Techno-economic Analysis of Hydrogen Electrolysis from Off-Grid Stand-Alone Photovoltaics Incorporating Uncertainty Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Solar-driven electrolysis of water to generate hydrogen is emerging as a viable strategy to decarbonize the global energy economy. However, this direction is more expensive than traditional fossil fuel generation of hydrogen, and effective pathways to lower this cost need to be identified. Here, we report a Monte Carlo approach to explore a wide range of input assumptions to identify key cost drivers, targets, and localized conditions necessary for competitive stand-alone dedicated PV powered hydrogen electrolysis. We determine the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH), considering historical weather data for specific locations to model our PV system, and optimize its size compared to the electrolyzer. This analysis and its methods show the potential for green hydrogen production using off-grid PV, shows the merits of remote systems in areas of high solar resource, and provides cost and performance targets for electrolyzer technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Energy and Environment Impacts · Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 2020
2. 2019
3. 2019
4. 2019
5. 2017
6. Bruce · 2018
7. The potential and economic viability of hydrogen production from the use of hydroelectric and wind farms surplus energy in Brazil: a national and pioneering analysis10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.199 ↗
8. Techno-economic analysis for rustic electrification in Egypt using multi-source renewable energy based on PV/wind/FC10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.038 ↗
9. Grid-connected hydrogen production via large-scale water electrolysis10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112108 ↗
10. Power-to-Gas Hydrogen: techno-economic assessment of processes towards a multi-purpose energy carrier10.1016/j.egypro.2016.11.007 ↗
11. Use of Hydrogen in Off-Grid Locations, a Techno-Economic Assessment10.3390/en11113141 ↗
12. Bertuccioli · 2014
13. A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy10.1039/C5EE02573G ↗
14. 2019
15. Nagashima · 2018
16. 2018
17. 2020
18. 2017
19. Renewable energy policies and barriers
20. 2018
21. A techno-economic analysis method for guiding research and investment directions for c-Si photovoltaics and its application to Al-BSF, PERC, LDSE and advanced hydrogenation10.1039/C8SE00047F ↗
22. Techno-economic implications of the electrolyser technology and size for power-to-gas systems10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.160 ↗
23. So what do innovating companies really get from publicly funded demonstration projects and trials? Innovation lessons from solar photovoltaics and wind10.1016/j.enpol.2010.04.005 ↗
24. Hydrogen production by water electrolysis: a review of alkaline water electrolysis, PEM water electrolysis and high temperature water electrolysis
25. 2020
26. Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045 ↗
27. Learning curves for hydrogen production technology: an assessment of observed cost reductions10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.011 ↗
28. The investment costs of electrolysis–a comparison of cost studies from the past 30 years10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.115 ↗
29. 2020
30. 2020
31. Flexible production of green hydrogen and ammonia from variable solar and wind energy. Case study of Chile and Argentina10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.028 ↗
32. The Hydrogen Energy Infrastructure Development in Japan10.1051/e3sconf/20186902001 ↗
33. Energiepark Mainz: Technical and economic analysis of the worldwide largest Power-to-Gas plant with PEM electrolysis10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.145 ↗
34. 2019
35. Graham · 2018
36. Fu · 2018
37. Solar water splitting by photovoltaic-electrolysis with a solar-to-hydrogen efficiency over 3010.1038/ncomms13237 ↗
38. A review on global sensitivity analysis methods
39. Monofacial vs bifacial Si-based PV modules: Which one is more cost-effective?10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.012 ↗
40. Feldman · 2019