journal article·2025-08-29Open access

A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from Infuse® Bone Graft

Niki Karipidou, John Paul Muller Gorley, Chrysoula Katrilaka, Chris Manglaris, Anastasios Nektarios Tzavellas, Maria Pitou, Angeliki Cheva, Nikolaos Michailidis, Eleftherios E. Tsiridis, Theodora Choli-Papadopoulou, Amalia Aggeli

Abstract

This review article provides a comprehensive evaluation of Infuse® and InductOs®, two ground-breaking recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2)-based bone graft products, focusing on their tissue-level regenerative responses, clinical applications, and associated costs. Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that rhBMP-2 induces strong osteoinductive activity, effectively promoting mesenchymal stem cell differentiation and vascularized bone remodeling. While generally well-tolerated, these osteoinductive effects are dose-dependent, and excessive dosing or off-label use may result in adverse outcomes, such as ectopic bone formation or soft tissue inflammation. Histological and imaging analyses in craniofacial, orthopedic, and spinal fusion models confirm significant bone regeneration, positioning rhBMP-2 as a viable alternative to autologous grafts. Notably, advances in delivery systems and scaffold design have enhanced the stability, bioavailability, and targeted release of rhBMP-2, leading to improved fusion rates and reduced healing times in selected patient populations. These innovations, alongside its proven regenerative efficacy, underscore its potential to expand treatment options in cases where autografts are limited or unsuitable. However, the high initial cost, primarily driven by rhBMP-2, remains a critical limitation. Although some studies suggest overall treatment costs might be comparable to autografts when factoring in reduced complications and operative time, autografts often remain more cost-effective. Infuse® has not substantially reduced the cost of bone regeneration and presents additional safety concerns due to the rapid (burst) release of growth factors and limited mechanical scaffold support. Despite representing a significant advancement in synthetic bone grafting, further innovation is essential to overcome limitations related to cost, mechanical properties, and controlled growth factor delivery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

3rd Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

School of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine: History, Progress, and Challenges10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061010-114257 ↗
2. Scaffold Techniques and Designs in Tissue Engineering Functions and Purposes: A Review10.1155/2019/3429527 ↗
3. Material Tissue Interaction—From Toxicity to Tissue Regeneration10.2341/15-249-BL ↗
4. Clinically Relevant Complications Related to Pedicle Screw Placement in Thoracolumbar Surgery and Their Management: A Literature Review of 35,630 Pedicle Screws10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11168 ↗
5. Clinical Complications of Biodegradable Screws for Ligament Injuries10.1016/j.msec.2019.110423 ↗
6. Complications of Syndesmotic Screw Removal10.3113/FAI.2011.1040 ↗
7. A Review on Biomaterials-Based Scaffold: An Emerging Tool for Bone Tissue Engineering10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105124 ↗
8. Kavitha Sri, A., Arthi, C., Neya, N.R., and Hikku, G.S. (2023). Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Composite as Scaffold Material for Bone Regeneration. Biomed. Mater., 18.10.1088/1748-605X/acc99e ↗
9. Geevarghese, R., Sajjadi, S.S., Hudecki, A., Sajjadi, S., Jalal, N.R., Madrakian, T., Ahmadi, M., Włodarczyk-Biegun, M.K., Ghavami, S., and Likus, W. (2022). Biodegradable and Non-Biodegradable Biomaterials and Their Effect on Cell Differentiation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms232416185 ↗
10. Dias, J.R., Ribeiro, N., Baptista-Silva, S., Costa-Pinto, A.R., Alves, N., and Oliveira, A.L. (2020). In Situ Enabling Approaches for Tissue Regeneration: Current Challenges and New Developments. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.00085 ↗
11. Katrilaka, C., Karipidou, N., Petrou, N., Manglaris, C., Katrilakas, G., Tzavellas, A.N., Pitou, M., Tsiridis, E.E., Choli-Papadopoulou, T., and Aggeli, A. (2023). Freeze-Drying Process for the Fabrication of Collagen-Based Sponges as Medical Devices in Biomedical Engineering. Materials, 16.10.20944/preprints202305.2064.v1 ↗
12. Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Challenges10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10 ↗
13. Bone Tissue Engineering and Regeneration: From Discovery to the Clinic—An Overview10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0475 ↗
14. Battafarano, G., Rossi, M., De Martino, V., Marampon, F., Borro, L., Secinaro, A., and Del Fattore, A. (2021). Strategies for Bone Regeneration: From Graft to Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 22.10.3390/ijms22031128 ↗
15. Research Progress of Bone Grafting: A Comprehensive Review10.2147/IJN.S510524 ↗
16. Dimitriou, R., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., and Giannoudis, P.V. (2011). Bone Regeneration: Current Concepts and Future Directions. BMC Med., 9.10.1186/1741-7015-9-66 ↗
17. Bone Graft Options in Spinal Fusion: A Review of Current Options and the Use of Mesenchymal Cellular Bone Matrices10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.130 ↗
18. Efficacy, Cost, and Complications of Demineralized Bone Matrix in Instrumented Lumbar Fusion: Comparison With rhBMP-210.1177/2192568220942501 ↗
19. Allografts and Spinal Fusion10.14444/8056 ↗
20. Santoro, A., Voto, A., Fortino, L., Guida, R., Laudisio, C., Cillo, M., and D’Ursi, A.M. (2025). Bone Defect Treatment in Regenerative Medicine: Exploring Natural and Synthetic Bone Substitutes. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 26.10.3390/ijms26073085 ↗
21. Kim, K.D., Batchelder, C.A., Koleva, P., Ghaffari-Rafi, A., Karnati, T., Goodrich, D., Castillo, J., and Lee, C. (2025). In Vivo Performance of a Novel Hyper-Crosslinked Carbohydrate Polymer Bone Graft Substitute for Spinal Fusion. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12030243 ↗
22. De Pace, R., Molinari, S., Mazzoni, E., and Perale, G. (2025). Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies. J. Clin. Med., 14.10.3390/jcm14061838 ↗
23. Greising, S.M., and Call, J.A. (2022). Biomaterials in Connective Tissue Regeneration and Rehabilitation. Regenerative Rehabilitation, Springer International Publishing. Physiology in Health and Disease.10.1007/978-3-030-95884-8 ↗
24. Body Temperature-Activated Protein-Based Injectable Adhesive Hydrogel Incorporated with Decellularized Adipose Extracellular Matrix for Tissue-Specific Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.033 ↗
25. Is INFUSE Bone Graft Superior to Autograft Bone? An Integrated Analysis of Clinical Trials Using the LT-CAGE Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device10.1097/00024720-200304000-00001 ↗
26. Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Surgery10.5312/wjo.v8.i7.531 ↗
27. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing rhBMP-2/Absorbable Collagen Sponge Versus Autograft for the Treatment of Tibia Fractures With Critical Size Defects10.1097/BOT.0000000000001492 ↗
28. Self-assembly of Amphiphilic Β-sheet Peptide Tapes Based on Aliphatic Side Chains10.1002/psc.1335 ↗
29. Nanobiotechnology—Quo Vadis?10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.012 ↗
30. De Novo Designed Positively Charged Tape-Forming Peptides: Self-Assembly and Gelation in Physiological Solutions and Their Evaluation as 3D Matrices for Cell Growth10.1039/c0sm00974a ↗
31. Extracellular Matrix Structure10.1016/j.addr.2015.11.001 ↗
32. A Multi-Functional Scaffold for Tissue Regeneration: The Need to Engineer a Tissue Analogue10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.030 ↗
33. Analysis of the Linear Viscoelasticity of Polyelectrolytes by Magnetic Microrheometry—Pulsed Creep Experiments and the One Particle Response10.1122/1.3266946 ↗
34. Trabecular-Bone Mimicking Osteoconductive Collagen Scaffolds: An Optimized 3D Printing Approach Using Freeform Reversible Embedding of Suspended Hydrogels10.1186/s41205-025-00255-0 ↗
35. Scaffold Design for Bone Regeneration10.1166/jnn.2014.9127 ↗
36. Kisiel, M., Klar, A.S., Ventura, M., Buijs, J., Mafina, M.-K., Cool, S.M., and Hilborn, J. (2013). Complexation and Sequestration of BMP-2 from an ECM Mimetic Hyaluronan Gel for Improved Bone Formation. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0078551 ↗
37. Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Surgery: Recommendations for Use and Alternative Bone Substitutes—A Narrative Review10.21037/jss-22-23 ↗
38. Fan, L., Ren, Y., Emmert, S., Vučković, I., Stojanovic, S., Najman, S., Schnettler, R., Barbeck, M., Schenke-Layland, K., and Xiong, X. (2023). The Use of Collagen-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24043744 ↗
39. FDA-Approved Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitute Devices in Bone Regeneration10.1016/j.msec.2021.112466 ↗
40. Lyu, S., and Siegel, R.A. (2016). Drug-Device Combinations for Chronic Diseases, Wiley.10.1002/9781119002956 ↗
41. A Comprehensive Clinical Review of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (INFUSE® Bone Graft)10.1007/s00264-007-0418-6 ↗
42. Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in Craniofacial Surgery
43. Jung, N., Park, J., Park, S.-H., Oh, S., Kim, S., Cho, S.-W., Kim, J.-E., Moon, H.S., and Park, Y.-B. (2023). Improving Bone Formation by Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Collagen Membrane with rhBMP-2: A Novel Concept. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14030170 ↗
44. Von Benecke, J.P., Tarsitano, E., Zimmermann, L.-M.A., Shakesheff, K.M., Walsh, W.R., and Bae, H.W. (2024). A Narrative Review on Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2: Where Are We Now?. Cureus.10.7759/cureus.67785 ↗
45. Wang, D., Qi, G., Zhang, M., Carlson, B., Gernon, M., Burton, D., Sun, X.S., and Wang, J. (2024). Peptide Hydrogel for Sustained Release of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 In Vitro. J. Funct. Biomater., 15.10.3390/jfb15120369 ↗
46. Inductos (2025, July 04). European Medicines Agency. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/overview/inductos-epar-summary-public_en.pdf.
47. Medtronic (2025, July 04). Available online: https://www.medtronic.com/.
48. (2025, July 04). What Is a Dental Bone Graft?. Available online: https://westlittlerockdentist.com/what-is-a-dental-bone-graft/.
49. Kwon, J.-W., Cho, J.H., Lee, J.B., and Kim, J.H. (2024). Evaluation of the Fusion Rate and Safety of Escherichia Coli-Derived rhBMP-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm Trial. J. Clin. Med., 13.10.3390/jcm13061733 ↗
50. The Potential of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 as a Neurotrophic Factor for Parkinson’s Disease10.4103/1673-5374.274327 ↗
51. BMP2 Promotes the Differentiation of Neural Stem Cells into Dopaminergic Neurons in Vitro via miR-145-Mediated Upregulation of Nurr1 Expression
52. Pros, Cons, and Costs of INFUSE in Spinal Surgery10.4103/2152-7806.76147 ↗
53. (2025, July 04). Medtronic Expands Use of Controversial Infuse Product. Available online: https://www.mddionline.com/product-development/medtronic-expands-use-of-controversial-infuse-product.
54. (2025, July 04). Infuse Bone Graft. Available online: https://www.drugwatch.com/infuse/.
55. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using rhBMP-2 With Tapered Interbody Cages10.1097/00024720-200210000-00001 ↗
56. Laparoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With rhBMP-2: A Prospective Study of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes10.1097/00007632-200112150-00026 ↗
57. A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-210.1089/ten.teb.2015.0357 ↗
58. A Critical Review of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Trials in Spinal Surgery: Emerging Safety Concerns and Lessons Learned10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.023 ↗
59. Halloran, D., Durbano, H.W., and Nohe, A. (2020). Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Development and Bone Homeostasis. J. Dev. Biol., 8.10.3390/jdb8030019 ↗
60. Radiographic and CT Evaluation of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2–Assisted Spinal Interbody Fusion10.2214/AJR.10.5484 ↗
61. Perioperative Complications with rhBMP-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion10.1007/s00586-010-1494-7 ↗
62. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Rates in Patients Using a Novel Titanium Implant and Demineralized Cancellous Allograft Bone Sponge10.1016/j.ijsp.2013.08.001 ↗
63. Incidental Durotomy in Lumbar Spine Surgery: Incidence and Management10.1007/s00586-004-0821-2 ↗
64. Intraoperative and Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Review of 513 Patients10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14129 ↗
65. Unintended Durotomy in Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Surgery: A 10-Year Systematic Review of the Literature10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15266 ↗
66. Cancer Risk After Use of Recombinant Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Spinal Arthrodesis10.2106/JBJS.L.01483 ↗
67. Safety and Effectiveness of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Spinal Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Individual-Participant Data10.7326/0003-4819-158-12-201306180-00005 ↗
68. Effectiveness and Harms of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Spine Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.7326/0003-4819-158-12-201306180-00006 ↗
69. Risk of Cancer After Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 (Rh-BMP-2)10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d3b4 ↗
70. Longer Follow-up Continues to Reveal No Increased Risk of Cancer with the Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein in Spine Fusion10.1016/j.spinee.2019.05.005 ↗
71. The Influence of the Sequential Delivery of Angiogenic Factors from Affinity-Binding Alginate Scaffolds on Vascularization10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.12.057 ↗
72. Growth Factor Delivery-Based Tissue Engineering: General Approaches and a Review of Recent Developments10.1098/rsif.2010.0223 ↗
73. BMP-2 Evaluation in Surgery for Tibial Trauma (BESTT) Study Group (2002). Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures: A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized Study of Four Hundred and Fifty Patients. J. Bone Jt. Surg., 84, 2123–2134.10.2106/00004623-200212000-00001 ↗
74. Open Fractures of the Lower Extremity: Current Management and Clinical Outcomes10.1302/2058-5241.3.170072 ↗
75. Clinical Efficacy of Grafting Materials in Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Systematic Review10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.028 ↗
76. Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2: A Randomized Trial in Open Tibial Fractures Treated with Reamed Nail Fixation10.2106/JBJS.I.01763 ↗
77. A Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures: Modern Ring External Fixators Versus Internal Fixation (FIXIT Study)10.1097/BOT.0000000000000804 ↗
78. (2025, July 04). Intramedullary Nailing (Basic Technique). Available online: https://surgeryreference.aofoundation.org/orthopedic-trauma/adult-trauma/basic-technique/basic-principles-of-im-nailing#insertion-of-guide-wires.
79. (2025, July 04). Infuse Bone Graft rhBMP2 Instructions for Preparation and Surgical Application for Open Tibial Fracture 2005. Available online: https://gahpl.com/pdf/biologics/InfuseBMP.pdf.
80. Recombinant Human BMP-2 for the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures10.3928/01477447-20120525-23 ↗
81. Recombinant Human BMP-2 and Allograft Compared with Autogenous Bone Graft for Reconstruction of Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures with Cortical Defects: A Randomized, Controlled Trial10.2106/JBJS.E.00381 ↗
82. Effects of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in Grade III Open Tibia Fractures Treated with Unreamed Nails—A Clinical and Health-Economic Analysis10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.013 ↗
83. Pivotal, Randomized, Parallel Evaluation of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2/Absorbable Collagen Sponge and Autogenous Bone Graft for Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.085 ↗
84. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation10.1016/j.cden.2006.03.004 ↗
85. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Review of Selected Treatment Modalities
86. Application of Recombinant Human BMP-2 with Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate and Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Titanium Mesh for Vertical Maxillary Defect Reconstruction Prior to Implant Placement
87. Adverse Events Reported After the Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 210.1016/j.joms.2011.09.008 ↗
88. Pre-operative Measurement of the Volume of Bone Graft in Sinus Lifts Using C Ompu D Ent10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02267.x ↗
89. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation10.4103/jisp.jisp_236_18 ↗
90. Bone Grafting: Sourcing, Timing, Strategies, and Alternatives10.1097/BOT.0000000000000460 ↗
91. Economic Evaluation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Fusion: An Evidence-Based Modeling Approach10.1097/00007632-200208151-00017 ↗
92. A Cost Analysis of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Versus Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft in Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Fusion10.3928/0147-7447-20031001-12 ↗
93. On, S.-W., Park, S.-Y., Yi, S.-M., Park, I.-Y., Byun, S.-H., and Yang, B.-E. (2023). Current Status of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in Maxillofacial Surgery: Should It Be Continued?. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10091005 ↗
94. RhBMP-2 Versus Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Lumbar Spine Fusion in Patients Over 60 Years of Age: A Cost-Utility Study10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ffabe ↗
95. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Localized Alveolar Ridge and Maxillary Sinus Augmentation10.1016/j.joms.2015.11.027 ↗
96. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Demineralized Bone Matrix and rhBMP-2 versus Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Alveolar Cleft Patients10.1097/PRS.0000000000004646 ↗
97. Reduced Morbidity and Improved Healing with Bone Morphogenic Protein-2 in Older Patients with Alveolar Cleft Defects10.1097/01.prs.0000293870.64781.12 ↗
98. Lee, H.Y., An, S.B., Hwang, S.Y., Hwang, G.Y., Lee, H.-L., Park, H.J., Shin, J., Kim, K.N., Wee, S.W., and Yoon, S.L. (2025). Synergistic Enhancement of Spinal Fusion in Preclinical Models Using Low-Dose rhBMP-2 and Stromal Vascular Fraction in an Injectable Hydrogel Composite. Mater. Today Bio, 30.10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101379 ↗
99. Lee, H.-Y., Kang, J.-I., Lee, H.-L., Hwang, G.-Y., Kim, K.-N., and Ha, Y. (2023). Concentration-Dependent Efficacy of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Using a HA/β-TCP Hydrogel Carrier in a Mini-Pig Vertebral Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Model. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 24.10.3390/ijms24010892 ↗
100. Lyu, H.-Z., and Lee, J.H. (2020). The Efficacy of rhBMP-2 Loaded Hydrogel Composite on Bone Formation around Dental Implants in Mandible Bone Defects of Minipigs. Biomater. Res., 24.10.1186/s40824-020-0183-9 ↗