Hakeem KR, Jawaid M, Alothman OY (eds) Agricultural biomass based potential materials. Springer, Switzerland, pp 259–29110.1007/978-3-319-13847-3_13 ↗
47. Tatsumi D, Ishioka S, Matsumoto T (2002) Effect of fiber concentration and axial ratio on the rheological properties of cellulose fiber suspensions. J Soc Rheol Jpn 30:27–3210.1678/rheology.30.27 ↗