journal article·2026-04-01Open access

Biological Impact of Extrusion Bioprinting Nasoseptal Chondrocytes for Tissue Engineering Applications

Thomas Harry Jovic, Josh Roberts, Feihu Zhao, Shareen Heather Doak, Iain Stuart Whitaker

Abstract

Shear stress is a significant consideration in 3D bioprinting systems, with implications for cell viability and behaviour. This study hypothesised that relevant levels of shear stress would be generated during the process of 3D bioprinting human nasoseptal chondrocytes in a nanocellulose alginate bioink, with implications for cell viability and chondrogenic gene expression. Through a combined approach of in silico modelling and in vitro testing, we assessed chondrocyte viability and gene expression immediately within the first 72 h post-printing. Cell viability was determined using live–dead, alamarBlue and lactate dehydrogenase assays immediately and 24 h post-printing compared to cell-only and unprinted cell–biomaterial controls. Gene expression analysis of Type 2 collagen, SOX9, aggrecan and alkaline phosphatase gene expression was performed 4 h and 72 h post-printing. Computational fluid dynamics predicted a shear stress of 292 Pa and maximum fluid velocity of 19 mm/s during the bioprinting process. No statistically significant cell death or cell lysis was detected between groups immediately post-printing; however, statistically significant chondrocyte cell death was observed at 24 h in the printed group (p = 0.047). Moreover, the bioprinting process evoked a transient initial rise in both chondrogenic (SOX9, aggrecan) and osteogenic gene expression (ALP) with a marked suppression in type 2 collagen expression at 72 h (0.05, p = 0.0005), indicating biological effects evoked by shear stress during printing. This study highlights the importance of optimising the bioprinting process to facilitate low shear stress conditions for durable cartilage tissue engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Reconstructive Surgery & Regenerative Medicine Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

Welsh Centre for Burns & Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK

Department of Biomedical Engineering & Zienkiewicz Institute, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, UK

Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK

Funding

The Scar Free Foundation & Health and Care Research Wales Programme · Action Medical Research and the VTCT Foundation · Microtia UK, the Royal College of Surgeons England · British Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons · the Academy of Medical Sciences and the Welsh Clinical Academic Training Programme

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Applications of Three-Dimensional Printing in Surgery10.1177/1553350616681889 ↗
2. Jessop, Z.M., Al-Himdani, S., Clement, M., and Whitaker, I.S. (2015). The Challenge for Reconstructive Surgeons in the Twenty-First Century: Manufacturing Tissue-Engineered Solutions. Front. Surg., 2.10.3389/fsurg.2015.00052 ↗
3. Will Regenerative Medicine Replace Transplantation?10.1101/cshperspect.a015693 ↗
4. Thomas, D.J., Jessop, Z.M., and Whitaker, I.S. (2018). 3D Bioprinting for Reconstructive Surgery: Techniques and Applications, Woodhead Publishing.10.1016/B978-0-08-101103-4.00034-X ↗
5. Tarassoli, S.P., Jessop, Z.M., Jovic, T., Hawkins, K., and Whitaker, I.S. (2021). Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting—A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 9.10.3389/fbioe.2021.616753 ↗
6. 25th Anniversary Article: Engineering Hydrogels for Biofabrication10.1002/adma.201302042 ↗
7. Tissue Engineering by Self-Assembly of Cells Printed into Topologically Defined Structures10.1089/tea.2007.0173 ↗
8. Rapid Prototyping of Scaffolds Derived from Thermoreversible Hydrogels and Tailored for Applications in Tissue Engineering10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00139-4 ↗
9. Three-Dimensional BioAssembly Tool for Generating Viable Tissue-Engineered Constructs10.1089/ten.2004.10.1566 ↗
10. 3D Bioprinting for Biomedical Devices and Tissue Engineering: A Review of Recent Trends and Advances
11. Toward Next-Generation Bioinks: Tuning Material Properties Pre- and Post-Printing to Optimize Cell Viability10.1557/mrs.2017.162 ↗
12. Integrin-Dependent Signal Cascades in Chondrocyte Mechanotransduction10.1023/B:ABME.0000017538.72511.48 ↗
13. Effects of Shear Stress on Articular Chondrocyte Metabolism
14. Shear and Compression Bioreactor for Cartilage Synthesis10.1007/978-1-4939-2938-2_16 ↗
15. Mechanotransduction Pathways in the Regulation of Cartilage Chondrocyte Homoeostasis10.1111/jcmm.15204 ↗
16. The ECM-Cell Interaction of Cartilage Extracellular Matrix on Chondrocytes10.1155/2014/648459 ↗
17. Jovic, T.H., Zhao, F., Jia, H., Doak, S.H., and Whitaker, I.S. (2024). Orbital Shaking Conditions Augment Human Nasoseptal Cartilage Formation in 3D Culture. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 12.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1360089 ↗
18. An Overview of Extrusion-Based Bioprinting with a Focus on Induced Shear Stress and Its Effect on Cell Viability10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00093 ↗
19. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 ↗
20. Shear Stress Induces Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells10.2217/rme.10.60 ↗
21. Printability of Pulp Derived Crystal, Fibril and Blend Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/ab0631 ↗
22. Characterization of Pulp Derived Nanocellulose Hydrogels Using AVAP® Technology10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.091 ↗
23. Characterization of Cell Damage and Proliferative Ability during and after Bioprinting10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00714 ↗
24. Shear Bioreactors Stimulating Chondrocyte Regeneration, a Systematic Review10.1186/s41232-019-0105-1 ↗
25. Apoptotic Pathways: Ten Minutes to Dead10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.019 ↗
26. Pressure and Shear Differentially Alter Human Articular Chondrocyte Metabolism: A Review
27. Combining Regenerative Medicine Strategies to Provide Durable Reconstructive Options: Auricular Cartilage Tissue Engineering10.1186/s13287-015-0273-0 ↗
28. The Rate of Fluid Shear Stress Is a Potent Regulator for the Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells10.1002/jcp.28296 ↗
29. Bioprinting-Associated Shear Stress and Hydrostatic Pressure Affect the Angiogenic Potential of Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells10.18063/ijb.v8i4.606 ↗
30. Characterization of Cell Viability during Bioprinting Processes10.1002/biot.200900004 ↗
31. Effect of Needle Geometry on Flow Rate and Cell Damage in the Dispensing-Based Biofabrication Process10.1002/btpr.679 ↗
32. 3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 ↗
33. A Comparative Analysis of Pulp-Derived Nanocelluloses for 3D Bioprinting Facial Cartilages10.1016/j.carbpol.2023.121261 ↗
34. Emergence of FRESH 3D Printing as a Platform for Advanced Tissue Biofabrication10.1063/5.0032777 ↗
35. Fabrication of Complex Hydrogel Structures Using Suspended Layer Additive Manufacturing (SLAM)10.1002/adfm.201904845 ↗