DataVXCarbon LettersPaper
journal article·2025-02

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based magnetic photocatalysts for removal of antibiotics

Akshay Verma, Gaurav Sharma, Tongtong Wang, Amit Kumar, Pooja Dhiman, Alberto García-Peñas

Carbon Letters· Volume 35· Issue 1
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

The increasing presence of antibiotics in aquatic ecosystems has raised serious concerns about their ecological and human health impacts. In response, extensive research has focused on the degradation and removal of these stubborn pollutants. Among various approaches, heterogeneous photocatalysis has gained prominence due to its effectiveness in eliminating diverse contaminants from water. This method stands out for its cost-efficiency, environmental friendliness, and high performance, making it a practical solution for pollutant mitigation. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has attracted significant attention for developing advanced photocatalysts. Its non-metallic nature, robust stability, suitable electronic configuration, and favorable 2.7 eV band gap make it an excellent candidate. However, g-C3N4 faces challenges such as limited visible-light absorption, rapid charge recombination, low oxidation power, and poor texture, which hinder its photocatalytic efficiency. These issues can be addressed by developing g-C3N4-composite-based magnetic semiconductor photocatalysts possessing compatible energy bands. Integrating magnetic materials with g-C3N4 photocatalysts offers new possibilities for easy separation and recyclability, enhancing practical use. While previous studies have also detailed various modification methods for g-C3N4-based materials, the structure-performance relationships of g-C3N4, particularly for detecting and degrading antibiotics, need further exploration. This review critically examines the utilization of g-C3N4-based magnetic photocatalysts for antibiotic removal, exploring fabrication techniques, physical properties, and performance metrics. Various strategies to optimize their efficiency, including doping, heterojunction formation, and surface modification, are also covered. It also delves into the mechanisms of photocatalytic antibiotic degradation, addressing challenges and opportunities in developing these materials. Ultimately, we propose that the synergy of magnetic components into g-C3N4 not only represents a significant advancement in photocatalyst design but also opens new avenues for sustainable wastewater treatment technologies, demonstrating a high level of novelty in the field. The review provides valuable insights into current research and potential advancements in antibiotic remediation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

Electronic materialsCompositesCatalysis & surfaces

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Suyana P, Ganguly P, Nair BN, Pillai SC, Hareesh US (2021) Structural and compositional tuning in g-C3N4 based systems for photocatalytic antibiotic degradation. Chem Eng J Adv 8:100148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2021.10014810.1016/j.ceja.2021.100148 ↗
2. Ganguly P, Panneri S, Hareesh US, Breen A, Pillai SC (2019) Recent advances in photocatalytic detoxification of water. In: Thomas S, Pasquini D, Leu S-Y, Gopakumar DA (eds) Nanoscale materials in water purification. Elsevier, pp 653–68810.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00029-X ↗
3. Saravanan A, Kumar PS, Hemavathy RV, Jeevanantham S, Harikumar P, Priyanka G, Devakirubai DRA (2022) A comprehensive review on sources, analysis, and toxicity of environmental pollutants and its removal methods from water environment. Sci Total Environ 812:152456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15245610.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152456 ↗
4. Sarojini G, Venkatesh Babu S, Rajamohan N, Senthil Kumar P, Rajasimman M (2021) Surface modified polymer-magnetic-algae nanocomposite for the removal of chromium- equilibrium and mechanism studies. Environ Res 201:111626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.11162610.1016/j.envres.2021.111626 ↗
5. Zhang Y, Zhao YG, Maqbool F, Hu Y (2022) Removal of antibiotics pollutants in wastewater by UV-based advanced oxidation processes: Influence of water matrix components, processes optimization and application: a review. J Water Process Eng 45:02496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.10249610.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102496 ↗
6. Qiu M, Liu Z, Wang S, Hu B (2021) The photocatalytic reduction of U(VI) into U(IV) by ZIF-8/g-C3N4 composites at visible light. Environ Res 196:110349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.11034910.1016/j.envres.2020.110349 ↗
7. Alharbi NS, Hu B, Hayat T, Rabah SO, Alsaedi A, Zhuang L, Wang X (2020) Efficient elimination of environmental pollutants through sorption-reduction and photocatalytic degradation using nanomaterials. Front Chem Sci Eng 14:1124–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1923-z10.1007/s11705-020-1923-z ↗
8. Han Y, Yang L, Chen X, Cai Y, Zhang X, Qian M, Chen X, Zhao H, Sheng M, Cao G, Shen G (2020) Removal of veterinary antibiotics from swine wastewater using anaerobic and aerobic biodegradation. Sci Total Environ 709:136094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13609410.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136094 ↗
9. Yang C, Wang L, Yu Y, Wu P, Wang F, Liu S, Luo X (2020) Highly efficient removal of amoxicillin from water by Mg–Al layered double hydroxide/cellulose nanocomposite beads synthesized through in-situ coprecipitation method. Int J Biol Macromol 149:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.09610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.096 ↗
10. Gutiérrez Sánchez P, Hrichi A, Garrido Zoido JM, Álvarez Torrellas S, Larriba M, Victoria Gil M, Amor HB, García J (2024) Natural clays as adsorbents for the efficient removal of antibiotic ciprofloxacin from wastewaters: experimental and theoretical studies using DFT method. J Ind Eng Chem 134:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.04410.1016/j.jiec.2023.12.044 ↗
11. Dai C, Chen D, Wu J, Liu J, Shi S, Zhang J, Feng Y (2022) Construction of a novel integrated electrochemical oxidation-coagulation system for simultaneous removal of suspended solids and antibiotics. Chem Eng J 447:137505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13750510.1016/j.cej.2022.137505 ↗
12. Yin R, Chen Y, He S, Li W, Zeng L, Guo W, Zhu M (2020) In situ photoreduction of structural Fe(III) in a metal-organic framework for peroxydisulfate activation and efficient removal of antibiotics in real wastewater. J Hazard Mater 388:121996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12199610.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121996 ↗
13. Balakrishnan A, Appunni S, Chinthala M, Vo DVN (2022) Biopolymer-supported TiO2 as a sustainable photocatalyst for wastewater treatment: a review. Environ Chem Lett 20:3071–3098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01443-810.1007/s10311-022-01443-8 ↗
14. Balakrishnan A, Gopalram K, Appunni S (2021) Photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dicholorophenoxyacetic acid by TiO2 modified catalyst: kinetics and operating cost analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:33331–33343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12928-410.1007/s11356-021-12928-4 ↗
15. Wang M, Jin C, Kang J, Liu J, Tang Y, Li Z, Li S (2021) CuO/g-C3N4 2D/2D heterojunction photocatalysts as efficient peroxymonosulfate activators under visible light for oxytetracycline degradation: Characterization, efficiency, and mechanism. Chem Eng J 416:128118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12811810.1016/j.cej.2020.128118 ↗
16. Lu S, Shen L, Li X, Yu B, Ding J, Gao P, Zhang H (2022) Advances in the photocatalytic reduction functions of graphitic carbon nitride-based photocatalysts in environmental applications: a review. J Clean Prod 378:134589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13458910.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134589 ↗
17. Luo Y, Han Y, Xue M, Xie Y, Yin Z, Xie C, Li X, Zheng Y, Huang J, Zhang Y, Yang Y, Gao B (2022) Ball-milled bismuth oxybromide/biochar composites with enhanced removal of reactive red owing to the synergy between adsorption and photodegradation. J Environ Manag 308:114652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11465210.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114652 ↗
18. Asadzadeh Khaneghah S, Habibi YA (2020) g-C3N4/carbon dot-based nanocomposites serve as efficacious photocatalysts for environmental purification and energy generation: a review. J Clean Prod 276:124319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12431910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124319 ↗
19. Manna M, Sen S (2023) Advanced oxidation process: a sustainable technology for treating refractory organic compounds present in industrial wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30:25477–25505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19435-010.1007/s11356-022-19435-0 ↗
20. Hemmati Eslamlu P, Habibi Yangjeh A (2024) A review on impressive Z- and S-scheme photocatalysts composed of g-C3N4 for detoxification of antibiotics. Flat Chem 43:100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flatc.2023.10059710.1016/j.flatc.2023.100597 ↗
21. Wei H, Meng F, Yu W, Li J, Zhang H (2023) Highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of levofloxacin by novel S-scheme heterojunction Co3O4/Bi2MoO6@g-C3N4 hollow microspheres: performance, degradation pathway and mechanism. Sep Purif Technol 318:123940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.12394010.1016/j.seppur.2023.123940 ↗
22. Jabbar ZH, Graimed BH (2022) Recent developments in industrial organic degradation via semiconductor heterojunctions and the parameters affecting the photocatalytic process: a review study. J Water Process Eng 47:102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.10267110.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102671 ↗
23. Sabri M, Habibi Yangjeh A, Rahim Pouran S, Wang C (2023) Titania-activated persulfate for environmental remediation: the-state-of-the-art. Catal Rev 65:118–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2021.199677610.1080/01614940.2021.1996776 ↗
24. Feizpoor S, Rahim Pouran S, Habibi Yangjeh A (2023) Recent progress on photocatalytic evolution of hydrogen gas over TiO2-x-based emerging nanostructures. Mater Sci Semicond Process 162:107444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2023.10744410.1016/j.mssp.2023.107444 ↗
25. Van KN, Huu HT, Nguyen Thi VN, Le Thi TL, Truong DH, Truong TT, Dao NN, Vo V, Tran DL, Vasseghian Y (2022) Facile construction of S-scheme SnO2/g-C3N4 photocatalyst for improved photoactivity. Chemosphere 289:133120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13312010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133120 ↗
26. Li Y, He Z, Liu L, Jiang Y, Ong WJ, Duan Y, Ho W, Dong F (2023) Inside-and-out modification of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) photocatalysts via defect engineering for energy and environmental science. Nano Energy 105:108032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10803210.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108032 ↗
27. Hayat A, Shah Syed JA, Al Sehemi AG, El Nasser KS, Taha TA, Al Ghamdi AA, Sohail M (2022) State of the art advancement in rational design of g-C3N4 photocatalyst for efficient solar fuel transformation, environmental decontamination and future perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:10837–10867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.25210.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.252 ↗
28. Ling GZS, Ng SF, Ong WJ (2022) Tailor-engineered 2D cocatalysts: harnessing electron-hole redox center of 2D g-C3N4 photocatalysts toward solar-to-chemical conversion and environmental purification. Adv Funct Mater 32:2111875. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20211187510.1002/adfm.202111875 ↗
29. Shang W, Liu W, Cai X, Hu J, Guo J, Xin C, Li Y, Zhang N, Wang N, Ce H, Shi Y (2023) Insights into atomically dispersed reactive centers on g-C3N4 photocatalysts for water splitting. Adv Powder Mater 2:100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmate.2022.10009410.1016/j.apmate.2022.100094 ↗
30. Zhan D, Tian J, Fu Q, Liu P, Zhao Y, Liu W, Li D, Huang Y, Han C (2023) In situ photo deposition of Cu and Ni(OH)2 dual cocatalyst: synergistic effect on enhancing g-C3N4 photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Surf Sci 641:158463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15846310.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158463 ↗
31. Bang Truong H, Cuong Nguyen X, Hur J (2023) Recent advances in g-C3N4-based photocatalysis for water treatment: magnetic and floating photocatalysts, and applications of machine-learning techniques. J Environ Manage 345:118895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11889510.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118895 ↗
32. Truong HB, Huy BT, Ray SK, Gyawali G, Lee YI, Cho J, Hur J (2022) Magnetic visible-light activated photocatalyst ZnFe2O4/BiVO4/g-C3N4 for decomposition of antibiotic lomefloxacin: photocatalytic mechanism, degradation pathway, and toxicity assessment. Chemosphere 299:134320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13432010.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134320 ↗
33. Zhou P, Chen F, Su X, Zhang T, Meng S, Xie M, Song Y, Yan X, Xu Y (2023) Ag2O modified magnetic BaFe12O19/C3N4 photocatalysts with enhanced antibiotic removal: photocatalytic mechanism and toxicity evaluation. Adv Powder Technol 34:104015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2023.10401510.1016/j.apt.2023.104015 ↗
34. Zhang C, Li Y, Shuai D, Shen Y, Xiong W, Wang L (2019) Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for water disinfection and microbial control: a review. Chemosphere 214:462–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.13710.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.137 ↗
35. Singh P, Shandilya P, Raizada P, Sudhaik A, Rahmani Sani A, Hosseini Bandegharaei A (2020) Review on various strategies for enhancing photocatalytic activity of graphene-based nanocomposites for water purification. Arab J Chem 13:3498–3520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2018.12.00110.1016/j.arabjc.2018.12.001 ↗
36. Bilal M, Mehmood S, Rasheed T, Iqbal HMN (2020) Antibiotics traces in the aquatic environment: persistence and adverse environmental impact. Curr Opin Environ Sci Health 13:68–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.11.00510.1016/j.coesh.2019.11.005 ↗
37. Torres NH, de Salles Pupo MM, Ferreira LFR, Maranho LA, Américo Pinheiro JHP, Vilca FZ, de Hollanda LM, Tornisielo VL (2017) Spatial and seasonal analysis of antimicrobials and toxicity tests with Daphnia magna, on the sub-basin of Piracicaba river, SP, Brazil. J Environ Chem Eng 5:6070–6076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.11.03110.1016/j.jece.2017.11.031 ↗
38. Bilal M, Ashraf SS, Barceló D, Iqbal HMN (2019) Biocatalytic degradation/redefining “removal” fate of pharmaceutically active compounds and antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ 691:1190–1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.22410.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.224 ↗
39. Mishra S, Singh AK, Cheng L, Hussain A, Maiti A (2023) Occurrence of antibiotics in wastewater: potential ecological risk and removal through anaerobic–aerobic systems. Environ Res 226:115678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.11567810.1016/j.envres.2023.115678 ↗
40. Oberoi AS, Jia Y, Zhang H, Khanal SK, Lu H (2019) Insights into the fate and removal of antibiotics in engineered biological treatment systems: a critical review. Environ Sci Technol 53:7234–7264. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b0113110.1021/acs.est.9b01131 ↗
41. Larsson DGJ, Flach CF (2022) Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:257–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x ↗
42. Kotwani A, Joshi J, Kaloni D (2021) Pharmaceutical effluent: a critical link in the interconnected ecosystem promoting antimicrobial resistance. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:32111–32124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14178-w10.1007/s11356-021-14178-w ↗
43. Nassri I, khattabi rifi S, Sayerh F, Souabi S, (2023) Occurrence, pollution sources, and mitigation prospects of Antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and endocrine disruptors in the aquatic environment. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 20:100878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2023.10087810.1016/j.enmm.2023.100878 ↗
44. Stanton IC, Bethel A, Leonard AFC, Gaze WH, Garside R (2022) Existing evidence on antibiotic resistance exposure and transmission to humans from the environment: a systematic map. Environ Evid 11:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-022-00262-210.1186/s13750-022-00262-2 ↗
45. Zhang Q, Zhang G, Liu D, Zhang X, Fang R, Wang L, Chen Y, Lin L, Wu H, Li S (2022) A dataset of distribution of antibiotic occurrence in solid environmental matrices in China. Sci Data 9:276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01384-510.1038/s41597-022-01384-5 ↗
46. Kraemer SA, Ramachandran A, Perron GG (2019) Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms 7:180. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms706018010.3390/microorganisms7060180 ↗
47. Singh A, Chaurasia D, Khan N, Singh E, Chaturvedi Bhargava P (2023) Efficient mitigation of emerging antibiotics residues from water matrix: integrated approaches and sustainable technologies. Environ Pollut 328:121552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.12155210.1016/j.envpol.2023.121552 ↗
48. Ben Y, Fu C, Hu M, Liu L, Wong MH, Zheng C (2019) Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: a review. Environ Res 169:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.11.04010.1016/j.envres.2018.11.040 ↗
49. Han QF, Zhao S, Zhang XR, Wang XL, Song C, Wang SG (2020) Distribution, combined pollution and risk assessment of antibiotics in typical marine aquaculture farms surrounding the Yellow Sea, North China. Environ Int 138:105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.10555110.1016/j.envint.2020.105551 ↗
50. Jari Y, Roche N, Necibi MC, El Hajjaji S, Dhiba D, Chehbouni A (2022) Emerging pollutants in Moroccan wastewater: occurrence, impact, and removal technologies. J Chem 2022:9727857. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/972785710.1155/2022/9727857 ↗
51. Waleng NJ, Nomngongo PN (2022) Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in the environmental waters: African and Asian perspectives. Environ Chem Ecotoxicol 4:50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enceco.2021.11.00210.1016/j.enceco.2021.11.002 ↗
52. Lin K, Wang R, Han T, Tan L, Yang X, Wan M, Chen Y, Zhao T, Jiang S, Wang J (2023) Seasonal variation and ecological risk assessment of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in a typical semi-enclosed bay—the Bohai Bay in northern China. Sci Total Environ 857:159682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.15968210.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159682 ↗
53. Sulis G, Sayood S, Gandra S (2022) Antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: current status and future directions. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 20:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2021.195170510.1080/14787210.2021.1951705 ↗
54. Zhang M, Yang Y, An X, La H (2021) A critical review of g-C3N4-based photocatalytic membrane for water purification. Chem Eng J 412:128663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.12866310.1016/j.cej.2021.128663 ↗
55. Wen J, Xie J, Chen X, Li X (2017) A review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci 391:72–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.03010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030 ↗
56. Raaja Rajeshwari M, Kokilavani S, Sudheer Khan S (2022) Recent developments in architecturing the g-C3N4 based nanostructured photocatalysts: synthesis, modifications and applications in water treatment. Chemosphere 291:132735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13273510.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132735 ↗
57. Liu H, Zhang H, Chen M, Zhang C, Du C, Peng J, Jiang K (2020) Peroxymonosulfate-assisted photocatalysis with g-C3N4/BiOCOOH nanocomposites for the synergistic removal of organic pollutants. J Water Process Eng 38:101580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.10158010.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101580 ↗
58. Garg T, Nitansh GA, Kaushik A, Singhal S (2023) State-of-the-art evolution of g-C3N4 based Z-scheme heterostructures towards energy and environmental applications: A review. Mater Res Bull 168:112448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2023.11244810.1016/j.materresbull.2023.112448 ↗
59. Kroke E, Schwarz M, Horath Bordon E, Kroll P, Noll B, Norman AD (2002) Tri-s-triazine derivatives. Part I. From trichloro-tri-s-triazine to graphitic C3N4 structures. New J Chem 26:508–512. https://doi.org/10.1039/B111062B10.1039/B111062B ↗
60. Zhang Z, Leinenweber K, Bauer M, Garvie LAJ, McMillan PF, Wolf GH (2001) High-pressure bulk synthesis of crystalline C6N9H3·HCl: A Novel C3N4 graphitic derivative. J Am Chem Soc 123:7788–7796. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja010384910.1021/ja0103849 ↗
61. Liu J, Wang H, Chen ZP, Moehwald H, Fiechter S, van de Krol WL, Jiang L, Antonietti M (2015) Microcontact-printing-assisted access of graphitic carbon nitride films with favorable textures toward photoelectrochemical application. Adv Mater 27:712–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20140454310.1002/adma.201404543 ↗
62. Singh PP, Srivastava V (2022) Recent advances in visible-light graphitic carbon nitride (gC3N4) photocatalysts for chemical transformations. RSC Adv 12:18245–18265. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA01797K10.1039/D2RA01797K ↗
63. Huang D, Li Z, Zeng G, Zhou C, Xue W, Gong X, Yan X, Chen S, Wang W, Cheng M (2019) Megamerger in photocatalytic field: 2D g-C3N4 nanosheets serve as support of 0D nanomaterials for improving photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B 240:153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.07110.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.071 ↗
64. Mf Li, Yg L, Gm Z, Liu N, Sb L (2019) Graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites used for antibiotics removal in water treatment: a review. Chemosphere 226:360–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.11710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.117 ↗
65. Wudil YS, Ahmad UF, Gondal MA, Al Osta MA, Almohammedi A, Sa’id RS, Hrahsheh F, Haruna K, Mohamed MJS (2023) Tuning of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) for photocatalysis: a critical review. Arab J Chem 16:104542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.10454210.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104542 ↗
66. Mao L, Lu B, Shi J, Zhang Y, Kang X, Chen Y, Jin H, Guo L (2023) Rapid high-temperature hydrothermal post treatment on graphitic carbon nitride for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Catal Today 409:94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.03.03510.1016/j.cattod.2022.03.035 ↗
67. Li X, Cong H, Wang R, Wang Y, Nie Z, Jing Q, Zhao Y, Song H, Wang H (2022) Ascorbic acid-induced structural defect in photocatalytic graphitic carbon nitride to boost H2O2 fuel cell performance. J Power Sources 532:231368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23136810.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231368 ↗
68. Zhu Y, Sun Y, Khan J, Liu H, He G, Liu X, Xiao J, Xie H, Han, (2022) NaClO-induced sodium-doped cyano-rich graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets with nitrogen vacancies to boost photocatalytic hydrogen peroxide production. Chem Eng J 443:136501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13650110.1016/j.cej.2022.136501 ↗
69. Ye Q, Xu L, Xia Y, Gang R, Xie C (2022) Zinc oxide quantum dots/graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets based visible-light photocatalyst for efficient tetracycline hydrochloride degradation. J Porous Mater 29:571–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-022-01197-210.1007/s10934-022-01197-2 ↗
70. Liu W, Wen F, Wang J (2022) Construction of chlorine doped graphitic carbon nitride nanodisc for enhanced photocatalytic activity and mechanism insight. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:16887–16899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.17810.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.178 ↗
71. Cao A, Zhang M, Su X, Romanovski V, Chu S (2022) In situ fabrication of NiS2-decorated graphitic carbon nitride/metal–organic framework nanostructures for photocatalytic H2 evolution. ACS Appl Nano Mater 5:5416–5424. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c0041710.1021/acsanm.2c00417 ↗
72. Zeng G, Duan M, He J, Ge F, Wang W (2022) Sulfate doped graphitic carbon nitride with enhanced photocatalytic activity towards degradation of methylene blue. Mater Lett 309:31310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13131010.1016/j.matlet.2021.131310 ↗
73. Truong HB, Nguyen XC, Hur J (2023) Recent advances in g-C3N4-based photocatalysis for water treatment: magnetic and floating photocatalysts, and applications of machine-learning techniques. J Environ Manage 345:118895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.11889510.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118895 ↗
74. Robertson JD, Rizzello L, Avila Olias M, Gaitzsch J, Contini C, Magoń MS, Renshaw SA, Battaglia G (2016) Purification of nanoparticles by size and shape. Sci Rep 6:27494. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep2749410.1038/srep27494 ↗
75. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068445e10.1021/cr068445e ↗
76. Singh P, Sharma K, Hasija V, Sharma V, Sharma S, Raizada P, Singh M, Saini AK, Hosseini Bandegharaei A, Thakur VK (2019) Systematic review on applicability of magnetic iron oxides–integrated photocatalysts for degradation of organic pollutants in water. Mater Today Chem 14:100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2019.08.00510.1016/j.mtchem.2019.08.005 ↗
77. Jabbar ZH, Graimed BH, Okab AA, Ammar SH, Najim AA, Radeef AY, Taher AG (2024) Preparation of magnetic Fe3O4/g-C3N4 nanosheets immobilized with hierarchal Bi2WO6 for boosted photocatalytic reaction towards antibiotics in aqueous solution: S-type charge migration route. Diam Relat Mater 142:110817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2024.11081710.1016/j.diamond.2024.110817 ↗
78. Kiwi J, Rtimi S (2021) Insight into the interaction of magnetic photocatalysts with the incoming light accelerating bacterial inactivation and environmental cleaning. Appl Catal B Environ 281:119420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11942010.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119420 ↗
79. Jing J, Li J, Feng J, Li W, Yu WW (2013) Photodegradation of quinoline in water over magnetically separable Fe3O4/TiO2 composite photocatalysts. Chem Eng J 219:355–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.05810.1016/j.cej.2012.12.058 ↗
80. Beydoun D, Amal R, Low GKC, McEvoy S (2000) Novel photocatalyst: titania-coated magnetite. activity and photodissolution. J Phys Chem B 104:4387–4396. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp992088c10.1021/jp992088c ↗
81. Mallakpour S, Tukhani M, Hussain CM (2021) Sustainable plant and microbes-mediated preparation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and industrial application of its chitosan, starch, cellulose, and dextrin-based nanocomposites as catalysts. Int J Biol Macromol 179:429–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.18310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.183 ↗
82. Chan HT, Do YY, Huang PL, Chien PL, Chan TS, Liu RS, Huang CY, Yang SY, Horng HE (2006) Preparation and properties of bio-compatible magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 304:415–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.12610.1016/j.jmmm.2006.01.126 ↗
83. Niu Y, Zhang X, Kang Y, Sun P, Liu H, Xiao Z, Zhao D (2024) Magnetic microcapsules based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles: preparation, properties, and applications. Mater Today Commun 39:108660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10866010.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108660 ↗
84. Liu ZL, Wang HB, Lu QH, Du GH, Peng L, Du YQ, Zhang SM, Yao KL (2004) Synthesis and characterization of ultrafine well-dispersed magnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 283:258–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.05.03110.1016/j.jmmm.2004.05.031 ↗
85. Li B, Meng M, Cui Y, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Dong H, Zhu Z, Feng Y, Wu C (2019) Changing conventional blending photocatalytic membranes (BPMs): focus on improving photocatalytic performance of Fe3O4/g-C3N4/PVDF membranes through magnetically induced freezing casting method. Chem Eng J 365:405–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.04210.1016/j.cej.2019.02.042 ↗
86. Ziaalmolki S, Aslibeiki B, Zarei M, Torkamani R, Sarkar T (2023) Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalysis via magnetic nanocomposites: a comparative study of g-C3N4, g-C3N4/Fe3O4, and g-C3N4/Fe3O4/ZnO. Mater Today Commun 37:107340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10734010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107340 ↗
87. Sonu, Sharma S, Dutta V, Raizada P, Hosseini Bandegharaei A, Thakur V, Singh P (2021) An overview of heterojunctioned ZnFe2O4 photocatalyst for enhanced oxidative water purification. J Environ Chem Eng 9:105812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10581210.1016/j.jece.2021.105812 ↗
88. Hajalilou A, Mazlan SA (2016) A review on preparation techniques for synthesis of nanocrystalline soft magnetic ferrites and investigation on the effects of microstructure features on magnetic properties. Appl Phys A 122:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0217-210.1007/s00339-016-0217-2 ↗
89. Karimi Z, Karimi L, Shokrollahi H (2013) Nano-magnetic particles used in biomedicine: core and coating materials. Mater Sci Eng C 33:2465–2475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.04510.1016/j.msec.2013.01.045 ↗
90. Dai X, Lu G, Hu Y, Xie X, Wang X, Sun J (2019) Reversible redox behavior of Fe2O3/TiO2 composites in the gaseous photodegradation process. Ceram Int 45:13187–13192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.25510.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.255 ↗
91. Nasirian M, Mehrvar M (2019) Photocatalytic degradation of aqueous methyl orange using a novel Ag/TiO2/Fe2O3 photocatalyst prepared by UV-assisted thermal synthesis. Desalin Water Treat 137:371–380. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2019.2319210.5004/dwt.2019.23192 ↗
92. Hitam CNC, Jalil AA (2020) A review on exploration of Fe2O3 photocatalyst towards degradation of dyes and organic contaminants. J Environ Manag 258:110050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.11005010.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110050 ↗
93. Akhavan O (2010) Thickness dependent activity of nanostructured TiO2/α-Fe2O3 photocatalyst thin films. Appl Surf Sci 257:1724–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.00510.1016/j.apsusc.2010.09.005 ↗
94. Liu X, Chen K, Shim JJ, Huang J (2015) Facile synthesis of porous Fe2O3 nanorods and their photocatalytic properties. J Saudi Chem Soc 19:479–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.06.00910.1016/j.jscs.2015.06.009 ↗
95. Li J, You J, Wang Z, Zhao Y, Xu J, Li X, Zhang H (2022) Application of α-Fe2O3-based heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst in wastewater treatment: a review of recent advances. J Environ Chem Eng 10:108329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.10832910.1016/j.jece.2022.108329 ↗
96. Wang C, Liu H, Sun Z (2012) Heterogeneous photo-fenton reaction catalyzed by nanosized iron oxides for water treatment. Int J Photoenergy 2012:801694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/80169410.1155/2012/801694 ↗
97. Wang Y, Li C, Wang S, Shao Z, Xie L, Qin Y, Zhang L, Xu K, Chai X (2024) 0D/2D dual Fenton α-Fe2O3/Fe-doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst and the synergistic photo-Fenton catalytic mechanism insight. Chemosphere 358:142158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.14215810.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142158 ↗
98. Liu S, Yu B, Wang S, Shen Y, Cong H (2020) Preparation, surface functionalization and application of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 281:102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2020.10216510.1016/j.cis.2020.102165 ↗
99. Balakrishnan A, Chinthala M (2022) Comprehensive review on advanced reusability of g-C3N4 based photocatalysts for the removal of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 297:134190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13419010.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134190 ↗
100. Bui TS, Bansal P, Lee BK, Mahvelati Shamsabadi T, Soltani T (2020) Facile fabrication of novel Ba-doped g-C3N4 photocatalyst with remarkably enhanced photocatalytic activity towards tetracycline elimination under visible-light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 506:144184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14418410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144184 ↗