Show source-provided references
1. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth
3. Shrinkage stress and degree of conversion of a dental composite submitted to different photoactivation protocols
4. Albar, N., and Khayat, W. (2023). Fracture Load of Mesio–Occluso–Distal Composite Restorations Performed with Different Reinforcement Techniques: An In Vitro Study. Polymers, 15.
10.3390/polym15061358 ↗6. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network
10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169 ↗8. Deterioration of anterior resin composite restorations in moderate to severe tooth wear patients: 3-year results
10.1007/s00784-022-04647-y ↗10. Influence of Geometrical Configuration of the Cavity in the Stress Distribution of Restored Premolars with Composite Resin
10.19177/jrd.v1e1201372-82 ↗12. Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining material on microleakage of composite resin restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
13. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies
10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.016 ↗15. Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations
16. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restoration using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers
10.4103/0972-0707.87215 ↗17. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with or without liners using 2 step etch and rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems
10.2341/10-215-L ↗18. Microbial microleakage assessment of class V cavities restored with different materials and techniques: A laboratory study
10.4103/1735-3327.215958 ↗19. The injection molding technique for strong, esthetic class II restoration
20. Gernhardt, C.R., Nguyen, A.D., Michaelis, M., and Pütz, N. (2023). Clinical Outcome of Class I and II Restorations with and without an Intermediary Layer of a Flowable Composite after 24 Months: A Prospective, Randomized, Split-Mouth-Designed, Controlled and Single-Blinded Clinical Trial. Appl. Sci., 13.
10.3390/app13074224 ↗21. Marginal adaptation of Class 2 adhesive restorations
22. Analysis of dentinal stress distribution of maxillary central incisors subjected to various post-and-core applications
10.2341/04-192 ↗23. Ammarullah, M.I., Afif, I.Y., Maula, M.I., Winarni, T.I., Tauviqirrahman, M., Akbar, I., Basri, H., van der Heide, E., and Jamari, J. (2021). Tresca Stress Simulation of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty during Normal Walking Activity. Materials, 14.
10.3390/ma14247554 ↗24. Ammarullah, M.I., Hartono, R., Supriyono, T., Santoso, G., Sugiharto, S., and Permana, M.S. (2023). Polycrystalline Diamond as a Potential Material for the Hard-on-Hard Bearing of Total Hip Prosthesis: Von Mises Stress Analysis. Biomedicines, 11.
10.3390/biomedicines11030951 ↗25. Biomechanical Effects of the Porous Structure of Gyroid and Voronoi Hip Implants: A Finite Element Analysis Using an Experimentally Validated Model
10.3390/ma16093298 ↗26. Stress distribution in carbon-post applied with different composite core materials: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
10.1080/01694243.2017.1304172 ↗27. Ritter, A., Walter, R., and Boushell, L.W. (2019). Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry, Elsevier. [7th ed.].
28. Gomes Torres, C.R. (2019). Modern Operative Dentistry. Principles for Clinical Practice, Springer. [1st ed.].
10.1007/978-3-030-31772-0 ↗29. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations
30. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: Current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations
10.5005/jcdp-7-4-79 ↗31. Ammarullah, M.I., Santoso, G., Sugiharto, S., Supriyono, T., Wibowo, D.B., Kurdi, O., Tauviqirrahman, M., and Jamari, J. (2022). Minimizing Risk of Failure from Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Prosthesis by Selecting Ceramic Materials Based on Tresca Stress. Sustainability, 14.
10.3390/su142013413 ↗32. Jamari, J., Ammarullah, M.I., Santoso, G., Sugiharto, S., Supriyono, T., and van der Heide, E. (2022). In Silico Contact Pressure of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Implant with Different Materials Subjected to Gait Loading. Metals, 12.
10.3390/met12081241 ↗33. Benazzi, S., Nguyen, H.N., Kullmer, O., and Kupczik, K. (2016). Dynamic Modelling of Tooth Deformation Using Occlusal Kinematics and Finite Element Analysis. PLoS ONE, 11.
10.1371/journal.pone.0152663 ↗34. FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods
35. Hsu, M.L., and Chang, C.L. (2010). Application of Finite Element Analysis in Dentistry. Finite Element Analysis, Sciyo. [1st ed.].
10.5772/10007 ↗36. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Anterior Two-Unit Cantilever Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses
10.1155/2015/864389 ↗37. Determination of resistance forces from mandibular movements through dynamic simulation using kinematic analysis and finite elements method
39. Compressive Strength of Composite Resins at Different Expo-sure Time Using LED and Halogen Units
42. Vermudt, A., Kuga, M.C., Besegato, J.F., Oliveira, E.C.G., Leandrin, T.P., Só, M.V.R., Moraes, J.C.S., and Pereira, J.R. (2022). Effect of Curing Modes on the Mechanical Properties of Commercial Dental Resin-Based Composites: Comparison between Different LEDs and Microwave Units. Polymers, 14.
10.3390/polym14194020 ↗48. Physical, mechanical and rheological characterization of resinbased pit and fissure sealants compared to flowable resin composites
10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.001 ↗49. Influence of artificial aging: Mechanical and physicochemical properties of dental composites under static and dynamic compression
10.1007/s00784-021-04122-0 ↗50. The effect of radiation exposure and storage time on the degree of conversion and flexural strength of different resin composites
10.1186/s42269-021-00605-y ↗52. Dynamic and static elastic moduli of packable and flowable composite resins and their development after initial photo curing
10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.038 ↗53. (2022, October 19). Admira Fusion, Scientific Compendium. Available online: https://www.voco.dental/us/portaldata/1/resources/products/scientific-reports/us/Admira_Fusion_Scientific_Compendium.pdf.
54. (2022, October 19). Grandio–Viscoelastic Properties, Scientific Report. Available online: https://www.voco.dental/en/portaldata/1/resources/products/scientific-reports/gb/grandio_scr_viscoelastic-properties_gb.pdf.
55. (2022, October 19). Admira Fusion Flow Instruction for Use. Available online: https://www.voco.dental/en/products/direct-restoration/ormocer/admira-fusion-flow.aspx.
56. (2022, October 19). Grandio Flow Instructions for Use. Available online: https://www.voco.dental/en/products/direct-restoration/composites/grandio-flow.aspx.
57. (2022, October 19). Filtek™ Supreme XTE Universal Restorative-Instruction Sheet. Available online: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/1651855O/3m-filtek-supreme-xte-technique-guide-ebook.pdf.
58. (2022, October 19). Instruction for Use Grandio-VOCO. Available online: https://www.voco.dental/us/service/download/instructions-for-use.aspx.
59. (2022, October 19). Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative Data Sheet. Available online: https://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/2240189O/3m-filtek-supreme-flowable-technical-data-sheet.pdf.
60. Sass, L., Popa, D., Duta, A., and Marinescu, G. (2019). Computer Aided Design, SITECH. [1st ed.].
65. Identification of the occurrence and pattern of masseter muscle activities during sleep using EMG and accelerometer systems
10.1186/1746-160X-5-7 ↗68. Biomechanical stress analysis of mandibular first permanent molar; restored with amalgam and composite resin: A computerized finite element study
10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1047 ↗69. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: A three-dimensional finite element analysis
10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60206-7 ↗70. The effects of cavity size and incremental technique on micro tensile bond strength of resin composite in class I cavities
10.1016/j.dental.2006.03.012 ↗72. Adhesive class I restorations in sound molar teeth incorporating combined resin-composite and glass ionomer materials: CAD-FE modeling and analysis
10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.017 ↗73. Zarone, F., Di Mauro, M.I., Ausiello, P., Ruggiero, G., and Sorrentino, R. (2019). Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: A narrative review. BMC Oral Health, 19.
10.1186/s12903-019-0838-x ↗77. Influence of Sandwich, Snowplow and Injection Molding Modified Composite Lining Strategies on the Microleakage of Class II Proximal Box Cavities
78. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.007 ↗80. Invitro cytotoxicity of resin-containing restorative materials after aging in artificial saliva
10.1007/s007840050093 ↗82. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of class II composite restoration that extend apical to cemento-enamel junction
10.2341/08-91 ↗83. The effect of different types of flowable restorative resins on microleakage of Class V cavities
84. The Marginal Seal of Class II Restorations: Flowable Composite Resin Compared to Injectable Glass Ionomer
85. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations
10.5005/jcdp-10-6-9 ↗86. Yantcheva, S.M. (2021). Marginal Adaptation and Micropermeability of Class II Cavities Restored with Three Different Types of Resin Composites—A Comparative Ten-Month In Vitro Study. Polymers, 13.
10.3390/polym13101660 ↗87. López-Torres, J., Hernández-Caba, K., Cervantes-Ganoza, L., Ladera-Castañeda, M., Martínez-Campos, R., Solís-Dante, F., Briceño-Vergel, G., and Cayo-Rojas, C. (2023). Microleakage of Class II Bulk-Fill Resin Composite Restorations Cured with Light-Emitting Diode versus Quartz Tungsten-Halogen Light: An In Vitro Study in Human Teeth. Biomedicines, 11.
10.3390/biomedicines11020556 ↗88. Şenol, A.A., Karabulut Gençer, B., Tarçın, B., Kahramanoğlu, E., and Yılmaz Atalı, P. (2023). Microleakage and Marginal Integrity of Ormocer/Methacrylate-Based Bulk-Fill Resin Restorations in MOD Cavities: SEM and Stereomicroscopic Evaluation. Polymers, 15.
10.3390/polym15071716 ↗89. Evaluation of Gingival Microleakage in Class II Composite Restorations with Different Lining Techniques: An In Vitro Study
90. Finite Element Method: An Overview
91. Three dimensional finite element analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different post-core materials
95. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: An FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading
10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.019 ↗96. Effect of hybrid layer and thickness on stress distribution of cervical wedge-shaped restorations
10.1055/s-0039-1697824 ↗98. Transmission of composite polymerization contraction force through a flowable composite and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
10.1590/S1678-77572007000600008 ↗99. Comparison in stress distributionof different base materialsand thicknesses in MOD class II direct composite resin restoration: A 3D finite element study Lining Strategies on the Microleakage of Class II Proximal Box Cavities