journal article·2023-05-30Open access

Effect of Biosilicate® Addition on Physical–Mechanical and Biological Properties of Dental Glass Ionomer Cements

Gabriela de Alencar Pinto Magalhães, Joshua J. Thomson, Cristine Smoczer, Laura Ann Young, Adaias O. Matos, Rafael Rocha Pacheco, Maria Trevelin Souza, Edgar Dutra Zanotto, Regina Maria Puppin Rontani

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of incorporating Biosilicate® on the physico-mechanical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC). This bioactive glass ceramic (23.75% Na2O, 23.75% CaO, 48.5% SiO2, and 4% P2O5) was incorporated by weight (5%, 10%, or 15%) into commercially available GICs (Maxxion R and Fuji IX GP). Surface characterization was made by SEM (n = 3), EDS (n = 3), and FTIR (n = 1). The setting and working (S/W time) times (n = 3) and compressive strength (CS) were analyzed (n = 10) according to ISO 9917-1:2007. The ion release (n = 6) was determined and quantified by ICP OES and by UV-Vis for Ca, Na, Al, Si, P, and F. To verify cell cytotoxicity, stem cells from the apical papilla (SCAP) were exposed to eluates (n = 3, at a ratio of 1.8 cm2/mL) and analyzed 24 h post-exposure. Antimicrobial activity against Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175, NCTC 10449) was analyzed by direct contact for 2 h (n = 5). The data were submitted for normality and lognormality testing. One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test were applied for the working and setting time, compressive strength, and ion release data. Data from cytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity were submitted for Kruskal–Wallis’ testing and Dunn’s post hoc test (α = 0.05). Among all experimental groups, only those with 5% (wt) of Biosilicate® showed better surface quality. Only M5% showed a comparable W/S time to the original material (p = 0.7254 and p = 0.5912). CS was maintained for all Maxxion R groups (p > 0.0001) and declined for Fuji IX experimental groups (p < 0.0001). The Na, Si, P, and F ions released were significantly increased for all Maxxion R and Fuji IX groups (p < 0.0001). Cytotoxicity was increased only for Maxxion R with 5% and 10% of Biosilicate®. A higher inhibition of S. mutans growth was observed for Maxxion R with 5% of Biosilicate® (less than 100 CFU/mL), followed by Maxxion R with 10% of Biosilicate® (p = 0.0053) and Maxxion R without the glass ceramic (p = 0.0093). Maxxion R and Fuji IX presented different behaviors regarding Biosilicate® incorporation. The impacts on physico-mechanical and biological properties were different depending on the GIC, but therapeutic ion release was increased for both materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Health Sciences and Pediatric Dentistry, Pediatric Division, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba 13414-903, Brazil

Division of Integrated Biomedical Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI 48208, USA

Division of Clinical Essentials and Simulation, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI 48208, USA

Department of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA

Vitreous Materials Laboratory, Department of Materials Engineering, Center for Research, Education and Technology in Vitreous Materials (CeRTEV), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development · University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. The ART approach using glass-ionomers in relation to global oral health care10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.013 ↗
2. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): Rationale, technique, and development10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02423.x ↗
3. Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: A comprehensive overview10.1007/s00784-012-0783-4 ↗
4. Glass ionomer polyalkenoate cements and related materials: Past, present and future10.1038/s41415-022-4239-1 ↗
5. Sidhu, S.K., and Nicholson, J.W. (2016). A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J. Funct. Biomater., 7.10.3390/jfb7030016 ↗
6. Resolving nanoscopic structuring and interfacial THz dynamics in setting cements10.1039/D1MA01002F ↗
7. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic study of the role of tartaric acid in glass-ionomer dental cements10.1177/00220345880670120201 ↗
8. Maturation processes in glass-ionomer dental cements10.1080/23337931.2018.1497492 ↗
9. Caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer sealant reapplication: Study presents three-year results10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0082 ↗
10. Fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans: A mini review10.1080/20002297.2017.1344509 ↗
11. Chronologic Trends in Studies on Fluoride Mechanisms of Action10.1177/0022034517717680 ↗
12. Fluorides in caries prevention and control: Empiricism or science10.1159/000077763 ↗
13. The role of poly (acrylic acid) in conventional glass polyalkenoate cements10.1515/polyeng-2015-0079 ↗
14. Glass-ionomer cements for clinical dentistry10.1179/175355509X12614966220506 ↗
15. Binaljadm, T., Moorehead, R., Almela, T., Franklin, K., Tayebi, L., and Moharamzadeh, K. (2019). Biomodification of a Class-V Restorative Material by Incorporation of Bioactive Agents. Dent. J., 7.10.3390/dj7040110 ↗
16. Sparse feature selection methods identify unexpected global cellular response to strontium-containing materials10.1073/pnas.1419799112 ↗
17. The effects of strontium-substituted bioactive glasses on osteoblasts and osteoclasts in vitro10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.121 ↗
18. Bioactive sol-gel glass added ionomer cement for the regeneration of tooth structure10.1007/s10856-008-3464-8 ↗
19. Sol-gel-derived bioactive glass nanoparticle-incorporated glass ionomer cement with or without chitosan for enhanced mechanical and biomineralization properties10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.017 ↗
20. Effects of bioactive glass incorporation into glass ionomer cement on demineralized dentin10.1038/s41598-021-86481-y ↗
21. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.006 ↗
22. Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023 ↗
23. Black, J., and Hastings, G. (2013). Handbook of Biomaterial Properties, Springer Science & Business Media.
24. Compositional and microstructural design of highly bioactive P2O5-Na2O-CaO-SiO2 glass-ceramics10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.014 ↗
25. Biosilicate®—A multipurpose, highly bioactive glass-ceramic. In vitro, in vivo and clinical trials10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.03.022 ↗
26. The effect of a novel crystallised bioactive glass-ceramic powder on dentine hypersensitivity: A long-term clinical study10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02157.x ↗
27. After bleaching enamel remineralization using a bioactive glass-ceramic (BioSilicate®)
28. Biocompatibility, induction of mineralization and antimicrobial activity of experimental intracanal pastes based on glass and glass-ceramic materials10.1111/iej.13382 ↗
29. Assessment of antimicrobial effect of Biosilicate® against anaerobic, microaerophilic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms10.1007/s10856-011-4330-7 ↗
30. Synthesis, characterization, and incorporation of upconverting nanoparticles into a dental adhesive10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0120 ↗
31. Studies of the early stages of the dynamic setting process of chemically activated restorative glass-ionomer cements
32. Physical Properties of Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Pre-Reacted Spherical Glass Fillers10.1590/0103-6440202003276 ↗
33. Effect of ultrasound on the setting characteristics of glass ionomer cements studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy10.1007/s10856-008-3578-z ↗
34. Study of the chemical interaction between a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement and dentin10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0384 ↗
35. Enhanced bioactivity of glass ionomer cement by incorporating calcium silicates10.1080/21592535.2015.1123842 ↗
36. Development of the foremost light-curable calcium-silicate MTA cement as root-end in oral surgery. Chemical-physical properties, bioactivity and biological behavior10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.011 ↗
37. Kinetics of ion release from a conventional glass-ionomer cement10.1007/s10856-021-06501-1 ↗
38. Kunert, M., Rozpedek-Kaminska, W., Galita, G., Sauro, S., Bourgi, R., Hardan, L., Majsterek, I., and Lukomska-Szymanska, M. (2022). The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials. Cells, 11.10.3390/cells11203238 ↗
39. Sonoyama, W., Liu, Y., Fang, D., Yamaza, T., Seo, B.M., Zhang, C., Liu, H., Gronthos, S., Wang, C.Y., and Wang, S. (2006). Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration in swine. PLoS ONE, 1.10.1371/journal.pone.0000079 ↗
40. Evaluation of the Apical Complex and the Coronal Pulp as a Stem Cell Source for Dentin-pulp Regeneration10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.025 ↗
41. Smeda, M., Galler, K.M., Woelflick, M., Rosendahl, A., Moehle, C., Lenhardt, B., Buchalla, W., and Widbiller, M. (2022). Molecular Biological Comparison of Dental Pulp- and Apical Papilla-Derived Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23052615 ↗
42. Sphericity of apatite particles determined by gas permeability through packed beds
43. Therapeutic ion-releasing bioactive glass ionomer cements with improved mechanical strength and radiopacity10.3389/fmats.2015.00063 ↗
44. Structure of bioactive glass and its application to glass ionomer cement10.4012/dmj.18.155 ↗
45. Atomic and vibrational origins of mechanical toughness in bioactive cement during setting10.1038/ncomms9631 ↗
46. Review paper: Role of aluminum in glass-ionomer dental cements and its biological effects10.1177/0885328209344441 ↗
47. Nanoscale Mobility of Aqueous Polyacrylic Acid in Dental Restorative Cements10.1021/acsami.7b15735 ↗
48. The influence of polyacid molecular weight on some properties of glass-ionomer cements10.1177/00220345890680021401 ↗
49. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.007 ↗
50. Influence of alkali metal ions on the fracture properties of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00129-4 ↗
51. IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass-ionomer cement10.1177/00220345960750120201 ↗
52. Glass ionomer cement formulations: I. The preparation of novel fluoroaluminosilicate glasses high in fluorine10.1177/00220345790580061001 ↗
53. A review of powder modifications in conventional glass-ionomer dental cements10.1039/C0JM02309D ↗
54. Aluminosilicate glasses for polyelectrolyte cements10.1021/i360074a027 ↗
55. Benefits and drawbacks of zinc in glass ionomer bone cements10.1088/1748-6041/6/4/045007 ↗
56. Bactericidal strontium-releasing injectable bone cements based on bioactive glasses10.1098/rsif.2012.0647 ↗
57. An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements10.1038/s41405-020-0040-x ↗
58. Effect of variations from the recommended powder/liquid ratio on some properties of resin-modified cements10.1080/00016350600555859 ↗
59. AMP Kashani, M. (2013). Effect of Cation Substitutions in an Ionomer Glass Composition on the Setting Reaction and Properties of the Resulting Glass Ionomer Cements. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham].
60. Cytotoxicity and changes in gene expression under aluminium potassium sulfate on Spodoptera frugiperda 9 cells10.1007/s10646-021-02478-3 ↗
61. Susceptibility of mitochondrial superoxide dismutase to aluminium induced oxidative damage10.1016/j.tox.2008.10.009 ↗
62. Identifying health impacts of exposure to copper using transcriptomics and metabolomics in a fish model10.1021/es902558k ↗
63. The relationship between metal toxicity and cellular redox imbalance10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.007 ↗
64. Metabolomic analysis reveals the mechanism of aluminum cytotoxicity in HT-29 cells10.7717/peerj.7524 ↗
65. Inhibition of proton-translocating ATPases of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei by fluoride and aluminum10.1007/BF00291269 ↗
66. Effects of fluoride and aluminum from ionomeric materials on S. mutans biofilm10.1177/154405910308200405 ↗
67. Inhibition of H+-transporting ATPase by formation of a tight nucleoside diphosphate-fluoroaluminate complex at the catalytic site10.1073/pnas.85.23.8958 ↗
68. The Biology of Streptococcus mutans10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0051-2018 ↗
69. Antibacterial activity of resin composites containing surface pre-reacted glass-ionomer (S-PRG) filler10.1016/j.dental.2016.06.018 ↗