journal article·2025-06-03Open access

Transparent 3-Layered Bacterial Nanocellulose as a Multicompartment and Biomimetic Scaffold for Co-Culturing Cells

Karla Pollyanna Vieira de Oliveira, Michael Yilma Yitayew, Ana Paula Almeida Bastos, Stefanie Cristine Nied Mandrik, Luismar Marques Porto, Maryam Tabrizian

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are widely used to provide a more physiologically relevant microenvironment in which to host and study desired cell types. These models vary in complexity and cost, ranging from simple and inexpensive to highly sophisticated and costly systems. In this study, we introduce a novel translucent multi-compartmentalized stacked multilayered nanocellulose scaffold and describe its fabrication, characterization, and potential application for co-culturing multiple cell types. The scaffold consists of bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) layers separated by interlayers of a lower density of nanocellulose fibers. Using this system, we co-cultured the MDA-MB-231 cell line with two tumor-associated cell types, namely BC-CAFs and M2 macrophages, to simulate the tumor microenvironment (TME). Cells remained viable and metabolically active for up to 15 days. Confocal microscopy showed no signs of cell invasion. However, BC-CAFs and MDA-MB-231 cells were frequently observed within the same layer. The expression of breast cancer-related genes was analyzed to assess the downstream functionality of the cells. We found that the E-cadherin expression was 20% lower in cancer cells co-cultured in the multi-compartmentalized scaffold than in those cultured in 2D plates. Since E-cadherin plays a critical role in preventing the initial dissociation of epithelial cells from the primary tumor mass and is often downregulated in the tumor microenvironment in vivo, this finding suggests that our scaffold more effectively recapitulates the complexity of a tumor microenvironment.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Cancer Research and Treatments · Cancer Cells and Metastasis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering and Food Engineering, Technology Center, Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Campus Reitor João David Ferreira Lima, Florianópolis 88040-900, SC, Brazil

Faculty of Dental Medicine and Oral Health Sciences, McGill University, 2002 Avenue McGill College, Suite 500, Montreal, QC H2A 1G1, Canada

BiomatX Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 3775 University Street, Montreal, QC, H3A 2B6, Canada

Embrapa Swine and Poultry, BR153, km 110, Tamanduá District, Concórdia 89715-899, SC, Brazil

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (Capes) · Canadian Institutes of Health Research

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. Molecular assembly and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix: A fibrous protein perspective10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.11.022 ↗
2. A guide to the composition and functions of the extracellular matrix10.1111/febs.15776 ↗
3. The extracellular matrix at a glance10.1242/jcs.023820 ↗
4. Charting the unexplored extracellular matrix in cancer10.1111/iep.12269 ↗
5. Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression10.1038/s41576-020-00292-x ↗
6. Three-dimensional cancer models mimic cell-matrix interactions in the tumour microenvironment10.1093/carcin/bgu108 ↗
7. Deconstructing Dimensionality
8. Extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers10.1002/jcb.27681 ↗
9. Modeling physiological events in 2D vs. 3D cell culture10.1152/physiol.00036.2016 ↗
10. Jensen, C., and Teng, Y. (2020). Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture?. Front. Mol. Biosci., 7.10.3389/fmolb.2020.00033 ↗
11. The relevance of using 3D cell cultures, in addition to 2D monolayer cultures, when evaluating breast cancer drug sensitivity and resistance10.18632/oncotarget.9935 ↗
12. Comparison of 2D and 3D cell culture models for cell growth, gene expression and drug resistance10.1016/j.msec.2019.110264 ↗
13. Life in 3D is never flat: 3D models to optimise drug delivery10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.020 ↗
14. Monferrer, E., Martín-Vañó, S., Carretero, A., García-Lizarribar, A., Burgos-Panadero, R., Navarro, S., Samitier, J., and Noguera, R. (2020). A three-dimensional bioprinted model to evaluate the effect of stiffness on neuroblastoma cell cluster dynamics and behavior. Sci. Rep., 10.10.1038/s41598-020-62986-w ↗
15. Moghimi, N., Hosseini, S.A., Dalan, A.B., Mohammadrezaei, D., Goldman, A., and Kohandel, M. (2023). Controlled tumor heterogeneity in a co-culture system by 3D bio-printed tumor-on-chip model. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-40680-x ↗
16. Simple method for fluorescence DNA in situ hybridization to squashed chromosomes
17. Saji Joseph, J., Tebogo Malindisa, S., and Ntwasa, M. (2019). Two-Dimensional (2D) and Three-Dimensional (3D) Cell Culturing in Drug Discovery. Cell Culture, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.81552 ↗
18. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
19. Rana, D., Arulkumar, S., Vishwakarma, A., and Ramalingam, M. (2015). Considerations on Designing Scaffold for Tissue Engineering. Stem Cell Biology and Tissue Engineering in Dental Sciences, Elsevier Inc.10.1016/B978-0-12-397157-9.00012-6 ↗
20. Sultana, N. (2018). Mechanical and biological properties of scaffold materials. Functional 3D Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Materials, Technologies, and Applications, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-08-100979-6.00001-X ↗
21. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture10.1038/nmeth.3839 ↗
22. González-Díaz, E.C., and Varghese, S. (2016). Hydrogels as Extracellular Matrix Analogs. Gels, 2.10.3390/gels2030020 ↗
23. Biocompatibility of Nanocellulose
24. Mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose and interactions with smooth muscle cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.026 ↗
25. The Chemical Action of Pure Cultivation of Bacterium Aceti10.1039/CT8864900172 ↗
26. Ryngajłło, M., Kubiak, K., Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska, M., Jacek, P., and Bielecki, S. (2019). Comparative genomics of the Komagataeibacter strains—Efficient bionanocellulose producers. Microbiologyopen, 8.10.1002/mbo3.731 ↗
27. Immunological aspects of nanocellulose10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.004 ↗
28. Nanocellulose as a sustainable biomass material: Structure, properties, present status and future prospects in biomedical applications10.1039/C7NR04994C ↗
29. Dehydration of bacterial cellulose and the water content effects on its viscoelastic and electrochemical properties10.1080/14686996.2018.1430981 ↗
30. Aditya, T., Allain, J.P., Jaramillo, C., and Restrepo, A.M. (2022). Surface Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23.10.3390/ijms23020610 ↗
31. Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: A multipurpose advanced material10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018 ↗
32. Bacterial nanocellulose-IKVAV hydrogel matrix modulates melanoma tumor cell adhesion and proliferation and induces vasculogenic mimicry in vitro10.1002/jbm.b.34055 ↗
33. 3D Culturing and differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells on bacterial nanocellulose scaffolds10.3109/21691401.2013.821410 ↗
34. Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.025 ↗
35. Bacterial nanocellulose: Engineering, production, and applications10.1080/21655979.2021.2009753 ↗
36. Gama, F.M., Gatenholm, P., and Klemm, D. (2016). Bacterial NanoCellulose: A Sophisticated Multifunctional Material, CRC Press.10.1201/b12936 ↗
37. Nanofiber density determines endothelial cell behavior on hydrogel matrix10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.029 ↗
38. Bacterial Cellulose Membranes Constitute Biocompatible Biomaterials for Mesenchymal and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Culture and Tissue Engineering
39. Engineering of porous bacterial cellulose toward human fi broblasts ingrowth for tissue engineering10.1557/jmr.2014.315 ↗
40. Human Skeletal Muscle Myoblast Culture in Aligned Bacterial Nanocellulose and Commercial Matrices10.1021/acsami.4c07612 ↗
41. Multicompartment Hydrogels10.1002/marc.202100895 ↗
42. Triphasic hydrogel for cell co-culture in compartmentalized all-liquid micro-bioreactor10.1016/j.algal.2024.103803 ↗
43. Nanofibered Gelatin-Based Nonwoven Elasticity Promotes Epithelial Histogenesis10.1002/adhm.201700895 ↗
44. Taymour, R., Chicaiza-Cabezas, N.A., Gelinsky, M., and Lode, A. (2022). Core-shell bioprinting of vascularized in vitro liver sinusoid models. Biofabrication, 14.10.1088/1758-5090/ac9019 ↗
45. Vinson, B.T., Phamduy, T.B., Shipman, J., Riggs, B., Strong, A.L., Sklare, S.C., Murfee, W.L., Burow, M.E., Bunnell, B.A., and Huang, Y. (2017). Laser direct-write based fabrication of a spatially-defined, biomimetic construct as a potential model for breast cancer cell invasion into adipose tissue. Biofabrication, 9.10.1088/1758-5090/aa6bad ↗
46. Nanocellulose biosynthesis by Komagataeibacter hansenii in a defined minimal culture medium
47. Preparation and properties of transparent cellulose hydrogels10.1002/app.13015 ↗
48. One-step fabrication of porous micropatterned scaffolds to control cell behavior10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.12.023 ↗
49. The choice of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiation protocol influences the response of THP-1 macrophages to a pro-inflammatory stimulus10.1016/j.jim.2016.01.012 ↗
50. Genin, M., Clement, F., Fattaccioli, A., Raes, M., and Michiels, C. (2015). M1 and M2 macrophages derived from THP-1 cells differentially modulate the response of cancer cells to etoposide. BMC Cancer, 15.10.1186/s12885-015-1546-9 ↗
51. Identification of fibroblast heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment10.4161/cbt.5.12.3354 ↗
52. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promoted tumor spheroid invasion on a microfluidic 3D co-culture device10.1039/c000022a ↗
53. Cancer-associated fibroblasts affect breast cancer cell gene expression, invasion and angiogenesis10.1007/s13402-018-0371-y ↗
54. Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote progression and gemcitabine resistance via the SDF-1/SATB-1 pathway in pancreatic cancer10.1038/s41419-018-1104-x ↗
55. Cancer associated fibroblasts sculpt tumour microenvironment by recruiting monocytes and inducing immunosuppressive PD-1 + TAMs
56. Tumor-Associated Macrophages: From Mechanisms to Therapy10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 ↗
57. Ireland, L.V., and Mielgo, A. (2018). Macrophages and fibroblasts, key players in cancer chemoresistance. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 6.10.3389/fcell.2018.00131 ↗
58. Crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune cells in cancer10.1111/jcmm.14745 ↗
59. Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment-Implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.007 ↗
60. Gelatin-Based Matrices as a Tunable Platform to Study in Vitro and in Vivo 3D Cell Invasion10.1021/acsabm.8b00767 ↗
61. Single-cell morphology encodes metastatic potential10.1126/sciadv.aaw6938 ↗
62. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: Orchestrating the composition of malignancy10.1101/gad.279737.116 ↗
63. Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0545 ↗
64. Engineering Bone Regeneration with Bioabsorbable Scaffolds with Novel Microarchitecture10.1089/ten.1999.5.35 ↗
65. Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020 ↗
66. Matrix Pore Size Governs Escape of Human Breast Cancer Cells from a Microtumor to an Empty Cavity10.1016/j.isci.2020.101673 ↗
67. In vitro cell migration and invasion assays10.1016/j.mrrev.2012.08.001 ↗
68. Dvorak, K.M., Pettee, K.M., Rubinic-Minotti, K., Su, R., Nestor-Kalinoski, A., and Eisenmann, K.M. (2018). Carcinoma associated fibroblasts (CAFs) promote breast cancer motility by suppressing mammalian Diaphanous-related formin-2 (mDia2). PLoS ONE, 13.10.1371/journal.pone.0195278 ↗
69. Malignant cells facilitate lung metastasis by bringing their own soil10.1073/pnas.1016234107 ↗
70. McCarthy, J.B., El-Ashry, D., and Turley, E.A. (2018). Hyaluronan, cancer-associated fibroblasts and the tumor microenvironment in malignant progression. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 6.10.3389/fcell.2018.00048 ↗
71. Cui, K., Ardell, C.L., Podolnikova, N.P., and Yakubenko, V.P. (2018). Distinct migratory properties of M1, M2, and resident macrophages are regulated by αdβ2and αmβ2integrin-mediated adhesion. Front. Immunol., 9.10.3389/fimmu.2018.02650 ↗
72. Tedesco, S., De Majo, F., Kim, J., Trenti, A., Trevisi, L., Fadini, G.P., Bolego, C., Zandstra, P.W., Cignarella, A., and Vitiello, L. (2018). Convenience versus biological significance: Are PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells a reliable substitute for blood-derived macrophages when studying in vitro polarization?. Front. Pharmacol., 9.10.3389/fphar.2018.00071 ↗
73. Cancer cells optimize elasticity for efficient migration: Migratory index10.1098/rsos.200747 ↗
74. Mechanics of the normal woman’s breast10.3233/THC-2007-15404 ↗
75. Breast cancer models: Engineering the tumor microenvironment10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.006 ↗
76. Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027 ↗
77. Impact of Hydrogel Stiffness on Differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Microspheroids Sara10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0237 ↗
78. Sarrió, D., Palacios, J., Hergueta-Redondo, M., Gómez-López, G., Cano, A., and Moreno-Bueno, G. (2009). Functional characterization of E- and P-cadherin in invasive breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer, 9.10.1186/1471-2407-9-74 ↗
79. Eslami Amirabadi, H., Tuerlings, M., Hollestelle, A., SahebAli, S., Luttge, R., van Donkelaar, C.C., Martens, J.W.M., and den Toonder, J.M.J. (2019). Characterizing the invasion of different breast cancer cell lines with distinct E-cadherin status in 3D using a microfluidic system. Biomed. Microdevices, 21.10.1007/s10544-019-0450-5 ↗
80. E-cadherin expression in human breast cancer cells suppresses the development of osteolytic bone metastases in an experimental metastasis model
81. Characterization of triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell spheroid model10.2147/OTT.S249756 ↗
82. Russo, G.C., Karl, M.N., Clark, D., Cui, J., Carney, R., Su, B., Starich, B., Lih, T.S., Zhang, Q., and Wu, P.H. (2020). E-cadherin promotes cell hyper-proliferation in breast cancer. bioRxiv.
83. JUNB governs a feed-forward network of TGFβ signaling that aggravates breast cancer invasion10.1093/nar/gkx1190 ↗
84. TGF-β1-induced EMT promotes targeted migration of breast cancer cells through the lymphatic system by the activation of CCR7/CCL21-mediated chemotaxis10.1038/onc.2015.133 ↗
85. Regulation and function of JunB in cell proliferation10.1042/BST0360864 ↗
86. The prognostic value of JUNB-positive CTCs in metastatic breast cancer: From bioinformatics to phenotypic characterization10.1186/s13058-019-1166-4 ↗
87. Differential Expression Profiles of the Transcriptome in Breast Cancer Cell Lines Revealed by Next Generation Sequencing10.1159/000485344 ↗
88. The suppression of DUSP5 expression correlates with paclitaxel resistance and poor prognosis in basal-like breast cancer10.7150/ijms.24981 ↗
89. Dual Specificity Phosphatase 5 Is a Novel Prognostic Indicator for Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer
90. Bacterial synthesized cellulose—Artificial blood vessels for microsurgery10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00021-1 ↗