journal article·2025-01-23Open access

The Microbial Diversity and Biofilm Characteristics of d-PTFE Membranes Used for Socket Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Barbara Franović, Marija Čandrlić, Marko Blašković, Ira Renko, Katarina Komar Milas, Elitza Petkova Markova-Car, Bojana Mohar Vitezić, Dragana Gabrić, Ivana Gobin, Sabina Mahmutović Vranić, Željka Perić Kačarević, Olga Cvijanović Peloza

Abstract

Background: Understanding microbial colonization on different membranes is critical for guided bone regeneration procedures such as socket preservation, as biofilm formation may affect healing and clinical outcomes. This randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) investigates, for the first time, the microbiome of two different high-density polytetrafluoroethylene (d-PTFE) membranes that are used in socket preservation on a highly molecular level and in vivo. Methods: This RCT enrolled 39 participants, with a total of 48 extraction sites, requiring subsequent implant placement. Sites were assigned to two groups, each receiving socket grafting with a composite bone graft (50% autogenous bone, 50% bovine xenograft) and covered by either a permamem® (group P) or a Cytoplast™ (group C). The membranes were removed after four weeks and analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for bacterial adherence, qPCR for bacterial species quantification, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for microbial diversity and composition assessment. Results: The four-week healing period was uneventful in both groups. The SEM analysis revealed multispecies biofilms on both membranes, with membranes from group C showing a denser extracellular matrix compared with membranes from group P. The qPCR analysis indicated a higher overall bacterial load on group C membranes. The NGS demonstrated significantly higher alpha diversity on group C membranes, while beta diversity indicated comparable microbiota compositions between the groups. Conclusion: This study highlights the distinct microbial profiles of two d-PTFE membranes during the four-week socket preservation period. Therefore, the membrane type and design do, indeed, influence the biofilm composition and microbial diversity. These findings may have implications for healing outcomes and the risk of infection in the dental implant bed and should therefore be further explored.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Doctoral School of Biomedicine and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Department of Integrative Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine Rijeka, University of Rijeka, Krešmirova ulica 40/42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Dental Clinic Dr. Blašković, Linićeva ulica 16, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Laboratory for Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemical Engineering, Faculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva ulica 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Center for Gut Microbiome, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Department of Dental Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena 21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Interdisciplinary University Study of Molecular Biosciences, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Trg Sv. Trojstva 3, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Department of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Braće Branchetta 20/1, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Krešimirova 42, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Department of Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Gundulićeva 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Department of Dental Medicine, Clinical Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Department of Anatomy, Histology, Embriology, Pathology Anatomy and Pathology Histology, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Crkvena21, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Botiss Biomaterials GmbH, 15806 Zossen, Germany

Funding

Croatian Science Foundation · University of Rijeka

References (92)

Show source-provided references
1. A Review on Alveolar Ridge Preservation Following Tooth Extraction10.1016/S1532-3382(12)70029-5 ↗
2. A Systematic Review of Post-Extractional Alveolar Hard and Soft Tissue Dimensional Changes in Humans10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x ↗
3. Modeling and Remodeling of Human Extraction Sockets10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x ↗
4. Ridge Alterations Post-Extraction in the Esthetic Zone: A 3D Analysis with CBCT10.1177/0022034513506713 ↗
5. Clinical Relevance of Dimensional Bone and Soft Tissue Alterations Post-Extraction in Esthetic Sites10.1111/prd.12167 ↗
6. Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Why, When and How10.1038/s41415-019-0647-2 ↗
7. Tissue Changes of Extraction Sockets in Humans: A Comparison of Spontaneous Healing vs. Ridge Preservation with Secondary Soft Tissue Healing10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x ↗
8. Radiographic Alveolar Bone Changes Following Ridge Preservation with Two Different Biomaterials10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02154.x ↗
9. Alveolar Ridge Preservation. A Systematic Review10.1007/s00784-012-0758-5 ↗
10. Osteology Consensus Group 2011 Evidence-Based Knowledge on the Biology and Treatment of Extraction Sockets
11. Effect of Alveolar Ridge Preservation Interventions Following Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1111/jcpe.13057 ↗
12. Barrier Membranes for Tissue Regeneration in Dentistry
13. Rider, P., Kačarević, Ž.P., Elad, A., Rothamel, D., Sauer, G., Bornert, F., Windisch, P., Hangyási, D., Molnar, B., and Hesse, B. (2022). Analysis of a Pure Magnesium Membrane Degradation Process and Its Functionality When Used in a Guided Bone Regeneration Model in Beagle Dogs. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15093106 ↗
14. Korzinskas, T., Jung, O., Smeets, R., Stojanovic, S., Najman, S., Glenske, K., Hahn, M., Wenisch, S., Schnettler, R., and Barbeck, M. (2018). In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Macrophage Response of a Non-Resorbable PTFE Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19102952 ↗
15. Clinical Classification of Healing Complications and Management in Guided Bone Regeneration Procedures with a Nonresorbable D-PTFE Membrane10.11607/prd.5590 ↗
16. Zhang, M., Zhou, Z., Yun, J., Liu, R., Li, J., Chen, Y., Cai, H., Jiang, H.B., Lee, E.-S., and Han, J. (2022). Effect of Different Membranes on Vertical Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Biomed. Res. Int., 2022.10.1155/2022/7742687 ↗
17. Zelikman, H., Slutzkey, G., Rosner, O., Levartovsky, S., Matalon, S., and Beitlitum, I. (2022). Bacterial Growth on Three Non-Resorbable Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) Membranes-An In Vitro Study. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15165705 ↗
18. Oral Microbiome: Unveiling the Fundamentals10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_304_18 ↗
19. Begić, G., Petković Didović, M., Lučić Blagojević, S., Jelovica Badovinac, I., Žigon, J., Perčić, M., Cvijanović Peloza, O., and Gobin, I. (2022). Adhesion of Oral Bacteria to Commercial D-PTFE Membranes: Polymer Microstructure Makes a Difference. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23062983 ↗
20. In Vitro Evaluation of Various Bioabsorbable and Nonresorbable Barrier Membranes for Guided Tissue Regeneration10.1186/1746-160X-4-22 ↗
21. Alveolar Ridge Preservation: Complications and Cost-Effectiveness10.1111/prd.12469 ↗
22. Recent Advances in the Development of GTR/GBR Membranes for Periodontal Regeneration—A Materials Perspective10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022 ↗
23. Microbial Etiological Agents of Destructive Periodontal Diseases10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00020.x ↗
24. Infectious Aspects of Periodontal Regeneration10.1111/j.1600-0757.1999.tb00154.x ↗
25. Cheng, X., Zhou, X., Liu, C., and Xu, X. (2021). Oral Osteomicrobiology: The Role of Oral Microbiota in Alveolar Bone Homeostasis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fcimb.2021.751503 ↗
26. Korsch, M., Marten, S.-M., Stoll, D., Prechtl, C., and Dötsch, A. (2021). Microbiological Findings in Early and Late Implant Loss: An Observational Clinical Case-Controlled Study. BMC Oral Health, 21.10.1186/s12903-021-01439-w ↗
27. Histological Results after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Straumann® BoneCeramic, Bio-Oss®, Puros®, and Autologous Bone. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02431.x ↗
28. Čandrlić, M., Tomas, M., Karl, M., Malešić, L., Včev, A., Perić Kačarević, Ž., and Matijević, M. (2022). Comparison of Injectable Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and a Bovine Xenograft in Socket Preservation: Qualitative and Quantitative Histologic Study in Humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23052539 ↗
29. Dimensional Changes Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation in the Posterior Area Using Bovine-Derived Xenografts and Collagen Membrane Compared to Spontaneous Healing: A 6-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial10.1007/s00784-019-02979-w ↗
30. Oguić, M., Čandrlić, M., Tomas, M., Vidaković, B., Blašković, M., Jerbić Radetić, A.T., Zoričić Cvek, S., Kuiš, D., and Cvijanović Peloza, O. (2023). Osteogenic Potential of Autologous Dentin Graft Compared with Bovine Xenograft Mixed with Autologous Bone in the Esthetic Zone: Radiographic, Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24076440 ↗
31. (2024, November 12). Research Randomizer. Available online: https://randomizer.org/.
32. Medical Contraindications to Implant Therapy: Part I: Absolute Contraindications10.1097/01.id.0000247855.75691.03 ↗
33. Medical Contraindications to Implant Therapy: Part II: Relative Contraindications10.1097/ID.0b013e31803276c8 ↗
34. Platelet-Rich Fibrin vs. Buccal Advancement Flap for Closure of Oroantral Communications: A Prospective Clinical Study10.1007/s00784-022-04846-7 ↗
35. (2024, December 27). Laboratory Biosafety Manual, 3rd Edition. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546506.
36. Weiss, S., Amir, A., Hyde, E.R., Metcalf, J.L., Song, S.J., and Knight, R. (2014). Tracking down the Sources of Experimental Contamination in Microbiome Studies. Genome Biol., 15.10.1186/s13059-014-0564-2 ↗
37. Zibar Belasic, T., Badnjevic, M., Zigante, M., Mohar Vitezic, B., Spalj, S., and Markova-Car, E.P. (2024). Supragingival Dental Biofilm Profile and Biofilm Control during Orthodontic Treatment with Fixed Orthodontic Appliance: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch. Oral Biol., 164.10.1016/j.archoralbio.2024.105984 ↗
38. Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science Using QIIME 210.1038/s41587-019-0209-9 ↗
39. DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data10.1038/nmeth.3869 ↗
40. The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web-Based Tools10.1093/nar/gks1219 ↗
41. Kers, J.G., and Saccenti, E. (2021). The Power of Microbiome Studies: Some Considerations on Which Alpha and Beta Metrics to Use and How to Report Results. Front. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fmicb.2021.796025 ↗
42. Deciphering Diversity Indices for a Better Understanding of Microbial Communities10.4014/jmb.1709.09027 ↗
43. Oral Multispecies Biofilm Development and the Key Role of Cell-Cell Distance10.1038/nrmicro2381 ↗
45. Ionescu, A., Dodi, A., Petcu, L.C., and Nicolescu, M.I. (2022). Open Healing: A minimally invasive protocol with flapless ridge preservation in implant patients. Biology, 11.10.3390/biology11010142 ↗
46. Zafiropoulos, G.-G., Kačarević, Z.P., Qasim, S.S.B., and Trajkovski, B. (2020). Open-Healing Socket Preservation with a Novel Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene (dPTFE) Membrane: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Medicina, 56.10.3390/medicina56050216 ↗
47. Microbiological and FE-SEM Assessment of d-PTFE Membrane Exposed to Oral Environment after Alveolar Socket Preservation Managed with Granular Nc-HA10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2805 ↗
48. Yang, Z., Wu, C., Shi, H., Luo, X., Sun, H., Wang, Q., and Zhang, D. (2022). Advances in Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration Techniques. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 10.10.3389/fbioe.2022.921576 ↗
49. Udeabor, S.E., Heselich, A., Al-Maawi, S., Alqahtani, A.F., Sader, R., and Ghanaati, S. (2023). Current Knowledge on the Healing of the Extraction Socket: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10101145 ↗
50. The Influence of Membrane Exposure on the Outcomes of Guided Tissue Regeneration: Clinical and Microbiological Aspects10.1034/j.1600-0765.2003.01641.x ↗
51. Bacterial Colonization of Barrier Material and Periodontal Regeneration10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00534.x ↗
52. Gil, A.C.K., Merino, E.A.D., Costa, D.P., Giracca, C.N., Mazzon, R., Magrin, G.L., de Almeida, J., and Benfatti, C.A.M. (2024). A Novel Device for the Evaluation of In Vitro Bacterial Colonization in Membranes for Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration. Dent. J., 12.10.3390/dj12070202 ↗
53. Guided Bone Regeneration: Materials and Biological Mechanisms Revisited10.1111/eos.12364 ↗
54. Biofilm, Pathogenesis and Prevention—A Journey to Break the Wall: A Review10.1007/s00203-015-1148-6 ↗
55. Bacterial Biofilm: Its Composition, Formation and Role in Human Infections
56. Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces10.3201/eid0809.020063 ↗
57. Muhammad, M.H., Idris, A.L., Fan, X., Guo, Y., Yu, Y., Jin, X., Qiu, J., Guan, X., and Huang, T. (2020). Beyond Risk: Bacterial Biofilms and Their Regulating Approaches. Front. Microbiol., 11.10.3389/fmicb.2020.00928 ↗
58. Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys for Orthopaedic Applications: A Review on Corrosion, Biocompatibility and Surface Modifications10.1016/j.msec.2016.06.020 ↗
59. Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Implantable Devices and Approaches to Its Treatment and Prevention10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01067 ↗
60. Current Understanding of Multi-Species Biofilms10.4248/IJOS11027 ↗
61. Fleming, D., and Rumbaugh, K. (2018). The Consequences of Biofilm Dispersal on the Host. Sci. Rep., 8.10.1038/s41598-018-29121-2 ↗
62. Human Oral Microbiota and Its Modulation for Oral Health10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.146 ↗
63. Oral Microbial Biofilms: An Update10.1007/s10096-019-03641-9 ↗
64. Effect of Mechanical Stress on Biofilms Challenged by Different Chemicals10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.028 ↗
65. Mechanisms of Biofilm Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2 ↗
66. Bacterial Biofilms: An Emerging Link to Disease Pathogenesis10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 ↗
67. Zhou, P., Manoil, D., Belibasakis, G.N., and Kotsakis, G.A. (2021). Veillonellae: Beyond Bridging Species in Oral Biofilm Ecology. Front. Oral Health, 2.10.3389/froh.2021.774115 ↗
68. Luo, A., Wang, F., Sun, D., Liu, X., and Xin, B. (2021). Formation, Development, and Cross-Species Interactions in Biofilms. Front. Microbiol., 12.10.3389/fmicb.2021.757327 ↗
69. Aggregatibacter (Actinobacillus) Actinomycetemcomitans: A Triple A* Periodontopathogen?10.1111/j.1600-0757.2009.00331.x ↗
70. Streptococcus Mutans, Caries and Simulation Models10.3390/nu2030290 ↗
71. Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Streptococcus Salivarius, a Commensal Bacterium of the Oral Cavity and Digestive Tract10.1128/AEM.03133-13 ↗
72. Begić, G., Badovinac, I.J., Karleuša, L., Kralik, K., Cvijanovic Peloza, O., Kuiš, D., and Gobin, I. (2023). Streptococcus Salivarius as an Important Factor in Dental Biofilm Homeostasis: Influence on Streptococcus Mutans and Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans in Mixed Biofilm. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24087249 ↗
73. Willis, A.D. (2019). Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics. Front. Microbiol., 10.10.3389/fmicb.2019.02407 ↗
74. Navigating the Multiple Meanings of β Diversity: A Roadmap for the Practicing Ecologist10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x ↗
75. Undersampling and the Measurement of Beta Diversity10.1111/2041-210x.12023 ↗
76. Microbial Biofilms and Wound Healing: An Ecological Hypothesis10.1177/0268355514528845 ↗
77. The Oral Microbiome Diversity and Its Relation to Human Diseases10.1007/s12223-014-0342-2 ↗
78. Groeger, S., Zhou, Y., Ruf, S., and Meyle, J. (2022). Pathogenic Mechanisms of Fusobacterium Nucleatum on Oral Epithelial Cells. Front. Oral Health, 3.10.3389/froh.2022.831607 ↗
79. Fusobacterium Nucleatum in Periodontal Health and Disease
80. Periodontal-Disease-Associated Biofilm: A Reservoir for Pathogens of Medical Importance10.1016/j.micpath.2015.09.009 ↗
81. Fusobacterium Nucleatum and Tannerella Forsythia Induce Synergistic Alveolar Bone Loss in a Mouse Periodontitis Model10.1128/IAI.06276-11 ↗
82. The Additional Value of Real-Time PCR in the Quantitative Detection of Periodontal Pathogens10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00925.x ↗
83. Multiplex Real-Time PCR Detection and Relative Quantification of Periodontal Pathogens10.1002/cre2.37 ↗
84. Next Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Methodologies for Infectious Disease Research and Public Health: Approaches, Applications, and Considerations for Development of Laboratory Capacity
85. van Dijk, L.R., Walker, B.J., Straub, T.J., Worby, C.J., Grote, A., Schreiber, H.L., Anyansi, C., Pickering, A.J., Hultgren, S.J., and Manson, A.L. (2022). StrainGE: A Toolkit to Track and Characterize Low-Abundance Strains in Complex Microbial Communities. Genome Biol., 23.10.1186/s13059-022-02630-0 ↗
86. ART-DeCo: Easy Tool for Detection and Characterization of Cross-Contamination of DNA Samples in Diagnostic next-Generation Sequencing Analysis10.1038/s41431-018-0317-x ↗
87. Rosenbaum, J., Usyk, M., Chen, Z., Zolnik, C.P., Jones, H.E., Waldron, L., Dowd, J.B., Thorpe, L.E., and Burk, R.D. (2019). Evaluation of Oral Cavity DNA Extraction Methods on Bacterial and Fungal Microbiota. Sci. Rep., 9.10.1038/s41598-018-38049-6 ↗
88. Bone Healing after Tooth Extraction with or without an Intervention: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00450.x ↗
89. Hard and Soft Tissue Changes Following Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Systematic Review10.1111/clr.12911 ↗
90. Alterations in Bone Quality after Socket Preservation with Grafting Materials: A Systematic Review10.11607/jomi.2913 ↗
91. Interventions for Replacing Missing Teeth: Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques for Dental Implant Site Development
92. Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Socket Grafting after Flapless Tooth Extraction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009 ↗