journal article·2025-04-03Open access

Commercial Biomaterial-Based Products for Tendon Surgical Augmentation: A Scoping Review on Currently Available Medical Devices

Marta Pluchino, Leonardo Vivarelli, Gianluca Giavaresi, Dante Dallari, Marco Govoni

Abstract

Tendon defect is one of the common clinical diseases related to the growing population mean age and the number of athletes. Due to an increasing demand for tendon repair surgical interventions, several tendon augmentation products, capable of guaranteeing the necessary biological and visco-elasticity properties and mechanical support, have been developed. In this regard, commercially available products may be grouped into three main categories: (i) natural, (ii) synthetic, and (iii) hybrid biomaterial-based products. Firstly, to better define the research area of this work, common search engines were employed to acquire information from reports or website portfolios of important competitors in the global tendon repair market. Secondly, public registries and bibliographic databases were also employed to analyse data from registered clinical trials and published clinical studies performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of each product. Ten new products have been launched on the market in the last fifteen years: advantages, disadvantages, and future perspectives regarding their use for tendon augmentation treatment are discussed. Although hybrid biomaterial-based products may be considered as more oriented to the new frontiers of tendon augmentation technology, future improvements, especially focused on both mechanical properties and biocompatibility, are needed. However, scientific innovations must navigate convoluted clinical regulatory paths, which, due to high costs for investors, long development timelines, and funding shortages, hinder the translation of many scientific discoveries into routine clinical practice.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tendon Structure and Treatment · Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Shoulder Injury and Treatment

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Reconstructive Orthopaedic Surgery and Innovative Techniques—Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy

Surgical Science and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health · “Ottimizzazione dei trattamenti attraverso l’integrazione di approcci innovativi e studio delle interazioni tessutali”

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. Global Market Insights (2024, December 12). Tendon Repair Market Size. Available online: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/tendon-repair-market.
2. Steinmann, S., Pfeifer, C.G., Brochhausen, C., and Docheva, D. (2020). Spectrum of Tendon Pathologies: Triggers, Trails and End-State. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 21.10.3390/ijms21030844 ↗
3. DelveInsight’s Analysis (2025, February 07). Tendinopathy Incidence in the United States in 2022. Available online: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/11/29/2788013/0/en/Tendinopathy-Market-to-Register-Incremental-Growth-During-the-Study-Period-2019-2032-Estimates-DelveInsight-Leading-Companies-in-the-Market-Novartis-SynOx-Abbisko-AmMax-Deciphera.html.
4. Worldwide Incidence and Surgical Costs of Tendon Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.32098/mltj.01.2023.05 ↗
6. Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders10.1111/j.1600-0838.1997.tb00124.x ↗
7. Tendinopathy: Update on Pathophysiology10.2519/jospt.2015.5884 ↗
8. Treatment of tendinopathy: What works, what does not, and what is on the horizon10.1007/s11999-008-0260-1 ↗
9. Conservative management of tendinopathy: An evidence-based approach
10. Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review10.32098/mltj.03.2013.16 ↗
11. Persistent Deficits after an Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Narrative Review10.1155/2022/7445398 ↗
12. (2025, February 07). Tissues and Cells Directive (2004/23/EC). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/23/oj/eng.
13. (2025, February 07). 21 CFR Part 1271—Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products, Available online: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-L/part-1271.
14. Costa-Almeida, R., Calejo, I., and Gomes, M.E. (2019). Mesenchymal Stem Cells Empowering Tendon Regenerative Therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20.10.3390/ijms20123002 ↗
15. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded Decellularized Tendon Scaffold for Tissue Engineering10.2174/1574888X15666200723123901 ↗
16. Boosting tendon repair: Interplay of cells, growth factors and scaffold-free and gel-based carriers10.1186/s40634-017-0117-1 ↗
17. Tissue engineering: The hope, the hype, and the future10.1089/ten.2006.12.1143 ↗
18. Updates in Tendinopathy Treatment Options10.1016/j.cpm.2019.06.002 ↗
19. (2025, February 07). Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj/eng.
20. (2025, February 07). Clinical Evaluation—Equivalence: A Guide for Manufacturers and Notified Bodies. Available online: https://health.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-09/md_mdcg_2020_5_guidance_clinical_evaluation_equivalence_en_0.pdf.
21. (2025, February 07). The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/media/82395/download?attachment.
22. Publication trends in ligament augmentation techniques: Current concepts10.1016/j.jisako.2023.04.003 ↗
23. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation10.7326/M18-0850 ↗
24. Hierarchy of Evidence Within the Medical Literature10.1542/hpeds.2022-006690 ↗
25. Scaffolds for tendon and ligament repair: Review of the efficacy of commercial products10.1586/17434440.6.1.61 ↗
26. Antigen removal for the production of biomechanically functional, xenogeneic tissue grafts10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.041 ↗
27. Arthrex Inc (2024, December 06). DX Reinforcement Matrix. Available online: https://www.arthrex.com/orthobiologics/arthrex-dx-reinforcement-matrix?currenttab=resources.
28. Smith & Nephew (2024, December 06). REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant. Available online: https://www.smith-nephew.com/en/health-care-professionals/products/sports-medicine/regeneten-bioinductive-implant#overview.
29. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01586351 (2024, December 06). Rotator Cuff Reconstruction with Xenologous Dermis-patch Augmentation and ACP®—Injection, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01586351?tab=results.
30. Porcine Dermis Patch Augmentation of Supraspinatus Tendon Repairs: A Pilot Study Assessing Tendon Integrity and Shoulder Function 2 Years After Arthroscopic Repair in Patients Aged 60 Years or Older10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.024 ↗
31. Superior capsular reconstruction using a porcine dermal xenograft for irreparable rotator cuff tears: Outcomes at minimum two-year follow-up10.1016/j.jse.2020.08.020 ↗
32. Editorial Commentary: Don’t Pig Out When Selecting a Shoulder, Rotator Cuff Augmentation Graft! Xenografts Are Not the Way to Go10.1016/j.arthro.2017.07.013 ↗
33. Arthroscopic Superior Capsule Reconstruction Using the DX Reinforcement Matrix in Patients with Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears—Pilot Data10.55095/achot2019/044 ↗
34. Colosio, A., Bergomi, A., Pratobevera, A., Paderno, M., Saccomanno, M.F., and Milano, G. (2023). Combined Biologic Augmentation Strategies with Collagen Patch Graft, Microfractures, and Platelet Concentrate Injections Improve Functional and Structural Outcomes of Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair. J. Clin. Med., 12.10.20944/preprints202307.1566.v1 ↗
35. Interpositional arthroplasty with Dx Reinforcement Matrix®: A possible solution in the surgical treatment of lateral TMT joints arthritis10.1016/j.fastrc.2023.100267 ↗
36. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04444076 (2024, December 06). Clinical Trial on the Effect of REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant in the Supraspinatus Tendon Repair, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04444076?term=NCT04444076&rank=1.
37. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04450342 (2024, December 06). REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in Full-Thickness Tears (REGENETEN), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04450342?term=NCT04450342&rank=1.
38. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04861714 (2024, December 06). Evaluation of Regeneten Augmentation for Subscapularis Healing After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RESTOR), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04861714?term=NCT04861714&rank=1.
39. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03734536 (2024, December 06). Treatment of Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears (REGEN PUB 2018), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03734536?term=NCT03734536&rank=1.
40. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06252389 (2024, December 06). Degenerative Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair with Regeneten Augmentation, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06252389?term=NCT06252389&rank=1.
41. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04673344 (2024, December 06). Regeneten Patch vs. Standard Care in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04673344?term=NCT04673344&rank=1.
42. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06269965 (2024, December 06). Assessment of Collagen Membrane Interest in Distal Cuff Lesions Repair (REGENECUFF), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06269965?term=NCT06269965&rank=1.
43. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04248751 (2024, December 06). Evaluating the Use of a Bioinductive Graft in Treating Massive Rotator Cuff Tears, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04248751?term=NCT04248751&rank=1.
44. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05444465 (2024, December 06). Use of the REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in High Grade Partial-Thickness Tears (IMPACT), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05444465?term=NCT05444465&rank=1.
45. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06215417 (2024, December 06). Rotator Cuff Augmentation with Human Dermal Allograft Versus Bovine Collagen Xenograft Patch: A Randomized Controlled Trial (HDA v Regen), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06215417?term=NCT06215417&rank=1.
46. Augmentation of a Transosseous-Equivalent Repair in Posterosuperior Nonacute Rotator Cuff Tears With a Bioinductive Collagen Implant Decreases the Retear Rate at 1 Year: A Randomized Controlled Trial10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.014 ↗
47. Isolated bioinductive repair of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears using a resorbable bovine collagen implant: Two-year radiologic and clinical outcomes from a prospective multicenter study10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.022 ↗
48. Increased stiffness and reoperation rate in partial rotator cuff repairs treated with a bovine patch: A propensity-matched trial10.1016/j.jse.2022.02.003 ↗
49. Bioinductive Collagen Implant Augmentation for the Repair of Chronic Lower Extremity Tendinopathies: A Report of Two Cases
50. Bioinductive Collagen Implant Augmentation for Myotendinous Achilles Rupture in a Teenage Competitive Gymnast: A Case Report10.2106/JBJS.CC.22.00383 ↗
51. Alafair Biosciences (2024, December 06). VersaWrap®. Available online: https://www.alafairbiosciences.com/versawrap.
52. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05598801 (2024, December 06). A Single-Center, Prospective, Clinical Study of VersaWrap Utilization in the Hand, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05598801?term=NCT05598801&rank=1.
53. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04976335 (2024, December 06). Quantitative and Clinical Assessment of Flexor Tendon Gliding Following Application of a Bioresorbable Hydrogel: A Prospective, Randomized Study in Patients Undergoing Distal Radius Fracture Repair, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04976335?term=NCT04976335&rank=1.
54. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04322370 (2024, December 06). Prospective Randomized Blinded Trial of VersaWrap Tendon Protector for Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Injuries, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04322370?term=NCT04322370&rank=1.
55. Hones, K.M., Nichols, D.S., Barker, H., Cox, E., Hones, J.A., and Chim, H. (2023). Outcomes following use of VersaWrap nerve protector in treatment of patients with recurrent compressive neuropathies. Front. Surg., 10.10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123375 ↗
56. Nerve wrapping for recurrent compression neuropathy: A systematic review10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.085 ↗
57. Synthasome (2024, December 06). X-Repair. Available online: https://www.synthasome.com/xRepair.php.
58. Wright Medical Group (2024, December 06). BioFiber™. Available online: https://www.wright.com/footandanklebrand/biofiber.
59. Xiros (2024, December 06). Leeds-Kuff Patch. Available online: https://komak.pl/wp-content/uploads/PDF/leeds.pdf.
60. Artelon (2024, December 06). FLEXBAND™. Available online: https://www.artelon.com/artelon-science.
61. Xiros (2024, December 04). Pitch-Patch. Available online: https://xiros.co.uk/product/rotator-cuff-repair/.
62. Long-term successful arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears with a functional and degradable reinforcement device10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.010 ↗
63. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01849458 (2024, December 06). BioFiber Scaffold Post-Market Observational Study, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01849458?term=NCT01849458&rank=1.
64. Clinical Outcomes and Structural Healing After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Reinforced With A Novel Absorbable Biologic Scaffold: A Prospective, Multicenter Trial10.1177/2325967115S00071 ↗
65. Arthroscopic repair of posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with bioabsorbable patch augmentation: A magnetic resonance-controlled case series with 1-year follow-up10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.019 ↗
66. ISRCTN Registry Identifier ISRCTN79844053 (2024, December 06). Shoulder Patch for Rotator Cuff Tears. Available online: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN79844053.
67. Cowling, P., Hackney, R., Dube, B., Grainger, A.J., Biglands, J.D., Stanley, M., Song, D., Conaghan, P.G., and Kingsbury, S.R. (2020). The use of a synthetic shoulder patch for large and massive rotator cuff tears—A feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 21.10.1186/s12891-020-03227-z ↗
68. Safety Profile of Synthetic Elastic Degradable Matrix for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Foot & Ankle Surgery10.1177/19386400211067627 ↗
69. Achilles tendon reconstruction using a biosynthetic graft: A case report10.30795/jfootankle.2022.v16.1655 ↗
70. Simultaneous extensor hallicus longus tendon laceration and Dorsalis Pedis artery pseudoaneurysm: A case report and a review of the literature10.1016/j.fastrc.2023.100313 ↗
71. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05906004 (2024, December 06). Retrospective Data Collection and Prospective Clinical Investigation for the Augmentation or Reinforcement of the Rotator Cuff Using the Pitch-Patch, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05906004?term=NCT05906004&rank=1.
72. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT06076902 (2024, December 06). Patch Study (Patch-Augmented Rotator Cuff Repair), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06076902?term=NCT06076902&rank=1.
73. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03511547 (2024, December 06). Comparison of Arthroscopic Supraspinatus Tendon Tear Repair in Patients Over 60 Years with and Without Patch Augmentation, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03511547?term=NCT03511547&rank=1.
74. Application of a new polyester patch in arthroscopic massive rotator cuff repair-a prospective cohort study10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.015 ↗
75. Wright Medical Group (2024, December 06). BioFiber™ CM. Available online: https://www.wright.com/foot_self/biofiber-cm-collagen-coated-absorbable-scaffold.
76. CONMED (2024, December 04). BioBrace®. Available online: https://www.conmed.com/-/media/conmed/documents/literature/biobrace_productbrochure.ashx.
77. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05997381 (2024, December 06). BioBrace® Implant for Arthroscopic Repair of Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears (REinForce), Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05997381?term=NCT05997381&rank=1.
78. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05959733 (2024, December 06). Maximal Repair Versus Bridging Reconstruction with BioBrace®, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/expert-search?term=NCT05959733.
79. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05487677 (2024, December 06). Subscapularis Repair Augmentation for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/expert-search?term=NCT05487677.
80. Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Technique Using a Bio-Composite Scaffold for Tissue Augmentation10.1016/j.eats.2021.12.001 ↗
81. Chronic Midsubstance Patellar Tendon and Retinacular Rupture: Primary Repair Enhancement Using Bioinductive Implant Augmentation10.1016/j.eats.2023.05.009 ↗
82. A Novel Distal Biceps Rupture Repair Technique Utilizing a Biocomposite Scaffold10.52198/23.STI.42.OS1656 ↗
83. A Novel Achilles Tendon Repair Technique Utilizing a Bio-Composite Scaffold for a Sub-Acute Tear10.52198/23.STI.42.OS1701 ↗
84. Implantable medical devices for tendon and ligament repair: A review of patents and commercial products10.1080/17434440.2022.2142557 ↗
85. Clinical trials in orthopaedics research. Part III. Overcoming operational challenges in the design and conduct of randomized clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery10.2106/JBJS.K.00009 ↗
86. Rotator Cuff Repair with Graft Augmentation Improves Function, Decreases Revisions, and Is Cost-Effective10.1016/j.arthro.2022.01.011 ↗
87. Economic Evaluation of a Bioinductive Implant for the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears Compared with Standard Surgery in Italy10.1007/s12325-023-02686-9 ↗
88. Russo, M., Dirkx, G.K., and Rosso, C. (2024). Patch Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery-Review of Current Evidence and Newest Trends. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13175066 ↗
89. Tendon augmentation grafts: A systematic review10.1093/bmb/ldp051 ↗
90. Tendon regeneration and scar formation: The concept of scarless healing10.1002/jor.22853 ↗
91. What is the greatest regulatory challenge in the translation of biomaterials to the clinic?10.1126/scitranslmed.3004915 ↗