journal article·2023-09-09Open access

Fabrication and Optimization of 3D-Printed Silica Scaffolds for Neural Precursor Cell Cultivation

Georgia Kastrinaki, Eleftheria-Maria Pechlivani, Ioannis Gkekas, Nikolaos Kladovasilakis, Evdokia Gkagkari, Spyros Petrakis, Akrivi Asimakopoulou

Abstract

The latest developments in tissue engineering scaffolds have sparked a growing interest in the creation of controlled 3D cellular structures that emulate the intricate biophysical and biochemical elements found within versatile in vivo microenvironments. The objective of this study was to 3D-print a monolithic silica scaffold specifically designed for the cultivation of neural precursor cells. Initially, a preliminary investigation was conducted to identify the critical parameters pertaining to calcination. This investigation aimed to produce sturdy and uniform scaffolds with a minimal wall-thickness of 0.5 mm in order to mitigate the formation of cracks. Four cubic specimens, with different wall-thicknesses of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mm, were 3D-printed and subjected to two distinct calcination profiles. Thermogravimetric analysis was employed to examine the freshly printed material, revealing critical temperatures associated with increased mass loss. Isothermal steps were subsequently introduced to facilitate controlled phase transitions and reduce crack formation even at the minimum wall thickness of 0.5 mm. The optimized structure stability was obtained for the slow calcination profile (160 min) then the fast calcination profile (60 min) for temperatures up to 900 °C. In situ X-ray diffraction analysis was also employed to assess the crystal phases of the silicate based material throughout various temperature profiles up to 1200 °C, while scanning electron microscopy was utilized to observe micro-scale crack formation. Then, ceramic scaffolds were 3D-printed, adopting a hexagonal and spherical channel structures with channel opening of 2 mm, and subsequently calcined using the optimized slow profile. Finally, the scaffolds were evaluated in terms of biocompatibility, cell proliferation, and differentiation using neural precursor cells (NPCs). These experiments indicated proliferation of NPCs (for 13 days) and differentiation into neurons which remained viable (up to 50 days in culture). In parallel, functionality was verified by expression of pre- (SYN1) and post-synaptic (GRIP1) markers, suggesting that 3D-printed scaffolds are a promising system for biotechnological applications using NPCs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical Process Engineering Research Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece

Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece

Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Bone tissue engineering via application of a collagen/hydroxyapatite 4D-printed biomimetic scaffold for spinal fusion10.1063/5.0035601 ↗
2. Microdevices: Flexible Fabrication of Shape-Controlled Collagen Building Blocks for Self-Assembly of 3D Microtissues (Small 30/2015)10.1002/smll.201570182 ↗
3. Photo-cross-linkable methacrylated gelatin and hydroxyapatite hybrid hydrogel for modularly engineering biomimetic osteon10.1021/acsami.5b01433 ↗
4. Metre-long cell-laden microfibres exhibit tissue morphologies and functions10.1038/nmat3606 ↗
5. Highly elastic 3D-printed gelatin/HA/placental-extract scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.7150/thno.73146 ↗
6. Superhydrophilic 3D-printed scaffolds using conjugated bioresorbable nanocomposites for enhanced bone regeneration10.1016/j.cej.2022.136639 ↗
7. Development of a miniaturized 3D organoid culture platform for ultra-high-throughput screening10.1093/jmcb/mjaa036 ↗
8. Engineering organoids10.1038/s41578-021-00279-y ↗
9. Assay establishment and validation of a high-throughput screening platform for three-dimensional patient-derived colon cancer organoid cultures10.1177/1087057116650965 ↗
10. Lab-on-a-chip: A revolution in biological and medical sciences10.1021/ac002800y ↗
11. Sosa-Hernández, J.E., Villalba-Rodríguez, A.M., Romero-Castillo, K.D., Aguilar-Aguila-Isaías, M.A., García-Reyes, I.E., Hernández-Antonio, A., Ahmed, I., Sharma, A., Parra-Saldívar, R., and Iqbal, H.M.N. (2018). Organs-on-a-Chip Module: A Review from the Development and Applications Perspective. Micromachines, 9.10.3390/mi9100536 ↗
12. Krishani, M., Shin, W.Y., Suhaimi, H., and Sambudi, N.S. (2023). Development of Scaffolds from Bio-Based Natural Materials for Tissue Regeneration Applications: A Review. Gels, 9.10.3390/gels9020100 ↗
13. Hydrogels based on collagen and fibrin—Frontiers and applications10.1515/bnm-2015-0025 ↗
14. Poly(lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering10.1016/j.addr.2016.04.019 ↗
15. Development of biodegradable customized tibial scaffold with advanced architected materials utilizing additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105796 ↗
16. Polyglycolic acid-polylactic acid scaffold response to different progenitor cell in vitro cultures: A demonstrative and comparative X-ray synchrotron radiation phase-contrast microtomography study10.1089/ten.tec.2013.0213 ↗
17. Silk scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering10.1177/1535370215606994 ↗
18. Bone substitutes: A review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management10.1177/2041731418776819 ↗
19. Powder-based 3D printing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.03.009 ↗
20. 3D Bioprinting with Live Cells
21. Wu, C.A., Zhu, Y., and Woo, Y.J. (2023). Advances in 3D Bioprinting: Techniques, Applications, and Future Directions for Cardiac Tissue Engineering. Bioengineering, 10.10.3390/bioengineering10070842 ↗
22. Lima, T.d.P.L., Canelas, C.A.d.A., Concha, V.O.C., Costa, F.A.M.d., and Passos, M.F. (2022). 3D Bioprinting Technology and Hydrogels Used in the Process. J. Funct. Biomater., 13.10.3390/jfb13040214 ↗
23. Recent Advances in Bioink Design for 3D Bioprinting of Tissues and Organs
24. Fabrication, characterization, and optimization of a novel copper-incorporated chitosan/gelatin-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications
25. Current Developments in 3D Bioprinting for Tissue and Organ Regeneration—A Review10.3389/fmech.2020.589171 ↗
26. 3D Bioprinting at the Frontier of Regenerative Medicine, Pharmaceutical, and Food Industries10.3389/fmedt.2020.607648 ↗
27. 3D bioprinted conductive spinal cord biomimetic scaffolds for promoting neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells and repairing of spinal cord injury10.1016/j.cej.2022.138788 ↗
28. Inhibited astrocytic differentiation in neural stem cell-laden 3D bioprinted conductive composite hydrogel scaffolds for repair of spinal cord injury10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213385 ↗
29. Direct ink writing of silica-bonded calcite scaffolds from preceramic polymers and fillers10.1088/1758-5090/aa6c37 ↗
30. Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications
31. Kladovasilakis, N., Kontodina, T., Tsongas, K., Pechlivani, E.M., Tzetzis, D., and Tzovaras, D. (2021). Progress in Digital and Physical Manufacturing, Springer. Springer Tracts in Additive Manufacturing.
32. Asimakopoulou, A., Gkekas, I., Kastrinaki, G., Prigione, A., Zaspalis, V.T., and Petrakis, S. (2020). Biocompatibility of α-Al2O3 Ceramic Substrates with Human Neural Precursor Cells. J. Funct. Biomater., 11.10.3390/jfb11030065 ↗
33. Silk fibroin/alumina nanoparticle scaffold using for osteogenic differentiation of rabbit adipose-derived stem cells10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100518 ↗
34. Gofmanm, I.V., Nikolaeva, A.L., Khripunov, A.K., Ivan’kova, E.M., Shabunin, A.S., Yakimansky, A.V., Romanov, D.P., Popov, A.L., Ermakov, A.M., and Solomevich, S.O. (2021). Bacterial Cellulose-Based Nanocomposites Containing Ceria and Their Use in the Process of Stem Cell Proliferation. Polymers, 13.10.20944/preprints202105.0608.v3 ↗
35. Biocompatibility evaluation of porous ceria foams for orthopedic tissue engineering10.1002/jbm.a.35137 ↗
36. Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202 ↗
37. Review on current limits and potentialities of technologies for biomedical ceramic scaffolds production10.1002/jbm.b.34706 ↗
38. Various manufacturing methods and ideal properties of scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
39. Kladovasilakis, N., Tsongas, K., and Tzetzis, D. (2020). Finite Element Analysis of Orthopedic Hip Implant with Functionally Graded Bioinspired Lattice Structures. Biomimetics, 5.10.3390/biomimetics5030044 ↗
40. Multifunctional catalytic platform for peroxidase mimicking, enzyme immobilization and biosensing10.1016/j.bios.2015.10.042 ↗
41. 3D Printed Porous Methacrylate/Silica Hybrid Scaffold for Bone Substitution10.1002/adhm.202100117 ↗
42. Application of “Tissueoid Cell Culture System” Using a Silicate Fiber Scaffold for Cancer Research10.1159/000509133 ↗
43. (2013). Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing-Coordinate Systems and Test Methodologies (Standard No. ASTM ISO/ASTM52921-13).
44. Human iPSC-Derived Neural Progenitors Are an Effective Drug Discovery Model for Neurological mtDNA Disorders10.1016/j.stem.2016.12.013 ↗
45. Pechlivani, E.M., Kastrinaki, G., Zisis, C., Asimakopoulou, A., Gkagkari, E., Koutsonikolas, D., Tzovaras, D., and Kikkinides, E. (2023). 3D ceramic structure fabrication by Stereolithography and physicochemical characterization. Mater. Today Proc.10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.152 ↗