journal article·2019-07

Extraction and characterization of nanocellulose crystals from cotton gin motes and cotton gin waste

Jacobs H. Jordan, Michael W. Easson, Bruce Dien, Stephanie Thompson, Brian D. Condon

Cellulose· Volume 26· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) have attracted a great deal of attention as an environmentally-friendly biorenewable resource for use as reinforcing agents in nanocomposites, polymers, gels, and emulsions. CNCs are typically prepared from extracted cellulose or highly refined cellulose products. The chemical refining process can alter the chemical and physical properties of the cellulose fibers prior to extraction of CNCs. Moreover, the method of isolation can also insert various functional groups onto the nanocellulose, affecting thermal stability and imparting different physical properties. Herein, two byproducts of the cotton industry, cotton gin motes and cotton gin waste, are investigated for the preparation of nanocelluloses. Cellulose was purified from these two post-process agroindustrial by-products and CNCs subsequently produced by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Additionally, two acid hydrolysis methods were utilized to successfully extract CNCs from gin motes without chemical pretreatment. CNCs were obtained with diameters < 10 nm and lengths of ca. 100–300 nm resulting in high aspect ratios (12–33). Incorporating CNCs with these dimensions impart increased hydrophilicity to a substrate. The effect of post-extraction chemical treatments on crystallinity and morphology are discussed. The extracted nanocellulose derivatives were additionally characterized by FTIR, AFM, TGA, DLS, XRD and XPS. Differences in extraction method and chemical treatment resulted in different thermal properties and colloidal stability. Furthermore, this work provides a means of producing a high value commodity from inexpensive source materials such as cotton gin motes and cotton gin waste.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Biofuel production and bioconversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA, Reiner RS, Hunt CG, Baez C, Ibach R, Hirth KC (2018) Production of high lignin-containing and lignin-free cellulose nanocrystals from wood. Cellulose 25:5791–5805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1984-z10.1007/s10570-018-1984-z ↗
2. Agblevor FA, Batz S, Trumbo J (2003) Composition and ethanol production potential of cotton gin residues. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105–108:219–23010.1385/ABAB:105:1-3:219 ↗
3. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues: wheat straw and soy hulls. Biores Technol 99:1664–1671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.02910.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029 ↗
4. Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T (1998) Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surf A 142:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00404-X10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00404-X ↗
5. Bajwa SG, Bajwa DS, Holt G, Coffelt T, Nakayama F (2011) Properties of thermoplastic composites with cotton and guayule biomass residues as fiber fillers. Ind Crops Prod 33:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.01710.1016/j.indcrop.2011.01.017 ↗
6. Baumann H, Richter A, Klemm D, Faust V (2000) Concepts for preparation of novel regioselective modified cellulose derivatives sulfated, aminated, carboxylated and acetylated for hemocompatible ultrathin coatings on biomaterials. Macromol Chem Phys 201:1950–1962. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3935(20001001)201:15%3c1950:aid-macp1950%3e3.0.co;2-310.1002/1521-3935(20001001)201:15<1950::AID-MACP1950>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
7. Ben Ayed E, Cochereau R, Dechance C, Capron I, Nicolai T, Benyahia L (2018) Water-In-Water Emulsion Gels Stabilized by Cellulose Nanocrystals. Langmuir 34:6887–6893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0123910.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01239 ↗
8. Bhattacharjee S (2016) DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not? J Controlled Release 235:337–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.01710.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 ↗
9. Boluk Y, Danumah C (2013) Analysis of cellulose nanocrystal rod lengths by dynamic light scattering and electron microscopy. J Nanopart Res 16:2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2174-410.1007/s11051-013-2174-4 ↗
10. Brinchi L, Cotana F, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (2013) Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: technology and applications. Carbohyd Polym 94:154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.03310.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 ↗
11. Camarero Espinosa S, Kuhnt T, Foster EJ, Weder C (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromol 14:1223–1230. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400219u10.1021/bm400219u ↗
12. de Campos A et al (2013) Obtaining nanofibers from curaua and sugarcane bagasse fibers using enzymatic hydrolysis followed by sonication. Cellulose 20:1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9909-310.1007/s10570-013-9909-3 ↗
13. de Morais Teixeira E, Corrêa AC, Manzoli A, de Lima Leite F, de Oliveira CR, Mattoso LHC (2010) Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers. Cellulose 17:595–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9403-010.1007/s10570-010-9403-0 ↗
14. Dufresne A (2017) Cellulose nanomaterial reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 29:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.00410.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.004 ↗
15. Edwards V et al (2015) An assessment of surface properties and moisture uptake of nonwoven fabrics from ginning by-products. In: 2015. InTech, pp 45–61. https://doi.org/10.5772/6132910.5772/61329 ↗
16. Flauzino Neto WP et al (2016) Mechanical properties of natural rubber nanocomposites reinforced with high aspect ratio cellulose nanocrystals isolated from soy hulls. Carbohydr Polym 153:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.073 ↗
17. Foster EJ et al (2018) Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47:2609–2679. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CS00895J10.1039/C6CS00895J ↗
18. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-410.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 ↗
19. Hamad WY, Hu TQ (2010) Structure-process-yield interrelations in nanocrystalline cellulose extraction. Can J Chem Eng 88:392–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2029810.1002/cjce.20298 ↗
20. Han J, Zhou C, Wu Y, Liu F, Wu Q (2013) Self-assembling behavior of cellulose nanoparticles during freeze-drying: effect of suspension concentration, particle size, crystal structure, and surface charge. Biomacromol 14:1529–1540. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm400173410.1021/bm4001734 ↗
21. Hasani M, Cranston ED, Westman G, Gray DG (2008) Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals. Soft Matter 4:2238–2244. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806789A10.1039/B806789A ↗
22. Holt G, Simonton MG, Canto A (2004) Utilization of cotton gin by-products for the manufacturing of fuel pellets: an economic perspective. Appl Eng Agric 20:423–430
23. Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A (2012) Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibers and nanocrystals from rice husk. Ind Crops Prod 37:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.01610.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016 ↗
24. Kargarzadeh H, Ahmad I, Abdullah I, Dufresne A, Zainudin SY, Sheltami RM (2012) Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from kenaf bast fibers. Cellulose 19:855–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9684-610.1007/s10570-012-9684-6 ↗
25. Kargarzadeh H et al (2018) Advances in cellulose nanomaterials. Cellulose 25:2151–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1723-510.1007/s10570-018-1723-5 ↗
26. Klemm D et al (2018) Nanocellulose as a natural source for groundbreaking applications in materials science. Today’s State Mater Today 21:720–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00110.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 ↗
27. Kloser E, Gray DG (2010) Surface Grafting of Cellulose Nanocrystals with Poly(ethylene oxide) in Aqueous Media. Langmuir 26:13450–13456. https://doi.org/10.1021/la101795s10.1021/la101795s ↗
28. Kontturi E et al (2018) Advanced Materials through Assembly of Nanocelluloses. Adv Mater 30:e170377910.1002/adma.201703779 ↗
29. Lin N, Dufresne A (2014) Surface chemistry, morphological analysis and properties of cellulose nanocrystals with gradiented sulfation degrees. Nanoscale 6:5384–5393. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR06761K10.1039/C3NR06761K ↗
30. Ling Z et al (2018) Structural variations of cotton cellulose nanocrystals from deep eutectic solvent treatment: micro and nano scale. Cellulose. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2092-9 (Ahead of Print)10.1007/s10570-018-2092-9 ↗
31. MarketsandMarkets.com (2018) Nanocellulose market by type, application, and region—global forecast to 2023. MarketsandMarkets
32. Morais JP, de Freitas Rosa M, Nascimento LD, do Nascimento DM, Cassales AR (2013) Extraction and characterization of nanocellulose structures from raw cotton linter. Carbohyd Polym 91:229–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.01010.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.010 ↗
33. Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohyd Polym 135:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03510.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035 ↗
34. Nascimento DM et al (2018) Nanocellulose nanocomposite hydrogels: technological and environmental issues. Green Chem 20:2428–2448. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC00205C10.1039/C8GC00205C ↗
35. NRCan.gc.ca (2019) Current lumber, pulp and panel prices. Natural Resources Canada. https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/industry/current-prices/13309#pulp
36. Ortega A, Torre JG (2003) Hydrodynamic properties of rodlike and disklike particles in dilute solution. J Chem Phys 119:9914–9919. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.161596710.1063/1.1615967 ↗
37. Oun AA, Rhim J-W (2015) Effect of post-treatments and concentration of cotton linter cellulose nanocrystals on the properties of agar-based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 134:20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.05310.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.053 ↗
38. Reid MS, Villalobos M, Cranston ED (2017) Benchmarking Cellulose Nanocrystals: From the Laboratory to Industrial Production. Langmuir 33:1583–1598. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0376510.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03765 ↗
39. Rösslein M, Wick P, Prina-Mello A (2018) Characterisation of particles in solution—a perspective on light scattering and comparative technologies. Sci Technol Adv Mater 19:732–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2018.151758710.1080/14686996.2018.1517587 ↗
40. Sacui IA et al (2014) Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:6127–6138. https://doi.org/10.1021/am500359f10.1021/am500359f ↗
41. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-Mediated Oxidation of Native Cellulose. The Effect of Oxidation Conditions on Chemical and Crystal Structures of the Water-Insoluble Fractions. Biomacromol 5:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm049776910.1021/bm0497769 ↗
42. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogeneous Suspensions of Individualized Microfibrils from TEMPO-Catalyzed Oxidation of Native Cellulose. Biomacromol 7:1687–1691. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060154s10.1021/bm060154s ↗
43. Sawhney P, Allen H, Reynolds M, Slopek R, Condon B, Hui D, Wojkowski S (2012) Effect of web formation on properties of hydroentangled nonwoven fabrics. World J Eng 9:407–416. https://doi.org/10.1260/1708-5284.9.5.40710.1260/1708-5284.9.5.407 ↗
44. Sawhney P, Allen C, Reynolds M, Slopek R, Condon B (2013) Whiteness and absorbency of hydroentangled cotton-based nonwoven fabrics of different constituent fibers and fiber blends. World J Eng 10:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1260/1708-5284.10.2.12510.1260/1708-5284.10.2.125 ↗
45. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175590290100310.1177/004051755902901003 ↗
46. Sheltami RM, Abdullah I, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Kargarzadeh H (2012) Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohydr Polym 88:772–779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.06210.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.062 ↗
47. Shimizu M, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2013) Preparation and characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils with ammonium carboxylate groups. Int J Biol Macromol 59:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.02110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.021 ↗
48. Siqueira G, Bras J, Dufresne A (2010) Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2:728–765. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym204072810.3390/polym2040728 ↗
49. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Denver, CO
50. Soni B, el Hassan B, Mahmoud B (2015) Chemical isolation and characterization of different cellulose nanofibers from cotton stalks. Carbohyd Polym 134:581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.03110.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.031 ↗
51. Statista.com (2018) Cotton production in the U.S. from 2000 to 2017. statista.com. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191500/cotton-production-in-the-us-since-2000/
52. Stewart L (2010) Using cotton byproducts in beef cattle diets. University of Georgia
53. Thambiraj S, Ravi Shankaran D (2017) Preparation and physicochemical characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial waste cotton. Appl Surf Sci 412:405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.27210.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.272 ↗
54. Theivasanthi T, Anne Christma FL, Toyin AJ, Gopinath SCB, Ravichandran R (2018) Synthesis and characterization of cotton fiber-based nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 109:832–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.05410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.054 ↗
55. Valentini L, Cardinali M, Fortunati E, Kenny JM (2014) Nonvolatile memory behavior of nanocrystalline cellulose/graphene oxide composite films. Appl Phys Lett 105:153111. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.489860110.1063/1.4898601 ↗
56. Van Hai L, Son HN, Seo YB (2015) Physical and bio-composite properties of nanocrystalline cellulose from wood, cotton linters, cattail, and red algae. Cellulose 22:1789–1798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0633-z10.1007/s10570-015-0633-z ↗
57. Wang J, Yang Y, Yu M, Hu G, Gan Y, Gao H, Shi X (2018) Diffusion of rod-like nanoparticles in non-adhesive and adhesive porous polymeric gels. J Mech Phys Solids 112:431–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.01410.1016/j.jmps.2017.12.014 ↗
58. Zainuddin SYZ, Ahmad I, Kargarzadeh H, Abdullah I, Dufresne A (2013) Potential of using multiscale kenaf fibers as reinforcing filler in cassava starch-kenaf biocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 92:2299–2305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.10610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.106 ↗
59. Zhou L, He H, Li MC, Song K, Cheng HN, Wu Q (2016) Morphological influence of cellulose nanoparticles (CNs) from cottonseed hulls on rheological properties of polyvinyl alcohol/CN suspensions. Carbohyd Polym 153:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.11910.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.119 ↗
60. Zhou S, You T, Zhang X, Xu F (2018) Superhydrophobic Cellulose Nanofiber-Assembled Aerogels for Highly Efficient Water-in-Oil Emulsions Separation. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1:2095–2103. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0007910.1021/acsanm.8b00079 ↗