Influence of DC Bias on the Hysteresis, Loss, and Nonlinearity of Epitaxial PbZr0.55Ti0.45O3 Films
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The hysteresis, loss, and nonlinearity of the strain and polarization response of an epitaxial PbZr0.55Ti0.45O3 film are experimentally investigated for non‐switching AC excitation fields at a DC bias of 20 kV cm−1 in the 70 Hz to 5 kHz range. The measured strain is hysteretic and linear, whereas the polarization is hysteretic and highly nonlinear with excitation amplitude. Furthermore, compared to the case with zero bias, the effective piezoelectric coefficient that is extracted from the strain response is almost not changed for the investigated field range. In contrast, the loss tangent and nonlinearity of the polarization response are strongly reduced. The observations can not be explained by the Rayleigh model and its extensions, but are very well explained by the recently proposed polarization rotation model through addition of a non‐zero bias field term to the model. This model describes the film properties as the result of the nonlinear rotation of the polarization vector within the unit‐cell in response to the applied field, which is accompanied with viscous domain interaction. These results demonstrate that the polarization rotation model can describe the film response in a broad range of excitation frequencies and amplitudes, which far the applicable range of the Rayleigh model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Multiferroics and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Industrial Focus Group XUV Optics MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology University of Twente Enschede P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE The Netherlands
Inorganic Material Science MESA+ Institute of Nanotechnology University of Twente Enschede P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE The Netherlands
Funding
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Waser R. · 1991 · 311
2. Setter N. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 5
3. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02421.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02421.x ↗
4. 10.1557/mrs2009.17710.1557/mrs2009.177 ↗
5. 10.1557/mrs.2012.27310.1557/mrs.2012.273 ↗
6. 10.1088/0022-3727/45/49/49400110.1088/0022-3727/45/49/494001 ↗
7. Bayraktar M. · Opt. Express · 2014 · 22 · 25
8. 10.1364/OL.44.00510410.1364/OL.44.005104 ↗
9. Yang H. · ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. · 2017 · 5 · 11
10. 10.1063/1.32545310.1063/1.325453 ↗
11. Laikhtman B. · Phys. Solid State · 1973 · 15 · 62
12. Postnikov V. · Phys. Solid State · 1968 · 10 · 6
13. Postnikov V. · Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. · 1967 · 31 · 1888
14. 10.1080/0015019800800900610.1080/00150198008009006 ↗
15. 10.1088/0022-3727/29/7/04610.1088/0022-3727/29/7/046 ↗
16. Rayleigh L. · London Edinburgh Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. · 1887 · 23 · 142
17. Néel L. · Cah. Phys. · 1942 · 12 · 1
18. Néel L. · Cah. Phys. · 1943 · 13 · 861
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.173910.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1739 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.36218110.1063/1.362181 ↗
21. K.Vergeer Ph.D. Thesis Universiteit Twente2017.
22. 10.1063/1.220375010.1063/1.2203750 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.220773810.1063/1.2207738 ↗
24. Lian C. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2019 · 10 · 12
25. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.03313610.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033136 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20200539710.1002/adfm.202005397 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10832-007-9001-110.1007/s10832-007-9001-1 ↗
28. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/23/01810.1088/0953-8984/9/23/018 ↗
29. 10.1080/0015019990800911510.1080/00150199908009115 ↗
30. 10.1080/00150193.2017.135902710.1080/00150193.2017.1359027 ↗
31. Houwman E. P. · 2017 · 29
32. E.Houwman K.Vergeer G.Koster G.Rijnders arXiv:1901.10883 2019.