Passivation layer effect on the positive bias temperature instability of molybdenum disulfide thin film transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
As two-dimensional (2D) materials have a large surface to volume ratio, the stability of thin film transistors (TFTs) is likely to be lowered with air exposure. Therefore, we study the positive bias temperature instability (PBTI) of chemical vapor deposition (CVD) grown molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) TFTs before and after deposition of a passivation layer. The results of the PBTI study demonstrate that the fabricated devices adjust to the stretched-exponential model, which shows a threshold voltage shift attributed to the charge trapping mechanism. However, by depositing the passivation layer (Al2O3) that physically blocks the charge transfer process with O2 and H2O adsorbed to the surface of the MoS2 channel, the threshold voltage shifted reduces from 10 V to 7.4 V under stress condition. The quantitative value of tau (τ), one of the fitting parameters of the stretched-exponential model, also decreases from 6453 s to 5153 s, resulting in improved device stability.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Graphene/2D Materials Research Center, Center for Advanced Materials Discovery towards 3D Displays, School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms667810.1038/ncomms6678 ↗
2. 10.1021/nl500903710.1021/nl5009037 ↗
3. 10.1002/smll.20160399410.1002/smll.201603994 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.20531110.1103/PhysRevB.89.205311 ↗
5. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa87d010.1088/1361-6528/aa87d0 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl302015v10.1021/nl302015v ↗
7. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa610a10.1088/1361-6528/aa610a ↗
8. 10.1021/nl501275p10.1021/nl501275p ↗
9. 10.1021/nn502362b10.1021/nn502362b ↗
10. 10.1109/LED.2019.291659810.1109/LED.2019.2916598 ↗
11. 10.1038/nchem.158910.1038/nchem.1589 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0174610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01746 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20160368210.1002/adfm.201603682 ↗
14. 10.1002/aelm.20180025110.1002/aelm.201800251 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.aas872110.1126/sciadv.aas8721 ↗
16. 10.1109/LED.2010.207343910.1109/LED.2010.2073439 ↗
17. 10.1109/TED.2008.91866210.1109/TED.2008.918662 ↗
18. 10.1889/JSID18.10.79610.1889/JSID18.10.796 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.299065710.1063/1.2990657 ↗
20. 10.1039/C6RA22423G10.1039/C6RA22423G ↗
21. 10.1109/TED.2015.251188310.1109/TED.2015.2511883 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.sse.2016.09.01010.1016/j.sse.2016.09.010 ↗
23. 10.3390/ma1105082410.3390/ma11050824 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1583/ab402010.1088/2053-1583/ab4020 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-6528/aac6b010.1088/1361-6528/aac6b0 ↗
26. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa91a710.1088/2053-1583/aa91a7 ↗
27. 10.1021/nn401429w10.1021/nn401429w ↗
28. Ganapathi K.L. · IEEE Electron Device Lett. · 2016 · 37 · 797
29. 10.1063/1.496460610.1063/1.4964606 ↗
30. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa579f10.1088/1361-6463/aa579f ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-6528/aaa1d710.1088/1361-6528/aaa1d7 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cap.2019.12.00210.1016/j.cap.2019.12.002 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20110479810.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
34. 10.1021/cm502566210.1021/cm5025662 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp509771310.1021/jp5097713 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20110211110.1002/adfm.201102111 ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms624610.1038/ncomms6246 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.487368010.1063/1.4873680 ↗
39. 10.1021/nn505767310.1021/nn5057673 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.10870910.1063/1.108709 ↗
41. 10.1021/nn301572c10.1021/nn301572c ↗
42. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-42510.1186/1556-276X-8-425 ↗
43. 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/02100310.1088/2053-1583/3/2/021003 ↗