journal article·2021-10

Nonlinear buckling analysis of double-layered graphene nanoribbons based on molecular mechanics

Mohammad Sadegh Namnabat, Amin Barzegar, Emilio Barchiesi, Mahdi Javanbakht

Carbon Letters· Volume 31· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Double-layer graphene nanoribbons promise potential application in nanoelectromechanical systems and optoelectronic devices, and knowledge about mechanical stability is a crucial parameter to flourish the application of these materials at the next generation of nanodevices. In this paper, molecular mechanics is utilized to investigate nonlinear buckling behavior, critical buckling stress, and lateral deflection of double-layered graphene nanoribbons under various configurations of stacking mode and chirality. The implicit arc-length iterative method (modified Riks method) with Ramm’s algorithm is utilized to analyze the nonlinear structural stability problem. The covalent bonds are modeled using three-dimensional beam elements in which elastic moduli are calculated based on molecular structural mechanics technique, and the interlayer van der Waals (vdW) interactions are modeled with nonlinear truss elements. An analytical expression for Young’s modulus of nonlinear truss elements is derived based on the Lennard–Jones potential function and implemented in numerical simulation with a UMAT subroutine based on FORTRAN code to capture the nonlinearity of the vdW interactions during the buckling analysis. The results indicate that the highest critical buckling stress and the minimum lateral deflection occur for armchair and zigzag chirality, both with AB stacking mode, respectively. Moreover, the critical buckling stress is found to be directly dependent on the mode shape number regardless of in-phase or anti-phase deflection direction of layers. Lateral deflection exhibits a similar trend with mode shape in anti-phase mode; however, it is decreasing by increasing mode shape number in in-phase mode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. Prabhu SA, Kavithayeni V, Suganthy R, Geetha K (2020) Graphene quantum dots synthesis and energy application: a review. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00154-w10.1007/s42823-020-00154-w ↗
2. Sahoo SK, Mallik A (2019) Fundamentals of fascinating graphene nanosheets: a comprehensive study. Nano 14(3):1930003. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179329201930003210.1142/S1793292019300032 ↗
3. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV et al (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306(5696):666–66910.1126/science.1102896 ↗
4. Jung HY, Kim YR, Jeong HT (2020) All-solid-state supercapacitor composed of reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/activated carbon (AC) composite and polymer electrolyte. Carbon Lett 30(1):107–11310.1007/s42823-019-00077-1 ↗
5. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar JW, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321(5887):385–38810.1126/science.1157996 ↗
6. Ebrahimi F, Dabbagh A (2018) Effect of humid-thermal environment on wave dispersion characteristics of single-layered graphene sheets. Appl Phys A 124(4):30110.1007/s00339-018-1734-y ↗
7. Reunchan P, Jhi S-H (2011) Metal-dispersed porous graphene for hydrogen storage. Appl Phys Lett 98(9):09310310.1063/1.3560468 ↗
8. Kim G, Jhi S-H, Lim S, Park N (2009) Effect of vacancy defects in graphene on metal anchoring and hydrogen adsorption. Appl Phys Lett 94(17):17310210.1063/1.3126450 ↗
9. Dai G, Liu J, Qian H (2019) CO catalytic oxidation over graphene with double vacancy-embedded molybdenum: a DFT investigation. Carbon Lett 29(4):337–34410.1007/s42823-019-00038-8 ↗
10. Li J, Li J, Zhang H, Li T, Xiao J (2020) Structural characteristics and sodium penetration behaviors in anthracite cathodes: a combination study using Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations. Carbon Lett 30(3):259–26910.1007/s42823-019-00094-0 ↗
11. Nguyen HT (2019) Graphene layer of hybrid graphene/hexagonal boron nitride model upon heating. Carbon Lett 29(5):521–52810.1007/s42823-019-00056-6 ↗
12. Galashev AY, Katin KP, Maslov MM (2019) Morse parameters for the interaction of metals with graphene and silicene. Phys Lett A 383(2–3):252–25810.1016/j.physleta.2018.10.025 ↗
13. Gajbhiye SO, Singh S (2016) Nonlinear dynamics of bi-layered graphene sheet, double-walled carbon nanotube and nanotube bundle. Appl Phys A 122(5):52310.1007/s00339-016-0065-0 ↗
14. Overney G, Zhong W, Tomanek D (1993) Structural rigidity and low frequency vibrational modes of long carbon tubules. Zeitschrift für Physik D Atoms Mol Clust 27(1):93–9610.1007/BF01436769 ↗
15. Lu JP (1997) Elastic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanoropes. Phys Rev Lett 79(7):129710.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1297 ↗
16. Kamali K, Nazemnezhad R (2018) Interlayer influences between double-layer graphene nanoribbons (shear and tensile-compressive) on free vibration using nonlocal elasticity theory. Mech Adv Mater Struct 25(3):225–23710.1080/15376494.2016.1255821 ↗
17. Hosseini-Hashemi S, Sharifpour F, Ilkhani M (2016) On the free vibrations of size-dependent closed micro/nano-spherical shell based on the modified couple stress theory. Int J Mech Sci. 115:501–51510.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.07.007 ↗
18. Javanbakht M, Ghaedi MS (2020) Nanovoid induced martensitic growth under uniaxial stress: effect of misfit strain, temperature and nanovoid size on PT threshold stress and nanostructure in NiAl. Comput Mater Sci 184:10992810.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109928 ↗
19. Levitas VI, Jafarzadeh H, Farrahi GH, Javanbakht M (2018) Thermodynamically consistent and scale-dependent phase field approach for crack propagation allowing for surface stresses. Int J Plast 111:1–3510.1016/j.ijplas.2018.07.005 ↗
20. Jafarzadeh H, Levitas VI, Farrahi GH, Javanbakht M (2019) Phase field approach for nanoscale interactions between crack propagation and phase transformation. Nanoscale 11(46):22243–2224710.1039/C9NR05960A ↗
21. Auffray N, dell’Isola F, Eremeyev VA, Madeo A, Rosi G (2015) Analytical continuum mechanics à la Hamilton-Piola least action principle for second gradient continua and capillary fluids. Math Mech Solids 20(4):375–41710.1177/1081286513497616 ↗
22. Abali BE, Müller WH, dell’Isola F (2017) Theory and computation of higher gradient elasticity theories based on action principles. Arch Appl Mech 87(9):1495–151010.1007/s00419-017-1266-5 ↗
23. dell’Isola F, Seppecher P, Spagnuolo M, Barchiesi E, Hild F, Lekszycki T et al (2019) Advances in pantographic structures: design, manufacturing, models, experiments and image analyses. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 31(4):1231–128210.1007/s00161-019-00806-x ↗
24. Dell’Isola F, Seppecher P, Alibert JJ, Lekszycki T, Grygoruk R, Pawlikowski M et al (2019) Pantographic metamaterials: an example of mathematically driven design and of its technological challenges. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 31(4):851–88410.1007/s00161-018-0689-8 ↗
25. Peddieson J, Buchanan GR, McNitt RP (2003) Application of nonlocal continuum models to nanotechnology. Int J Eng Sci 41(3–5):305–31210.1016/S0020-7225(02)00210-0 ↗
26. Duan W, Wang CM (2007) Exact solutions for axisymmetric bending of micro/nanoscale circular plates based on nonlocal plate theory. Nanotechnology 18(38):38570410.1088/0957-4484/18/38/385704 ↗
27. Pradhan S, Phadikar J (2010) Scale effect and buckling analysis of multilayered graphene sheets based on nonlocal continuum mechanics. J Comput Theor Nanosci 7(10):1948–195410.1166/jctn.2010.1565 ↗
28. Ansari R, Shahabodini A, Rouhi H (2013) Prediction of the biaxial buckling and vibration behavior of graphene via a nonlocal atomistic-based plate theory. Compos Struct 95:88–9410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.06.026 ↗
29. Ansari R, Shahabodini A, Rouhi H (2015) A nonlocal plate model incorporating interatomic potentials for vibrations of graphene with arbitrary edge conditions. Curr Appl Phys 15(9):1062–106910.1016/j.cap.2015.06.012 ↗
30. Jiang RW, Shen ZB, Tang GJ (2017) A semi-analytical method for nonlocal buckling and vibration of a single-layered graphene sheet nanomechanical resonator subjected to initial in-plane loads. Acta Mech 228(5):1725–173410.1007/s00707-016-1795-y ↗
31. Shahabodini A, Ansari R, Darvizeh M (2017) Multiscale modeling of embedded graphene sheets based on the higher-order Cauchy-Born rule: nonlinear static analysis. Compos Struct 165:25–4310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.067 ↗
32. Lin F, Xiang Y, Shen H-S (2015) Buckling of graphene embedded in polymer matrix under compression. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 15(07):154001610.1142/S0219455415400167 ↗
33. Hwu C, Yeh Y-K (2014) Explicit expressions of mechanical properties for graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes via a molecular-continuum model. Appl Phys A 116(1):125–14010.1007/s00339-014-8241-6 ↗
34. Chang I-L, Chen J-A (2015) The molecular mechanics study on mechanical properties of graphene and graphite. Appl Phys A 119(1):265–27410.1007/s00339-014-8960-8 ↗
35. Alizadeh O, Mohammadi S (2019) The variable node multiscale approach: coupling the atomistic and continuum scales. Comput Mater Sci 160:256–27410.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.003 ↗
36. Turco E, Dell’Isola F, Cazzani A, Rizzi NL (2016) Hencky-type discrete model for pantographic structures: numerical comparison with second gradient continuum models. Z Angew Math Phys 67(4):8510.1007/s00033-016-0681-8 ↗
37. Rahali Y, Giorgio I, Ganghoffer J, dell’Isola F (2015) Homogenization à la Piola produces second gradient continuum models for linear pantographic lattices. Int J Eng Sci 97:148–17210.1016/j.ijengsci.2015.10.003 ↗
38. Giorgio I, Rizzi NL, Andreaus U, Steigmann DJ (2019) A two-dimensional continuum model of pantographic sheets moving in a 3D space and accounting for the offset and relative rotations of the fibers. Math Mech Complex Syst 7(4):311–32510.2140/memocs.2019.7.311 ↗
39. Giorgio I, Rizzi N, Turco E (2017) Continuum modelling of pantographic sheets for out-of-plane bifurcation and vibrational analysis. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 473(2207):20170636
40. Giorgio I, Della Corte A, Dell’Isola F, Steigmann DJ (2016) Buckling modes in pantographic lattices. CR Mec 344(7):487–50110.1016/j.crme.2016.02.009 ↗
41. Dell’Isola F, Della Corte A, Greco L, Luongo A (2016) Plane bias extension test for a continuum with two inextensible families of fibers: a variational treatment with Lagrange multipliers and a perturbation solution. Int J Solids Struct 81:1–1210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.08.029 ↗
42. Tserpes KI, Papanikos P (2014) Finite element modeling of the tensile behavior of carbon nanotubes, graphene and their composites Modeling of carbon nanotubes, graphene and their composites. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–32910.1007/978-3-319-01201-8 ↗
43. Giannopoulos G, Tsiros A, Georgantzinos S (2013) Prediction of elastic mechanical behavior and stability of single-walled carbon nanotubes using bar elements. Mech Adv Mater Struct 20(9):730–74110.1080/15376494.2012.676714 ↗
44. Allinger NL, Yuh YH, Lii JH (1989) Molecular mechanics. The MM3 force field for hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 111(23):8551–856610.1021/ja00205a001 ↗
45. Korobeynikov S, Alyokhin V, Babichev A (2018) Simulation of mechanical parameters of graphene using the DREIDING force field. Acta Mech 229(6):2343–237810.1007/s00707-018-2115-5 ↗
46. Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 94(26):8897–890910.1021/j100389a010 ↗
47. Turco E, Barchiesi E, Giorgio I, dell’Isola F (2020) A Lagrangian Hencky-type nonlinear model suitable for metamaterials design of shearable and extensible slender deformable bodies alternative to Timoshenko theory. Int J Nonlinear Mech 123:10348110.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2020.103481 ↗
48. Turco E, Barchiesi E (2019) Equilibrium paths of Hencky pantographic beams in a three-point bending problem. Math Mech Complex Syst 7(4):287–31010.2140/memocs.2019.7.287 ↗
49. Turco E (2018) In-plane shear loading of granular membranes modeled as a Lagrangian assembly of rotating elastic particles. Mech Res Commun 92:61–6610.1016/j.mechrescom.2018.07.007 ↗
50. Meo M, Rossi M (2006) Prediction of Young’s modulus of single wall carbon nanotubes by molecular-mechanics based finite element modelling. Compos Sci Technol 66(11–12):1597–160510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.015 ↗
51. Tserpes K, Papanikos P (2005) Finite element modeling of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos B Eng 36(5):468–47710.1016/j.compositesb.2004.10.003 ↗
52. Li C, Chou T-W (2003) A structural mechanics approach for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. Int J Solids Struct 40(10):2487–249910.1016/S0020-7683(03)00056-8 ↗
53. Li C, Chou T-W (2003) Elastic moduli of multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the effect of van der Waals forces. Compos Sci Technol 63(11):1517–152410.1016/S0266-3538(03)00072-1 ↗
54. Huang M-Y, Chen H-B, Lu J-N, Lu P, Zhang P-Q (2013) A modified molecular structural mechanics method for analysis of carbon nanotubes. Chin J Chem Phys. 19(4):28610.1360/cjcp2006.19(4).286.5 ↗
55. Eberhardt O, Wallmersperger T (2015) Energy consistent modified molecular structural mechanics model for the determination of the elastic properties of single wall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 95:166–18010.1016/j.carbon.2015.07.092 ↗
56. Singh S, Patel B (2015) Nonlinear elastic properties of graphene sheet under finite deformation. Compos Struct 119:412–42110.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.021 ↗
57. Kumar A, Sharma K, Dixit AR (2020) A review on the mechanical properties of polymer composites reinforced by carbon nanotubes and graphene. Carbon Lett. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x10.1007/s42823-020-00161-x ↗
58. Zhang X, Dong J, Gong X, Ding F (2018) The formation and stability of junctions in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Nanotechnology 29(48):48570210.1088/1361-6528/aae0b7 ↗
59. Shende P, Augustine S, Prabhakar B (2020) A review on graphene nanoribbons for advanced biomedical applications. Carbon Lett. 30:465–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-020-00125-110.1007/s42823-020-00125-1 ↗
60. Genoese A, Genoese A, Salerno G (2020) Buckling and post-buckling analysis of single wall carbon nanotubes using molecular mechanics. Appl Math Model 83:777–80010.1016/j.apm.2020.03.012 ↗
61. Genoese A, Genoese A, Rizzi NL, Salerno G (2019) On the in-plane failure and post-failure behaviour of pristine and perforated single-layer graphene sheets. Math Mech Solids 24(11):3418–344310.1177/1081286519833129 ↗
62. Eremeyev VA, Turco E (2020) Enriched buckling for beam-lattice metamaterials. Mech Res Commun 103:10345810.1016/j.mechrescom.2019.103458 ↗
63. Parashar A, Mertiny P (2012) Representative volume element to estimate buckling behavior of graphene/polymer nanocomposite. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):51510.1186/1556-276X-7-515 ↗
64. Rouhi S, Ansari R (2012) Atomistic finite element model for axial buckling and vibration analysis of single-layered graphene sheets. Phys E 44(4):764–77210.1016/j.physe.2011.11.020 ↗
65. Tserpes K, Vatistas I (2015) Buckling analysis of pristine and defected graphene. Mech Res Commun 64:50–5610.1016/j.mechrescom.2015.01.003 ↗
66. Jung MW, Myung S, Kim KW, Song W, Jo Y-Y, Lee SS et al (2014) Fabrication of graphene-based flexible devices utilizing a soft lithographic patterning method. Nanotechnology 25(28):28530210.1088/0957-4484/25/28/285302 ↗
67. Yu X, Cheng H, Zhang M, Zhao Y, Qu L, Shi G (2017) Graphene-based smart materials. Nat Rev Mater 2(9):1704610.1038/natrevmats.2017.46 ↗
68. Sheng Y, Rong Y, He Z, Fan Y, Warner JH (2015) Uniformity of large-area bilayer graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Nanotechnology 26(39):39560110.1088/0957-4484/26/39/395601 ↗
69. Rafiee MA, Lu W, Thomas AV, Zandiatashbar A, Rafiee J, Tour JM et al (2010) Graphene nanoribbon composites. ACS Nano 4(12):7415–742010.1021/nn102529n ↗
70. Neek-Amal M, Peeters F (2010) Defected graphene nanoribbons under axial compression. Appl Phys Lett 97(15):15311810.1063/1.3496467 ↗
71. Shi J-X, Ni Q-Q, Lei X-W, Natsuki T (2011) Nonlocal elasticity theory for the buckling of double-layer graphene nanoribbons based on a continuum model. Comput Mater Sci 50(11):3085–309010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.05.031 ↗
72. Zhu Y, Murali S, Cai W, Li X, Suk JW, Potts JR et al (2010) Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 22(35):3906–392410.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
73. Leenaerts O, Partoens B, Peeters F (2013) Tunable double dirac cone spectrum in bilayer α-graphyne. Appl Phys Lett 103(1):01310510.1063/1.4812977 ↗
74. Rafiee R, Eskandariyun A (2017) Comparative study on predicting Young’s modulus of graphene sheets using nano-scale continuum mechanics approach. Phys E 90:42–4810.1016/j.physe.2017.03.006 ↗
75. Cornell WD, Cieplak P, Bayly CI, Gould IR, Merz KM, Ferguson DM et al (1995) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 117(19):5179–519710.1021/ja00124a002 ↗
76. Nye JF (1985) Physical properties of crystals: their representation by tensors and matrices. Oxford University Press, Oxford
77. Kim JH, Jeong JH, Kim N, Joshi R, Lee G-H (2018) Mechanical properties of two-dimensional materials and their applications. J Phys D Appl Phys 52(8):08300110.1088/1361-6463/aaf465 ↗
78. Wan K-T, Guo S, Dillard DA (2003) A theoretical and numerical study of a thin clamped circular film under an external load in the presence of a tensile residual stress. Thin Solid Films 425(1–2):150–16210.1016/S0040-6090(02)01103-3 ↗
79. Blakslee O, Proctor D, Seldin E, Spence G, Weng T (1970) Elastic constants of compression-annealed pyrolytic graphite. J Appl Phys 41(8):3373–338210.1063/1.1659428 ↗
80. Kordkheili SH, Moshrefzadeh-Sani H (2013) Mechanical properties of double-layered graphene sheets. Comput Mater Sci 69:335–34310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.11.027 ↗
81. Saito R, Matsuo R, Kimura T, Dresselhaus G, Dresselhaus M (2001) Anomalous potential barrier of double-wall carbon nanotube. Chem Phys Lett 348(3–4):187–19310.1016/S0009-2614(01)01127-7 ↗
82. Scarpa F, Adhikari S, Chowdhury R (2010) The transverse elasticity of bilayer graphene. Phys Lett A 374(19–20):2053–205710.1016/j.physleta.2010.02.063 ↗
83. Namnabat MS, Barzegar A, Javanbakht M (2019) Finite element buckling analysis of double-layered graphene nanoribbons. Mater Res Express 6(5):05502310.1088/2053-1591/ab032d ↗
84. ABAQUS IJV (2014) Abaqus documentation, vol 6, pp 5–1
85. Krenk S (2009) Nonlinear modeling and analysis of solids and structures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511812163 ↗
86. Hang Y, Wen-Zhi W, Yu J, Guo W-L (2015) Tuning the energy gap of bilayer α-graphyne by applying strain and electric field. Chin Phys B 25(2):02310210.1088/1674-1056/25/2/023102 ↗
87. Farajpour A, Solghar AA, Shahidi A (2013) Postbuckling analysis of multi-layered graphene sheets under non-uniform biaxial compression. Phys E 47:197–20610.1016/j.physe.2012.10.028 ↗