Short Expandable-Wing Suture Anchor for Osteoporotic and Small Bone Fixation: Validation in a 3D-Printed Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Model
Source abstract
Abstract
Suture anchors are widely used for tendon and ligament repair, but their fixation strength is compromised in osteoporotic bone and limited bone volume such as the coracoid process. Existing designs are prone to penetration and insufficient cortical engagement under such conditions. In this study, we developed a novel short expandable-wing (SEW) suture anchor (Ti6Al4V) designed to enhance pull-out resistance through a deployable wing mechanism that locks directly against the cortical bone. Finite element analysis based on CT-derived bone material properties demonstrated reduced intra-bone displacement and improved load transfer with the SEW compared to conventional anchors. Mechanical testing using matched artificial bone surrogates (N = 3 per group) demonstrated significantly higher static pull-out strength in both normal (581 N) and osteoporotic bone (377 N) relative to controls (p < 0.05). Although the sample size was limited, results were consistent and statistically significant. After cyclic loading, SEW anchor fixation strength increased by 25–56%. In a 3D-printed anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction model, the SEW anchor provided nearly double the fixation strength of the hook plate, underscoring its superior stability under high-demand clinical conditions. This straightforward implantation protocol—requiring only a 5 mm drill hole without tapping, followed by direct insertion and knob-driven wing deployment—facilitates seamless integration into existing surgical workflows. Overall, the SEW anchor addresses key limitations of existing anchor designs in small bone volume and osteoporotic environments, demonstrating strong potential for clinical translation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Trauma Management and Diagnosis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang Ming Chaio Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
Department of Orthopedics, Tri-Service General Hospital Songshan Branch, National Defense Medical University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
Medical Device Innovation & Translation Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan
Funding
NSTC project
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of suture anchors10.1016/j.mporth.2016.12.001 ↗
2. Increasing pullout strength of suture anchors in osteoporotic bone using augmentation—A cadaver study10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.002 ↗
3. Suture anchor fixation in osteoporotic bone: A biomechanical study in an ovine model10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.040 ↗
4. Three anchor concepts for rotator cuff repair in standardized physiological and osteoporotic bone: A biomechanical study10.1016/j.jse.2019.07.032 ↗
5. Biomechanical comparison of different suture anchors used in rotator cuff repair surgery-all-suture anchors are equivalent to other suture anchors: A systematic review and network meta-analysis10.1186/s40634-023-00608-w ↗
6. Biomaterials used for suture anchors in orthopedic surgery10.4055/cios20317 ↗
7. Hsu, W.C., Wu, G.L., and Yeh, M.L. (2024). Fixation technique of biodegradable magnesium alloy suture anchor in the rotator cuff repair of the shoulder in a goat model: A technical note. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 25.10.1186/s12891-024-07300-9 ↗
8. Effect of structural design on the pullout strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair10.1002/jor.24135 ↗
9. Trindade, R., Albrektsson, T., Galli, S., Prgomet, Z., Tengvall, P., and Wennerberg, A. (2018). Bone immune response to materials, part I: Titanium, PEEK and copper in comparison to sham at 10 days in rabbit tibia. J. Clin. Med., 7.10.3390/jcm7120526 ↗
10. Evaluating osseointegration into a deeply porous titanium scaffold: A biomechanical comparison with PEEK and allograft10.1097/BRS.0000000000001672 ↗
11. Enhancing rotator cuff repair in rabbit osteoporosis with chitosan quaternary ammonium salt-coated nickel-titanium memory alloy anchors10.1177/03635465241302101 ↗
12. Development of a novel hybrid suture anchor for osteoporosis by integrating titanium 3D printing and traditional machining10.18063/ijb.v8i4.608 ↗
13. Biomechanical analysis of bioabsorbable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair using osteoporotic and normal bone models10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.017 ↗
14. Schonebaum, D.I., Garbaccio, N., Escobar-Domingo, M.J., Wood, S., Smith, J.E., Foster, L., Mehdizadeh, M., Cordero, J.J., Foppiani, J.A., and Choudry, U. (2025). Comparing biomechanical properties of bioabsorbable suture anchors: A comprehensive review. Biomimetics, 10.10.3390/biomimetics10030175 ↗
15. Li, X., Xiao, Y., Shu, H., Sun, X., and Nie, M. (2022). Risk factors and corresponding management for suture anchor pullout during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J. Clin. Med., 11.10.3390/jcm11226870 ↗
16. All-suture anchor pullout results in decreased bone damage and depends on cortical thickness10.1007/s00167-020-06004-6 ↗
17. The Hounsfield value for cortical bone geometry in the proximal humerus—An in vitro study10.1007/s00256-011-1255-7 ↗
18. Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00071-X ↗
19. Opportunistic screening for local osteoporosis of the proximal humerus on the basis of Hounsfield units: A study of patients with rotator cuff tears10.1111/os.14364 ↗
20. Reeves, J.M., Knowles, N.K., Athwal, G.S., and Johnson, J.A. (2018). Methods for post hoc quantitative computed tomography bone density calibration: Phantom-only and regression. J. Biomech. Eng., 140.10.1115/1.4040122 ↗
21. Do dual-thread orthodontic mini-implants improve bone/tissue mechanical retention?
22. Weidling, M., Heilemann, M., Schoenfelder, S., and Heyde, C.E. (2022). Influence of thread design on anchorage of pedicle screws in cancellous bone: An experimental and analytical analysis. Sci. Rep., 12.10.1038/s41598-022-11824-2 ↗
23. Enhancing spinal bone anchor pull-out resistance with an L-shaped anchor10.1371/journal.pone.0302996 ↗
24. Effect of anchor threads on the pullout strength: A biomechanical study10.1016/j.jor.2018.08.008 ↗
25. Kim, J.H., Hyeok, J.J., Woo, J.H., and Kim, S.M. (2025). Correlation analysis of suture anchor pull-out strength with cortical bone thickness and cancellous bone density on a finite element model. Bioengineering, 12.10.3390/bioengineering12080863 ↗
26. Rotator cuff repair with all-suture anchor enhances biomechanical properties and tendon-bone integration in a rabbit model10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37707 ↗
27. Alt, P.S., Marx, C., and Braun, S. (2024). All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 25.10.1186/s12891-024-07503-0 ↗
28. Ock, J., Seo, J., Koh, K.H., and Kim, N. (2023). Comparing the biomechanical properties of conventional suture and all-suture anchors using patient-specific and realistic osteoporotic and non-osteoporotic phantom using 3D printing. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-48392-y ↗
29. The clinical and biomechanical performance of all-suture anchors: A systematic review10.1016/j.asmr.2020.02.007 ↗
30. Hook plate fixation with and without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation with suture anchors for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_185_20 ↗
31. Liu, C.T., and Yang, T.F. (2020). Hook plate with or without coracoclavicular ligament augmentation in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular separation. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 21.10.1186/s12891-020-03726-z ↗
32. Subacromial osteolysis following hook plate fixation for acromioclavicular dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.018 ↗
33. Morphometric analysis of the coracoid process and glenoid width: A 3D-CT study10.1186/s13018-020-01600-1 ↗
34. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic acromioclavicular stabilization for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation10.5397/cise.2023.01060 ↗
35. Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular fixation using metallic versus all-suture anchors10.1177/23259671231222505 ↗
36. Liu, S., Li, C., Song, Z., Bai, X., and Wu, H. (2022). Comparison of open reduction and fixation with hook plate and modified closed reduction and fixation with tightrope loop plate for treatment of rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.10.1186/s12891-022-05261-5 ↗
37. Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.013 ↗
38. Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation10.5397/cise.2020.00150 ↗
39. (2021). Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications. Standard No. ASTM F136-21.
40. (2023). Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws. Standard No. ASTM F543-23.
41. Alemayehu, D.B., Todoh, M., and Huang, S.J. (2025). Hybrid biomechanical design of dental implants: Integrating solid and gyroid triply periodic minimal surface lattice architectures for optimized stress distribution. J. Funct. Biomater., 16.10.3390/jfb16020054 ↗
42. Design of a biomimetic graded TPMS scaffold with quantitatively adjustable pore size10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110665 ↗
43. Suture augmentation of acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular dislocation10.1097/MD.0000000000027007 ↗