Designing off-grid green hydrogen plants using dynamic polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers to minimize the hydrogen production cost
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrogen produced from electrolysis is an attractive carbon-free fuel and feedstock, but potential benefits depend on the carbon intensity of electricity production. This study uses technoeconomic modeling to analyze the benefits of producing zero-carbon hydrogen through dynamically operated polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers connected to photovoltaic and wind variable renewable energy (VRE) sources. Dynamic operation is considered for current densities between 0 and 6 A cm−2 and compared to a constant current density of 2 A cm−2 for different combinations of VRE to electrolysis (VRE:E) capacity ratios and compositions of photovoltaic and wind energy in four locations across the United States. For optimal VRE:E and wind:photovoltaic capacity ratios, dynamic operation is found to reduce the levelized cost of hydrogen by 5%–9%, while increasing hydrogen production by 134%–173%, and decreasing excess electrical power by 82%–95%. The framework herein may be used to determine the optimal VRE:E capacity and VRE mix for dynamically operated green hydrogen systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Energy and Environment Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 2022
2. Blank · 2020
3. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001 ↗
4. Emissions from photovoltaic life cycles10.1021/es071763q ↗
5. Updated sustainability status of crystalline-silicon-based photovoltaic systems – Life-cycle energy and environmental impact reduction trends10.1002/pip.3441 ↗
6. Spath Pamela · 2001
7. Eichman · 2014
8. Davies · 2021
9. 2019
10. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044 ↗
11. Peterson · 2021
12. Economics of converting renewable power to hydrogen10.1038/s41560-019-0326-1 ↗
13. European Union Natural Gas Import Price (I:EUNGIP). European Union Natural Gas Import Price. (n.d.).
14. A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
15. Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen electrolysis from off-grid stand-alone photovoltaics incorporating uncertainty analysis
16. Optimal design of solar-driven electrolytic hydrogen production systems within electricity markets10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229183 ↗
17. Cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.006 ↗
18. Can industrial-scale solar hydrogen supplied from commodity technologies be cost competitive by 2030?10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100174 ↗
19. Minimizing the cost of hydrogen production through dynamic polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer operation10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100935 ↗
20. Integrating Solar Energy, Desalination and Electrolysis
21. Computation and assessment of solar electrolyzer field performance: comparing coupling strategies10.1039/C8SE00399H ↗
22. Review—Engineering Challenges in Green Hydrogen Production Systems10.1149/1945-7111/ac6983 ↗
23. Bonanno · 2021
24. Jordan · 2012
25. Matthew · 2022
26. (2021). Lazard’s Levelized Cost of Hydrogen Analysis.
27. 2024
28. 2024
29. Study on Development of Water Electrolysis in the EU
30. H2A: Hydrogen Analysis Production Models. Hydrogen and Fuel Cells. NREL.
31. System Advisor Model. NREL.
32. Designing optimal integrated electricity supply configurations for renewable hydrogen generation in Australia10.1016/j.isci.2021.102539 ↗
33. Voltage losses in zero-gap alkaline water electrolysis10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229864 ↗
34. Green Hydrogen Cost Reduction: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5 C Climate Goal 60
35. Water electrolysers with closed and open electrochemical systems10.1038/s41563-020-0788-3 ↗