Optimal Selection of Biodegradable Polymer Composites for Load-Bearing Bone Tissue Engineering: A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Framework with Sensitivity-Based Robustness Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
The development of biodegradable scaffolds for load-bearing bone tissue engineering (BTE) presents a fundamental multi-criteria optimization challenge, requiring a simultaneous balance among mechanical performance, biological integration, and degradation kinetics. These criteria are inherently conflicting: composite formulations with the highest compressive strength frequently exhibit suboptimal porosity, while those with superior osteoconductivity often lack sufficient load-bearing capacity. To address this challenge rigorously, this study establishes a hybrid Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process–Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS) framework to evaluate and rank five clinically relevant biodegradable polymer–ceramic composite candidates: PLA/Hydroxyapatite (PLA/HA), PCL/Hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA), PLGA/Bioactive Glass (PLGA/BG), PLA/Carbon Nanotubes (PLA/CNT), and PLA/Magnesium (PLA/Mg). Quantitative property data were systematically extracted from ten peer-reviewed experimental studies published between 2021 and 2025, and converted into Triangular Fuzzy Numbers (TFNs) to explicitly model inter-study variability arising from differences in fabrication methods, filler loading, and testing conditions. Fuzzy AHP analysis identified Compressive Strength (w = 25.2%) and Cell Viability (w = 21.5%) as the dominant decision criteria for load-bearing cortical bone repair. The Fuzzy TOPSIS ranking identified PLA/HA as the optimal composite candidate (Closeness Coefficient, CCᵢ = 0.677), demonstrating the superior multi-criteria balance required for cortical bone repair applications. Although PLA/CNT achieved the highest mechanical strength, it was outranked due to lower osteoconductivity and elevated cytotoxicity uncertainty at high nanotube concentrations (CCᵢ = 0.544). Sensitivity analysis across five distinct weighting scenarios confirmed the robustness of PLA/HA as the primary candidate. These findings provide a validated, replicable computational blueprint for evidence-based scaffold material selection, with direct implications for reducing the burden of costly trial-and-error experimentation in BTE research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Bone health and osteoporosis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Near East University, TRNC, Mersin 10, Nicosia 99138, Turkey
Department of Medical Diagnostic Imaging, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
Research Institute for Medical and Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 27272, United Arab Emirates
Irfan Suat Gunsel Operational Research Institute, TRNC, Mersin 10, Nicosia 99138, Turkey
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.07.005 ↗
2. Dimitriou, R., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., and Giannoudis, P.V. (2011). Bone regeneration: Current concepts and future directions. BMC Med., 9.10.1186/1741-7015-9-66 ↗
3. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
4. Guastaldi, F.P.S., and Mahadik, B. (2026). Bone Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and Translation to Clinical Application. J. Funct. Biomater., 17.10.3390/jfb17020075 ↗
5. Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State of the art and future perspectives10.1016/j.msec.2011.04.022 ↗
6. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 ↗
7. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
8. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
9. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016 ↗
10. Biomaterials in orthopaedics10.1098/rsif.2008.0151 ↗
11. Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer10.1186/s13036-017-0074-3 ↗
12. The return of a forgotten polymer polycaprolactone in the 21st century10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
13. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050 ↗
14. Materials design for bone-tissue engineering10.1038/s41578-020-0204-2 ↗
15. Processing and properties of blackwood/polylactide biocomposites
16. Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications two decades review10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003 ↗
17. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1 ↗
18. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews10.1136/bmj.n71 ↗
19. 3D Printing Biocompatible Polyurethane/Poly(lactic acid)/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites: Anisotropic Properties10.1021/acsami.6b11793 ↗
20. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00099-9 ↗
21. Influence of PLA/PLLA/HA/β-TCP composites on biocompatibility
22. High-loading PLA/HA composites for orthopedic applications: A mechanical evaluation
23. High-resolution PLA-based composite scaffolds via 3-D printing technology10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.041 ↗
24. Characterisation of bone regeneration in 3D-printed ductile PCL/PEG/hydroxyapatite scaffolds with high ceramic microparticle concentrations10.1039/D1BM01645H ↗
25. 3D printing of PCL/nHA composite scaffolds: Influence of stiffness on cell differentiation
26. Optimization of poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)-bioactive glass composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering using stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105041 ↗
27. Xu, Z., Dou, T., Wang, Y., Zuo, H., Chen, X., Zhang, M., and Zou, L. (2023). Three-dimensional-printed carbon nanotube/polylactic acid composite for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15143080 ↗
28. 3D printing of personalized magnesium composite bone tissue engineering scaffold for bone and angiogenesis regeneration
29. A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: Improving the materials selection process10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.022 ↗
30. Effects of mechanical properties of carbon-based nanocomposites on scaffolds for tissue engineering
31. Material selection for biomedical applications using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS
32. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
33. Bioactive Polymer Composites for 3D-Printed Bone Implants: A Systematic Review