Fibroblast-Derived ECM as a Donor-Specific Pro-Osteogenic Coating Surpassing ASC- and Osteoblast-Derived ECM
Source abstract
Abstract
Large bone defects remain a major clinical challenge, as current treatments primarily provide mechanical stability while often insufficiently addressing the biological microenvironment. The cell-deposited extracellular matrix (CD-ECM) represents a promising strategy to improve implant bioactivity by mimicking key features of the native tissue. In this study, we compared CD-ECMs from adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (ASCs), ASC-derived osteoprogenitor cells, and dermal fibroblasts. ECM composition was analyzed, and its ability to support the osteogenesis of reseeded skeletal stem cells (SSCs) was assessed. Subsequently, the best performing cells were used to produce CD-ECM on a 3D scaffold. Furthermore, we improved the ECM by treating the ECM-producing cells with dextran sulfate (Dx-S). Fibroblast-derived ECM showed higher collagen and glycosaminoglycan contents compared to ASC-ECM or osteoprogenitor-ECM. Furthermore, only the fibroblast-derived ECM (Fibro-ECM) exerted a supportive effect on the osteogenesis of SSCs. SSCs seeded on ECM showed a higher proliferation rate and enhanced osteogenesis. Supplementation with dextran sulfate further increased ECM deposition and osteogenic potential. We showed that fibroblasts produced substantially more ECM with a stronger pro-osteogenic effect than ASCs or osteoprogenitor cells. The ECM and its pro-osteogenic effect could further be increased when fibroblasts were treated with Dx-S. Together, these results highlight Fibro-ECM as a promising and easily accessible cell-derived ECM deposition strategy to improve the biological performance of implants in bone regeneration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Mesenchymal stem cell research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Center for Preclinical Development, University of Zurich and University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistr. 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
Funding
Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation
2. The Metabolic Microenvironment Steers Bone Tissue Regeneration10.1016/j.tem.2017.11.008 ↗
3. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review
4. Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.008 ↗
5. Glatt, V., Evans, C.H., and Tetsworth, K. (2016). A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing. Front. Physiol., 7.10.3389/fphys.2016.00678 ↗
6. The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year review10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.007 ↗
7. Management of Open Tibial Shaft Fractures: Does the Timing of Surgery Affect Outcomes?10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00127 ↗
8. Femoral and tibial blood supply: A trigger for non-union?10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.006 ↗
9. Non-unions10.11138/ccmbm/2017.14.1.186 ↗
10. Outcome of Locked Compressive Nailing in Aseptic Tibial Diaphyseal Nonunions without Bone Defect10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_449_17 ↗
11. Treatment of aseptic tibial shaft non-union without bone defect10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.028 ↗
12. The influence of biomechanical stability on bone healing and fracture-related infection: The legacy of Stephan Perren10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.044 ↗
13. Fracture healing: Mechanisms and interventions10.1038/nrrheum.2014.164 ↗
14. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
15. Assuncao, M., Dehghan-Baniani, D., Yiu, C.H.K., Spater, T., Beyer, S., and Blocki, A. (2020). Cell-Derived Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 8.10.3389/fbioe.2020.602009 ↗
16. Lin, X., Patil, S., Gao, Y.G., and Qian, A. (2020). The Bone Extracellular Matrix in Bone Formation and Regeneration. Front. Pharmacol., 11.10.3389/fphar.2020.00757 ↗
17. Extracellular matrix-derived materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: A journey from isolation to characterization and application
18. Extracellular matrix dynamics: A key regulator of cell migration across length-scales and systems10.1016/j.ceb.2023.102309 ↗
19. Mesenchymal stem cells: Amazing remedies for bone and cartilage defects10.1186/s13287-020-02001-1 ↗
20. Bone Regeneration with Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Scaffolds: Systematic Review of Human Clinical Trials10.1007/s12015-024-10696-5 ↗
21. Lau, C.S., Park, S.Y., Ethiraj, L.P., Singh, P., Raj, G., Quek, J., Prasadh, S., Choo, Y., and Goh, B.T. (2024). Role of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 25.10.3390/ijms25126805 ↗
22. Macromolecular dextran sulfate facilitates extracellular matrix deposition by electrostatic interaction independent from a macromolecular crowding effect10.1016/j.msec.2019.110280 ↗
23. Dextran sulfate-amplified extracellular matrix deposition promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.049 ↗
24. Boraldi, F., Lofaro, F.D., Bonacorsi, S., Mazzilli, A., Garcia-Fernandez, M., and Quaglino, D. (2024). The Role of Fibroblasts in Skin Homeostasis and Repair. Biomedicines, 12.10.3390/biomedicines12071586 ↗
25. Identification of the Human Skeletal Stem Cell10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.029 ↗
26. Automated digital image quantification of histological staining for the analysis of the trilineage differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells10.1186/s13287-019-1170-8 ↗
27. Differentiated osteoblasts derived decellularized extracellular matrix to promote osteogenic differentiation10.1186/s40824-018-0115-0 ↗
28. Characterization of collagen response to bone fracture healing using polarization-SHG10.1038/s41598-022-21876-z ↗
29. Chen, J., Sun, T., You, Y., Wu, B., Wang, X., and Wu, J. (2021). Proteoglycans and Glycosaminoglycans in Stem Cell Homeostasis and Bone Tissue Regeneration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 9.10.3389/fcell.2021.760532 ↗
30. Correction: Osteoblastic heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans control bone remodeling by regulating Wnt signaling and the crosstalk between bone surface and marrow cells10.1038/s41419-018-0830-4 ↗
31. Role of fibroblast autophagy and proliferation in skin anti-aging10.1016/j.exger.2024.112559 ↗
32. Signaling of extracellular matrices for tissue regeneration and therapeutics10.1007/s13770-016-9075-0 ↗
33. El-Rashidy, A.A., El Moshy, S., Radwan, I.A., Rady, D., Abbass, M.M.S., Dorfer, C.E., and Fawzy El-Sayed, K.M. (2021). Effect of Polymeric Matrix Stiffness on Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells: Concise Review. Polymers, 13.10.3390/polym13172950 ↗
34. Osteogenesis and aging: Lessons from mesenchymal stem cells10.1186/s13287-018-0995-x ↗
35. Alkaline phosphatase: Structure, expression and its function in bone mineralization10.1016/j.gene.2020.144855 ↗
36. Andrographolide promotes proliferative and osteogenic potentials of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells through the activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling10.1186/s13287-021-02312-x ↗
37. TRUMATCHTM Graft Cage—Long Bone as a solution for tibial bone defect in traumatic aseptic non-union: A case report
38. Su, P., Tian, Y., Yang, C., Ma, X., Wang, X., Pei, J., and Qian, A. (2018). Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration during Bone Formation and Bone Diseases Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 19.10.3390/ijms19082343 ↗
39. Biocompatibility and biodistribution of matrix-bound nanovesicles in vitro and in vivo10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.026 ↗
40. Oral mucosal fibroblasts overexpressing BMP-2 differentiate into osteoblasts and participate in new bone formation during bone regeneration10.1016/j.job.2015.01.001 ↗
41. Matrix-bound nanovesicles alleviate particulate-induced periprosthetic osteolysis10.1126/sciadv.adn1852 ↗