Early Polylysine Release from Dental Composites and Its Effects on Planktonic Streptococcus mutans Growth
Source abstract
Abstract
The study aim was to assess the effect of incorporating polylysine (PLS) filler at different mass fractions (0.5, 1 and 2 wt%) on PLS release and Streptococcus mutans planktonic growth. Composite containing PLS mass and volume change and PLS release upon water immersion were assessed gravimetrically and via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), respectively. Disc effects on bacterial counts in broth initially containing 8 × 105 versus 8 × 106 CFU/mL Streptococcus mutans UA159 were determined after 24 h. Survival of sedimented bacteria after 72 h was determined following LIVE/DEAD staining of composite surfaces using confocal microscopy. Water sorption-induced mass change at two months increased from 0.7 to 1.7% with increasing PLS concentration. Average volume increases were 2.3% at two months whilst polylysine release levelled at 4% at 3 weeks irrespective of composite PLS level. Early percentage PLS release, however, was faster with higher composite content. With 0.5, 1 and 2% polylysine initially in the composite filler phase, 24-h PLS release into 1 mL of water yielded 8, 25 and 93 ppm respectively. With initial bacterial counts of 8 × 105 CFU/mL, this PLS release reduced 24-h bacterial counts from 109 down to 108, 107 and 102 CFU/mL respectively. With a high initial inoculum, 24-h bacterial counts were 109 with 0, 0.5 or 1% PLS and 107 with 2% PLS. As the PLS composite content was raised, the ratio of dead to live sedimented bacteria increased. The antibacterial action of the experimental composites could reduce residual bacteria remaining following minimally invasive tooth restorations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Oral microbiology and periodontitis research · Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, Department of Craniofacial Growth and Development, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London WC1X 8LD, UK
Division of Microbial Diseases, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London WC1X 8LD, UK
Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London WC1X 8LD, UK
Funding
National Institute for Health Research · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Wellcome Trust
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Bourguignon, D. (2020, February 16). Briefing EU Legislation in Progress Mercury Aligning EU Legislation with Minamata. Available online: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2017/595887/EPRS_BRI(2017)595887_EN.pdf.
2. Ricketts, D., Lamont, T., Innes, N., Kidd, E., and Clarkson, J.E. (2013). Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 28.10.1002/14651858.CD003808.pub3 ↗
3. Resin composite—State of the art10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020 ↗
4. Restorations in primary teeth: A systematic review on survival and reasons for failures10.1111/ipd.12346 ↗
5. Chlorhexidine-releasing methacrylate dental composite materials10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.014 ↗
6. Antibacterial Dental Composites with Chlorhexidine and Mesoporous Silica10.1177/0022034514555143 ↗
7. Is secondary caries with composites a material-based problem?10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.001 ↗
8. Novel dental composite with capability to suppress cariogenic species and promote non-cariogenic species in oral biofilms10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.004 ↗
9. Concentration dependence of quaternary ammonium monomer on the design of high-performance bioactive composite for root caries restorations10.1016/j.dental.2020.05.009 ↗
10. Panpisut, P., Liaqat, S., Zacharaki, E., Xia, W., Petridis, H., and Young, A.M. (2016). Dental Composites with Calcium / Strontium Phosphates and Polylysine. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0164653 ↗
11. Kangwankai, K., Sani, S., Panpisut, P., Xia, W., Ashley, P., Petridis, H., and Young, A.M. (2017). Monomer conversion, dimensional stability, strength, modulus, surface apatite precipitation and wear of novel, reactive calcium phosphate and polylysine-containing dental composites. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0187757 ↗
12. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of poly-l-lysine10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.001 ↗
13. Antimicrobial ε-poly-l-lysine induced changes in cell membrane compositions and properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.018 ↗
14. Sayed, S., and Jardine, M. (2015). Antimicrobial biopolymers. Advanced Functional Materials, John Wiley & Sons Inc.10.1002/9781118998977.ch12 ↗
15. Poly(propylene glycol) and urethane dimethacrylates improve conversion of dental composites and reveal complexity of cytocompatibility testing10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.017 ↗
16. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.044 ↗
17. Development of dental composites with reactive fillers that promote precipitation of antibacterial-hydroxyapatite layers10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.047 ↗
18. Aging studies of light cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins and a resin composite in water or ethanol/water10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.049 ↗
19. Conversion, shrinkage, water sorption, flexural strength and modulus of re-mineralizing dental composites10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.149 ↗
20. Dima, S., Lee, Y.-Y., Watanabe, I., Chang, W.-J., Pan, Y.-H., and Teng, N.-C. (2020). Antibacterial Effect of the Natural Polymer ε-Polylysine Against Oral Pathogens Associated with Periodontitis and Caries. Polymers, 12.10.3390/polym12061218 ↗
21. Antibacterial dental restorative materials: A review
22. Yaghmoor, R.B., Xia, W., Ashley, P., Allan, E., and Young, A.M. (2020). Effect of Novel Antibacterial Composites on Bacterial Biofilms. J. Funct. Biomater., 11, accepted.10.3390/jfb11030055 ↗
23. Natural Antimicrobials ε-Poly-l-lysine and Nisin A for Control of Oral Microflora10.1007/s12602-009-9020-0 ↗
24. Toward dental caries: Exploring nanoparticle-based platforms and calcium phosphate compounds for dental restorative materials
25. Optimizing quality and safety of dental materials10.1111/eos.12422 ↗
26. Ibrahim, M.S., Garcia, I.M., Kensara, A., Balhaddad, A.A., Collares, F.M., Williams, M.A., Ibrahim, A.S., Lin, N.J., Weir, M.D., and Xu, H.H.K. (2020). How we are assessing the developing antibacterial resin-based dental materials? A scoping review. J. Dent., e103369.10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103369 ↗