A Rare Case of Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in a Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Replacement
Source abstract
Abstract
Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris (ARMD) is one of the most frequent complications after Total Hip Replacement (THR) and often a cause of surgical revision. This is true especially for implants with Metal-on-Metal (MoM) and Large Diameter Heads (LDHs), which are frequently used to improve stability and reduce the risk of dislocation. However, ARMD is not exclusive to MoM replacement, as it can also occur in other implants such Ceramic-on-Ceramic (CoC), Metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP), and Ceramic-on-Polyethylene (CoP). In these non-MoM implants, ARMD is not caused by the tribo-corrosion between bearing surfaces but, rather, by the fretting at the interface between neck and stem of dissimilar metals. A case of a severe ARMD that happened to a 73-year-old female patient with CoC bearing THR at the right hip is presented in this case report. In this case, the ARMD was misdiagnosed for over a year, resulting in the development of a massive pseudotumor. The treatment of choice was a two-stage revision with the implant of a hip megaprosthesis. After more than 2 years of follow-up, complete recovery of hip Range of Motion (ROM) and normalization of chromium and cobalt levels in blood and urine were achieved. Despite the relatively short follow-up period, this can be considered a successful treatment of a major and misdiagnosed ARMD in a non-MoM hip replacement.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery Unit, Department of Ageing, Neurosciences, Head-Neck and Orthopedics Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Prevalence of total hip and knee replacement in the United States10.2106/JBJS.N.01141 ↗
2. Revision surgery of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties for adverse reactions to metal debris: A clinical update10.1080/17453674.2018.1440455 ↗
3. Ceramic-on-ceramic vs ceramic-on-polyethylene, a comparative study with 10-year follow-up10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14 ↗
4. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty—Implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome
5. Are Trends in Total Hip Arthroplasty Bearing Surface Continuing to Change? 2007–2015 Usage in a Large Database Cohort10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.044 ↗
6. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.22770 ↗
7. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: The influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25099 ↗
8. Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: A systematic review of outcomes10.5301/hipint.5000140 ↗
9. Adverse Reactions to Metal on Metal Are Not Exclusive to Large Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty10.1007/s11999-015-4539-8 ↗
10. Fretting corrosion of CoCrMo and Ti6Al4V interfaces10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.015 ↗
11. Ricciardi, B.F., Nocon, A.A., Jerabek, S.A., Wilner, G., Kaplowitz, E., Goldring, S.R., Purdue, E., and Perino, G. (2016). Histopathological characterization of corrosion product associated adverse local tissue reaction in hip implants: A study of 285 cases Histopathology. BMC Clin. Pathol., 16.10.1186/s12907-016-0025-9 ↗
12. Mechanisms of adverse local tissue reactions to hip implants10.3389/fbioe.2019.00176 ↗
13. Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: A case-control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging10.2106/JBJS.J.01508 ↗
14. Large-Diameter Modular Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty. Incidence of Revision for Adverse Reaction to Metallic Debris10.1016/j.arth.2012.01.019 ↗
15. Lehtovirta, L., Reito, A., Parkkinen, J., Peräniemi, S., Vepsäläinen, J., and Eskelinen, A. (2018). Association between periprosthetic tissue metal content, whole blood and synovial fluid metal ion levels and histopathological findings in patients with failed metal-on-metal hip replacement. PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0197614 ↗
16. Reito, A., Lainiala, O., Elo, P., and Eskelinen, A. (2016). Prevalence of failure due to adverse reaction to metal debris in modern, medium and large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements—The effect of novel screening methods: Systematic review and metaregression analysis. PLoS ONE, 11.10.1371/journal.pone.0147872 ↗
17. Induced membrane by silver-coated knee megaprosthesis: Keep or toss?
18. Adverse reactions to metal debris occur with all types of hip replace-ment not just metal-on-metal hips: A retrospective observational study of 3340 revisions for adverse reactions to metal debris from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northe10.1186/s12891-016-1329-8 ↗
19. Modular junction may be more problematic than bearing wear in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty10.1177/1120700018808696 ↗
20. Reito, A., Elo, P., Puolakka, T., Pajamäki, J., and Eskelinen, A. (2015). Femoral diameter and stem type are independent risk factors for ARMD in the Large-headed ASR THR group Orthopedics and biomechanics. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 16.10.1186/s12891-015-0566-6 ↗
21. Pseudotumour formation and subsequent resolution in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty following revision: Instructional review and an illustrative case report with revision using a dual mobility design10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36908 ↗
22. No Threshold Exists for Recommending Revision Surgery in Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty Patients with Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 346 Revisions10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.022 ↗
23. The contribution of the histopathological examination to the diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions in arthroplasty10.1302/2058-5241.6.210013 ↗
24. Corrosion and Fretting of a Modular Hip System: A Retrieval Analysis of 60 Rejuvenate Stems10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.010 ↗
25. Adverse tissue reaction to corrosion at the neck-stem junction after modular primary total hip arthroplasty10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.003 ↗
26. Predictors of time to revision and clinical outcomes following revision of metal-onmetal hip replacements for adverse reaction to metal debris10.1302/0301-620X.96B12.33473 ↗
27. Adverse reactions to metal debris in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty using a titanium-molybdenum-zirconium-iron alloy stem10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.030 ↗
28. Revision of a single type of large metal head metal-on-metal hip prosthesis10.5301/hipint.5000220 ↗